Linsider Launched 61
Fred Palmer writes: "Linsider was launched recently. We're featuring lots of business-related news, profiles for every major Linux company, stock information, content licensed under the OpenContent license, and much more.
You can read our press release, or skip straight to the home page. " We don't usually post new sites, but there's been a lot of word going around about Linsider/Linsight and what its aim is. Post-LinuxToday, Dave Whitinger [?] was rumoured to be spending a lot of time working on Linsight and this -- and it looks like it was worth the effort.
Looks cool, but... (Score:1)
:-)
this commercialism is sickening (Score:1)
I double took on the name... (Score:2)
-Dextius Alphaeus
Nice site compilation (Score:2)
Re:Looks cool, but... (Score:2)
Damned if you do, damned if you don't (Score:1)
But if they _do_ check it out, and realize the scoop is real and worth writing, then people like you and I criticize the story as being old news.
Nobody's forcing you to read it, just check the headlines. If it's old, move on!
:-)
Other stock sites (Score:5)
what we have here... (Score:1)
The stock quote choices laid bare (Score:1)
I wonder if SlashDot and Linsider will be checking each other's sites to see if they missed anything.
-Effendi
bring on the back end? (Score:3)
It would be cool if more OSS sites would publish their own source code, ala
Want to work at Transmeta? Hedgefund.net? Priceline?
Re:this commercialism is sickening (Score:2)
Commercialism pays the bills. Whether it's free beer OR free speech, someone has to pick up the tab. If this means advertising, or corporate sponsorship, or even, shudder selling software, money must move from place to place. Someone has to pay for the wires, servers and electricity.
ObTopic: This is an excellent looking site. It's well organized and clean. I appreciate the wide variety of content exports supported. I haven't had a chance to delve deeply, but I will bookmark it, and check back to see how it holds up.
site design. (Score:1)
Who's the freakin' designer that works for Linsight? get a freakin' clue [hel13.com]!
No RSS? (Score:2)
They *do* offer a Perl backend-syndication program to parse the XML, but I've already got some nice RSS tools. Integrating their stuff shouldn't be too hard, but putting another line in my RSS-reader's config file would be easier.
WTF, This is killing Open Source (Score:1)
First off, shareholders in dot coms are the ones behind the DMCA and all the noise it represents. Having a dedicated stock site, dedicated to linux and open source just feeds the machine.
Second, if you like open souce being open, al la EFF morals and viewpoint, you must not support franchises like these. On the surface they look inviting, get rich quick, eye candy for the community, look folks we've hit the big time with our little linux underdog. Keep it up and the same folks who are making it tought to copy DVD's are going to be regulating what we now know as open source.
Great...what we need now is... (Score:2)
Re:Great...what we need now is... (Score:2)
yes this is redundant... (Score:1)
Let's see... (Score:2)
Shouldn't that be Company Linudex? It's not as annoying as the rest of them.
--
From the 'who cares' dept. (Score:1)
A portal! Look mom! Look! It's got BOXES! LOOK! No, it's cool, see, those are STOCKS! And, wait, get this, it will be CUSTOMIZABLE!
Everyone knows php3 is passe these days. If you aren't using servlets, you're yawnsville.
--
blue
Re:bring on the back end? (Score:3)
Give us time - we just launched the site less than a week ago. :)
The moderator-kiddies strike again (Score:1)
Re:The moderator-kiddies strike again (Score:1)
Re:From the 'who cares' dept. (Score:1)
Re:No RSS? (Score:1)
Nice site in text! (Score:1)
Jeremy
Re:No RSS? (Score:1)
Re:pissed off moderator? (Score:1)
Re:bring on the back end? (Score:2)
Eric
Want to work at Transmeta? Hedgefund.net? Priceline?
Re:From the 'who cares' dept. (Score:1)
Everyone knows php3 is passe these days. If you aren't using servlets, you're yawnsville.
Everybody knows trying to use the latest technology just because some jerk thinks it's cools is passé. If you aren't using tried and true technology that's proven to work, you're crashville.
Re:I double took on the name... (Score:1)
Revenue Stream (Score:2)
Although I like what you guys are doing, The "Were not in it for the money comment,doesn't seem all that innocent and charitable, according to your press releases
KC computer firm gets $30 million in venture capital
Talley said the $30 million investment would allow the company to go into a "hypergrowth" mode and hire top industry professionals. In addition, "strategic acquisitions are very important to us, and this will allow us to pay in cash if we have to," he said.
Linux firm hopes cash infusion will steer it to IPO
"As things move along, we certainly see the professional services side moving up to 50 percent
Again, I like what you guys are doing and Linsight overall, good services and you have picked out your own nitch market, but being owned by Atipa, with 30M in venture capital to repay, the revenue has got to come from somewhere. The division your in my be more of a marketing branch for brand awareness etc., but this still goes back to revenue generating efforts. You may not see the marketing impact from where you sit, but beleive me it's there. I can't see Atipas VC's giving up 30M so you and Wells could code for the good of the Linux community, your are part of the revenue stream.
Thanks for the laughs (Score:1)
I gues it's offtopic, but damn!
How did you keep from laughing? Can you give me any tips on compiling and debugging with that cool-sounding RPM thing?
Re:From the 'who cares' dept. (Score:1)
I like Java's OO and everything, but do I *really* need to run cross-platform code for a single platform? What a waste....
Re:From the 'who cares' dept. (Score:1)
Hi Fred:
First, I don't know who you are, or to what depth your involvement with linsite extends. Please don't take the things I say personally. I am a person of strong opinions and no ready wealth of tact when it comes to expressing them.
You might notice that we have no banner ads on the site (nor will we ever). We're not trying to make any money on this... We're just providing a good service.
In fact, I did notice exactly that. In fact, I considered posting exactly that in response to the post above about posting the opening of your site to
I mean, come on Fred, LOOK at it. It's a portal, and it's not even a very interesting one. There's no sign of tux, no blessings by St. Larry.. just brown table-tops and lots of stock quotes. THIS is 'linsite?' Insight, into linux? No, no, in fact, it is not. It's a late-to-market, sub-par, CFO-friendly portal. And you didn't even release your php scripts for the kiddies. So, you know, you provide whatever service ya like, but if you post it to
If your site really WAS interesting, if it really DID have value, I'd have either posted a thank you, or not have posted at all. What do you want? You want me to thank you for not having banner ads? You want me to thank you for not having a profit motive? It's old hat, G. It's old hat, and it's bullshit. That site isn't free. Someone, somewhere, wants to make money off of it. In fact, consider this a challenge - you said you're not trying to make money, you said you're trying to provide good service - do either, do both. Give it up. Gimme some value. What are you doing? Where is the value? Search engines? A calendar? The same stories posted in different order under different headings all over your site? A fucking article talking about linux putting fucking AUSTRALIA on the software development map by the laughingstock of the IT industry? Cuz, you know, nothing good has ever come out of Australia, right? Do you have any idea how disgusting that article is? No? Here ya go:
"Australia has a great deal of creativity and a multicultural background to fuel content creation. Australia has always developed very sensitive content that probably would not be made in the US and Asia," he said. "
This is pure, 100% corporate, spin-laden, rhetorical, look-at-me-talk-and-say-nothing, BULLSHIT. Excuse me while I throw up. When I'm done, I'll clean my chin with SGI stock.
Have I made my point yet?
Ok, how about this. The very first item on Atipa.com's leetle web page is mention of a $30 million investment. Now.. Are you going to claim that none of the work done on linsite is done without the intention of furthering corporations that deal in linux solutions? Are you going to posit that just because linsite itself is monentarily valueless, there is not cash generated by its existence? Is linsite NPO? Doesn't seem to be.. In fact, it looks to me like everything on it is (C) of the Atipa corporation. Hmmmmm.
Wake up, clue in, and give us kernel patches. (yes, yes, yes, i realize SGI talks a lot about doing that - don't even bother to flame me with how great XFS for linux is, cuz i'll only laugh at you) If you encourage the corporatization of linux, then you are in it for the money, because corporations are about making money - the value they add to MY (free) linux is tertiary to the value they perceive (wrongly, i believe history will prove) that can be reaped from servicing it.
--
blue, unofficial
And, to the two morons at the bottom of this thread - come the fuck ON, people. If you can't recognize the sarcasm in my trumpeting servlets, you might really wanna go back to reading the mushroom, or something.