"LinuxOne" files for an IPO 161
ColPanek writes "Surprise: The newest planned Linux-related IPO is not VA Linux Systems or LinuxCare, but a company called LinuxOne, which apparently has been shipping its own distro since way back in September 1999 ... This summary of their preliminary prospectus says LinuxOne didn't disclose any underwriters for the proposed offering."
Re:Fascinating Tidbits... (Score:1)
Netcraft is probably broken. Both www.redhat.com, slashdot.org, linux.lanshark.com, and a number of other apache sites bring back the same response.
Long track record (Score:1)
Whoa, that long? Um... it's still September 1999.
Re:Let's see... (Score:1)
Re:must be a troll (Score:1)
This is more sad than funny.
Judge their site, fine. Be consistent though? (Score:1)
IPO. (Score:2)
I'm not sure who I'm going to hire yet or who I need because I'm not sure what I'm going to sell yet.
My biggest problem is to figure out whether this company should be valued at 90 million, or a more reasonable jack squat.
Hotnutz.com [hotnutz.com]
One more tidbit (Score:1)
I dunno why, but when someone can't write a webpage without the assistance of a GUI I somehow feel their programming and general computer skills are somewhat below what is necessary to create a Linux distribution.
"If you don't use windows then what do you use?"
"FreeBSD."
Re:Judge their site, fine. Be consistent though? (Score:1)
"linux one" and mandrake soft and that trans thing (Score:1)
have mentioned as having a deal with
Mandrake is actually the guys
at http://www.linuxone.com ---
Interesting site design yes?
Gentleman start your conspiracy theories....
Re:Let's see... (Score:1)
Somehow though, I doubt these fellows are interested in giving anything back to the Linux community..but if that's the case, they'll soon see it's a two-way street when,on a matter of principle, if needed, most of the Linux community refuses to support or even acknowledge the existence of "LinuxOpen"..guess there had to be a "rogue" bandwagon hopping company sooner or later as the money involved in Linux started getting bigger and bigger..
Peace,
SGI get it right (Score:1)
But FWIW, lienucks (long i) was the normal UK pronounciation for years and years, and is still pretty common. Maybe that is the most common Chinese/taiwanese pronounciation too?
LinuxOne BADLY in need a site redesign... (Score:1)
quick get the bandwagon (Score:4)
Okay, _who_ are they again? (Score:1)
Is it just me, or are these guys coming completely out of left field? They just started the company in March, they just shipped the first version of their distro this month, and now they're filing for IPO?
Anyone have any info on the execs for this company? Or the distro itself for that matter?
Re:from the "Products" page... (Score:1)
Maybe the SEC will make them change it to WANX.
Talk about IPO Bandwagon. (Score:1)
Can I IPO? What are the logistics involved here. I can have a linux distribution.
Joseph Elwell.
Let's see... (Score:5)
... Company has existed since March, 1999.
... Their web site is a total joke.
... Their web server is a stock Red Hat Linux box. They don't even serve their pages off their own alleged Linux distribution.
... Despite their claim of being a US company, linuxone.com is registered to some outfit in Austria.
... Despite their so-called "free download", they will ask people for $9.95.
... Their order page is a ... BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA ... a formmail CGI script. I'll bet a lot of people are perfectly comfortable sending their credit card number over the Internet in clear text.
If this isn't a big joke, I don't know what is.
--
They need a legal department (Score:1)
They're going to remove all patents and copyrights from their code? Not likely. Perhaps they need to run their literature past a good lawyer...
Re:More info on founder and directors (from S1) (Score:1)
Talk about IPO Bandwagon. (Score:1)
Can I IPO? What are the logistics involved here. I can have a linux distribution.
Joseph Elwell.
Compuglobalsuperhypermeganet (Score:1)
one of the funniest scenes in that show was when the 'comic book guy' was trying to download pictures of Captn Janway. The connection was to slow, and he said "perhaps this 'internet king' can help me get faster porn' or somthing like that
"Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"
Re:Let's see... (Score:1)
Actually, it's probably some type of scam. For some reason, I see a guy who looks like Eddie Murphy crossed with a used car salesman at the head of the company. There's no way they can pull off a standard IPO. Isn't this kind of thing regulated by the SEC?
At least we won't even notice while they're in their quiet period, though.
Transmeta (Score:1)
"Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"
Make $$$ fast!! (Score:2)
2. Put up a website advertising the first 100 free, the rest at $9.95 a pop.
3. Make some outrageous claims to drum up publicity.
4. Wait for the money to roll in.
Netcraft... (Score:1)
Re:Fascinating Tidbits... (Score:1)
I quite enjoyed the way this guy referred to his "product" as a "commercial, proprietary Linux." Hmmm... Ok.
Why didn't he just link his download page to Mandrake's. It seems like that's the distro he's "selling" as his own.
linuxone.NET?? (Score:1)
:) j/k
Seriously though, $29.99 for a BETA distro? Who are they trying to be, Microsoft????
Jeez. Keep me away from these guys.
I was looking at their "Open Positions". Mostly sales and marketing. Perhaps they should add one for "Web Designer" My little brother has done better.
The part I like is ... (Score:3)
Re:Let them (Score:1)
Massive Conspiracy (Score:1)
And who is employed by TransMeta? You guessed it, Linus Torvalds.
So with all of this eerie silence, NDAs and closed doors of TransMeta, we now know their true plot....
To create a "Me-Too, Red Hat" Linux corporation and become billionares.
"If you don't use windows then what do you use?"
"FreeBSD."
must be a troll (Score:2)
Re:More info on founder and directors (from S1) (Score:1)
So nobody except the founder -- not even the CFO -- is giving up his day job for this ...
And as I noted earlier, the CFO is a Sunnyvale City Councilman [slashdot.org]... very strange indeed...
Jason
Their Jobs listing is copied verbatim from Red Hat (Score:1)
Makes Linux companies look bad? (Score:1)
Too bad we can't short an IPO (Score:1)
Anyone know how long an Public Offering has to be out before you can short it?? And do you even think this company will be around that long????
-Pika
You can quote this... (Score:1)
This is such a scam, first of all, They have 10 employees, second, the website is run off of some script kiddies ADSL line, and It looks like it was designed in Microsoft Word 2000.
WebCoder Extraordinaires (Score:3)
www.
LinuxOne.net
Give me a break!
The company is located 3 miles from my house... I'll swing by tonight and see if it's a Mailboxes, etc. address. I can tell you that it's right on the rail road tracks... prime real estate!
Re:Which IPO is sillier? (Score:1)
IIRC when networksolutions.com was rs.internic.net didn't *.org sites mean the site was a non-profit enterprise?
With Andover.net's IPO should slashdot.org become slashdot.com? Not to reign in on Taco's parade, but he sells stuff on this site (i.e., slow banner ads). There's nothing *.org about this site anymore.
Just an observation.
Re:Teenage kids? (Score:1)
Name: adsl-216-101-248-91.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
Address: 216.101.248.91
is the web server
Re:Life Imitates The Simpsons (Score:1)
Mike
Re:Too bad we can't short an IPO (Score:1)
Re:Which IPO is sillier? (Score:1)
Re:Fascinating Tidbits... (Score:1)
> telnet www.linuxone.net
Trying 216.101.248.91...
Connected to www.linuxone.net.
Escape character is '^]'.
Welcome to LinuxOne! This is rinoa.
Red Hat Linux release 6.0 (Hedwig)
Kernel 2.2.5-15 on an i686
login:
telnet> quit
Nice machinenames, though. I suspect he's spending more time playing FFVIII than coding, though.
Tomorrow's News on www.LinuxOne.net (Score:1)
whois says they didn't exist before 21-Apr-99 (Score:1)
Re:Make $$$ fast!! - Method3 (Score:2)
As an added bonus, offer a "Proprietary, Secret Linux Distribution bundled with Viagra and a Database listing 100s of Hot Babes who think Linux is SEXY!!!!"
File for an IPO.
Say... is this more ethical than "get rich in realestate" kits sold on TV?
Hillarious (Score:1)
Its also nice to know they don't know how to edit inetd.conf...
Proprietary drivers in the Linux kernel (Score:1)
While this will certainly not win the good graces of RMS [fsf.org], last I knew it was Linus's interpretation that linking a binary-only driver with the Linux kernel did not constitute a "derived work" per the GPL [fsf.org]. Given that much of the kernel is © Linux Torvalds, I'd say that his interpretation goes.
Of course, this is a colossally stupid thing to do [tuxedo.org]. But it's not actually illegal.
Sunnyvale City Councilman involved in this sham? (Score:3)
Go click on the About LinuxOne [linuxone.net] on the cheesy website.
Now go visit the Sunnyvale City Council [sunnyvale.ca.us] webpage and a certain one Mr. Stan Kawczynski's bio [sunnyvale.ca.us]
Curious that an elected government official would be engaging in this kind of activity. True, there's nothing illegal here. But it sure smells funny...
For those of you who don't know, Sunnyvale [sunnyvale.ca.us] is the "heart of Silicon Valley"[tm] (their words, not mine)
Jason "former Sunnyvale resident" UntulisRe:This one's a winner! (Score:2)
Having only limited contact with either ADSL or cable "modems", I'm going to go out on a limb here...
The technology that'll require sophisticated proprietary device drivers? NICs. Ethernet. Plugged into the device in question. Man - that was tough.
OK... maybe there's embeded products coming down the line that'll require something more... complicated. But why?
Vaporware (Score:1)
Looks to me like several suits got together at lunch one day and decided to get in on this "linux thing".
It's not like they need any technical know-how. Can you think of any other software companies who started out with nothing to sell, bought and re-sold other people's work, and now own a good deal of the desktops out there?
Re:Massive Conspiracy (Score:2)
Re:Wow. (Score:1)
-- Keith Moore
Re:Teenage kids? (Score:1)
"It can take up to 36 hours to download free from the Internet..."
Or up to 100 hours if you are trying to serve 500+ MB files from an ADSL connection.
Talkback on LinuxToday (Score:4)
Read this:
"I really get sick of all the "SMUG KNOW-IT-ALL" attitude comming from some of the members of the LINUX Community! If you'd do a little research before confirming the opinion of some the folks watching the Linux Commununity (bunch of pimply faced teenagers), you'd know that LINUXONE is doing a Chinese translation of LINUX MANDRAKE Distro for the main-land Chinese market. A huge and very worth-while and possibly very lucritave endeavor. Before you run your mouth, ENGAGE YOUR BRAIN!
Keep in mind: YOU ALWAYS FIND THE MOST STICKS AND STONES UNDER THE TREE WITH BEST APPLES ON IT!
Regards,
George"
Looks like they have managed to find some hardcore fans on the first day..this is even more ridiculous...
I called him... (Score:2)
Then I decided to have information look up LinuxOne, Inc.'s phone number... no luck, again.
A quick trip to mapsonus.com gave me the location of LinuxOne [switchboard.com] based on the domain's street address. Seeing as how my office is at the intersection of Villa Dr. and N. Shorline Blvd, I have decided to visit the LinuxOne "office" after work today.
Yes, I am insane... and I'll tell you where that insanity leads me in an hour or so...
Re:The part I like is ... (Score:2)
Shut your mouth!
But I'm talking 'bout Torvald!
Then we can dig it!
Re:web-site definitely created on MS (Score:1)
4:41 B C:\LinuxOne\New Version\images\nav_order_dn.gif --> 140.174.127.97
Yep, this is the New Version. I would really like to see the old version, if this one is supposed to be an improvement.
The Owner.... (Score:1)
Also owns this [netusa.com] company. One of their 'services' is webdesign... $65 for one page! Hope they weren't the same guys that did Linuxone's page...blech!
It seems that he has issued stock before [yahoo.com] worth over 500 000 dollars.
--Wes
http://www.scs.ryerson.ca/wmoxam
Re:Fascinating Tidbits... (Score:1)
The webserver they are running isn't Apache, atleast, according to Netcraft, which says it's running "inetd in realloc(): warning, junk pointer too low to make sense"
It seems that Netcraft is broken. Here is what E-Soft's Server Probe [e-softinc.com] answers:
Site being probed: http://www.linuxone.net
Web Server: Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux)
Operating System:
nmap's best guess: Linux 2.1.122 - 2.1.132; 2.2.0-pre1 - 2.2.2
Queso's best guess: Linux 2.1.xx
--
Re:Too bad we can't short an IPO (Score:1)
Re:Life Imitates The Simpsons (Score:1)
Re:Judge their site, fine. Be consistent though? (Score:1)
Actually, the Transmeta page is very high quality:
What's wrong with it, exactly?
$17,000 to make $23 Million? (Score:1)
"LinuxOne had no revenue and a net loss of about $17,000 from its inception through July 31, the filing said. With almost 9.2 million shares to be outstanding after a planned IPO, the company would sell about a 33 percent stake and have a market value of $73.3 million if shares sell for $8 each."
$73 million for what? To continue the quote:
"LinuxOne said it operates a Web site with information and news about open source software and offers technical support, training, custom development, and consulting. The company makes its version of Linux, known as LinuxOne Operating System, available free via download from the Web site or for a price on CD-ROM."
Wow.. a web site with information and news about open source software... Now that is original.. And I found NO free download. I can't believe the press is falling for this. I think I'll file my SEC papers tommorrow for Zoid.com. There isn't anything there but apparently there doesn't have to be. What a scam.
Re:Founder seems kind of shady (Score:2)
Those graphics are straight outta Microsoft Word (Score:1)
mostly.
logistics (Score:1)
Hmm... perhaps incorporating oneself would be a good idea. and then gee, you're set!
Though I find this strange because we've "never" heard of them, think about it this way.. now we have. and now that they've been Slashdotted, they've got lots of coverage, and they have more of a chance at IPO success (even though I realize that it seems a lot of thoughts will be along the lines of "Who the heck are these people?!?")
Which IPO is sillier? (Score:1)
LinuxOne's or Andover.net's? ;-)
Hey, at least LinuxOne is at least using Linux, so I gotta give 'em props for that. Andover.net, on the other hand, despite labeling themselves as the "leading Linux/Open Source destination on the Internet," is for some reason using Solaris for their web server. What, there isn't an Open Source alternative? What kind of example and advocacy is that?
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
P.S. I just find the above odd, I'm not trying to put any damper on Rob's potential earnings from his Andover.net shares -- I hope he rides it for all it's worth. It's The American Dream, baby!
Yes. (Score:1)
Now think, as an investor.. is this company worth anything? RedHat is different.. and they made LOTS of noise. how much noise is this company going to make? What are they going to do in order to drive their stock prices up? You can IPO all you want.. who's gonna buy it?
Why the hell would they need $20,000,000 in order to build a linux distro? I can do it in my bedroom.
Re:quick get the bandwagon (Score:1)
Some Site (Score:1)
Way to go guys, you'll probably make it to the NASDAQ 500.
Re:Let's see... (Score:4)
Still fubar tho.
The owner is probably a spammer (Score:4)
This is pretty funny.
--
Good God Man! (Score:2)
Also, Note to Linuxone Sys Admin -
Read up on the latest security holes and lock down some of these ports:
www.linuxone.net ftp 21/tcp File Transfer [Control] [96,JBP]
www.linuxone.net telnet 23/tcp Telnet [112,JBP]
www.linuxone.net smtp 25/tcp Simple Mail Transfer [102,JBP]
www.linuxone.net finger 79/tcp Finger [52,KLH]
www.linuxone.net tacnews 98/tcp TAC News [ANM2]
www.linuxone.net sunrpc 111/tcp rpcbind SUN Remote Procedure Call
www.linuxone.net auth 113/tcp Authentication Service [130,MCSJ]
www.linuxone.net domain 53/tcp Domain Name Server [81,95,PM1]
www.linuxone.net http 80/tcp www www-http World Wide Web HTTP
#www.linuxone.net www 80/tcp World Wide Web HTTP [TXL]
www.linuxone.net pop3 110/tcp Post Office Protocol - Version 3 [122,MTR]
www.linuxone.net login 513/tcp remote login a la telnet;
www.linuxone.net cmd 514/tcp shell like exec, but automatic
#www.linuxone.net shell 514/tcp rlogin style exec (rshd)
www.linuxone.net unknown 1120/tcp unassigned
www.linuxone.net xterm 6000/tcp X-windows server
news.com picks this up as legit? (Score:1)
No stetch of the imagination to imagine some people getting a little confused, after all, isn't this the same model as RedHat, which the news.com story points out:
"saw its shares trade for as much as 135 earlier this month, after an August IPO at 14 per share."
Thankfully they go on to point out that the company has had a loss of $17,000 with no revenue.
Yow
Re:I called him... (Score:3)
Re:The part I like is ... (Score:2)
Also from the EDGAR filing:
How original.Shouldn't that be in the S1? (Score:2)
"A FURTHER POTENTIAL RISK FACTOR THAT MAY IMPAIR THE PROGRESS OF THE COMPANY IS ITS DEPENDENCE ON THE LINUX COMMUNITY TO WRITE THE CODE THAT WE WILL SHIP. WHILE THE LINUX COMMUNITY HAS AN UNPARALLELED TRACK RECORD IN DEVELOPING HIGH QUALITY CODE, THEIR SMUG KNOW-IT-ALL ATTITUDE MAY DETRACT FROM THEIR SUPPORT OF THE COMPANY'S GOALS. IN ADDITION, THE FACT THAT THEY ARE A BUNCH OF PIMPLY FACED TEENAGERS MAY POSE A FURTHER RISK TO THE COMPANY."
Hopefully, it's not too late to amend the filing.
Re:WebCoder Extraordinaires (Score:1)
I just called... (Score:1)
Re:Okay, _who_ are they again? (Score:1)
It's a bogus IPO affinity scam! (Score:1)
http://www.freeedgar.com/Search/ FilingsResults.asp?SourcePage=CompanyList&CIK=1095 398&UseFrame=1&FormType=&DateFiled=&Comp anyName=LINUXONE+INC [freeedgar.com]
This company is a joke! They are incorporated in some lawyer's office in Nevada. They have $0 in total revenue from inception to 31 July 1999. Check out this bald-faced description of their web site:
Linuxone.net offers users access to broad and authoritative content on open source software including news, employment and links to other Linux-related sites. We also offer extensive features for the open source community, software updates and downloads and a shopping center for our shrink-wrapped products and support offerings.
I also note that none of their executive officers except the founder have any equity in the company. That shows how little the CFO, the VP of Marketing, and the Corporate Secretary are involved: not at all. They are window dressing.
LinuxOne.com also plagiarized the Red Hat S-1 filing. For example, compare their "Apache, Perl, Sendmail" text to Red Hat's. For another example, compare their "Strategy" list of goals to Red Hat's "Our Strategy".
LinuxOne.com intends to distribute the stock by offering it for sale directly:
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION: The shares will be offered for sale by our management for a period of 180 days, unless extended in the discretion of our Board of Directors for an additional 90 days. No commissions will be paid to our management for any sales they make. This is a "self-underwritten" offering.
And then this:
LinuxOne has reserved up to 300,000 shares of common stock for sale at the initial public offering price through a directed share program, to directors, officers and employees of LinuxOne and to open source software developers and other persons that LinuxOne believes have contributed to the success of the open source software community and the development of LinuxOne.
Under the guise of an affinity program, they are going to spam and scam us to buy shares in their worthless company!
Re:Which IPO is sillier? (Score:1)
Go to www.networksolutions.com and check it out for yourself. In fact, these days they are actually *encouraging* people to register their domain name in all three hierarchies at once!! (talk about your easy ways for Network Solutions to triple thier income!)
Re:Netcraft... (Score:1)
$ telnet www.linuxone.net 80
Trying 216.101.248.91...
Connected to rinoa.LinuxOne.NET.
Escape character is '^]'.
HEAD / HTTP/1.0
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 02:21:59 GMT
Server: Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux)
Last-Modified: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 16:51:19 GMT
ETag: "dc002-32d-37e66607"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 813
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html
Connection closed by foreign host.
_______
and I just tried yer homepage:
$ telnet fas.harvard.edu 80
Trying 140.247.30.109...
telnet: connect to address 140.247.30.109: Connection refused
Trying 140.247.30.110...
telnet: connect to address 140.247.30.110: Connection refused
Trying 140.247.30.105...
telnet: connect to address 140.247.30.105: Connection refused
Trying 140.247.30.106...
telnet: connect to address 140.247.30.106: Connection refused
Trying 140.247.30.107...
telnet: connect to address 140.247.30.107: Connection refused
Trying 140.247.30.108...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
Hehehe!
What effect will this have....? (Score:1)
This guy isn't too bad (Score:1)
Let them (Score:1)
Having said that, I think that the SEC should stop this from happening, just because these people clearly aren't serious, or capable of putting out any quality product/service. It would be a waste of a symbol to add them to any stock exchange.
Re:Make $$$ fast!! (Score:1)
Founder seems kind of shady (Score:5)
This sounds like a baaaaaad investment to me...
Interesting: agreement with Linux Mandrake (Score:2)
Here's a press release [linux-mandrake.com] from Linux Mandrake about an agreement with LinuxOne, along with several other companies, to enter the Chinese market.
The release is from September 3. Interestingly, there's a little blurb describing LinuxOne (it seems to embellish the company), but there's no link to a LinuxOne web page. My guess is that these guys didn't even have a web site three weeks ago (the other companies mentioned all got links to their sites). It certainly looks like a site that could have gone up during someone's lunch hour.
Strategic Relationship with MandrakeSoft ??????? (Score:1)
This one's a winner! (Score:2)
A key feature of LinuxOpen is its ability to run on the most advanced PC workstations with devices that increase communication bandwidth, such as ADSL and cable modem. LinuxOne will support these new technologies with its sophisticated proprietary device drivers (software that provides an interface between an operating environment and its associated hardware).
Proprietary?! On a Linux distro? Hmmmm....
Just some kiddie on his adsl line (Score:2)
Fascinating Tidbits... (Score:4)
2) The page was written in Frontpage, or atleast some of the subtle hints, for instance, in the source there is a charset/content type tag, any webmeister who knew these tags existed yet still made such a crappy page could only be doing it in FP, which inserts such tags into any page by default.
3) The webserver they are running isn't Apache, atleast, according to Netcraft [netcraft.com], which says it's running "inetd in realloc(): warning, junk pointer too low to make sense"
4) According to the InterNIC whois database, the man who registered Linuxone.net has an address at Netusa.com, a man who can't set up sendmail is going to build a Linux distro worth 28,000,000? Hmmm...
"If you don't use windows then what do you use?"
"FreeBSD."
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Fascinating Tidbits... (Score:1)
Server: Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) (Red Hat/Linux)
Which is essentially a stock Red Hat 6.0 install. Also, /etc/issue on the standard telnet port shows that it's a stock Red Hat box.
More amusing, though is that browsing http://www.linuxone.net/images contains a WS_FTP.LOG file that says:
1999.09.08 14:41 B C:\LinuxOne\New Version\images\nav_order_dn.gif --> 140.174.127.97 /home/guest/LinuxOne WebPage/images nav_order_dn.gif /home/guest/LinuxOne WebPage/images nav_order_up.gif /home/guest/LinuxOne WebPage/images tab_order.gif
1999.09.08 14:41 B C:\LinuxOne\New Version\images\nav_order_up.gif --> 140.174.127.97
1999.09.08 14:41 B C:\LinuxOne\New Version\images\tab_order.gif --> 140.174.127.97
Which tends to support the conclusion that a Windows machine was used to generate this web page...
Clearly a blatant attempt to capitalize on Linux's popularity, and Red Hat's recent IPO. I hope it crashes and burns badly, to discourage other shysters from doing this. I fear that if these dorks were able to take a lot of people's money, it would make the IPO market a lot more hostile to genuine Linux companies.
Hopefully A Useful Failure (Score:2)
This enterprise sounds very much like an attempt to cash in on the RHAT excitement; if RHAT turned some "wunderkids" into paper billionaires, then surely LinuxOne can do the same, right?
The thing is, nobody had ever heard of LinuxOne before, and unlike RHAT, the company lacks:
It wouldn't be a bad thing if they succeeded at selling a few shares to the abjectly clueless; the resultant publicity would have the effect of injecting a degree of sanity hopefully without injuring any of the more credible enterprises out there.
More info on founder and directors (from S1) (Score:2)
Background of Officers and Directors
Dr. Wun C. Chiou, Sr. has been the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of our Company since inception. He has been active in the computer industry for more than 15 years. He holds a B.S. Degree from National Taiwan University in General Science and Psychology; a Masters Degree from Bowling Green State University in Physics and Mathematics; and a Ph.D. from Ohio State University in Biophysics. Dr. Chiou has also completed post-doctoral work at Ohio State University on image modeling. Dr. Chiou has held a variety of positions including Research Physicist for the U.S. Army, Areomed (1974-1979); Senior Staff Engineer for Hughes Aircraft Co. (1979-1981); Research Scientist for Teledyne Systems, Co., Northridge (1981-1982); Senior Technologist for the California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (1982-1984); Chief of Artificial Intelligent Branch of NASA Ames Research Center (1984-85); Consultant for Peterson & Co., Northridge; Senior Scientist for Lockheed, Palo Alto Research Center where he organized Lockheed's Artificial Intelligence Center (1985-1987); Founder, President and Director of Pacific Microelectronics, Inc. (1987-1996), which became NetUSA, Inc., a public corporation (1996-1999). Dr. Chiou resigned from NetUSA, Inc. and formed the Company in March 1999. Dr. Chiou has also taught at Cal State, Northridge and U.C. Berkeley Extension. He possesses knowledge and research experience regarding expert systems, artificial intelligence, image modeling, optical information processing, and system integration, among others. Prior to founding the Company, he was the Branch Chief of Artificial Intelligence software at NASA, at Ames Research Center in Mountain View. He has published many scientific articles in a variety of periodicals. Dr. Chiou is a member of the Optical Society of America, Society of Photo-Instrumentation Engineers, and the National Association for Artificial Intelligence. He will devote full time to the business of our Company.
Stan Kawczynski has been the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, and a Director of our Company since April, 1999. Since 1995, he has also been Vice President of Investments, specializing in estate and retirement planning, for Birchtree Financial Services, Inc., a member NASD/SIPC wholly-owned subsidiary of Block Financial Corporation, with offices in Sunnyvale and San Rafael, California and Kansas City, Missouri. From 1993 to 1995, he was Vice President of Government Affairs, as well as the Director and Chairman of the Board of Trilogy Systems, Inc., a new business opportunities incubator company. Throughout his 19-year investment career, Mr. Kawczynski has held positions of Account Executive with Dean Witter Reynolds, Senior Account Executive with PaineWebber and Vice President of Investments with First California Capital Markets Group. He is an active member of many civic organizations, including Council Member, former Mayor of the City of Sunnyvale, California, candidate for the California State Assembly, Chair of the Advisory Counsel for the Digital Clubhouse Network, member of the Steering Committee on Information Technology and Communication for the National League of Cities, past Chair, Policy Committee on Transportation, Communication and Public Works for the League of California Cities, past Zone Chairman, President and Secretary of the Sunnyvale Host Lions Club, and many others. Mr. Kawczynski will devote his time as required to the business of our Company.
Robert Philips has been Vice President of Marketing for our Company since April, 1999. Since 1996, he has also been a Communications Engineer for NEC Electronics, Inc. From 1995 to 1996, he was Vice President of Engineering and Marketing for GIK Technology and from 1991 to 1995, he was Vice President of Marketing for Mobile Link Solutions, Inc. He has been a founding executive for numerous Silicon Valley start up firms with responsibilities varying from development of business plans, proposals, collateral materials, advertising and public relations. Mr. Philips has a technical background in hardware, software, and network technology that provides insight to high-technology products. He holds a B.S. Degree in Physics, a B.S. Degree in Philosophy, an MBA Degree in Marketing and an MBA Degree-Extended Edition in High Technology Management. Mr. Philips will devote his time as required to the business of our Company.
Paul Kraus has been a Director and Secretary of our Company since April, 1999. He is a licensed California architect and founder of the Design Partnership in San Francisco, California. He was also founder and principal of Investpac Inc., a company which developed real estate during the 1980's. From 1992 to the present, he has been the President/CEO of Goodco Press Inc., a lithographic company located in Silicon Valley. Mr. Kraus will devote his time as required to the business of our Company.
Re:This one's a winner! (Score:2)
Besides that, their 'About LinuxOne' page has the cryptic message:
Fork? Maybe. Incompatible? Maybe.
Proprietary? Hmm, I think so.
--
QDMerge [rmci.net] 0.21!
Life Imitates The Simpsons (Score:3)
On a semi-serious note: two things could happen if the SEC actually lets these guys offer stock.
1) Nobody buys it, the IPO tanks, and Wall Street has a slightly lower opinion of upcoming IPOs like VA and LinuxCare.
2) Morons (see: mutual fund managers) buy a ton of LinuxOne stock, remembering the word "Linux" from a Red Hat press release and noticing the three digit share price next to RHAT. In three months when the earnings report is released with the entries "Income: Allowance $20 / Expenses: Kegger $4,329", the stock plummets. At that point, the Wall Street hive mind concludes "Huh, that Linux fad sure ended quickly". After that, VA or LinuxCare might not be able to get together ANY sort of IPO.
Open question to anyone with a background in finance: Are there any rules about what companies can and can't be publicly traded? Is it one of those capitalist "let the market decide" kind of deals?
Will LinuxOne be sending out "The Letter II"?
-Barry