Linux Turns 34 (tomshardware.com) 66
Mark Tyson writes via Tom's Hardware: On this day 34 years ago, an unknown computer science student from Finland announced that a new free operating system project was "starting to get ready." Linus Benedict Torvalds elaborated by explaining that the OS was "just a hobby, [it] won't be big and professional like GNU." Of course, this was the first public outing for the colossal collaborative project that is now known as Linux. Above, you can see Torvalds' first posting regarding Linux to the comp.os.minix newsgroup. The now famously caustic, cantankerous, curmudgeon seemed relatively mild, meek, and malleable in this historic Linux milestone posting.
Torvalds asked the Minix community about their thoughts on a free new OS being prepared for Intel 386 and 486 clones. He explained that he'd been brewing the project since April (a few months prior), and asked for direction. Specifically, he sought input about other Minix users' likes and dislikes of that OS, in order to differentiate Linux. The now renowned developer then provided a rough summary of the development so far. Some features of Linux that Torvalds thought were important, or that he was particularly proud of, were then highlighted in the newsgroup posting. For example, the Linux chief mentioned his OS's multithreaded file system, and its absence of any Minix code. However, he humbly admitted the code as it stood was Intel x86 specific, and thus "is not portable."
Last but not least, Torvalds let it be known that version 0.01 of this free OS would be out in the coming month (September 1991). It was indeed released on September 17, 1991, but someone else decided on the OS name at the last minute. Apparently, Torvalds didn't want to release his new OS under the name of Linux, as it would be too egotistical, too self-aggrandizing. He preferred Freax, a portmanteau word formed from Free-and-X. However, one of Torvald's colleagues, who was the administrator for the project's FTP server, did not think that 'Freax' was an appealing name for the OS. So this co-worker went ahead and uploaded the OS as 'Linux' on that date in September, without asking Torvalds.
Torvalds asked the Minix community about their thoughts on a free new OS being prepared for Intel 386 and 486 clones. He explained that he'd been brewing the project since April (a few months prior), and asked for direction. Specifically, he sought input about other Minix users' likes and dislikes of that OS, in order to differentiate Linux. The now renowned developer then provided a rough summary of the development so far. Some features of Linux that Torvalds thought were important, or that he was particularly proud of, were then highlighted in the newsgroup posting. For example, the Linux chief mentioned his OS's multithreaded file system, and its absence of any Minix code. However, he humbly admitted the code as it stood was Intel x86 specific, and thus "is not portable."
Last but not least, Torvalds let it be known that version 0.01 of this free OS would be out in the coming month (September 1991). It was indeed released on September 17, 1991, but someone else decided on the OS name at the last minute. Apparently, Torvalds didn't want to release his new OS under the name of Linux, as it would be too egotistical, too self-aggrandizing. He preferred Freax, a portmanteau word formed from Free-and-X. However, one of Torvald's colleagues, who was the administrator for the project's FTP server, did not think that 'Freax' was an appealing name for the OS. So this co-worker went ahead and uploaded the OS as 'Linux' on that date in September, without asking Torvalds.
Re: (Score:1)
I'd like to see Chuck meet AC? (Score:2)
But why did you propagate the BS Subject? You seemed to have a relevant alternative Subject related to an actual bone of technical contention.
Re: (Score:2)
So your'e saying that Linus wields a soft power that no amount of kung fu can overcome?
Re: (Score:2)
Was somebody at Netware I think.
SCO wanted gag order for Linus Torvalds, Groklaw i (Score:1)
Made My Career Possible (Score:5, Interesting)
I booted Slackware 3 off a floppy in 1994. I've written ten novels and some sixty other works on Linux. I wrote one of the first web sites ever developed on it. Linux is the technology foundation I've relied on for more than 30 years. It has been the right tool for every technology challenge I've ever faced.
The world would be a much darker place today if it weren't for Mr. Torvalds. Here's to you, my friend, and here's to 34 more.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Monkey boy, that you?
Still bitter after all those billions?
Lighten up!
Re: (Score:2)
But on the bright side, you already have the first part of your wish, clearly
Re: (Score:2)
The world would be a much darker place today if it weren't for Mr. Torvalds.
Or maybe BSD would've taken its place, and we'd be talking about GNU + BSD, who knows?
Re: Made My Career Possible (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I first downloaded Slackware in 1993 onto a large stack of 3.5" floppies, from a local BBS, using a 14.4 kb/s modem. It took a LONG time (a week, if I remember correctly). I had HD space for one operating system, and my college classes frequently required Windows-only software, so I alternated between Linux (I had moved on to Redhat) and Windows 95.
Shortly before I finished my degree in 1999, I got a Windows virus that wiped out everything. I had no backups, so I was screwed. Since I had to start over anywa
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Made My Career Possible (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Yep. I remember all the hoops I needed to jump through when putting Ubuntu(?) onto a laptop and trying to get the right driver/settings/config for whatever new WiFi chip was in it. Then configureing the wired network chip. Last laptop I put Mint on...it just installed and worked. Well, except for the HP laptop which supposedly has a gigabit ethernet chip in it, which doesn't seem to want to allow itself to be configured as a gigabit interface, even under Windows (yes, I pulled Linux off and reinstalled Wind
Re: (Score:2)
34 was my age when I quit my day job, thanks to Linux and the floodgates of open source software it opened for me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
3 years 365 days later... (Score:2)
Windows 95 was released. (It was released Aug 24, 1995).
365 days because 1992 was a leap year so it's technically 4*365 days ago but 1 day short of 4 years.
And between Linux and Windows 95 I got on the internet. I still remember the first Linux I used was some Slackware with kernel 1.2.3.
Re: (Score:2)
And, just throwing this out there... 20 years before Linux, Unix in 1970, then BSD in 1977, and 386BSD in 1992 - which I actually used around then.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No. They suck.
Re: Take my millions and disappear (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I really think that goes understated a lot.
I'm not going to quite say "writing an OS is easy" but there are a lot of people capable of doing that. Doing that and keeping a worldwide project going for decades, is fucking amazing. Those two things in one person are quite rare.
I'm amused when people call him an asshole or whatever, not because they're necessarily wrong, but because .. well .. WOULDN'T YOU?! Don't cross Linus. You don't need to, and it doesn't help. And he knows it doesn't help, so expect him t
35th Year of the Linux Desktop (Score:2)
echo "Happy 35th, Linux ðY â" $(uname -sr), still no kernel_panic && long_uptime!"
In just a few more years (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
If Linus were a tech CEO's wife, he would have already cheated on her with a much younger OS by now.
Re: (Score:2)
Why not? It's no less arbitrary than 25 or 30 or 40.
Re: (Score:2)
Why not? It's no less arbitrary than 25 or 30 or 40.
What makes you think the age of discrimination isn't arbitrary?
Re: (Score:2)
What age and what discrimination are you talking about?
Re: (Score:3)
I'd be annoyed if it was every 1/2 birthday, but it seems to be pretty rare.
* Linux turns 8 https://linux.slashdot.org/sto... [slashdot.org]
* Linux turns 10 https://linux.slashdot.org/sto... [slashdot.org]
* Linux is 10 today (dupe!) https://linux.slashdot.org/sto... [slashdot.org]
* Linux turns 17 today https://linux.slashdot.org/sto... [slashdot.org]
* Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever https://linux.slashdot.org/sto... [slashdot.org]
* Linux turns 27 https://linux.slashdot.org/sto... [slashdot.org]
* Linux turns 34
Re: (Score:2)
Could the pattern be that it's a slow news day?
Re: (Score:2)
Or the fact that Windows 95 turned 30 yesterday and that was big news. Linux turns 34 today which makes it more newsworthy than if it was reported next year as 35 years.
Re:34? (Score:5, Informative)
Ok, so the answer was 42, which is why it was important to any of us geeks/nerds
34 is 42 in octal
Slackware was my first Linux (Score:2)
Trying to get Slackware to boot on a turnkey PC server that had arrived with a cracked SCSI drive controller was my very first foray into Linux. (After 12 hours of futile efforts me and my coworker could not)
I was an OS/2 kid at the time and knew next to nothing about Unix. Thanks to Linux now I do.
Re: (Score:2)
And by 'cracked' I mean the expansion card was cracked in half during shipping.
Re: (Score:2)
Mine as well, bought the Slackware '96 book.
Thanks Linus (Score:2)
And then all the other contributors. I first installed it 31 years ago, probably on a DX-something-slow processor PC. Slackware something or other. Currently mainly use flavours of Ubuntu on VIM4 SBC computers and in Vagrant (on a Mac, because the year of the Linux desktop was/will be too late for me). Here's to the next 34 years.
SLS 1.0 (Score:2)
A dozen or so 5 1/4 inch floppies, and an office PC built to spec - I vaguely remember having to find SCSI drives for some reason. Or was it a very specific network card?
Became the email gateway for the company.
I miss the old Slashdot (Score:5)
However, there's still the odd gem in the comments sometimes. Too bad those are harder and harder to find.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. People have move onto other things, but I haven't found anywhere notably better. There are niche special interest forums on reddit (e.g programming), and more generalist ones. But I like the niche slashdot sits in.
On the flip side, I've watched it in real time play out how people get old and reactionary.
Re: I miss the old Slashdot (Score:2)
What a coincidence, I also still read Slashdot :)
Re: (Score:2)
What a coincidence, I also still read Slashdot :)
No way! :D
Re: (Score:2)
I miss the page-widening posts.
GNU/Linux (Score:2)
Back on the day, someone commenting on Slashdot would make the pendantic reminder that it is properly called "GNU/Linux."
Oops, I guess I just did. And you kids, get off my lawn!
Re: (Score:2)
/. isn't what it used to be, but more importantly, the world in which /. was great also isn't what it used to be.
Well, that and no CmdrTaco.
Re: (Score:2)
Same here. I used to spend endless time on /., even while at work, as so much of what happened over here was somehow relevant to my job anyway. Of course, I no longer do that same job, but even if I did I still wouldn't be a daily /. visitor today. Sic transit gloria mundi, I guess, but very sweet memories nonetheless.
Downloading the floppies for Linux 0.12 at work and then almost literally running home as fast as I could to get it installed is another of those beautiful memories. Especially as it actuall
I remember buying my first Linux (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes, buying. I lived in Cedar City Utah and first encountered Linux in a RedHat 2.0 beige box at a gaming store in Red Cliffs Mall in St George. Probably in 1994 or 5. Came with a couple of manuals, a boot floppy, and a CD. Had the 0.95 kernel. Getting dial-up configured was interesting since the ISP only knew about Trumpet Winsock... Then leaving it running for a few hours in the evening to update everything.
Within a week I was at the local BN buying O'Reilly books.
Re: (Score:2)
I also bought my first Linux shortly after you. It came on a CD in a big book call Slackware Unleashed. I still have the book somewhere. Funny, I was also living in Utah (Salt Lake) and still do. I've tried several distros since then but keep coming back to Slackware.
I think that original Slackware install was kernel 1.2.13. I compiled many kernels and kept my 486/66 DX humming nightly on those builds. It was a dream to run real serious software at home. It still is!
The "final bosses" of Linux (Score:2)
A free OS (Score:2)
When I was in college (in 1995), this one guy was going on about a free OS that was incredible. All I could think of was, sure, a free OS that is good, what a joke is that going to be. So together with another friend we decided to install this free OS and have a good laugh.
The laugh was on us, it was indeed incredible, offering multitasking, multi user, memory protection, the cli was so powerful, and on top of all that, all the code was open.