Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Linux Software

Slackware Linux 8.0 Reviewed 66

lotion writes: "When the Slackware Linux project was cut loose from its parent company in April many devoted users wondered if the project would continue. Patrick Volkerding vowed it would. Despite the upheaval that accompanied what amounted to corporate abandonment, Volkerding and the team made good on that promise. On June 28, 2001, Slackware Linux Release 8.0 was made available. The full review is here at Maximumlinux.org."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Slackware Linux Release 8.0 Review

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    dude you can get a s/390 for 40 bucks on e bay
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Yeah, the problem with Slackware is that you actually end up learning UNIX. The user actually have to take control. Pretty scary stuff for a confused mind. And yup, the text-base installer doesn't give you the option of playing Tetris during the install. It's so backward, you actually have to do some thinking.

    Also the package system is made of simple shell scripts. The BSD style init scripts are simpler to understand and modify than the other Linux distros. You can actually see how things works. It is very difficult to use Slackware without learning something.

    This is why I think Slackware should be ban. In fact I'm surprised that the DMCA did not explicitely ban the use of such distros. I guess nobody tipped the FBI about this.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Slashdot's gone cold I'm wondering why I got out of bed at all
    The morning rain clouds up my window and I can't see at all
    And even if I could it'll all be gray but your picture on my wall
    It reminds me, that it's not so bad -- it's not so bad

    Dear Rob, I wrote but you still ain't callin
    I left my email, my ICQ, and my yahoo chat at the bottom
    I sent two emails back in autumn, you must not-a got 'em
    There probably was a problem with your sendmail or somethin
    Sometimes I scribble email addees too sloppy when I jot 'em
    but anyways; fsck it, what's been up? Man how's your boxes?
    My boxes is linux too, I'm bout to be a compiler
    once I learn gcc,
    I'ma compile for miles ah
    I read about your Palm Pilot too I'm sorry
    I had a friend lose his Palm over at the airport in Maradonna
    I know you probably hear this everyday, but I'm your biggest fan
    I even read all your bullshit Linux news and BSD scams
    I got a room full of your posters and your pictures man
    I like the way you sold your ass too that shit was fat
    Anyways, I hope you get this man, hit me back,
    just to chat, truly yours, your biggest fan
    This is Stan

    Dear Rob, you still ain't called or wrote, I hope you have a chance
    I ain't mad - I just think it's FUCKED UP you don't answer fans
    If you didn't wanna talk to me outside your Linux World
    you didn't have to, but you coulda signed an autograph for Matthew
    That's my Senior sys admin he's only 26 years old
    We waited on a 9600 baud for you,
    four hours and you just said, "No."
    That's pretty shitty man - you're like his fsckin idol
    He wants to be just like you man, he likes you more than I do
    I ain't that mad though, I just don't like bein lied to
    Remember when we met in Boston - you said if I'd write you
    you would write back - see I'm just like you in a way
    I never had a clue about shit either
    I gcc'd shit with my wife then beat her
    I can relate to what you're saying in your page
    so when I feel like rmusering I read Slashdot to being the rage
    cause I don't really got shit else so that shit helps when I'm depressed
    I even got a tattoo of slashdot across the chest
    Sometimes I even packet myself to see how much it floods
    It's like adrenaline, the DDoS is such a sudden rush of blood
    See everything you say is real, and I respect you cause you tell it
    My girlfriend's jealous cause I talk about you 24/7
    But she don't know you like I know you Rob, no one does
    She don't know what it was like for people like us growin up
    You gotta call me man, I'll be the biggest fan you'll ever lose
    Sincerely yours, Stan -- P.S.
    We should be together too

    Dear Mister-I'm-Too-Good-To-Call-Or-Write-My-Fans,
    this'll be the last packet I ever send your ass
    It's been six months and still no word - I don't deserve it?
    I know you got my last two emails
    I wrote the @ signs on 'em perfect
    So this is my payload I'm sending you, I hope you hear it
    I'm on my modem now, I'm doing 9600 on the infohiway
    Hey Rob, I drank a fifth of vodka, you dare me to code?
    You know the song by Deep Purple by Depache Mode
    its irrelevant by playing on my linux player
    while I write some php scripts and play some Dragonslayer
    That's kinda how shit is, you coulda rescued me from drowning
    Now it's too late - I'm on a 1000 downloads now, I'm drowsy
    and all I wanted was a lousy letter or a call
    I hope you know I ripped +ALL+ of your pictures off the wall
    I love you Rob, we coulda been together, think about it
    You ruined it now, I hope you can't sleep and you dream about it
    And when you dream I hope you can't sleep and you SCREAM about it
    I hope your conscience EATS AT YOU and you can't BREATHE without me
    See Rob {*screaming*} Shut up bitch! I'm tryin to page
    Hey Rob, that's my senior admin screamin in the cage
    but I didn't cut the power off, I just rebooted, see I ain't like you
  • by Anonymous Coward
    >slackware sucks

    have you used it lately? you couldnt be further from the truth.

    >You all are still in denial

    you are a moron, we dont hold that against you.

    >Slackware is a dying distro.

    just because it was the first distro, just because its the most stable, secure, and unix-like, its dying?

    >how many ISPs/Companies are going to trust a distro named "Slack"ware.
    at least two which i've worked at, and are extremely happy, any company who does research and doesnt stop at the marketese.
    >Poor choice of a name.
    Debian? RedHat? Slackware? i guess its a judgement call there, but i personally think RedHat is a worse name choice than slack, and they too are quite successful.

    and to that last bit of drivel... If you're a windows user in denial, or a person who doesnt have enough brain cells to use a fork but still wants to be a 'hip geek' go with mandrake. if you raise that iq bar by about 10pts putting you at about 80, by all means go RH or Deb. If you consider yourself intelligent, or wish to use a powerful, fully configurable OS which doesnt strive to be the next windows... Slackware is your best choice. You will learn more about unix without effort, you will come to appreciate the simplicity of things like SystemV init scripts, and you wont make an ass out of yourself by trolling slashdot with such empty bullshit as this person has done.

    this has been a public service announcement paid for by the anti-troll assoc. and slashdot members against FUD
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Slackware needs some method of keeping current. On a stable debian box with updates pointed at security.debian.org a nightly (or hourly!) call to apt-get update; apt-get upgrade (with appropriate flags to resolve prompts you might be given during the package upgrade) will assure that you have the latest security patches applied. BSD has make World, redhat has up2date, mandrake has urpm... these are all inferior, but fine alternatives. Even microsoft has windowsupdate (which was also subjected to defacement the other day ha!) and various unattended install methods which come with the OS.

    This is one of the major reasons why I use Slackware instead of those other distros. I don't want an auto-updater. I prefer to admin my own machine, thank you very much, and I want to know exactly what I'm installing and why.

    Red Hat needs an automated tool. It's held together by a inconsistent patchwork of Python and shell scripts. To configure anything yourself you usually need to reverse engineer a script or two, which is a PITA. Don't even get me started about how many times I've been let down by the install/uninstall scripting and dependency checking in RPM. Running Red Hat, you really need to use up2date or Red Carpet, otherwise you'll be banging your head against thw wall in frustration.

    Instead of the hot glue, duct tape & bailing wire approach of Red Hat, a Slackware system holds together because it uses old fashioned, no-nonsense text config files, it places things right where a UNIX veteran expects, and it takes advantage of the file system to organize things. Any person who has administered a major commercial UNIX or BSD will feel right at home in Slackware, and utterly confused in most other distros.

    Slackware takes the KISS approach and makes it work.

  • by farrellj ( 563 )
    Back in the old days, we had to deal with *HOURLY* kernel releases! I mean, you had *DAYS* to savour the system before recompiling!

    ttyl
    Farrell
  • Well, I did start back in the kernel v0.12 days, when there was just a boot and a root disk...and when we got hard drive support, manually installing things...SLS was nice, but then I switched to Slackware (for religious reasons), I haven't changed yet. I've tried lots of different distros, and try and have a Red Hat version running just to keep up with that distro, since it is popular...but besides Slackware, the only other distro I use regularly is Tom's Ultimate Boot/Root disk...it's a lifesaver when you are a consultant...being able to walk in in and just boot it, and fix whatever people have screwed up.

    Slackware and Toms, both keeping the heart of the Linux movement alive.

    ttyl
    Farrell
    (what? I'm sentimental?)
  • Always remember that 'fdisk /mbr' using Microsoft's fdisk writes a perfectly valid DOS bootloader to the mbr.
  • Yeah, well, either that or somebody in a mask about to throw what may or may not have only been a fire extinguisher at the police. Sounds like a Darwin award to me.
  • It never was supported... It's being discontinued by David :(. He's going back to Georgia Tech to finish his degree. A few of us on the message board are going to continue it as a community project though.

    We had to change the name so it wasn't copyright infringement.
    www.splack.org
    splack.sourceforge.net

    We want to bring it up to Slackware 8.0 quality and then release it.

    I hacked on the TFTP configure scripts yesterday... It's coming along.
  • Bravo! Quality work troll! What's really freaky is 'Stan' was playing when I started to read your comment, heh.

  • LI is a very specific error. Most times it is simply a geometry mismatch. All you needed to do is visit your bios and change the way it looks at your hard drive. LBA vs Normal etc. Make the simple change - restart and problem solved.

    _.|..
  • by HiThere ( 15173 ) <charleshixsn@@@earthlink...net> on Saturday July 21, 2001 @11:25AM (#70463)
    There are some problems, but it's been a few years since I've needed to install Windows because of an mbr mixup. Partitions, now, that's a bit trickier...

    If you are using Mandrake, then the problem may not be with LILO. Mandrake 8 turned out to be incompatible with my Gateway E4300 as work... overwrote the SCSI drivers in bios. A boot disk appeared to work for a few boot cycles, but corruption recurred. (Fix: fdisk /mbr, powerdown, remove SCSI card, power up, setup bios, tell it to clear itself, reboot, reboot, power down, reinsert SCSI card, reboot to OS). After a few cycles I went to Red Hat 7.1, which was without problem, as had been Mandrake 7.2 (though that had required that I remove the LBA32 switch on the LILO setup).

    I'm seriously thinking of looking into some old Linload documents, though. What with my number of partitions, and my multiple disks, nobody can get lilo to fit into the MBR anymore, and even with three boot disks, I don't feel comfortable about depending of floppies. (Besides, it's slow and clumsy.)

    Grub might be an answer, I have a bad feeling about it, but I only tried it in the context of Mandrake (see above), so perhaps the problem wasn't with Grub at all.

    Caution: Now approaching the (technological) singularity.
  • I have used fdisk /mbr before numerous times. It works. It's not a documented option because back in the early 90's when many BIOSs didn't support LBA addressing, people used these things called disk managers that replaced some BIOS functions on bootup. Disk managers loaded from the MBR so, if you did an fdisk /mbr, you wiped out your disk manager and the drive geometry. Oops. Boot block viruses were also a real pain with those disk managers.
    However, if he didn't have a Linux boot disk, he probably didn't have a Windows one either :-)
  • Everyone here has made some excellent points. From the source of the defacement (a bad webpage script) to a nice little package called "autoslack". I wish the moderators had enough brains to mod up some replies to my post.

    Updating your software to be the "latest and greatest(?)" is ALWAYS a bad idea! I'm not proposing that, what I'm pointing out is the NEED for automated security updates.

    I do run update/upgrade on my debian unstable box at home every night, and every few days I have to check out what's broken and see if I can submit a bug report. I have a few other servers which use stable which if you knew much about debian, is mostly feature frozen. Debian has a rigorous packaging standard and a great QC division. I'm fairly confident that packages coming out of the pool are good enough for a power user. Packages in the stable distribution have gone through many iterations and integration testing. Security updates applied in haste may not have the same level of testing, but I'd much rather have exploits corrected than wait for complete integration testing.
  • I encourage you to look at debian. There are standards (like the placement of configfiles in /etc/$PKGNAME/*, and documentation /usr/share/doc/$PKGNAME/*, and man pages for almost all commands, which redhat sux at) that make debian much better than the sum of its parts.

    Finally I'm not talking about a daily BIND update, but security updates on the stable version of your distribution (for redhat this would be 6.2, slackware 7.whatever).

    Spend some time reading up on system security... what do all these guys the pundits interview say? Keeping current to the security flaws in your system is more than a full time job. You cannot at the same time as you add users, change passwords, bail users out (oops, I deleted that file! oh I screwed up and mailed out HR info to EVERYONE! oops, I wasted the website... etc etc...) keep up to speed on the security issues reguarding every element of every system you control.

    If you plan on using a UNIX of professional quality, then you rely on the individuals integrating and packaging your software to

    Can you make the state of each piece of software on your system your full time job? If not, remember that there is a hacker who can. Your box is theirs for the taking.
  • by TeknoDragon ( 17295 ) on Saturday July 21, 2001 @09:14AM (#70467) Journal
    I'm not certain about your security argument. Sometime last week slackware.org was defaced. The phrase "Not only windows can be hacked." or some misspelling thereof (sorry, didn't grab it) appeared on their site.

    Slackware needs some method of keeping current. On a stable debian box with updates pointed at security.debian.org a nightly (or hourly!) call to apt-get update; apt-get upgrade (with appropriate flags to resolve prompts you might be given during the package upgrade) will assure that you have the latest security patches applied. BSD has make World, redhat has up2date, mandrake has urpm... these are all inferior, but fine alternatives. Even microsoft has windowsupdate (which was also subjected to defacement the other day ha!) and various unattended install methods which come with the OS.

    How can you do this in slackware?
  • Just because a peice of software is up to date does not mean it is foolproof. There are always holes in any system. These holes don't always have to be software related either they can be, and usualy are user related ie someone made a password something stupid that is easy to guess. And really do you want bleeding edge updates, sometimes they are worse, buggie bigger holes ect, than the previous version. And also I would like to know just exactly what and why all the software on my servers are being replaced. I don't want some automated script to just keep getting the latest and greatest(?) patch with out my consent.
  • What??? So every local user can take snapshots of my desktop???

    You're opening up a pretty big security hole there.
  • Multiprise 2000 Model 257(ESO) - Enterprise System Server

    Typical Cost $2.7 million

    IBM Hardware

    S/390 System Configuration
    4 GB ECC Memory
    576 GB DASD
    (60) Channels
    (6) OSA/2
    (1) Internal Battery

  • by WyldOne ( 29955 ) on Saturday July 21, 2001 @07:51AM (#70471) Homepage
    Saw this in the docs and mentioned it to a guy from my W2k class (Yeah I know!!!! - not my choice, I like to eat) Just loved that shocked look on his face. His comment was "What? is that a $100,000 machine?" To which I grinned evilly and said "No, multimilion dollar big Iron from IBM." BWwaaa, Ha Ha!!!! His reaction was priceless! Ain't I a stinker?

    So now it's:
    $0 - Slackware O/S
    $5,000,000 for a machine to run it on (S/390)
    Priceless - the reaction of all those ego-centric Windows people
  • (1) Internal Battery

    only one? Cheap bastards.
  • that was the text from the review. i didnt mean to misrepresent it as my own. i havent used slackware since '95.

    use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that
  • by gimpboy ( 34912 ) <john,m,harrold&gmail,com> on Saturday July 21, 2001 @07:50AM (#70474) Homepage


    When the Slackware Linux project was cut loose from its parent company in April many devoted users wondered if the project would continue. Patrick Volkerding vowed it would. Despite the upheaval that accompanied what amounted to corporate abandonment, Volkerding and the team made good on that promise. On June 28, 2001, Slackware Linux Release 8.0 was made available. It is a very current distribution in terms of most of the component versions. Both kernels 2.4.5 and 2.2.19, glibc 2.2.3, KDE 2.1.2, Gnome 1.4, XFree86 4.1.0, and Samba 2.2 are among the major items. Two retail packaged versions will soon be available; one with and the other without the companion book, Slackware Essentials, for $39.99 and $49.99, respectively. The downloadable version on which this review is based comprises three CD's in ISO format.

    The first is a bootable install CD. For those whose systems are incapable of booting to a CD-ROM device, floppy bootdisk images and utilities are included. The second CD contains extra packages including additional window managers, ham radio packages such as the excellent F6FBB packet radio BBS, a mirror of the Slackware online book, Linux HOW-TO's, FAQ's, and Zipslack which allows installation of a small installation of Slackware on a DOS partition or Zip disk. The third CD contains the sources.

    For puposes of this review I installed Slackware 8.0 on a freshly wiped hard drive. The hardware configuration can be viewed here.

    The setup utility is text based, which seems like an anachronism in these days of fancy graphical installers. Potential users should not be put off because the utility is very easy to use and walks you through each step. The install disk includes fdisk and the excellent menu driven cfdisk for drive partitioning. If the drive is not already partitioned, the setup utility exits to a command prompt where the partitioning software must be run. Once complete, typing setup at the prompt puts you back into the setup utility where you select the partitions, select the mount points, and format them.

    Setup asks for the source from which the packages will be installed, which seems a little strange since the installation was booted from the CD.

    Once the source is selected setup then asks for the type of installation and groups of packages. Selecting the default installation types (such as "full") will install kernel 2.2.19 as the default kernel. If you intend to use kernel 2.4.5 or have a SCSI based system there are special considerations which are only vaguely touched upon in the documentation. If that's what you want go here for a little help.

    Once setup is finished installing packages it will ask if you want to configure LILO, a modem, basic networking (it correctly identified and installed the module for my Realtek 8139 based NIC), and finally prompt the user to press Ctrl-Alt-Delete to restart the system.

    Slackware 8.0 does not use a graphical login manager. Login is done through the console, though users may manually configure a graphical login manager should they desire. After login entering startx at the prompt will invoke the GUI. The default is KDE which was fine with me since I like KDE. This is easily changed (go here for how) for those who prefer something else.

    It did not install the driver modules for my soundcard requiring me to manually edit one configuration file. (Go here to read what worked for me.)

    I consider my user experience level with Linux to be somewhere shy of intermediate. But I remember installing Slackware Linux several years ago from floppy disks whose images took several hours to download over the blazing fast 14.4kbps connection I was using at the time. I did it on encouragement from a friend who suggested it would be easy. At the time it wasn't. It took me over two weeks before I got everything to work right. How things have changed.
  • >slackware sucks
    have you used it lately? you couldnt be further from the truth.

    I agree with AC, after enduring Redhat and Debian, I found Slackware to be "just right". Debian, for instance, is truly annoying with the million question gauntlet...

    just because it was the first distro...
    Hmmm. Are you sure? My first Linux experience was with SLS .99p6 in 1993, and I don't recall Slackware being available back then. I could be wrong, though :-)

    (Troll writes:)
    >Poor choice of a name


    How about MicroSoft? Small and limp... Yep, that's a good name.


    this has been a public service announcement paid for by the anti-troll assoc. and slashdot members against FUD

    Go, get 'em tiger!
  • by nitehorse ( 58425 ) <clee@c133.org> on Saturday July 21, 2001 @09:19AM (#70476)
    one word:

    autoslack.

    (see freshmeat.net for details. :)
  • by Snard ( 61584 )
    ... however, if you get the NI error, then it means you must bring your computer... a shrubbery!
  • I have been a slack user for about 3 years and I am VERY happy that Partick and comapny kept the project going. Slackare is a great choice for a server distro. I think that a bit to much was included in the 8.0 distro but it is an excellent project and I hope it continues for a LONG time!
  • by Inoshiro ( 71693 ) on Saturday July 21, 2001 @02:24PM (#70479) Homepage
    "Slackware needs some method of keeping current."

    Slackware Linux is not meant to be opperated "bare." The reccomended security configuration includes an in incredible A.I. system abbreviated as "S.Y.S.O.P." Through its amazing abilities, the S.Y.S.O.P. system monitors a steady feed of bug reports (the famed B.U.G.T.R.A.Q. system, first implemented in 1997 as an experiment in networking S.Y.S.O.P. systems over long distance, high latency networks in an asynchronus way) for information on what to do with the system. They will tirelessy maintain and care for you server installation, and can ever create whole new bits of software in the pursuit of their goals!

    While you Debian people may be happy to just blindly upgrade your BIND installation every few weeks, it has been found that through proper use of a S.Y.S.O.P. system, you can ditch the automated upgrades by moving to another DNS server altogether! These amazing devices will also help end users if they are clustered sufficiently to preventy burnout.

    An intelligient S.Y.S.O.P. -- no server should be without one!

    --
  • by rkent ( 73434 ) <rkent@post.ha r v a r d . edu> on Saturday July 21, 2001 @09:10AM (#70480)
    Well, that review won't load for me right now, so I'm going to shoot my mouth off before reading it. That's SOP around here, right? ;)

    Anyway, I installed slack 8 a couple nights ago, and my main concern is that I can't find any X server besides the frame buffer X server. Oh, excuse me, there's print-only as well. Anyway, the VESA framebuffer is nice to install with, although the slack 8 interface takes no advantage of it, BUT it's not really nice to keep running in VESA mode.

    Most of us have accellerated graphics cards, to say the least; do you really want to keep running that GeForce in VESA mode? I was told in the #slackware channel that one has to compile one's own X server for a particular card...? Now, I know slackware is a DIY distro, but this seems like a huge step backwards. I used to be able to plug in the precompiled mga driver for my Matrox card, but no longer by the looks of things.

    If anyone else can prove me wrong, I'd love it. I like lots of other things about slack, but I'd really rather not need to compile X just to get accelerated graphics performance.

    ---

  • a pretty large security hole on anything but a single user system such as mine.
  • you can put xhost +localhost in your .xinitrc script, and the export DISPLAY=... in you /etc/profile and that should take care of those problems (without having to play with xauth)
  • an unchecked exec() call allowed a minor defacement, not a hack. the integrity of the server was not compromised, some script kiddie just changed a web page. it was quickly fixed.

    and on your second point ... its called autoslack
  • So basically you're saying the price of the OS is irrelevant?
  • Slackware 8 is most definitely the best version yet... it kicks major ass. Go download (or purchase!) it today and try it out.
    -----
  • Whoah, you really took a wrong turn. All you need to do to fix a corrupted lilo is stick in your slackware install disk, reboot, type in the proper parameters at the boot prompt (for instance if your root partition is /dev/hdb1 the paramaters are "root=/dev/hdb1 ro",) boot up, type "lilo" at the prompt after boot, remove the install disk, and reboot.

    If the problem is bad hard drive geometry you can fix that in BIOS. You certainly didn't need to format or reinstall.


    "That old saw about the early bird just goes to show that the worm should have stayed in bed."
  • Silly silly person. Don't run X as root. Run X as user, when you need to do something as root, su in an xterm and start whatever you need running as root there.


    "That old saw about the early bird just goes to show that the worm should have stayed in bed."
  • by maligor ( 100107 ) on Saturday July 21, 2001 @09:19AM (#70488)
    You seem to have gotten stuck to the XFree86 3.x age. Slackware comes with XFree86 4.1 and from my experience there is only one server, and the specific drivers are libraries. The XFree86 default configuration in Slack8 is to use fbdev. To chege this edit /etc/X11/XF86Config and next time, RTFM.
  • why is the version without the "companion book" more expensive than the one without? Or is that just a misuse of the word respectively?
  • fdisk /mbr really screws up my win partition because of the western digital ezdrive software. my bios doesn't support > 1024 cyls..... time to upgrade i suppose.... :)
  • Though Slackware wasn't my first Linux distribution, it is still my favorite.

    It was a major improvement over Soft Landing Linux, and still remains the most UN*X-like Linux available. Like most of its strong userbase I was woo'd away with advanced and integrated package management and the inate simplicity provided by apt-get.

    I remember how broken was my spirit when Red Hat became the primary distribution on the Infomagic Linux CD kit.

  • I've been using Slack since kernel 2.0.29 and since then I've never had a problem with video performance.
    I just run xf86config (CLI I know..but it works) choose my video card by name and slack installs the correct driver. I then just startx and all is fine. I've used S3 Virge, Diamond FireGL 1000 Pro, Voodoo1 (pass-thru) and now Nvidia TNT2 Ultra. All worked right away. The only hitch is..if you want accelerated graphics with Nvidia, you must download nvidias' drivers, untar and type make..it installs itself. Then change then 'nv' in /etc/X/XF86Config to 'nvidia' and load the glx module. Works beautifully.
    I've tried Mandrake, RH, Caldera, Storm, Corel, and Suse distros and ALWAYS come back to Slack. Patrick does a wonderful job.
  • I think that's what he's doing, and wants to run an X app as root from an xterm.

    Why not put xhost +localhost in your .xinitrc, then set your DISPLAY in /root/.profile? Or if you su -m, you keep your environment, does that keep $DISPLAY?

  • http://www.kernal.org
    http://www.gnu.org

    Thank you.

    KFG
  • Just install 2.13 with --prefix=/usr/local/old and set PATH. Then upgrade to 2.52 with --prefix=/usr . 2.13 is still there, but in /pasture .
  • You can read it online at http://www.slackware.com/book/ .
  • It isn't.

    8.0 + the book = $49.95

    8.0 = $39.95

    The book = $19.95

  • Perhaps your arguments would be taken to heart better if you were to _back your statements up with examples_?! It's easy to go around blabbing about something with no factual information isn't it? But that gets you nowhere.
  • Slackware was my first Linux distro. It took me almost 3 days to download all the packages I wanted on my 33.6k modem, but it was well worth it.

    Now I have slackware 8.0 iso! Hurray! Hurray!

  • Here I am again, after having spent the whole night re-installing windows. I made the ultimate mistake of installing lilo on my master boot record.

    It's always fun to turn your computer on and see it say "LI" and stop responding. There's a lesson to be learned kids. Always use a boot disk.. unless of course all your floppies are 10 years old and don't work right anyhow.

  • slack 8 is great, i've been running it since prerelease, solid as a rock with 2.4.6 (yeah i know). i don't need a fancy installer as some people have been whining about, but if they wanna update it a little, i'm cool with that.

    my only complaint is that it shipped with autoconf 2.50, which is seriously broken and should not be used if want stuff to compile correctly. a good idea would be to get a previous version, rather than using the one that comes with it.

    --

  • Don't know what you're talking about, but my Slackware 8 CD contains XFree86 4.1.0 -- all of it -- and I am using it with accelerated 3D support (NVidia drivers) on my GeForce2 card.

    Perhaps you've taken a wrong turn somewhere?

    Whoever told you that you had to compile your own X server was likely playing with you because you seem to have taken a wrong turn somewhere. Honestly, XF86_SVGA is the one you want, and combine it with whichever one of the loadable drivers you prefer (XFree86 4 and later uses a loadable driver module system donated by MetroLink, IIRC).

    If you have an older card (many S3 cards, for example), you aren't supported under XFree86 anymore (as of release 4) and will have to stick to an XFree86 3.x distribution or downgrade before you can get accelerated graphics.
  • Also, if "fdisk /mbr" fails (like it did with me), you can "sys" your hard drive from a windows bootdisk. (sys c: a:, I think, you might want to check that first...) You do have a windows bootdisk, don't you? (It is a requirement if you are brave enough to run windows...)
  • heheh :)
  • ahem.. you dont have to reply to these posts you know :p stop feeding the trolls
  • What? You haven't tried Debian?
  • Slackware.org was hacked due to some new php scipting that went unchecked, not a vunrability in the OS.
  • by Eric Destiny ( 255168 ) on Saturday July 21, 2001 @07:46AM (#70508)
    Inoshiro's review [kuro5hin.org] on K5 [kuro5hin.org]

    "I am a man, and men are
    animals who tell stories."

  • I got my ATi Rage 128 AGP card up and running by merly re-compiling the kernel with AGP support, and removing the #'s infront of "Load "GLX"" "Load "DRM"" in /etc/X11/Xf86Config
    :)
  • First, www.slackware.com is running slackware.
    The main ftp is currently hosted at sourceforge which is running debian.

    Regarding that screenshot, they didn't really "hack" the slackware webserver, and it's not because it's running slackware. Chris from the Slackware core team already commented that is was a "sloppily written" script in their website. [slackware.com]

  • The ability of a community to keep a great project going despite adverse circumstances is one of the things I love about open source and the community around it.
    ---------
    -King Arthur "One, two, FIVE!"
    -Dude with coconuts "Three, sir."
  • I'm getting fed up with "reviews" that only talk about installing the system. Yeah, OK, Slack doesn't have a graphical installation, and you may be asked to compile some things yourself, or edit some config files by hand. Right.

    But... I don't know about you, but I tend to install an OS *once* (and usually, because I have never met an OS that installed exactly as I want, devote an afternoon to it) and use it *every day*.

    Reviewers... install the OS. Play with it. Use it as you would use your normal environment, at work and at home, for a couple of weeks. Then tell us your gut feeling.

    Typical use cases:

    - at work. I want a quickly-setup, rock-solid system that I can forget about to get on with the task at hand and earn my salary. Setting up extra services and altering the configuration must be very fast, no-nonsense.

    - at home / play. I want a fun distribution which I can spend hours trying to discover. Stability isn't that crucial since I switch off my computer every day (hey, it's a laptop which I lug around everywhere I go). "Cleanliness" is very important since I want to be able to install and remove new gizmos (often in alpha or pre-alpha versions, often requiring newer versions of libraries, often before a .rpm exists) at a whim.

    How does Slack cater for either of these needs? I haven't read that in the review. I am severly disappointed.

    Sylvain.

  • 19 July 2001: Compiled kernel 2.4.6
    21 July 2001: Compiled kernel 2.4.7
    22 July 2001: Installed Slackware 8.0
    23 July 2001: Recompiled kernel 2.4.7
    25 July 2001: Compiled kernel 2.4.8
    27 July 2001: Installed Redhat 8.0
    28 July 2001: Recompiled kernel 2.4.8
    31 July 2001: Installed Slackware 8.1
    2 August 2001: Compile kernel 2.4.9 etc...

    Sure it's fun being a 1337 linux user.
  • Damn it... I wish I had logged in when I posted that..

    I'm a karma whore and now I see where it has gotten me...

    XDFGF

    My life sucks
  • Oh. ive had horror stories with lilo and my mbr... but fixed when spent nights and days with no sleep or food only computer

    ill save the stories.. but ill let you use your imagination.. windows and linux in same hd (differnt partitions) ... and to see them fight, wine and bicker to each other is not good when all i wanna do is make either one start... was rough

    now the lesson part of this post...

    i had installed win2k (ntfs) on a hd... i then installed debian linux on another hd.. problem was i didn't want to write lilo on my MBR on my windows hd cause of previous experiences withthat....
    so i wanted my nix to be master and windows slave... this way linux can handle everything that delt with boot without touching the windows side. but since windows was alrady installed as master it didn't want to boot as slave (i guess it though.. "uh no boy! im no slave im a master!) again afriad to touch my windows side (it breaks so easy) someone (credit goes to andy (sheepdog))suggested tricking windows into thinking it was master. great i thought... but how... and here it was... just a few extra lines in lilo.conf and windows everything boots perfect!


    other = /dev/hdb1
    label = dos
    loader = /boot/chain.b
    map-drive = 0x80
    to = 0x81
    map-drive = 0x81
    to = 0x80
    table = /dev/hdb


    now that i think was beautiful.. to see those two guys get along....

    thanks you lilo for making this all possible... (now i have to link this to main post).... see lilo isn't that bad.. its good.. (done)

  • "Slackware's the best!" reply gets a score of 1, and "Its those damned slackers......" gets a score of 2. do we have an insider from Slackware moderating these posts?

    anywho, i say: kudos to Patrick for not commercializing his project and making it as great as it is for years for those damn hardcore linux user - like i am :)

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...