Council of the EU Says "We Cannot Support Linux" 370
An anonymous reader writes "The Council of the EU has a streaming service so that we can watch its meetings — but the service can only be accessed by Mac or MS Windows users. This is because they employ WMV format for the videos. In the FAQ they express a really strange opinion about this: 'The live streaming media service of the Council of the European Union can be viewed on Microsoft Windows and Macintosh platforms. We cannot support Linux in a legal way. So the answer is: No support for Linux.' An online petition has been set up to create pressure to convince the EU council to change its service to one that is platform independent."
Ogg Theora? (Score:5, Informative)
And even if you think it is illegal to watch MPEG on Linux in the EU, the crime would be committed by the veiwer, not the broadcaster.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Ogg Theora? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
>One serious problem is that there are no working Theora VFW plugins (some exist, but they are unusable). You *have* to install VLC or mplayer.
I am an mplayer man, but Realplayer supports ogg, what is wrong with that? In the UK at least most people will have it as it is required for BBC and so on.
Re:Forget it (Score:4, Interesting)
Please don't do this (Score:5, Insightful)
It's much better to admit there's nothing that works out there that's OSS than to recommend a poor OSS solution. The reason is that the number one justification against OSS is shoddy quality. You talk to J. Random PHB and the reason they don't want to use OSS is because it's poor quality/not supported. Well, advocating things that are, in fact, poor quality just provides them with ammo for their argument.
Also it can hurt a format to get lots of exposure before it's ready. If everyone's first exposure to Theora is when it's buggy, that idea will form in their minds and later when it's stable, they will still associate Theora = buggy and thus give it a pass.
At this point, we just need to wait on Theora. Vorbis is great, I've no doubt in time Theroa will be its match, however it's not the kind of thing that will happen in a day.
Re:Please don't do this (Score:5, Informative)
Really? Why?
And that reason is???
That wouldn't be true, of course.
The patents on MPEG-1 have long ago expired. It has pretty good quality (better than Theora/VP3) when encoded with a recent implimentation (ie. libavcodec for video, twolame for audio). And more than that, it is by far the most widely compatible format around, supported by just about every video player made in the past several years, on just about every single platform around.
I, however, do. The VP3 codec is hated by just about everyone who knows anything about video.
It has really poor video quality, compared to even much older video codecs.
It is very CPU-intensive to encode.
It's playback performance is horrible. Once you reach resolutions where a full frame can't fit in your CPU cache, you get performance worse than codecs like h.264.
In some 4 years of Theora's development, Xiph hasn't removed any of VP3's limitations, nor added any advantages over the original VP3 codec. Since they've frozen the bitstream, even the potential for them to do any of that has passed...
I was somewhat active in the Theora development process some time ago, but I've long since given it up for dead.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
And the answer to your question is: no, Snow and Dirac can't be easily inserted into Ogg. Ogg's inability to handle arbitrary codecs is one of the reasons I don't recommend Ogg.
Re:What is wrong with QuickTime, its open (Score:4, Informative)
Because Quicktime is despised just slightly less than Ogg.
Off the top of my head:
Significant overhead.
Metadata at the end of files (like AVI).
This precluding good playback of partial files, and causes really terrible problems with partially damaged MOV files.
Unbelivably large number of different ways to do anything.
An unbelivably huge and complex standard that probably nobody on earth understands entirely.
14 different versions of the standard, and a field in the MOV header to dictate which version of the standard the player should use to read the file.
And finally: patents
If quicktime wasn't so horrible, you certainly wouldn't have ever seen formats like Ogg or MKV.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Definately. If an interested party would pick-up Snow, finalize the bitstream, and start adding some performance optimizations for encoding and high-def playback, it could beat-out every other video codec out there. The quality/bitrate is easily better than even h.264, and can scale down to ridiculously low bitrates while being completely watchable.
Nope. SnoPenguin nailed it. Ogg is terribly code
What happened to more eyes, shallow bugs? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The rest of your reaction basically boils down to complaining about popularity (websites nobody has heard of, codecs that aren't bundled with popular OSes) and oxymoronically complaining that only technical people can read theora.org and claiming I'm speaking only to a technically minded audience here on
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Please don't do this (Score:4, Insightful)
Since when did this exact reason stop Microsoft or other software solution providers from pushing their products?
Sorry, just had to say - this is a chicken and the egg problem. Reminds me of Linux "not being ready for the desktop." If no one picked it up to use on the desktop when it wasn't ready, it will likely never be ready. OTOH, the more people use an open piece of software, the more development it attracts.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Some websites offer users the choice of more than one format. It doesn't have to be limited to one choice or the other. Here is one example of a web page that allows users to choose which format they want to use when viewing a video clip. In this case it happens to be a choice between Flash and Ogg.
Several video clips in Flash and Ogg format [sun.com]
It is not unreasonable to expect an official government website to make an extra effort to make public records available to all voters. Offering the content in t
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
No. The goal here is to make these videos accessible to as many people as possible, ideally, everyone. While switching to Ogg Theora would help Linux users out because they would be able to watch the video legally, it would ultimately make the videos far less accessible because for everyone not using Linux it's making it harder to watch the videos. Streaming WMV is not the best solution, but it's better than forcing everybody to use poorly supported software that's still in alpha.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I have a revolutionary idea
Re:Ogg Theora? (Score:5, Insightful)
No, it's not. Using a codec that everyone can play after installing the additional software is better than using one that some people can't play at all.
Besides, it's not as if the Windows users would have to fend for themselves -- all the EU has to do is pick a player for Windows and link to it from their site (maybe write something like "can't see the video? click here"). It's Not That Hard!
Re:Ogg Theora? (Score:4, Interesting)
I pointed out in the letter I wrote to my MEP that people in France have reverse-engineered the format, so the only barrier to legally supporting it is belief that software patents are valid. I have some hope that she will address this, since she is a member of the FFII and has actively campaigned against software patents in the past.
No codecs required, either (Score:5, Informative)
Going straight Theora+Vorbis wouldn't work that well, since the user would have the install the codecs first and Vorbis/Theora support is severely lacking on OS X.
Quoting the site:
I have sent them an email: You should do the same! (Score:3, Interesting)
I am interested in politics - especially on the European level, because political decisions heavily influence the way we, citizens of the EU states, live. As have learnt through Slashdot, a news website [1], the Council of the EU has decided to offer a streaming media service.
In my opinion, this is a very interesting service with great potential to provide citizens with more information to actual issues.
Unfortunately, the stream is only avaiable in a proprietary format named Wi
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The only thing stopping them from 'legally' supporting Linux is the existence of software patents, which are not valid in the EU. Remind them of this.
Finally, re
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Someone's fired (Score:5, Insightful)
Having said that... (Score:2)
Re:Having said that... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Having said that... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean the FAQ page? That's written like a native English speaker would, even a bit casual. I don't think there was a translation problem. Well, at least between English and another natural language. Maybe a translation error from suitspeak to normalspeak?
Re: (Score:2)
A blatant lie to cover up for laziness... (Score:5, Funny)
<complete_nonsense>
You don't know the EU very well do you? You see this has nothing to do with laziness. If the EU replaces it's WMV streaming systems with a competing product it will result in 68 shirt and tie wearing MCSEs with nice conservative Bill Gates haircuts being replaced by a couple of hairy bucktoothed nerds with a nasty armpit malodor problem and the fashions sense of a Portuguese donkey wrangler. So this whole mess is really all about French objections because of the effect such a change would have on the already low fashion standards of EU employees and all the other EU member countries fears that it might make the unemployment situation in the European MCSE community any worse since the job security of the European MCSE community is already badly threatened by the way Linux looks set to exterminate Windows from the EU's desktop computer market.
</complete_nonsense>
Where's the illegal? (Score:5, Insightful)
What's so illegal about a Flash-based streaming player?
Re:Where's the illegal? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I have one. I am sure it is legal for me to possess and use it. Why don't you cite the existence of an *illegal* one, and please specify, with the chapter and verse of law please, where and how it is illegal, and what, precisely, is it illegal to do with it?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Not much to be said here (Score:5, Insightful)
The petition to urge them to use a platform-independent format is a good answer.
Open Government (Score:3, Insightful)
Hello, there are open-source players for WMV3 (Score:5, Informative)
Yes I think it still has patent issues or something but in Europe I don't think that matters.
Why is WMV so popular anyways? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
90% or more of the potential audience will be able to view it, and from the producer's perspective, it doesn't suck that much. That's why WMV is popular.
Re: (Score:2)
90% or more of the potential audience will be able to view it, and from the producer's perspective, it doesn't suck that much. That's why WMV is popular.
And that is why a monopoly abuser like Microsoft must be regulated. The only correct solution to this WMV problem is for the EU to impose mandatory royalty free licensing.
Q. Why is WMV so popular anyways? A. Inertia (Score:3, Insightful)
Inertia, it works,
Re:Why is WMV so popular anyways? (Score:4, Informative)
1) Also encoding for Real Player means extra encoding fees,
2) Although Flash claims to support live streaming, the license fees for it's servers to make a viable live streaming infrastructure are completely ridiculous so it is only good for progressive download.
3) No one offered any other format,
4) One of the largest networks in the world, Akamai, only has a small number of Real Server licenses left and they are dwindling due to lack of demand,
5) Live streaming from a whole network is a different ballgame to streaming from one server. Only Real and WMS can handle it properly. I know Icecast probably
From my own experience in smaller scale streaming I have not had much success using a Theroa/Icecast solution because there is no basic application just to grab V4L and convert it to a stream (I even tried coding one myself before running out of time and getting stumped since I lack the skills), though you can use ffmpeg2theroa to grab from a DV CAM. I tried Flumotion but it only seems to work with the latest and greatest version of Fedora at any given time. It's also way to complicated. Exactly what is all this "planet", "atmosphere", "streams" stuff about? I got nowhere fast trying to install it on CentOS4 which is what the enocding box runs (and I am not in a position to suddenly change OS since it does lots of other functions).
Youtube!!! (Score:5, Funny)
*ducks*
Re: (Score:2)
Needs rewording (Score:5, Insightful)
realplayer (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
How can that be done? Pick a format that doesn't require royalties.
Interpretation (Score:5, Interesting)
Realplayer? (Score:4, Insightful)
So why again is it illegal to run something that is not MS specific?
Hello, welcome to the new year, we're in the 21st century, not in the early 90s, there's something called "interoperability" that has been growing in the tech world... Time for reality to harvest!
Re:Realplayer? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
IT'S OK (Score:5, Funny)
Compatibility is Illegal Now? (Score:3, Interesting)
Use something else? (Score:2)
looking at it from their perspecive (Score:4, Informative)
This is the market share for browsers as of Nov 2006:
Microsoft Internet Explorer, 80.56%
Firefox, 13.50%
Safari, 4.03%
Netscape, 0.83%
Opera, 0.67%
This is the market share for Operating Systems as of Nov 2006:
Windows XP, 84.95%
Windows 2000, 5.46%
Mac OS, 4.10%
Windows 98, 1.90%
MacIntel, 1.29%
Windows ME, 0.91%
Windows NT, 0.76%
Linux, 0.37%
You could argue for better firefox support, but as much as we love linux, I suppose they have no obligation to make it work for something that is that small minority among desktop users.
Re: (Score:2)
Out of curiosity, where did you get your market share numbers from?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
90% of a country's population is caucasian, 6% is black, 3% is oriental and 1% is of other racial groups. The EU suddenly decides that it can only offer services to the majority, how fast do you think people's asses would be nailed to the wall?
They have an obligation to not discriminate between groups of people. By only allowing people using Windows or Mac OS/X to use services, that's discrimination.
Also, those statistics are misleading, since Opera identifies itself as IE by d
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Civil Rights are Violated. (Score:3, Interesting)
That's an unbelievably bizarre metaphor - equating operating system support as anything like racial discrimination.
I can't understand why anyone would confuse freedom and civil liberties, can you? Is it worse to screw everyone for the benefit of a few, than it is to screw other races? Violating others is wrong, regardless of numbers.
A government that forces non free software for popular participation is not interested in popular participation or does not mind having a third party as a mediator of th
Wait a sec...! (Score:4, Insightful)
Not so fast dude! The last time I checked, no body has ever chosen to be born caucasian, black, oriental or otherwise...on the other hand, there is likely a huge probability that all these folks that do not belong to the "chosen" platform to support actually chose to use the platform. And now, they are clamoring for support! Jeez!
Sorry in advance in case you made an application to whoever created you, to create you the way you are.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Or maybe you mean even the poor have the choice to pirate a copy of Windows.
Re: (Score:2)
Not everyone has the financial means to choose the non-free version. [...] Or maybe you mean even the poor have the choice to pirate a copy of Windows.
The "poor" do not have the means to choose at all. The poor go to the library. Only relatively wealthy people have computers of their own.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Wait a sec...! (Score:4, Insightful)
Nah, that misses the point. Just take the original analogy about "operating systems vs. race" and switch it to "operating systems vs. religion". Religion is something that is a choice - you want to leave yours and join another, you are free to do so - but if the EU would suddenly only 'support' 95% of religions, there would be a heck of an outrage. In modern civilization, it is legitimate to choose your religion. Is the EU saying that the only legitimate choice of operating system is Windows (or Mac)? That's quite a big commercial endorsement there.
The original analogy/argument is valid, the EU is in the wrong on this one. (Although to be fair it's probably only a few EU computer techs and their managers who even know about this decision.)
Re: (Score:2)
Anyway, these stats seem to be for US, not EU. Opera has much higher usage in Europe (3-8%, reaching 15% in some countries). Also Linux is over 1%.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Mine are from http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.a sp [w3schools.com]
2006------------IE7-----IE6-----IE5-----Fx------Mo z*----N7/8----O7/8/9
November--------7.1%----49.9%---2.9%----29.9%---2. 5%----0.2%----1.5%
2006------------WinXP---W2000---Win98---WinNT---W2 003---Linux---Mac
November--------74.9%---8.0%----1.0%----0.4%----1. 8%----3.3%----3.5%
Mac and Linux seem to pretty close....No?
Re:looking at it from their perspecive (Score:4, Insightful)
Sure they can (Score:3, Insightful)
There's a real difference between accommodating a minority who's that way because of a physical problem they can't overcome (such as loss of limb use, blindness, etc) and a minority who's that way because they choose to be so.
For example suppose you tried to mandate that the government had to provide parking at their official buildings for any kind of vehicle someone might want. Now suppose that a trucker
Re:looking at it from their perspecive (Score:4, Informative)
Yeah?
Where did you get your numbers?
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.
Aggregate IE: 59.9
Firefox: 29.9
Mozilla: 2.5
Netscape 7/8
Opera 1.5
Which one of those doesn't pass the Acid2? Only IE. 40 percent of the world uses a browser that supports standards enough to render Acid2, and IE's numbers have declined while the rest have only gained.
"You could argue for better firefox support, but as much as we love linux, I suppose they have no obligation to make it work for something that is that small minority among desktop users."
If you scroll down to the OS stats:
XP: 71.6
Win2K 13.6
Win98 2.6
WinNT
W2k3 1.7
Linux 3.2
Mac 3.3
But then it's not about "supporting linux" it's about using _standard_ codecs and standard files. Wmv is "Windows Only" and not a standard where other codecs are actual standards and are cross platform as a _result_ of being standards.
But hey, you're here to troll for Microsoft instead of contribute any facts to the discussion.
By the way, even though it has the least market share, Opera kicks all other browsers.
--
BMO
Re:looking at it from their perspecive (Score:4, Informative)
The stats at www.w3schools.com are not representative of what most people are using, they represent what Web developers and other technically inclined people are using. Think about who visits www.w3schools.com.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
So post stats from somewhere else. At least I left a reference, as opposed to the parent which didn't leave a reference.
And here's a question, how many bots ID themselves as IE?
http://www.realmeme.com/roller/page/realmeme?entry =the_traffic_generator [realmeme.com]
--
BMO
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Let me think... might the low number of Linux visits probably be related to the bad Linux support? You know, if it doesn't work for them, they're less likely to return for another visit? Those circular causation chains are a bitch, aren't they?
Sure, Linux is small. But it's not exactly as if nobody would use it. For example, I dare to say that there are more Linux users on the Internet than blind users. Yet a lot of effort is made, especially on government s
Re:looking at it from their perspecive (Score:4, Informative)
Your numbers are suspect. According to the market research company IDC, 25% of servers and 2.8% of desktop computers ran Linux as of 2004. [wikipedia.org] This is consistent with the 3.3% share of web hits that w3schools measures as of last month.
Re: (Score:3)
Honestly, that's a strawman argument. It doesn't matter to anyone at all whether linux is supported.
What we want supported are OPEN BLOODY STANDARDS. In today's day and age it is inutterably stupid to lock oneself to a particular platform.
The viability of providing future access to information depends upon the use of open standards.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Eu translates all documents to 20 languages, including Latvian, Lithuanian, Estonian and Maltese. With 450 million people in EU and about 400 000 people speaking Maltese, we have EU caring for even 0.1% percent. Even the streaming service includes translations for those languages!
I don't really care about EU stre
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention, Firefox is vastly more popular than Netscape Navigator. Firefox should be first in the list to be supported by government organizations, because it is the most popular browser which is available for free, to everyone, on essentially every platform.
If the only browser
What next?... (Score:2)
Will not stand in the EU (Score:5, Insightful)
We will not have our legislation locked down in ways that force EU citicens to buy software from one specific vendor. FUCK YOU.
We like to think we're better than the US. Apperarently our legislators are also bought off. If you as an elected politician get your salary from Microsoft Corporation or Apple Computer inc, please report directly to me for your ticket to Baghdad and the Saddam Hussein rope massage. Thank you for your incompetent attempt at running a democracy, please don't come again.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you certainly sound as arrogant as the Americans.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And that is the crux of the argument. An elected government says, "we're using the a media format that is used by the most-popular operating system and Web browser." On the surface, that seems reasonable, in that they're makeing the information available to most of the viewing audience. It also satisfies the politician's need to appear even-handed. Unfortunately, it makes that same data virtually
Haha (Score:5, Insightful)
Great work... (Score:5, Insightful)
Players already exist (Score:2)
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/keepstreami
I'm watching wmv video right now... (Score:4, Insightful)
Is watching it online a Privilege or a Right? (Score:4, Interesting)
Nevertheless, the number of people using Linux--and probably MacOS as well--pales in comparison to those who do not have a computer at all. (or hispeed internet, or a fast enough machine, etc.)
Assuming the CotEU is required to provide streaing video for those without Windows or MacOS, then who's to say they shouldn't have to make it available to those without a computer at all?
In my city (Ottawa, Canada), City Council meetings are open to the public. Anyone can go. Can't participate, but you can watch. You can also watch Council meetings on the local Cable channel (which means you have to purchase cable from Rogers--and this has been the case for decades without public outcry) You can also watch online. I think they use a RealMedia format.
If you don't have a computer (or cable TV) at home, there are computer terminals at all the public library branches and at many community centres. Assuming the City has a right to make these meetings available for live viewing to all citizens (which, really, is covered by letting any citizen attend meetings in person) then they have done so by making these computer terminals available at local libraries. Not incidentally, this would also cover off the Linux-using population in the case of the CotEU.
If your computer cannot access the stream (because it can't run on Linux, or is too old, or your internet connection isn't fast enough), then you can go to one of these places to view it. Or, if you want equality, the Council can stop streaming online, and everyone will be unable to watch it.
- RG>
It works FINE in VLC (Score:2)
I had to dig out the URL form the "Page Info" in order to test it, but that's just user-interface issues, not codec ones.
Try it yourself with the current release of VLC:
vlc mms://ceu.streampower.be/ceu/archive/CEU_PRESS_CO
The EU does not have software patents (yet, at least) so there should be no legal issues with using VLC to decode this stream.
We need to get our story straight... (Score:4, Insightful)
But whenever we see some site choose to make new content available in those very same Windows formats, many of the same people who were telling potential new users that all these things were easy on Linux suddenly switch and say that Linux users are locked out.
If we want to get people to use Linux, we have to get our story straight as to what Linux can do!
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Not at all. Linux users can play WMV video and audio. As of a few months ago, you don't even need the binary codec DLLs or an x86 system for the large majority of WMV video and audio formats.
The reason that's not openly supported by organizations, of course, is the patent licensing fees, which prevent most distros from including programs like MPlayer
Oh the noes. (Score:3, Interesting)
Irony of hammering m$ and then requiring it. (Score:3, Interesting)
Then they say it is is required to play the video.
If you are really concerned about this ... (Score:3, Informative)
Send a protest by email, or better yet, written letter to them: streaming.helpline@consilium.europa.eu (technical) or Public.info@consilium.europa.eu (organizational),
Council of the European Union
Rue de la Loi, 175 B-1048 Bruxelles
Telephone (32-2) 281 61 11
Fax (32-2) 281 69 99
Contact your local/national members of the european parliament or even better, members of the council directly.
Microsoft and related industries has a lot of well paid lobbyists at the EU, open source advocates and private people who just want to use Linux as an alternative have nothing.
Make some pressure.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The community is not even really asking for *support*; merely to not be explicitly suppressed.
I have a banking site that I must use, which uses the user agent to decide who may and who may not use the web site to pay their bills.
I do not want "support" for my browser, I just want them to stop purposely trying to prevent me from using it. They do *more* work to try