ARM Linux And Russell King Interview 37
Jeremy Andrews writes: "Kerneltrap has posted the latest in-depth kernel hacker interview with Russell King, who originally ported Linux to ARM and continues to oversee ARM Linux development. Russell talks about ARM, the 2.4 kernel, the upcoming 2.5 kernel and much more..."
ARM linux? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:ARM linux? (Score:3, Insightful)
erm, correct me if i'm wrong, but there's nothing that stops Linux people from taking code from the *BSDs.
there is, however, something that stops *BSD people from taking code from Linux and putting it in their kernels - the GPL.
*BSD people don't want kernels that can't run without GPL code.
Linux people can always take *BSD code and smack a GPL on top of the BSD license.
seems to me like Russell King has misunderstood something.
please don't tack flamebait onto my story (Score:1)
Re:please don't tack flamebait onto my story (Score:3, Insightful)
He didn't tack flamebait onto your story. He's 100% correct.
Re:ARM linux? (Score:2)
They were discussing this week ago on the lkml but www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/ is down right now so I can't find the link.
It was in a thread about module_licenses.
Re:ARM linux? (Score:2, Informative)
If you take some BSD code and GPL it, you must be pretty damn sure that it's not patented code. Not many people want to take that bet.
grain of salt (Score:1, Flamebait)
banned compaq research lab from posting any kernel patchs for Ipaq to him
will not upgrade his gcc so makefiles from kbuild wont work
and lots of other little things
personally I have liked the work done by NP on the ARM linux kernel
regards
john jones
Re:grain of salt (Score:1)
del ta'ic or del'tic adj.
So what does a river delta have to do with your bad spelling?
Dinivin
Re:grain of salt (Score:1)
You should get your facts right.
Compaq Research Labs is not and never was banned from posting patches to him. If you look at rmk's latest patches you will see that he merged quite some Ipaq specific stuff.
I know what you're talking about: a year ago there was a flamewar going on about the SA1100 serial drivers between Russell and Compaq's George France. Both are pretty strong characters, and at a certain point Russell posted that he would put CRL in his personal killfile. At that point I stepped in and stopped the flamewar.
The serial driver stuff is pretty much resolved right now, it even had a positive ending: the serial drivers in linux-2.5 will almost certainly be based on the ideas that arose after this accident.
Your gcc remark is also not true. If you look up the "possible compiler bug" thread in the linux-arm mailing list archive [linux.org.uk], you can read that he uses Red Hat's gcc-2.96-80 to compile kernels.
I'm glad you like Nicolas Pitre's work, but as you might now Nico only maintains the SA-11x0 port (and works on the XScale). Russell maintains the complete ARM Linux tree, so as you can see Russell and Nico have to work pretty close together. They also pretty much agree on the linux-arm* mailing lists
The good news for you is that Russell integrated quite a large amount of Nico's patch in his latest kernels. See rmk's changelog [linux.org.uk].
arm / garmin etrex venture (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:arm / garmin etrex venture (Score:2, Informative)
The Future is Small (Score:1)
Maybe kernel hackers could recalibrate their ideas of what's glamorous to work on and enduser Linux might tale off, thereby securing the future of Linux server side...
My