Comdex Update: Linux a smash hit 37
Alan writes "The Linux
booth was an absolute smash at the Comdex in Vancouver today.
This was it's first day, but the booth stayed packed from when
the doors opened to about an hour before they closed. And
when I say packed, I mean PACKED. People were overflowing into the
aisles to talk to the volunteers that were there. We quickly
ran out of the Caldera CDs and Linux Journals that were donated.
Even people who weren't part of the booth but used linux were
stopping to talk to people about it and help to show them all about linux. We were literally the most busy booth there. There was even a tv crew from BCTV (www.tvforbc.com, no story though) who came out and put us on the news!
In short, Linux was the toast of the show :)"
OOps! Caldara CDs not suse (Score:1)
Who gave what aside, Linux is Linux, and Linux was a hit
Red Hat tried that before. (Score:1)
Give 'em Linux or give 'em death! (Score:1)
With some minor level of basic computer knowledge, any Linux install I've ever been through is easier and far less time consuming than an Win95 install. And, truth be told, I prefer the UI of the Slackware install scripts to the Red Hat ones.
Give 'em Red Hat!!! (Score:1)
Caldera and SuSE are major proponents of Linux in the BC Linux organizations, as such we have to show them as well as RedHat, although I agree that RedHat is easier to install for beginners.
Besides, we may have some people attend the show that are familiar with Unix in general, who could probably succesfully install Caldera or SuSE.
I Agree (Score:1)
I started with Slackware... God, that was a bitch to install and continued to be an eternal PITA. I tried RedHat on another machine and never looked back. Even for experienced users, RH is nice. (Until you get into the roll-your-own custom distro stuff for REALLY specific applications.)
BTW, I disagree on the Win95/WinNT thing. WinNT is MUCH easier to install than '95. But RedHat blows NT away hands-down.
Win95 install - Many hours. (Reboot, reboot, reboot)
NT install - 1-2 hours.
RHL -
Give 'em Red Hat!!! - We tried. (Score:1)
We even talked to a CD-duplicating place a couple of booths down, but no luck.
-Mike (VanLUG member)
You never checked on SuSE (Score:1)
CU
Tobias
Good work guys (Score:1)
Man, that Linux booth was packed. It was hard even getting near it. It was definitely the booth that generated the highest excitement level.
Too bad you guys didn't have the floor space of, say, Microsoft.
Cheers,
- Jim
DEBIAN IS KING!!! (Score:1)
FYI: lynx can use proxies, as well as wget; dpkg and dselect is really good, put apt-get, or dselect with apt method is the best package management system ever.
Szo
Don't worry, SuSE not that difficult (Score:1)
2 weeks ago I installed SuSE 6.0 and it was a breeze. IIRC there even is an option to let the setup-program do the partitioning, but that's just as useless as the RH version if you happen to have another OS on you drives, which is very probable if we're talking about Linux newbies.
KDE 1.1 (Score:1)
I Agree (Score:1)
but linux distros overall will dominate because they can be customized for anyone's special needs. There could be Grandma Linux that boots with very few daemons, has a very easy GUI that starts automatically, has some imaging software for her fancy new sewing machine that accepts bitmaps for patterns, a fast browser, etc. What is even more beautiful, is the small company that distributes Grandma Linux could then support it in a much more personal manner. Possibly even customize some apps for her. Or better yet, customize her homepage so that she has quick access to stuff she cares about, yahoo, her mutual funds, email lists of her kids and grandkids, etc. Some equally as beautiful is that for her monthly charge of $20 or whatever the service provider could offer a sub $1000, or $500 pc.
What I'm trying to say, is that linux does not have to be user un-friendly. Most people use general purpose distros, these necessarily include users of MIT level technical ability and people like me (a law student who only discovered linux 8 months ago). Linux offers the freedom to customize a distro based on a larger distro, to tweak it for a very specific purpose (i.e., the opposite pole of a beowulf implementation). We all tend to focus on which distro is better than which, when we should focus on how to make every conceivable distro for every purpose and start businesses to support them. Linux will be hurt by a one company domination model. It will flourish where many distros are based on open standards. There will always be shortcomings with any model, but I think the one I have envisioned is superior. Any comments?
RedHat = Horror for Newbies (Score:1)
Supprise? :) (Score:1)
Øyvind
Hey... (Score:1)
Age >= 21 (Score:1)
Nice troll... (Score:1)
Erik Ratcliffe
Caldera Systems, Inc.
Relax. (Score:1)
Sorry, nothing personal.
Linux Booth (Score:1)