SuSE Linux 9.3 Professional Review at Mad Penguin 35
llywelynelysium writes "Mad Penguin has an excellent review of the upcoming SuSE 9.3 Professional release. The review is mostly positive, commenting on SUSE's improved speed, improved Gnome suppport, inclusion of Xen, and interestingly, the use of Firefox as the default browser. On the other hand, the review states that Novell has futher crippled the multimedia capabilities of their distribution by removing MP3 playback support. SUSE scores three stars in the end."
No MP3? (Score:2)
And from Novell's page: WTF? Using WMA? Or using files the computer can't play without an iPod?
Re:No MP3? (Score:3, Informative)
Of course all easily remedied, but an annoyance all the same.
Will end up being like DVD playback. Not included but you can to get it.
Re:No MP3? (Score:2)
For most people, XMMS is a single-purpose application!
YOU Fixes MP3 Issues (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?showtopic=1308 6 [suseforums.net]
YOU already has fixes to the kdemultimediapackage that corrects the MP3 problems. I don't know why they'd cripple MP3 support to begin with, but it's nice they fixed things so quickly.
Re:YOU Fixes MP3 Issues (Score:5, Informative)
http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2005-A
The real thing is that they're not including MP3 support by default due to possible legal conflicts, namely software patents
further crippled? (Score:1)
Re:further crippled? (Score:4, Informative)
mpeg4 and DVD playback
xmms (Score:1)
And btw who uses mp3s anymore? Ogg Vorbis beats mp3 hands down \o/
Ogg is free, (supported by xmms), patentless and offers better compression (or what ever you call it) than mp3.
Re:xmms (Score:3, Informative)
Lots and lots of people. MP3 is pretty much a de facto standard for digital music files. Do a search on eMule or any other file-sharing service. Most of the music you'll find in those services is MP3. MP3 has become the word in the mainstream to describe music files, or is at least the one format most commonly associated with them. OGG may be a better technology, but that doesn't take away from the fact that MP3 is more or less another word for "digital music" for years now
Re:xmms (Score:1)
Re:xmms (Score:1)
Ogg Vorbis Players (Score:2)
Full List [xiph.org]
Re:Ogg Vorbis Players (Score:2)
ok sarcasm off...
I wasn't aware that many portable players were supporting it... good to know.
But for me the issue is needing an in-dash car stereo that supports it...
Re:Ogg Vorbis Players (Score:2)
Re:xmms (Score:2)
Portable digital music players play Ogg Vorbis. (Score:2)
Check out http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/PortablePlayers [xiph.org] for a wiki page on portable digital audio players that play Ogg Vorbis files.
Re:xmms (Score:3, Informative)
Oh, yes, and hundreds of portable devices support it, also. Not to mention the huge existing filebase, right?
BTW, I think you mean Ogg Vorbis [xiph.org]. Ogg [xiph.org] is a file format, and within it, just for audio, there's Vorbis, Speex [speex.org], and FLAC [sourceforge.net] support, etc. Ogg also does video, using Theora [theora.org], among others. Vorbis is likely the most popular audio codec using Ogg. However, Vorbis is lossy, so it makes no sense t
Ogg Vorbis is better than MP3 in many ways. (Score:3, Insightful)
The review fails to convey any comprehension of why MP3 support is missing in the most widely-used GNU/Linux distributions ("I confess to not knowing all of the specifics regarding the legalities of MP3 playback [...]")? This point was apparently important enough to the reviewer to lower the overall score of SUSE and recommend installing the proprietary RealPlayer software (turning what might otherwise be a free software system into something far less trustworthy, sharable, and inspectable).
What is impre
Re:Ogg Vorbis is better than MP3 in many ways. (Score:2)
Re:Ogg Vorbis is better than MP3 in many ways. (Score:4, Informative)
The algorithms used to make and decode MP3s are patented by Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (licenses are paid through Thomson). Thus, in countries which observe software patents (such as the US), any implementation of those algorithms cannot be legally distributed without paying a patent license fee. Fraunhofer and Thomson claim that the relevant patents apply in many countries besides the US [mp3licensing.com] (warning: this page lists patents you might not wish to become familiar with). The patent holder determines what the fee is and they can change the fee at any time or refuse to issue a license to a particular would-be licensee. Most patent holding corporations tie the license fee to the number of copies of programs distributed (which means such payment schemes are incompatible with free software).
mp3licensing.com [mp3licensing.com], the site which lists the license schedule, lists a one-time payment for the MP3 decoder (between US$50,000 and US$60,000), but as far as I know, nobody has paid that fee. The encoder has no one-time fee, and thus cannot be legally distributed as free software in countries where software patents exist.
I suspect that in some years when these patents have expired, there will be a lot of GNU/Linux distributions picking up support to make and play MP3 files. Ogg Vorbis will still be a better option on technical grounds, however. If you're encoding human spoken voice, consider Speex [speex.org] with or without the Ogg container. I'm very impressed with what it can do in such a small file.
Re:Ogg Vorbis is better than MP3 in many ways. (Score:2)
Re:Ogg Vorbis is better than MP3 in many ways. (Score:1)
Note that mp3 playback is actually NOT crippled since RealPlayer 10 is included (I know, I know, no flames pl
Re:xmms (Score:2)
Re:xmms (Score:1)
ANSWER - A lot of people. According to a quick google search, VHS players still outnumber DVD players in households 4 to 1.
Removed MP3 as well? (Score:3, Insightful)
Growl. Oh well, guess I won't be bothering with that upgrade then.
It's bad enough that they crippled Kaffine/Xine in 9.2 -- You can't even download and install the missing libs; they've blocked them from within the software - if you really want to play DVDs in 9.2, you have to remove Xine and install a non-crippled version from elsewhere, and then install the missing libs as well. Way too much hassle to be worth the effort for a home user. But I don't mind. I can watch DVDs without SuSE's help. MP3s are different - I play music all the time on my computer, so if MP3 playing is crippled in the same way in 9.3, I certainly won't be upgrading, no matter how good the new KDE sounds.
Re:Removed MP3 as well? (Score:2, Insightful)
This matters not at all to me... (Score:2)
MP3 support is almost a non-issue if I'm doing something serious like serving files, doing a network border gateway, etc. If I was using it for my desktop then I'd be ticked. If it would run on my desktop without another $500 worth of R
I'm running the RC... (Score:3, Informative)
The only rough spot was x would hang if I logged out the user. I could kill x with a cntr-alt-back, but the system would not nicely shut down. A minor nitpick was a fairly normal install without openoffice (would grab that and a few others fresh from the net) still required five bloody CD's to install. How hard is it to arrange a CD to have all the required packages on the first one or two iso images?
The MP3 thing pisses me off. I installed it on a spare drive since it was still a RC, so only tested a handful of apps. Rational's IDE has issues, but it looks like I can fix the scripts. Had it been a real install, I'd be a lot angry to find what looks like a sound card issue was a malformed player.
Summary (Score:2, Informative)
* Linux kernel 2.6.11.4
* GCC 3.3.5/glibc 2.3.4
* Xorg 6.8.2
* GNOME 2.10
* KDE 3.4
* OpenOffice.org 2.0 PR
* Xen 2.0.5c-4 virtualization software
* Firefox 1.0.1
* Beagle desktop search
* F-Spot 0.0.12 image manager
* NetApplet network connection manager
* RealPlayer 10
* Adobe Acrobat 7
>Relatively new 03/16/2005 Linux kernel 2.6.11.4
>Quite disappointed with (old) GCC not much use if you have a Pentium-M notebook
>X.org new February 9,
Re:Summary (Score:1)
I've noti
What about the jukebox programs? (Score:3, Interesting)
The review may be excellent... (Score:2, Interesting)
This one is good: Installation is probably the hardest thing to cover in a Linux review. I mean, what can you really say about it? It either did the trick or it didn't.
First the guy says it's hard to cover. Then he goes on to compare it to one of two simple choices. Make up your mind, partner. Anyway, I'd rather not clutter up my rant with anything else on-topic.
Let me disclose that Suse is the only Linux distro that I really can't stand. I gave it a fair shot (
Where to get software not on the CDs? (Score:2, Informative)
Check out the bottom of the this screenshot in the taskbar:
http://madpenguin.org/images/reviews/suse93/help.
and you can see the reviewer has been browsing the alt.binaries.warez.linux news groups while writing the review!
Good review though
Review has been updated (Score:1)