Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Linux Software

VA on Upside 63

wendell wrote in to send us an interesting little article about VA Linux Systems and how the Linux companies are hiring major free software developers.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

VA on Upside

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Read Geoffry Moore's book "Inside
    the Tornando", a Silicon Valley
    staple. According to Geoffry, when
    a market (in this case, the Linux
    white-box market) reaches the
    hypergrowth stage (the Tornado),
    the most important thing is to add
    as many new customers as quickly as
    you can.

    Even if you piss off 1 of 3 buyers in
    the process, because you don't have
    enough resources to make every customer
    happy, its OK, because the two happy
    customers have been "acquired" not for
    one sale, but for possibly hundreds over
    their lifetime.

    Quality products and services come later --
    once the growth tapers off. It has to
    come soon enough so that all your
    acquired customers don't get pissed off
    and leave too.

    Case study here is DBMS -- Oracle locked
    in lots of customers and treated them
    really badly in the process when the
    DBMS Tornado happened. Some of their
    competitors slowed down sales in order
    to treat each customer better. Those
    competitors are all dead and dying
    (this was when IBM was mainframe only
    and Microsoft wasn't a DB company ...).

    All I'm saying is, your experience is more
    a byproduct of the hypergrowth than of VA
    (or any of its competitors) being shoddy or
    evil ...
  • Quoting from the article:
    "I call it reputation capital," DiBona says. "People want to work for us, because they know we're the ones that have Leonard doing RAID development. They know Larry and how long he's been involved with Linux. Basically, they know we give a fuck."

    Basically they know we give a fuck. Nice choice of words. Very professional image.

  • by ijw ( 39276 ) on Thursday May 27, 1999 @10:06AM (#1876652)
    I talked to a VA salesman, formerly of Corel, who had sold us many Netwinders, and he told me about all the top engineers (San Mehat eg) from Corel who jumped to VA. He mentioned some secret hires, notably "a prominent Australian Linux guru", nuff said.

    They like VA. So do I, especially when they get some laptops!

    ira
  • This is off-topic except that it is related to this entire thread. As I write this, 1/3 of the comments have been down-graded to -1. Okay, some of these deserve it. And I suspect that this one may too fade away into obscurity.

    However, Mike Holve's posts concerning the late/absent delivery of equipment that he ordered from VA is not flame-bait. His tone could have been nicer, but he seems to have a legitimate complaint. A company can hire all the great programmers in the world, but if they neglect the customer, they will ultimately lose. This point is important! Fortunately, Chris D. has responded to Holve's in a very nice manner.

    I been a reader at /. for a while and I have enjoyed Holve's comments, especially those related to SGI (I use a SGI). He is not one to troll.
  • Thanks for the vote of confidence, but they're okay guys, the get it, although our apple guy is rather obsessed by UI's,but that's to be expected.

    One of the things we faced in growing was that people who were experts in manufacturing or such were perhaps not from the linux community, so we have had to have them drink our brand of kool aid.

    A couple of them didn't get it at first, but they came around. It has been important to VA that as we grow that we hire a ton of linux people to keep the balance even, and we feel that we've done a great job.

    Chris


    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG

  • This is what I think the scores should be:
    -1: Totally inappropriate flamebait and useless crap. If it may be useful to someone give it a 0
    0: Comments may be useful to some people but aren't exactly groundbreaking and relavant.
    1: The vast majority of comments
    2+: Comments that stand out from the crowd.

    What I think has happened with the new system. Moderators now get a pull down menu and they then rate comments based on their view of them (flamebait, troll, insightful, etc) meaning that minor flamebait may quickly be moved down to -1 while only a slightly interesting article may make it up to 5 quickly when it deserved a 2.

    TAKE NOTE: moderators please check the current score before moderating a post. If you agree the score is correct then *don't* select a moderation option as this will then alter the score either up or down depending on what you slect. I preferred the old method as it was clear that you were adding or deducting points from people this method just looks like a rating system by the people who don't check up on it.
    --
  • by dface ( 26059 ) on Thursday May 27, 1999 @10:15AM (#1876658)
    A nice article overall... I just have some comments on Corporations...

    I like the idea that all these powerplayers are getting totally immersed in linux development. That can only serve to better the community. However, I think these companies need to make sure that their employees work well together as a team. I don't think there needs to be a distinction between team players and superstars. A person can be both.

    Also, I'm a tad bit skeptical on having total linux development go into the hands of a corporation. I suppose I'm a bit of a Stallmanist. I feel that Linux definately needs to remain a community oriented project. So far it's going well. But as we dawn a new era of Linux development, I feel it's key to remain non-corporate.
  • I agree, there certainly needs to be something done about the current moderation system. It seems to have two problems:
    1. People seem to be positing a lot more pointless messages to use up peoples moderator points.

    2. Moderators are making bad decisions. Sometimes they moderate up a discussion that has already got the appropriate score and other times thjey modeate down a post with an already appropriate score.

    Can you please check the present score before moderating a comments.

    --

  • That should NOT have been moderated down.

    > Thats not saying that you can NOT pay a hacker a good salary though;

    Well, you can't. You can probably make a reasonable wage working for VA, or Red Hat, but you'll always be able to get more money elsewhere. In the big corporate world, a good programmer will get six digits a year easily. Well into six digits.

    > just that it's not the most important thing.

    Yes, but money talks, and it what puts the food on the table. Until open source jobs pay the same as the rest of the industry, I'll just have to make do with hacking for a couple of hours each week. I would certainly jump at the chance to work on open source projects - Linux mainly. But, that's not going to happen, at least with the way things are right now.

  • yes I'm afraid you're 100% correct. That was a terribly bad choice of word(s)

    Chris, buddy, as far as I can see you have great passion for Linux development... fantastic... but for your sake don't make that mistake again, whether it be doing "Linux" things or whatever.

    We all make these mistakes. That was a biggie, Chris... stay focused.

    Cheers

    AndyM
  • Value Added.

    When you buy a VA machine, you know you're getting components that run well with Linux (as vs. components that run well with NT, that might run crappy with Linux -- like the Dell that MindCraft used to out-benchmark Linux), and you know that you have access to big-name talent if you run into driver problems or something else of that nature. If you buy a Dell... well, Dell knows NT, but Dell doesn't know Linux.

    This isn't enough to make VA a compelling buy at the low end, but for people wanting mission-critical Linux servers, they want to buy those from a company that has Linux expertise, not from Joe's Screwdriver Shop or Dell NT Systems.

    Note: I don't work for VA or any Linux hardware vendor, and have no reason to hype VA (I'm now working for a software vendor as a database programmer and system administrator, my true love). That doesn't change the "facts on the ground", which is that when people want mission-critical Linux servers, they don't buy them from Bob's Screwdriver Shop.

  • No you are right, I did a big slap o' the head on myself for that, but it's not that big of a deal, a man's allowed to make mistakes :-) If this is the worst representation of me in the press, I'm happy.

    Chris DiBona

    VA Linux Systems


    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG

  • are we seeing the first wave of oss devotees being hired by l*nux related companies? what a great irony, programers willing to do programming for free being employed.


  • I left Digital Domain because I had the opportunity to do good work for Linux on something I cared about (3D support). That was my motivation.

    I did my job hunting at Linux World. I picked a few key people and companies that I wanted to talk to and mentioned that I was thinking of moving on. The response I got was extremely positive.

    I knew I could have my pick, so I took my time and decided what was important to me. I wasn't concerned about the money. I knew all the companies would offer me "enough." I was looking for where I could do the most good, and have the most fun doing it.

    For what I wanted to do Precision Insight had the right mix. I get to work from home. They are leading the charge in 3D. It's a great group of people that would have been difficult to assemble in one place.

    So, I'm very pleased with how it all worked out. I get what I want and Linux moves forward in the process.

    - |Daryll

  • by Mandrake ( 3939 ) <mandrake@mandrake.net> on Thursday May 27, 1999 @10:29AM (#1876670) Homepage Journal
    Well - all the work that we do here is given a free software license (GPL,BSD, or X, depending on the project) and put back into the community. and we all work with people in the community on different projects in the community that need work. XFree86, Enlightenment, next generation BIOS, the kernel, Mesa, etc... and besides, since the code is all free software even if the company decides to do something nasty at some point (which I highly doubt), the community already has everything we worked on here, and those of us who did the work can choose to leave the company and even continue working on it if we want to. Or if we don't leave, you can work on it from outside, even if we don't want to work on it anymore. That's be beauty of the free software community.
    just my two cents
    --
    Geoff Harrison (http://mandrake.net)
    Senior Software Engineer - VA Linux Labs (http://www.valinux.com)
  • That's kind of you to make excuses for us, but dropping the ball on this guys order sucked, so we're trying to fix it, no-one should drop through the cracks.

    Hypergrowth is very tricky though, I mean, I started in november and va has sextupled in size. Sheeze.

    Chris

    VA Linux Systems.


    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG

  • If I wasn't a longtime /. reader, I would swear that Microsoft's "Anti Linux Squad" had come up with the clever tactic of joining Linux communities & disrupting them with idiotic, vitriolic rants, and attempts to turn people against each other. Of course I've been reading /. since way before Linux showed up on MS radar screens, so I know that's just how people act 'round these parts. Still, it's something to think about, like how it turns out half the Black Panther members were really CIA or FBI agents. Maybe MS is "tryin' kill da movement with da new COINTELPRO," to quote The Coup.

    So listen up, if you really are a part of the 'Linux Revolution,' put aside the ego and the petty jealousy and take a civil tone when you write, especially if you are mad about something. A calm tone will get you much further than the cleverest irate rant will.

    And writing better code will take you further than that.

  • If you think that a six figure salary is more important than a free operating system, then perhaps the free software community simply isn't for you. Most of us here isn't in it for the money, because as you say, there's almost never any to get. We do this because we feel that we can contribute something good to the world. For some of us, hacking free software is not just a job; it's our mission in life.

    It's like some people turn to politics because they think they can make a difference to the world. I turn to hacking because I think I can make a difference; it has given my life a meaning and I'd go millions of miles out of my way to be able to continue with supporting the free software community. EVEN if it means living on a minimal vage.

  • There still isn't enough of a margin to finance any more than the most basic kernel and desktop development because these are what bring in the revenue for a company like VAResearch. People don't buy VAResearch systems because it comes with a word processor. They buy VAResearch systems because of the low level kernel drivers and desktop managers built into it which they add applications to from someone else.
  • I've been waiting on a machine for about five weeks now. Gotten one excuse after another. I've had it with them, and will *never* order anything from them again. Stay tuned for a full review on the site (Everything Linux).

    Matter of fact, the fourth or fifth "delivery date" (the latest one) was supposed to be today. It's after 5pm. I don't have my machine. AGAIN.

  • Okay, so Larry's eyes look super freaky in that picture in upside, he's actually quite normal looking. I assure you. Repeat after me: VA is not an organization run by aliens. One of us...One of us...
    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG
  • Now we are seriously off-topic wrt this thread but I agree with you. Get rid of the 1st post and haxOr crap but do not negatively moderate honest opinions. This can be relatively difficult when it pertains to issues related to MS. However, moderation should be based on content, both positive and negative. What should not happen is censorship by instinctively down-grading opinions that you don't agree with.
  • Posted by FascDot Killed My Previous Use:

    I'm not getting your cryptic reference. Who is "a prominent Australian Linux guru"?
    --
    "Please remember that how you say something is often more important than what you say." - Rob Malda
  • Actually, we lost Andrew Tridgell to Linuxcare, where he'll be doing good work.

    Chris DiBona
    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG

  • Okay, this post explains why the picture looked weird, and some dumbass moderator marks it down.

    Moderation is starting to look worse and worse to me (which is why i read at -1).
  • Uhhmmm... Although I would find it hard to believe, the only "a prominent Australian Linux guru" I know works for RedHat ADL and is called Carsten Haitzler AKA The Rasterman. This can't be true, can it?
  • Sure, some of the stuff at -1 is bad, but then again, so is some of the stuff at 2+. Some of the -1 comments are actually quite interesting or informative (such as the one explaining why exactly that guy looks like an alien in the picture - dithering problems in the photo).
  • Yeah, isn't wonderful? The thing is, it's not all that uncommon anymore. Especially in departments that have little, if any, contact with the public. At the company I work at (not for, I'm a coop employee/contractor), at least 1/3 of the conversations involves someone swearing at/about something/one. While we rarely have face-to-face contact with our customers (just a bunch of programmers ;) ), I would expect someone who's giving an interview to give a little more thought to their choice of words.
  • by chrisd ( 1457 ) <chrisd@dibona.com> on Thursday May 27, 1999 @10:24AM (#1876694) Homepage

    We have the same debates here too, to wit:

    Will the influences of companies, even hard core linux companies like VA, cause the creative spirit behind linux and it's advances to die a death of ennui?

    We , obviously, hope the answer is no, and we have taken the course of hiring coding gods like mandrake and mark and such as a way of sort of building a hot house of linux development, we think that any negatives that may be imposed in a corporate setting (which we have done our best to minimize) are more than made up by the proximity (yes phyiscal, and yes, I know about IRC :-) of other, well, brilliant linux hackers.

    We also think that by having these guys work full time on Linux results in ,well, more Linux. I mean I think we can all agree that Linux has come an amazing distance with what amounts to as spare and part time work, so imagine what it will be like with people working full time.

    Anyhow, enough philosophy, back to coding.

    Chris DiBona

    VA Linux Systems


    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG

  • I don't know why people make so much fuss over these words. They are commonly used words these days so I don't know why people are still offended by them. The english language changes and these words are now commonplace I don't see why people should have to watch what they're saying.
    --
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Some (maybe even many) /. moderators seem to be way too liberal with the -1 score. It should be reserved for hax0r crap or completely off topic postings "GNU/Linux!!". Not for jokes that the moderator doesn't understand. Not for people who's opinions are against the norm. Too many times I have seen inappropiate -1's given out. I fear the moderation will make too many people's alignment negative, and the /. moderators will become a self selecting group of people who score down many posts.. In fact, I'm flat out scared to post w/ my account because I don't want to lose my positive alignment.. The last time I was a moderator I spent all of my 5 points undoing moderator injustices..
  • In case anyone didn't know, Sam Ockman hates my guts and hates VA. IT's too bad that he can't get past it. So he comes on Slashdot and tries to attack me and VA personally.It's pretty funny actually.

    Chris DiBona

    VA Linux Systems


    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG

  • Honestly, I think the article has a few flaws in that analogy...

    To be successful in the Open Source community means you have to be a team player, IMHO. These people are probably as much superstars because they're great team players as they are because they're *damn good* at what they do. I'm sure MS has some really smart people - It just seems that no one there is very much of a team player, which is probably partly a function of their corporate environment, which seems to be driven by $$$ not only on a corporate level, but on and individual employee level, too.
  • I think that if you can find something you love to do, do it well, and make a living doing it, you're one very lucky individual.
  • This is a problem, I'll look into it right now, if you'd like to call me personally, please call 408-542-8600 x 8606, but be sure I'll track down what the hell happened.

    Chris DiBona

    VA Linux Systems


    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG

  • "if money is seen as a reason for doing something, that task will suddenly become less interesting to do...it's not the most important thing."

    Haven't you ever even thought about it? Getting paid ridiculous sums of money to persue your hobby in a professional environment where you have the budget for and access to equipment a hobbyist can only dream of? Maybe I'm just not a true hacker. But if being a hacker means doing what I do now and maybe not getting paid for it, you can have it. I'll stick to my business contracts and $130k annual income thank you.
  • by Jonas Öberg ( 19456 ) <jonas@gnu.org> on Thursday May 27, 1999 @10:29AM (#1876704) Homepage
    While there's some similarities between whats happening in the free software community and the NBA (or whatever), there's also some things that just aren't the same at all. For example, you could look at the money involved in hiring someone. In the free software community in general, people pay more attention to the work itself and other benefits instead of to their paycheck.


    I know I've posted this before, but you really should check out ``Studies Find Reward Often No Motivator'' [gnu.org].
    One of the conclusions of that article is that if money is seen as a reason for doing something, that task will suddenly become less interesting to do. I can't even remember the last time I did something for money; it's just too hard a struggle to become motivated to do something that doesn't interest you, even if the reward is money so you can live for another year.


    Thats not saying that you can NOT pay a hacker a good salary though; just that it's not the most important thing. When it comes to money, the importance is that you get enough money so that you can pay your rent, food and buy some interesting toys to play with on your spare time (if you have any). Once that goal is reached, the next issue is about what kind of tasks that the work would involve. I tend to think that hackers are more agressive in this area because many of them often have a very well laid out idea of what they want to do and they'd rather be unemployed than be forced to go out of their way to fit into the company.


    Hackers are an easy prey. If someone came to me and asked me if I'd like to for VA, I'm pretty sure I'd jump on that train. The reasons should be obvious; these companies create an athmosphere much like that of the Homebrew Computer Club and other similar organisations, such as all local Linux-based clubs. Being in such an athmosphere is in itself very motivating and interesting and I'd recommend it to anyone out there who gets the chance.

  • "Some of the hobby-related things don't get done as much as they used to," he says. "I don't spend as much time modifying my home system as I used to. Then again, I also get to play with a lot more expensive toys than when I was doing this as a hobby."

    It's all about cool toys...

    I think it's great that hackers are getting paid to do what they love. Another post mentioned that all the stuff they develop is licensed under GPL, BSD, etc, and released back into the community. So what you get is the badasses working full-time to make things better and everyone benefits. I think this is a good example of how an "open source business model" works. More on the side of how the model can work for the workers, not necesarrily the stockholders. It's worth enough to companies to keep developement going that they hire what are basically community programmers (not programming for the company, but for the community at large). It's also been (being) shown that a well-developed and supported BRAND NAME is worth investing in. And how is a brand supported...SERVICE. You reach a point, because of the minor cost of the product itself, that a large percentage of revenue is directed at the one thing that sets you apart from the competition..service.

    Or maybe marketing, we'll have to wait and see

    (although I think more people are realizing that being told what a great OS you have is not necessarily reflective how great your OS is)

  • Who'd you send it to?
    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG
  • by Alan Cox ( 27532 ) on Thursday May 27, 1999 @10:40AM (#1876708) Homepage
    Red Hat have a pile of people, VA now have a good
    collection, SuSE have some

    I don't think there is a monopoly problem. Any
    vendor doing serious commercial support needs a
    pet hacker.
  • What kind of a work atmosphere is it there -- do you just give them a desk and whopping good PC and let 'em go totally unguided :-), or do you have a few specific goals, or ...

    Just curiousity.

    --
  • jobs is overwhelmed, if you've made it this far on the thread, email me and I'll try to see if you are someone that would be appropriate for va. Jobs gets 100's of emails a day, sometimes more after being slashdotted.

    chris@valinux.com [mailto] Chris DiBona

    VA Linux Systems


    --
    Grant Chair, Linux Int.
    VP, SVLUG

  • If I wasn't a longtime /. reader, I would swear that Microsoft's "Anti Linux Squad" had come up with the clever tactic of joining Linux communities & disrupting them with idiotic, vitriolic rants, and attempts to turn people against each other.

    I don't think that's too far fetched; some of the stuff posted on /. lately has made the Linux community look pretty bad. It would be far worse without moderation.

    Anyway, back to VA. They make some nice systems, but they got some serious competition coming from Dell nowdays. Check out that 410 workstation on Dell's Linux [dell.com] page. A dual P2-400 system is not that expensive, and a dual P3-450 should only be about $100 more when they get around to selling one.

    TedC

    lurk_mode = ON;

Put your Nose to the Grindstone! -- Amalgamated Plastic Surgeons and Toolmakers, Ltd.

Working...