Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
It's funny.  Laugh. Software Linux

Washington State LUG to Hold "Nerd Auction" 376

elrous0 writes "As part of a PR stunt, a Washington Linux user group is holding a "Nerd Auction" and appealing to local sororities to exchange dates and makeover advice for their computer skills and homework assistance. 'The problem is that we're all still nerds. Let's face it, guys. If anyone's going to bid on us, we'll need some spicing up,' writes Washington State Linux Users Group president Ben Ford on the group's website. 'And who better to help with that than sorority girls who like nothing better than a makeover?' So far there has been no comment on how a Linux user group is going to help sorority girls with their Windows machines."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Washington State LUG to Hold "Nerd Auction"

Comments Filter:
  • by psychicsword ( 1036852 ) * <The@@@psychicsword...com> on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:13PM (#20760353)

    So far there has been no comment on how a Linux user group is going to help sorority girls with their Windows machines.

    Isn't it obvious, by installing linux.
    • by IdleTime ( 561841 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:15PM (#20760395) Journal
      Like, only if your brain isn't like a sorority girl, like!
    • Re:How to help... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by happyemoticon ( 543015 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:21PM (#20760519) Homepage

      Yeah, and the superior stability of Linux means her computer will never get infected with adware, viruses, or even slow down on boot time. In fact, it'll never have any problems short of a hard drive crash, motherboard failure, or power supply failure. What good is that? You'll never get to see her again.

      • What good is that? You'll never get to see her again.

        There's always the command line ...
      • by fuzzix ( 700457 ) <flippy@example.com> on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:36PM (#20760753) Journal

        Yeah, and the superior stability of Linux means her computer will never get infected with adware, viruses, or even slow down on boot time. In fact, it'll never have any problems short of a hard drive crash, motherboard failure, or power supply failure. What good is that? You'll never get to see her again.
        This is why you make sure her sshd is available from outside... ;)

        "Your research paper DISAPPEARED?! That's awful... Two months of work, you say? I'll be right over!"
      • by misleb ( 129952 )
        You've heard the joke about the engineer and the talking frog, right?
        • by happyemoticon ( 543015 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @05:10PM (#20761219) Homepage

          I just looked it up. Pretty funny. I'll quote it for anyone equally uninformed:

          An engineer was crossing a road one day, when a frog called out to him and said, "If you kiss me, I'll turn into a beautiful princess." He bent over, picked up the frog and put it in his pocket. The frog spoke up again and said, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a beautiful princess, I will stay with you for one week." The engineer took the frog out of his pocket, smiled at it and returned it to the pocket. The frog then cried out, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a princess, I'll stay with you for one week and do ANYTHING you want." Again, the engineer took the frog out, smiled at it and put it back into his pocket. Finally, the frog asked,

          "What is the matter? I've told you I'm a beautiful princess, and that I'll stay with you for one week and do anything you want. Why won't you kiss me?" The engineer said, "Look, I'm an engineer. I don't have time for a girlfriend, but a talking frog, now that's cool."
      • by Mr. Underbridge ( 666784 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:57PM (#20761037)

        What good is that? You'll never get to see her again.

        Like you didn't give yourself a shell account with superuser access. Come on. You'll be able to make that thing stop working at will!

        That and you'll install software to remotely control her webcam anyway. You'll definitely be seeing her...

      • What good is that? You'll never get to see her again.

        Umm, I think that may have been a given to start with... :)

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        And what is more important, she wont be able to figure out how to make som private home video for all of us to see.
      • by Penguinisto ( 415985 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @05:39PM (#20761529) Journal
        Get root on the machine, then type this:

        # echo "10 17 * * 5 root (ifconfig eth0 down ; ifconfig eth1 down ; wall "Your computer is broken, please call $NERD at $PHONE immediately")" > /etc/crontab

        ...guaranteed you'll have at least one babe calling you once a week, ne? And be sure to set your frickin' variables before you type that.

        (I swear, it's like the mere mention of meeting a chick turns off the whole BOFH part of the brain with you people...)

        /P

    • by eln ( 21727 ) * on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:34PM (#20760717)
      That's exactly what will happen. The geeks install linux, and the sorority girls kick the geeks in the nuts for ruining their computers. In this way, everyone wins. The sorority girls get to tell their professors they can't do their homework because their computers are toasted, thereby giving them more free time to attempt to get impregnated by the football team, and the geeks get more contact from a human female than they have ever gotten or will ever get again.

      This is the very definition of "win-win".
    • Ok, so how will the Linux geeks help them with their cute little pink iMacs and iPods?
    • If ladies can be talked out of their OS, what else do you think the guys can talk them out of...
  • by Anonymous Custard ( 587661 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:17PM (#20760441) Homepage Journal
    If there's one good reason to support windows, it's to help sorority girls upload their pajama party photos to your^H^H^H^H their flickr account.
    • by Frosty Piss ( 770223 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:21PM (#20760527)

      If there's one good reason to support windows, it's to help sorority girls upload their pajama party photos
      Why? Is there a problem with the photos I took through the second story window from a ladder? I know they're only 6 mega pixels and the lighting is a bit uneven, but I thought they looked kind of "arty"...
  • by Frosty Piss ( 770223 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:18PM (#20760445)
    This is not the Washington State LUG, it's the Washington State University LUG
    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by metlin ( 258108 )
      Yes, because when they mean Penn State or Georgia State, they refer to the respective states (as opposed to, say, the State of Pennsylvania or the State of Georgia).

      Gee.
      • not what its called (Score:3, Informative)

        by Mr 44 ( 180750 )
        True, except that no-one calles WSU "Washington State". It's referred to most commonly as "Wazzu [wikipedia.org]" or sometimes W.S.U.
      • Considering that there's also a city named Washington in this country, "Washington state" is a good way to disambiguate the state from the federal capital.
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by treeves ( 963993 )
        It's quite common around here to hear people say "I live in Washington State". AFAIK this is the only state where this is said, and I suppose it distinguishes between it and Washington D.C.
        I went to WSU, but I live in Oregon now. A similar problem we face locally is when you say Vancouver and you mean Canada, you have to say Vancouver BC, otherwise Vancouver, WA is assumed.
  • Optimistic (Score:5, Insightful)

    by spleen_blender ( 949762 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:18PM (#20760455)
    The sorority girls probably aren't going to bite. They know they can get nerds like us to work on their computer and homework assignments and have to give nothing in return. They just have to be... girls. This is sort of like people boycotting gasoline... it just won't work. They can hold out indefinitely since they have other sources of income (read: non-nerds sexing them up) where as we will sit there demanding cheaper gas (read: any sexing up).
    • I dunno.... most of the nerds I have ever known never fell for that. Then again, I have known a lot of cynical and bitter people over the years....
    • Re:Optimistic (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Stringer Bell ( 989985 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:24PM (#20760575)
      Confidence is sexy, according to my wife and most of her girlfriends. Be nervous, introspective, self-conscious, and "girls don't like nerds" becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • by ksheff ( 2406 )
      That behaviour sounds very familiar. That's basically why every woman I've ever dated has gone out with me: I'm paying for dinner/movie/whatever and/or they have a computer that needs fixing. Then it's "oh, gee..look at the time. goodbye".
    • by Moraelin ( 679338 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @05:03PM (#20761123) Journal
      As I've been saying before, the situation is pretty skewed for both genders.

      - About half the guys in a high school or university want the top 10 super-models. Move a bit lower and about 90% of the guys want the top 10% girls. Some might eventually get realistic enough to settle for a bit less, but only grudgingly.

      - About the same applies to the girls. Half the girls want the top 10 jocks. Some 90% of the girls want the top 10% most desirable guys.

      Interestingly enough, according to a recent study, girls seem to be a bit more realistic as to who they can actually get. Guys will tend to aim above what they can get.

      Basically anyone who says that someone can get laid anytime she wishes and by anyone she wishes because she's a girl, probably is doing the same daydreaming: thinking about those top 10 most popular girls in the whole damn college. Noone thinks of the shy, flat, nerdy girl in the back row when they make such generalization. That's her problem in a nutshell: to 90% of the guys she's just short of invisible, or little more than a piece of decor.

      To put it even more bluntly, half the western culture (of both genders) is generally more about getting a status symbol than someone they actually plan to get along with. It's the same as getting, say, the sportiest BMW you can afford: it's typically not as much because you actually need something that expensive and that much of a gas guzzler, but just to show everyone that you can afford what most others can't. Same here: girlfriends and boyfriends get chosen as status symbols more than anything else.

      And same as almost noone wants the lower half of the guys, if they have a choice, noone wants the lower half of the girls either. Note that I'm not talking about the butt-ugly gang of either sex. Just being _average_, already isn't much of a status symbol.

      So my take of what's going to happen is basically:

      1. They _will_ find a bunch of girls noone else wants, willing to give it a try. Then they'll get to go, "eeew" as they discover that they didn't get some smooth and highly desirable jock. (Who just happened to be single and limited in nerdiness to knowing how to install Windows.)

      2. The guys, conversely, will drool at the thought, right until they find out who they got to meet. And that it's not the horny super-model with huge tits, that they thought they _deserve_ for being so smart and for knowing all that command line stuff. Cue the mandatory "eew" from the guys too.

      Nice try, but probably no banana.

      Both groups will eventually settle on something more realistic, but if we're talking university LUGs and sororities, not yet. Well, not for most of them.

      (And before anyone accuses me of being sexist, note that I've talked about both genders.)
      • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

        by UbuntuDupe ( 970646 )
        That's a very good point, and a great summary. However, I believe there is one asymmetry:

        A non-desirable guy can be converted into the top 10% merely by giving women the appearance that other women want him. The converse is not true: making that ugly, nerdy girl appear to be fawned over by guys, won't make her suddenly attractive to the guys.
      • by drsmithy ( 35869 ) <drsmithy@gmai3.14159l.com minus pi> on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @10:16PM (#20763559)

        - About half the guys in a high school or university want the top 10 super-models. Move a bit lower and about 90% of the guys want the top 10% girls. Some might eventually get realistic enough to settle for a bit less, but only grudgingly.

        - About the same applies to the girls. Half the girls want the top 10 jocks. Some 90% of the girls want the top 10% most desirable guys.

        Interestingly enough, according to a recent study, girls seem to be a bit more realistic as to who they can actually get. Guys will tend to aim above what they can get.

        Do you have a source for that ? I'd be interested to read it, because - along with your conclusion - the result certainly seems arse-about-face to me.

        On a related note, I also recall some study done recently (on a university campus, maybe ?), basically on how successful the "Wanna fuck" pickup line works on males vs females (obviously they werent quite that crude, but it sums up the objective). From memory, the "success rate" of males vs females was something like 20% vs 80% (ie: 80% of women received a positive answer to their attempt, only 20% of men did - certainly the difference was dramatic). Further, of the men who declined, the reason was almost always due to some form of outside restriction on their ability to say agree (spouse/significant other, unavailable at the requested time, inappropriate relationship, etc) rather than not being interested in the sex. For women, the reasons were basically reversed - most said no because they weren't interested.

        Certainly, the idea that men are more selective than women goes against everything I've ever read about (and experienced, but that's anecdotal) so I'd be interested to read your source for suggesting otherwise.

        Basically anyone who says that someone can get laid anytime she wishes and by anyone she wishes because she's a girl, probably is doing the same daydreaming: thinking about those top 10 most popular girls in the whole damn college. Noone thinks of the shy, flat, nerdy girl in the back row when they make such generalization. That's her problem in a nutshell: to 90% of the guys she's just short of invisible, or little more than a piece of decor.

        Actually, no, I'm thinking about the ~50% of average women out there, plus the ~25% of "more desirable" women.

        • by RMH101 ( 636144 ) on Thursday September 27, 2007 @04:01AM (#20765511)

          From memory, the "success rate" of males vs females was something like 20% vs 80% (ie: 80% of women received a positive answer to their attempt, only 20% of men did
          Can you guys just do without me for a couple of minutes? Got to go and ask five women in the office something...
      • by pcgabe ( 712924 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @11:02PM (#20763853) Homepage Journal

        noone wants the lower half of the girls
        What are you talking about? The lower half is my favorite part of a girl!
    • by Anonymous Coward
      what is your people's problem? get out of the basement.
  • Gibert: I just wanted to say that I'm a nerd, and I'm here tonight to stand up for the rights of other nerds. I mean uh, all our lives we've been laughed at and made to feel inferior. And tonight, those bastards, they trashed our house. Why? Cause we're smart? Cause we look different? Well, we're not. I'm a nerd, and uh, I'm pretty proud of it.

    Lewis: Hi, Gilbert. I'm a nerd too. I just found that out tonight. We have news for the beautiful people. There's a lot more of us then there are of you. I know there
    • by hawk ( 1151 )
      Well, *that* should justify an opening bid of seventeen cents and an empty lipstick cannister . . .

      hawk
  • Protection (Score:4, Funny)

    by SuperBanana ( 662181 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:19PM (#20760489)

    So far there has been no comment on how a Linux user group is going to help sorority girls with their Windows machines

    Lots of protection.

    • You bet! (Score:2, Funny)

      by nrgy ( 835451 )

      Protection is nice and all but it doesn't hurt to see if shes infected before hand to, I recommend a full OPEN PORT scan just before you sync up with her.

      lolita.crabs.exe, lawlerskates_herbies.ini and parishilton_nude_genetal_warts.bat are some pretty nasty viruses. Wouldn't wanna infect your kernel with those if you know what I mean.

  • Mustn't RTFA... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Otter ( 3800 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:21PM (#20760521) Journal
    I submitted this yesterday [slashdot.org], but apparently a working link [yahoo.com] to the story is considered bad form.
  • by who's got my nicknam ( 841366 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:21PM (#20760523) Homepage
    Lesbian Until Graduation. That makes the headline of this article even more interesting!
  • Geek = Nerd? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by krgallagher ( 743575 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:26PM (#20760607) Homepage
    I have seen this reported in a couple of places in the last two days, and every time it makes my skin crawl. The reporters are all happy to make a joke out of it, and the LUG is too, so maybe I should not get upset. Still, I am proud to be a geek, but I do not consider myself a nerd. The quote that gets me in this article is "The idea is to trade their computer skills to sorority girls in exchange for a makeover and, possibly, a date."

    I can see a number of problems with this.

    • Just because I use Linux does not mean I can't get a date.
    • Using Linux might make me a geek, but it does not make me a nerd.
    • Why does the reporter assume the LUG members have the ulterior motive of getting laid?

    OK, I'll admit that most men have the ulterior motive of trying to get laid. Still, the tone of every report I have read is, "Look what the nerds will go through in an attempt to get laid." They are propagating a stereotype and no one seems to care.

    • Just because I use Linux does not mean I can't get a date.

      I find this obnoxious as well..

      Using Linux might make me a geek, but it does not make me a nerd.

      So just USING a certain piece of software can make you a geek?? You know, I thought being a geek was more than just the clothes you wear, the software you use, etc. More likely, you use linux BECAUSE you are a geek. Though I won't deny there are people who want "geek cred" or whatever... I find it ironic though. Besides which, the articles quotes the LUG president calling themselves nerds!

      Why does the reporter assume the LUG members have the ulterior motive of getting laid?

      I don't think the reporter DOES assume that--in fact, the article goes into the origin

    • Re:Geek = Nerd? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Hatta ( 162192 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @05:09PM (#20761205) Journal
      Why does the reporter assume the LUG members have the ulterior motive of getting laid?

      Because they're male.
    • by Surt ( 22457 )

      Using Linux might make me a geek, but it does not make me a nerd.

      I'm not sure that using linux makes you either:

      http://mw1.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/geek [merriam-webster.com]
      http://mw1.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nerd [merriam-webster.com]

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by dangitman ( 862676 )

      Still, I am proud to be a geek, but I do not consider myself a nerd.

      So, you are proud to bite the heads off of chickens in a carnival show, but you aren't interested in technical and academic matters? Perhaps slashdot is not the right website for you? Sounds like you should be at www.chickenbeheaders.com.

      Using Linux might make me a geek, but it does not make me a nerd.

      I don't see how. Using Linux does not require you to bite the heads off of chickens.

  • nice way to find some pics and install vnc server and write down some ip's and.. ect.
    fyi, sorority girls like coorslite, 2 pitchers ought to do it
  • So what's the minimum bid that the nerds need to come up with to get near the girls? Oh wait...
    • Heh, can we bid on them? How long do we get them for? I have some programming work that needs doing ... :P
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:27PM (#20760633)

    Binky: Gee Ben, what are we gonna do tonight?

    Ben: The same thing we do every night Binky: reinforce offensive gender role stereotypes!

    Binky: NARF!
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by jiawen ( 693693 )

      Mod parent up!

      Are there seriously no women in their LUG? Why not? Reaching out to sororities makes a good joke, but it does almost nothing to address the real issues. Maybe they should actually reach out to, and acknowledge, the geek women who already exist.

      But then, this is Slashdot, where it usually seems that every poster is assumed to be male, and where every Linux user is assumed to be male, and every geek and nerd is assumed to be male, so I'm probably just asking for a headache.

  • Nerds and Smarts (Score:4, Insightful)

    by bziman ( 223162 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:37PM (#20760763) Homepage Journal

    As a Linux user for well over a decade, I'm periodically tempted to drop by the local LUG, but every time I do, I find myself annoyed at the, well, nerdiness of the people there. I mean, sure, I know fourteen programming languages, I was a software engineer for a decade, and I'm working on a PhD in Computer Science (after already having studied Physics and Linguistics), but I just don't fit in to "Nerd" culture. This is because when I'm not doing something useful with Computer Science, traveling around the world, or I'm at the gym, or playing the piano, or sitting court-side at an NBA game or at any number of other social events. Your sorority girls are happy to have a smart guy who can fix their computer — but they're going to go for the ones who can function in society before they go to the fat, bespectacled, social outcasts that seem to congregate at LUGs.

    -brian

    • by SparkleMotion88 ( 1013083 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:57PM (#20761047)
      Oh yeah? Well I worked as a software architect for 30 years while being a full-time professor in math and African history. I know 37 programming languages and 12 natural languages. When I'm not busy being intellectually awesome I like to go rock climbing, practice ninjitsu, wrestle bears, make 100 ft tall bronze sculptures, and play oustide linebacker for the Kansas City Chiefs. So I don't think I'm a nerd either -- I'm entirely too awesome. I don't need to offer to fix a woman's computer in order to spend time with her. I usually just walk around and they are attracted to my awesomeness as if it had its own gravity.

      I also think people who join LUGs are pathetic losers who probably couldn't attract a desperate woman *or* successfully wrestle even a small bear. I'm way better than them, and I'm glad to see that there are other folks out there who are just like me (only slightly less awesome).
    • Yup. This is going to be a debacle, provided they actually have someone socially skilled enough to make it happen.

  • by destinyland ( 578448 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:40PM (#20760807)
    Maybe the female college students are already smart enough to fix their own computers, and don't need a big strong man-brain to show them how. For that matter, aren't there any female nerds who'd like also to be appreciated for the technical skills? Can they auction themselves off to the highest bidder too? This story is demeaning to women and to geeks.
    • by huckda ( 398277 )

      Maybe the female college students are already smart enough to fix their own computers
      haven't been on many college campuses lately have you? ;)

      J/K =)
    • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

      by roystgnr ( 4015 )
      For that matter, aren't there any female nerds who'd like also to be appreciated for the technical skills?

      Of course there are, but currently their numbers are unfortunately more limited.

      Can they auction themselves off to the highest bidder too?

      Yes, or to the victor in a no-holds-barred fight to the death if the mood strikes them. Supply and demand are powerful forces. Of course, that demand is often limited to male nerds, so "to the death" might take a while.
  • by sayfawa ( 1099071 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:41PM (#20760821)
    Administrator: How can we get these nerds to socialize better so that more girls will take CS?

    Nerd: Well, you could maybe stop calling us nerds?

    Administrator: Dweeb, wonk, spaz -- it's all good.
  • Meh..boxes (Score:5, Funny)

    by Liquidrage ( 640463 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:41PM (#20760827)
    "So far there has been no comment on how a Linux user group is going to help sorority girls with their Windows machines"

    Meh, if you've seen one box you've seen them all.
    When you're really break it down they're all nothing but I/O devices. Sure, some might have a few more bugs then others. And sure, some are more easy to get into then others. But at the end of the day a box is a box.
    Oh, and beer never hurts.
  • We had a slave auction for charity at the Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity where I lived. I remember being sold for $500, but for the life of me, I can't remember to who or what I ended up having to do. Thank you alcohol.
    • No offense (I mean I don't know who you are or what your specialties are) but if someone paid $500 for you to be their slave for a night I am sincerely happy for you that you can't remember what happened.

      I see suppressed memories surfacing in a therapy session one day in your future...
  • Some Answers (Score:5, Informative)

    by lgbr ( 700550 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @04:49PM (#20760919)
    To clarify on some details: We are the Linux Users Group at Washington State University, in Pullman, Washington. Enrollment in general in Computer Science has been down for the past few years. This has more greatly affected female enrollment, than anything else, where the number of females in WSU's Computer Science department is somewhere below 10%. What I'd like to make clear is that this event is not being put on to get geeks laid. Rather, it is to make the rest of campus aware that we exist, and are human. Our president, Ben Ford, and a female member came up with the idea to run this event. We hadn't planned for it to be much more than a fund raiser. But when the Associated Press ran a story on this yesterday, things started to blow up. Since then, our president has been shipped off to news studios. I've been on TV twice, and can hardly keep my phone from going off long enough for me to be interviewed. At the time of this writing, three sororities are in full participation for the event. The support has been so huge, that instead of a small fund-raiser like we were intending, the goal now is to raise enough money for a female scholarship in Computer Science.
    • by Toonol ( 1057698 )
      Really amazing. It sounds like it's being competently handled, which is great. And it's wonderful that it may be successful enough to actually create a scholarship.

      Having the press show up certainly helps get buy-in from the sororities, eh?
  • Why do they specifically need sorority girls? There are PLENTY of hot social women in technical majors that would gladly help them present themselves better. I speak from first hand experience. When I was in college, I lived in a dorm building with about 40 women in science and engineering majors. While not all of them are hot (maybe 60% were), about 90% of them were social, fun, and smart. And that was just in one dorm building. If they really must have a sorority, why not try Alpha Omega Epsilon? It's an
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      As a female engineer at WSU I am VERY aware of the lack of women in our field. Having an already somewhat small department, there is only a handful of women who are active in clubs. Even if they could get those women to help with the auction, it wouldn't attract the same attention that having a sorority participate has. We do not have a chapter of Alpha Omega Epsilon at WSU (Yes, I know that it is an engineering sorority. I am a member of AOE from a previous institution). We also do not have any chapters of
  • by Samurai Cat! ( 15315 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @05:08PM (#20761187) Homepage
    "So far there has been no comment on how a Linux user group is going to help sorority girls with their Windows machines."

    These guys will just lower their standards and deal with the Windows stuff.

    Just like the sorority girls will be lowering their standards by going out on dates with these guys.

    It's a win-win!
  • Congradulations (Score:2, Interesting)

    Truly fine promotional work. I joined the WSU LUG my freshman year after playing willing victim with my Windows 95 box to a few exploits a member showed me. My passion for computer security and quality operating systems has never waned. Since I left WSU in 2001 I've kept in contact and Ford has been one of the remaining members who has put in a great deal of personal effort into sustaining the group. Congratulations and I hope you have a fabulous year.
  • The number one way people get laid if beer ok.

    it's the universal equaliser. forget your over complicated dating setup, just buy a fucking keg people.

  • Makeovers (Score:5, Funny)

    by Ilan Volow ( 539597 ) on Wednesday September 26, 2007 @05:49PM (#20761651) Homepage
    These sorority girls really know their makeovers. Once LUG members have been given advice on mascara, making their boobs look bigger, and looking good in a belly shirt no man will be able to resist them!

The best defense against logic is ignorance.

Working...