Linux-Mandrake 5.3 80
Jacques Le Marois wrote
in to plug Linux Mandrake
which has just released v5.3 of their self dubbed
"User-Friendly Linux Distribution". Probably best
described as "Red Hat, KDE and some other nifty
stuff".
Redhat with GNOME (Score:1)
Downloads & Experience & Other Reasons (Score:1)
KDE is NOT necessary for Unix accessability. That's just stupid KFUD. Although bundling a better filemangler is something the Hatters should do.
Mandrake is a convenience meta-distribution built on what someone else has done. While the convenience aspect & competition pressure is nice, you all are giving them more credit than they really deserve & not giving the Hatters enough.
Of course RH5.2 didn't have kernel 2.2.1 in it; it wasn't done then. However, Mandrake benefits from the fact that the new kernel can be dropped right into RH5.2.
Tetris... (Score:1)
BTW: try kshisen-so
linux-mandrake (Score:1)
/usr/local/qt/examples/tetrix (Score:1)
/usr/local/qt/examples/tetrix
Probebly why the KDE crew didn't bother.
I've been running it for days... (Score:1)
--Lenny
A Ha! (Score:1)
I suppose I should load KWM and see what all is in the new menu...I've just been running K apps from Window Maker.
--Lenny
RIVA TNT to be SUPPORTED!!... (Score:1)
yourself, you lazy idiot.
Next time, check the documentation to see whether
the card you're buying is supported. It's not
that hard.
RIVA TNT to be SUPPORTED!!... (Score:1)
> reply worth the time it takes to read it.
Why should I put any effort into my post? (S)He
apparently didn't.
I'll ignore it when (s)he stops posting off-topic
comments.
> Perhaps you speak of yourself?
Good one, AC.
I like it! (Score:1)
I would also like to know.. (Score:1)
Mandrake Linux 5.3?
Supported since 3.3.3 (Score:1)
User friendly? Damn Right! (Score:1)
The Point! (Score:1)
Our precious bodily fluids..... (Score:1)
I've been running a TNT for 1 1/2 months now.... (Score:1)
__bzero (Score:1)
When the linker tries to resolve the symbol for the libc it was compiled against, it looks for __bzero. Which isn't there.
Your best bet is to download source rpms of the packages that are giving you the errors and then do a:
rpm -Uvh ***.src.rpm
cd
rpm -bb ***.spec
cd
rpm -Uvh ***..rpm
To build the packages yourself ( ensuring binary compatibility).
In fact, using src rpms gives you all the flexibilty of a tar.gz build ( via modifying the spec file ) while retaining all the nifty rpm stuff ( package integrity verification, no
Question about Redhat and Mandrake compatibility (Score:1)
more ./ popularity! (Score:1)
Redhat with GNOME (Score:1)
And still no support for RIVA TNT... (Score:1)
Ditto (Score:1)
Preorder now! (Score:1)
Mandrake 5.2 was a snap on my TP600 (Score:1)
Question about Redhat and Mandrake compatibility (Score:1)
Redhat. Does that mean that I can "upgrade" a RedHat 5.2 system (which I just installed about a week ago) to Mandrake 5.3 easily? If so, how? Just boot the CD and choose "upgrade"? Also does Mandrake 5.3 include *all* of the packages that Redhat 5.2 does? I don't want to lose any functionality if I choose to install it on another
box instead of RH 5.2. Thanks in advance,
--Skeezix
Damn, another distro (Score:1)
I've been running it for days... (Score:1)
Name copyright? (Score:1)
Ditto (Score:1)
I d'ld the ISO for this 'round about Monday or so.
Used a bunch of the RPMS to upgrade parts of my
RH 5.2 setup.
Although trying to implement the 2.2.1 kernel
included *still* broke something....so how *do* I fix the undefined __bzero thing anyway!!!
And still no support for RIVA TNT... (Score:1)
Check out their website at www.metrolink.com
latest version is 4.3
The Mirrors (Score:1)
and grab it (downloading myself as we speak!).
Bryan R.
Whats so special about Mandrake? (Score:1)
Name copyright? (Score:1)
And still no support for RIVA TNT... (Score:1)