Ubuntu Budgie Could Be The New Flavor of Ubuntu Linux (softpedia.com) 116
prisoninmate writes: Budgie-Remix maintainer David Mohammed informs Softpedia about the progress made with the upcoming operating system, whose ultimate goal is to become an official Ubuntu Linux flavor, possibly under the name of Ubuntu Budgie. Even Canonical founder Mark Shuttleworth said in a Google+ comment last month that it will definitely support if there is a community around the packaging. Since their initial report, it looks like the developer managed to get in contact with the Ubuntu MATE project leader Martin Wimpress, who urged him to target Ubuntu 16.10 for an official status of his soon-to-be-named Ubuntu flavor built on top of the Budgie desktop environment created by the team of developers from Solus Project.
Bubuntu (Score:1)
"Bubuntu".
Just saying.
Re:Another day (Score:5, Insightful)
Distros and Remixes are completely different. A remix is where the exact same repositories are used, just that the installer bootstraps a different set of packages. This means that as soon as core Ubuntu gets an security update, the remix will get the same.
Linux Mint made the mistake of becoming a separate distro, meaning that they had to review security updates, etc. If they'd simply focused on getting cinnamon, nemo, etc into the official Ubuntu repositories, they would now be view more favorably after their breach.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
> 50% of human beings? What a dubious statement.
Ummm... What are you replying to?
Re: (Score:2)
> 50% of human beings? What a dubious statement.
Ummm... What are you replying to?
The breach had nothing to do with the distro. I like the fact that they try not to have things break when Ubuntu does. I don't want straight Ubuntu. I want Mint. So do most other people.
emphasis mine
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Perhaps you are not aware that Linux Mint uses the Ubuntu repositories for their main edition, so they get security updates at the same time as their parent distro? The same goes for Mint's Debian edition, the package manager pulls directly from Debian's security repository. There is no delay or review by the Mint developers required.
I'm sure it'll go down a tweet (Score:2)
*hides*
Re: (Score:3)
It's not down. Just pining for the fjords.
Great summary (Score:5, Insightful)
Side note: Is it really a good idea to distinguish your Ubuntu flavor with an animal? I know it's not "Bodacious Budgie" or something along those lines, but it could be confusing nonetheless.
Re:Great summary (Score:5, Informative)
It would be nice if, in the summary, you told me what makes "Budgie" different from every other kind of Ubuntu. Side note: Is it really a good idea to distinguish your Ubuntu flavor with an animal? I know it's not "Bodacious Budgie" or something along those lines, but it could be confusing nonetheless.
Budgie is a DE, like Xfce and GNOME: https://solus-project.com/budg... [solus-project.com]
The Ubuntu flavors are differentiated by their name (Xfce: Xubuntu, KDE: Kubuntu, etc.), and the animal names designate the release number (16.04 will be "Xenial Xerus" for all of the flavors).
Re: (Score:1)
It would be nice if, in the summary, you told me what makes "Budgie" different from every other kind of Ubuntu. Side note: Is it really a good idea to distinguish your Ubuntu flavor with an animal? I know it's not "Bodacious Budgie" or something along those lines, but it could be confusing nonetheless.
Budgie is a DE, like Xfce and GNOME: https://solus-project.com/budg... [solus-project.com] Thanks! Wish I could mod up insightful. The Ubuntu flavors are differentiated by their name (Xfce: Xubuntu, KDE: Kubuntu, etc.), and the animal names designate the release number (16.04 will be "Xenial Xerus" for all of the flavors).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You added just one sentence, in the middle of the comment. Otherwise the two look very similar.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Great summary (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I love that out of everything in this thread, the parents post is what someone decided was +4 Interesting. :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Your comment wasn't removed at all, but you screwed up the formatting. You quoted the entire thing so it looks exactly like you're just parroting somebody without adding anything. How did you let that get past the preview?
Re: (Score:1)
The Ubuntu flavors are differentiated by their name (Xfce: Xubuntu, KDE: Kubuntu, etc.), and the animal names designate the release number (16.04 will be "Xenial Xerus" for all of the flavors).
So, Bubuntu? :)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Budgie is a DE
And what is a DE ? Sorry, but two letter acronyms are ungooglable.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean it isn't a development environment?
Re: Great summary (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You should be able to fix that by changing your desktop theme..but I've no experience with Dell, so I may be wrong.
Check System_Settings :: Workspace_Appearance :: Desktop_Theme
Re: (Score:2)
Do you need us to define LMGTFY as well?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Great summary (Score:4, Insightful)
What I don't get is why having a different desktop environment requires a whole different distribution. Why not just give the option when installing it instead of having all these supposedly different distributions with different names?
Re: (Score:2)
You're surprised that linux users and developers are more interested in linux software than in windows software? Most of us never use Wine and have no interest in it. Linux development is not generally done as a marketing tactic to try to win over windows users.
Re: (Score:1)
They've been going downhill since Halo 3 (Score:5, Funny)
No way am I buying an OS from them.
Thank Goodness (Score:1)
I've been following the Solus project for quite some time and had several conversations with the lead developer (Ikey - https://github.com/ikeydoherty). It's refreshing to have a project leader be such a stubborn advocate for the Linux desktop at a time when everyone else (or at least Canonical & Co.) are focusing solely on mobile and tablets. The vast majority of us Ubuntu users have slowly watched the desktop age and lack the attention it needs in the name of convergence - this could be the thing th
Just to make a point... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
There is also some talk of making Enlightenment and Cinnamon officially supported.
They need Cinnamon, end of story. They could have 100 different desktop environments, it doesn't matter if none are as good as Cinnamon. I just switched from Ubuntu to Mint (despite the security breach). Cinnamon is what a desktop environment on a PC should look like.
Re: (Score:2)
There is also some talk of making Enlightenment and Cinnamon officially supported.
They need Cinnamon, end of story. They could have 100 different desktop environments, it doesn't matter if none are as good as Cinnamon. I just switched from Ubuntu to Mint (despite the security breach). Cinnamon is what a desktop environment on a PC should look like.
There is a not-officially-supported Ubuntu ISO which is preinstalled with Cinnamon: http://www.cubuntu.fr/ [cubuntu.fr]
:P
Use what you like, I'm just letting you know
Re: (Score:2)
There is a not-officially-supported Ubuntu ISO which is preinstalled with Cinnamon: http://www.cubuntu.fr/ [cubuntu.fr]
Thanks, but that sounds like a recipe for trouble.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've used KDE, Gnome2, Gnome 1.8, Gnome 3, XFCE, XPde, Unity, Enlightenment, and IceWM as primary DEs for extended periods. The best one I've ever used was Gnome 3. I interact with it the least: when I need to do something, it happens quickly and efficiently, and I'm on a new desktop with whatever window I need doing whatever it was I was trying to do instead of playing with the DE.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a bit of a carp, but I find this kind of thinking, and the whole concept of distro "flavors", mildly annoying. The number of "officially supported" DEs equals the number of DEs packaged in the official repos, period. I don't know precisely what that number is, because there is a lack of descriptive indexing of exactly what is in the repos, but there is certainly no dependence on having a "flavor" differentiated
Re: (Score:2)
All of them corrupted from cold POST by systemd. #DeckChairs
Re: (Score:2)
Ubuntu: An ancient African word meaning "too pragmatic to install debian".
Ubuntu has some innovations such as launchpad integration and PPAs but I can't say I miss much running Mate on upstream debian.
(it's Canonical's non-desktop development that holds some interest - I might give Ubuntu Touch another try on my phone once I file a bug on network-specific 3G data support.)
Apparently it's about a new DE (Score:3)
Apparently it's a new DE for the next Ubuntu LTS release and forward.
Here's a project link [launchpad.net].
It has the vibe of a Korora [kororaproject.org]/OzoneOS or Elementary [elementary.io] ripp, both of which look way more mature than this "Ubuntu Budgie" thing.
I don't get the buzz.
Looks like a project in pre-alpha stage, if you ask me.
Lubuntu compared to Budgie-Remix (Score:1)
Still won't use it (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
they're now selling converged-desktop mobile devices with Mir, whereas Wayland is still alpha-quality.
Wayland works pretty well on my phone. What's alpha about it?
just restin' (Score:2)
Ubuntu Budgie Could Be The New Flavor of Ubuntu Linux
I prefer albatross flavor [wikipedia.org].
What happens when he sells out? (Score:3)
Now what happens when a distro developer builds a loyal following and then sells out?
Re: (Score:2)
It would be somewhat easier for a malware author to buy out one of the hundreds of revenueless linux distros than to purchase Microsoft.
Oh, hurray... (Score:2)
... another Windows Start Menu clone.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm from Victoria and I'd honestly never heard of the expression until a federal politician decided to parade his manliness, apparently quite seductive to rusted-on Liberal-voters, in red Speedos.
Budgies? (Score:2)
"Budgies? Budgies? We don't need no stinkin' budgies."
Sneak it into the repos (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It will probably use systemd. I think that upstart is officially dead now, latest release was in september 2014.
Re: (Score:2)
This highlights the difference between FLOSS and proprietary systems. If you hate how mangled the GUI is in the newest version of macOS or Windows, you're screwed. But Linux and the BSDs have a lot of great options to on