Microsoft Offers Linux Certification. Yes, Really. (dice.com) 200
Nerval's Lobster writes: Former CEO Steve Ballmer once publicly referred to Linux as a 'cancer.' Not content to just let Ballmer blow up about it, company also spent a good deal of money and legal effort on claiming that open-source software violated its patents. A decade ago, the idea of Microsoft creating a Linux certification would have seemed like lunacy. But now that very thing has come to pass, (Dice link) with the Microsoft Certified Solutions Associate (MCSA) Linux on Azure certification, designed in conjunction with the Linux Foundation. Earning the Linux on Azure certification requires tech pros to pass Microsoft Exam 70-533 (Implementing Microsoft Azure Infrastructure Solutions) as well as the Linux Foundation Certified System Administrator (LFCS) exam, which collectively require knowledge of Linux and Azure implementation. Microsoft evidently recognizes that open-source technology increasingly powers the cloud and mobile, and that it needs to play nice with the open-source community if it wants to survive and evolve.
Not your father's Microsoft (Score:5, Insightful)
They're seemingly doing everything right, expect for Windows 10 spying. Heck, even their HW is good now (Remember Zune, Ballmer's brainchild?)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not your father's Microsoft (Score:4, Interesting)
Yeah, and that may be the forgotten lesson the new CEO is embracing. Even if you have really good, if not the best, of something in a sea of competition, if you try to force a monoculture you are going to drive people away.
Windows didn't require a microsoft brand mouse in order to function and they still made a hefty profit on both hardware and software.
But the times they did require a monocultire, like C#/.NET for most of its life, they found a lot of people just walked away and stuck to arguably inferior products.
Just look at hololens, their big ball of holyshitthisisawesome. They have competition in the hardware department already, but they're helping asus instead of trying to block them. Now there's going to be two AR headsets running windows 10 instead of an all microsoft one and a competitor that would probably run a custom linux.
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, and that may be the forgotten lesson the new CEO is embracing. Even if you have really good, if not the best, of something in a sea of competition, if you try to force a monoculture you are going to drive people away.
Not even that, just trying to push your product into a saturated market period, and hoping that throwing enough money at it somehow improves your chances of gaining consumer mindshare.
The only reason xbox worked was because Nintendo was giving the middle finger to third party developers, while Sega failed to gain interest of third party developers, leaving just Sony, giving Microsoft room to be a second platform in the rule of three [wikipedia.org]. Nintendo and Sega both ate shit that generation because when it comes to p
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Their mice & trackballs are/were first rate.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not a good day to Zune (Score:4, Interesting)
Files with an expiry date beyond which the music would not play meant it needed to know the date so a calendar was thrown in as an afterthought without even the most simple tests being applied - so on the last day of leap year the Zune would not work at all. A failure so epic that it is one for the textbooks and will be remembered long after anything else about the Zune.
Re: Not a good day to Zune (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course the MS fanboys blamed it on outsourcing and it's possible that Apple did that too, but that is no excuse for a company not properly testing something with their name on it before release.
Re: (Score:2)
But surely being able to squirt songs at each other on the other days made up for that?
Re:Not your father's Microsoft (Score:4, Funny)
That's like saying "my son is doing a great job living a life of good morals, ... except for those rapes".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I have seen many attempts in public forums suggesting that Microsoft "has changed" and to otherwise rehabilitate its image.
"Seemingly doing everything right [except] for Windows 10 spying." Oh, is that all? Forcibly installing surveillance software on its users' hardware, and unsetting explicitly set privacy settings in the process? Is that all?
Yes, Microsoft has great respect for its user base, and is seemingly doing everything right.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If reality was a novel the only way the Trump for President plot would get past an editor is if the Democrats had paid him to do it
Re: (Score:2)
Untapped Market For MS (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
They could make a killing selling support for a Linux distribution . Lots of IT people are locked into Microsoft as a vendor and this would give them a good option.
That is an interesting point of view...
Would I pay $100 for a "Microsoft-supported" copy of Linux that they provided certified updates for and driver support for?
Yes, I probably would.
Step 1.) Embrace (Score:2)
seriously. They're just slow on their usual tricks...
Re: (Score:2)
They could make a killing selling support for a Linux distribution . Lots of IT people are locked into Microsoft as a vendor and this would give them a good option.
Particularly if they write drivers for any hardware that has missing support
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I dunno why it irritates you. If you actually RTFA, you'd know the second component of the Linux on Azure cert is a Linux Foundation sysadmin certification, so it isn't just an Azure cert.
Re:Untapped Market For MS (Score:5, Informative)
But if all you wanted was the Linux cert, you could just call the Linux Foundation and get that. So yes, it is really just an Azure cert bundled with (I assume) a discounted Linux Foundation cert.
Makes sense. As I understand it, the vast majority of workloads on Azure are running Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? Whose podcast was that? Because I've heard it's maybe as much as 90 percent Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
Great! (Score:2)
Now need to memorize which mouse clicks in gnome3 for non related work items and obscure powershell cmd let's for Linux no one uses in the real world for a high quality and respected cert
Re: (Score:3)
Great, now IBM's Watson has a /. account.
Year of the Linux desktop! (Score:5, Interesting)
I can imagine the day when Windows is built on top of Linux, similar to how MacOS is built on top of BSD. That will be the year of the Linux desktop!
Maybe in 2020, Windows version 12.
Re: (Score:1)
MacOS is built on top of BSD
What?
Re: (Score:3)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I hope you don't mind me disregarding your "It is so because I say so" comment.
And about that premise thing.. That's conclusions or implications, not analogies. The requirement for an analogy is that it is analogous (duh), and frankly, it is. You know what? Because I say so. I recommend doing a little research.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Car analogy: If I build a car that uses your transmission and your steering wheel, I haven't built my car on top of yours.
It's more like you built a car that uses our chassis, our motor, our transmission, our fuel injection system, and our braking system. You added your own internal space, complete with spiffy modern seats, dashboard, and a very cool navigation system. You also changed any internal and external cosmetic element of he car. The steering wheel is actually yours also.
So your car is clearly not our car. But you have indeed built your car on top of ours.
Re: (Score:2)
So you're saying that Mac OS is just a user interface on top of a vanilla BSD? I think I've got a bridge to sell to you.
Your analogy describes what pfSense is to FreeBSD, if anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The GP is correct, and you're correct. So WTF are you arguing about? It's based on NeXTSTEP and BSD, as is plainly stated in the article. Besides, the entire web of core components that Mac OSX is built on: NeXSTEP, Mach, OpenBSD; all of them are tied somehow to BSD. It's in all of it.
underpinnings of OS X (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not going to happen. Microsoft won't do an Apple and break backwards compatibility with previous versions of Windows all for the sake of switching what is currently a well maintained and stable kernel for something else.
Their only flirt with the idea (Windows RT) was a colossal flop. I don't see them repeating that, and I definitely don't see them doing so without providing an alternative in the process.
Re: (Score:2)
With their inner knowledge of Windows and the various system calls and such it uses how hard would be be for Microsoft to perfect WINE?
Didn't early versions of OS X allow running OS 9.x applications?
Re: (Score:2)
Didn't early versions of OS X allow running OS 9.x applications?
Yes. It was called "Classic" mode; the only caveat was that you had to have MacOS9 install media. Otherwise, it ran practically any MacOS 9.x compatible application without a hitch.
Re: (Score:2)
With their inner knowledge of Windows and the various system calls and such it uses how hard would be be for Microsoft to perfect WINE?
Didn't early versions of OS X allow running OS 9.x applications?
With their knowledge of all that what is the business case for even attempting to do something like that?
Re: (Score:2)
Just like apple did, break away from old crufty OS for a fresh start, but not piss off your existing customer base - let them keep older versions of their apps for a OS cycle or two
Re: (Score:2)
Just like apple did, break away from old crufty OS for a fresh start, but not piss off your existing customer base
That's Apple, a company that has zero problem with breaking compatibility, switching architectures, screwing around coders. Microsoft on the other hand knows that backwards compatibility is one of its biggest strengths and the amount of effort they put into keeping old shit running on their platforms is simply astounding. You're comparing a company which tells people how it is, to a company which makes sure the old stuff will keep running with every new version.
Also if you don't think that Apple pissed off
Re: (Score:2)
Not going to happen. Microsoft won't do an Apple and break backwards compatibility with previous versions of Windows all for the sake of switching what is currently a well maintained and stable kernel for something else.
In Apple's case, they provided a compatibility layer to allow programs compiled for classic Mac OS to run on Mac OS X unmodified. They did phase the compatibility layer out, but after ample opportunity was given for developers to produce actual OS X versions of their software. In Windows' case, there is the massive amount of unmaintained legacy software that many businesses rely on to take into account, but the answer there is to keep maintaining the compatibility layer. As it is, Microsoft put some effort
Re: (Score:2)
That's more because Windows RT is essentially Windows for ARM CPUs, and basically no Windows software is compiled for ARM CPUs. There are ways of dealing with that, such as what Apple did when they changed CPU architecture from PowerPC to Intel - a compatibility layer that's essentially PowerPC emulation. That's not such a realistic option for running x86 software on ARM - not if you want reasonable speeds, anyway.
Windows NT had versions running on DEC's Alpha processors. DEC released an emulation layer called FX!32 [wikipedia.org] to allow x86 programs to run on Alpha NT machines*.
While such an emulation layer wouldn't provide great performance on a WindowsRT machine, a lot of programs are not that processor intensive. Any amount of backwards compatibility could increase interest in the WindowsRT platform. With more interest, it might persuade more developers to cross-compile to ARM versions of Windows.
Unfortunately Microsoft was t
Windows emulation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There actually is an x86 emulation (well, dynamic recompilation, which is faster) layer for Windows RT. It's unofficial and only runs on jailbroken devices, but it's there. App compat isn't that great yet, because it has to shim all Win32 calls from the x86 version to the ARM version (this is much faster and has a smaller install footprint than emulating a full x86 Windows, and makes it possible to optimize the translation a bit, but means each Win32 API needs to be shimmed and there are a huge number of th
Re: (Score:2)
I would say that is the only future that makes any real sense. Then we get BSD or Linux with a fully developed GUI for regular people who don't do CLI and we get MS Office on Linux without having to use some fucked web based version that requires a subscription.
Re: (Score:2)
It was discontinued with the release of Windows 8.1 and one of the reasons cited at the time was lack of users and lack of interest from developers. It didn't do things quite the same way as many Linux distributions but quite a bit of code could be ported fairly easily.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe they will spin off the Windows division (Score:5, Interesting)
Maybe Microsoft will one day spin-off the Windows division, so it becomes just another operating system that their cloud service supports. If they start writing their services to use .NET, then they could use Roslyn and .NET Core to make all their services portable. One could run IIS or Exchange on Linux. If it meant more sales for Azure, they could profit from it.
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong (?) (Score:1)
My memory tells me Ballmer referred to the GPL as a cancer, not Linux.
But hey, I'm too lazy to even check on Google as it's monkeyboy we're talking about, so who cares...
Re: (Score:3)
In other news... (Score:2)
...hell's temperature just dropped to that of liquid nitrogen.
Re: (Score:1)
That would be when MS Office runs on a linux desktop. (Which many workplaces would love.)
Re: (Score:2)
That would be when MS Office runs on a linux desktop. (Which many workplaces would love.)
No, when that happens, hell's temperature will drop to that of liquid helium.
Re: (Score:3)
That's ridiculous. Very few businesses require the most recent version. Most could do with one from two releases back. Very few people are pushing Office to limits, such that they can only get what they need using the latest version. How do you think they got along before the latest version was released?
Re: (Score:2)
Would *you* trust a MS Linux certification? (Score:2)
Re:Would *you* trust a MS Linux certification? (Score:5, Funny)
Welcome to your first Microsoft Linux Certification class. Today we're going to learn about the command line.
The first command we will try is
sudo rm -rf /
Please try it now.
Good job. The course is over. You are now all Certified.
Re: (Score:2)
Trick lesson/question! Where's the bootloader?
Re: (Score:2)
Well the new MCSE/MCSA certification track it is not hte training I do not trust.
It is the silliness of the questions. MS are very very hard. Not in a technical sense. But more of memorizing which mouse click and knowing 3 ways to do everything with every obscure option in 1. gui 2. Netsh and 3. Powershell. It is never something you ever used in the real world and MS adds another gui tool for each task in each new version of server. So there can be 8 ways to setup a static IP, DNS, name, and adding the dc t
Re: (Score:2)
1. gui 2. Netsh and 3. Powershell. It is never something you ever used in the real world
I think you'll find that if you manage real-world Windows servers you will use at least one of the three.
Re: Would *you* trust a MS Linux certification? (Score:2)
I do use it but the question is asking for silly things like which column do you use for managing y in tool z when an admin uses z for something else. Or which out of 50 arguments would you select in powershell when no one uses that command anyway for that kind of task . admins typically do it with another command 95% of the time and would use get help anyway or PS ESE etc.
Tests are a joke.
Re: (Score:2)
Not much to their certification... It only covers how to replace the Linux boot loader...
"bootrec /fixmbr"
That's it, you are now Microsoft certified in Linux...
.
.
For you shills out there, I'm making a joke..
Well... (Score:2)
Hell's temperature has become a lot more tolerable lately, but now we've got to crouch all the time to avoid the pigs.
Re: (Score:2)
Just got my MS BCCT (Score:4, Funny)
Increasingly? (Score:5, Insightful)
Increasingly? INCREASINGLY?? Open source isn't "increasingly" powering Internet services, IT'S BEEN THE BENCHMARK SINCE DARPA. FFS, Microsoft was the cancer, trying to force proprietary standards down everyones throat.
Re: (Score:2)
Hah! Reminds me of the late 90's when MS was fighting the internet and tried to co-opt the acronym "DNS" for Dynamic Network Systems or some such.
Re: (Score:2)
Increasingly? INCREASINGLY?? Open source isn't "increasingly" powering Internet services, IT'S BEEN THE BENCHMARK SINCE DARPA.
This is only true if you fail to distinguish between the modern definition of open source (OSI's definition) and proprietary but source-available
The ARPANET started running on the Sigma 7, running BPM. Various other operating systems ran other early nodes, but all of them were proprietary. Many did provide source code to the operating system when you bought the machine, but they were still proprietary. Later, Unix rose in popularity, but Unix was also proprietary. BSD eventually became truly open source,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The only people I know who still use Windows only use it for gaming. Otherwise, they either have a Mac or use Linux. On the server side, it's been Linux for more than a decade now.
I think that in your typical corporation Windows server installs still outweighs Linux server installs. Im sure there are exceptions in some corporations but in the "cloud" Linux seems to have the largest market share I've not seen many desktops/laptops with Linux but this could be just my neck of the woods (east Europe)
Re: (Score:2)
Windows server installs still outweighs Linux server installs.
If you are counting processors or rack space occupied, undoubtedly. But if you have some metric that tells you how much work is done on either platform, Linux comes out ahead.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most departments of our university are also considering switching because it's cheap to find or even build a local Windows IaaS provider.
Re: (Score:2)
The only people I know who still use Windows only use it for gaming.
That's a nice anecdote. I use Windows for pretty much everything, except for some servers that are hosted elsewhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Now I manage a windows environment. It's all 2012R2 and with server manager, core/minimal, DSC, and powershell. I honestly really enjoy it and find it to be a perfectly fine solution.
Seriously. If half the whiners would just learn Powershell and try managing some actual, modern Windows servers, I'm sure they'd go, "Huh! Whaddaya know." In some sense, modern Windows Server is kind of like C#, in that Microsoft learned from the competition, took its ideas, polished them up, and put its own spin on them. Nothing really wrong with that, if your chief concern is getting work done and not just arguing on the interwebs.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. No doubt. And then halfway across the river we'd say Huh! Whaddaya know.! :-( [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
That is completely incorrect. There have been Software Engineers for quite some time, and your ignorance of their existence does not chaneg the fact that they exist.
Re: (Score:2)
What edge case? Home users might have migrated to iPads but Windows still rules the roost in the business world, or did Microsoft go bust while I wasn't looking.
Re: (Score:2)
Because it's data. On Slashdot, data doesn't matter. Only being in agreement with the prevailing wisdom will earn you mod points.
Now fuck off, you obvious M$ $hill.
I'm a new guy in that company so I have nothing to do with the choice of OS installed on our systems. And it wasn't really different on other company I've worked for. My point was simply that MS is still heavily used in business but oh well, fuck me I'll go grab my M$ check now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Paying for a certification is an artificial barrier to entry for the disadvantaged to get into the computer field.
I was just poor white boy earning a pittance and working 80 hours a week as a video game tester when I saved up my money to get my A+, Network+ and MCP certifications in one year. I then got a help desk job that paid the same amount of money as a video game tester but only working 40 hours a week. I was able to enjoy life since I was no longer disadvantaged and have a meaningful career.
Absolutely true (Score:2)
and obvious for a very long time. I remember it being clear that Redhat wanted to be the Microsoft of the Linux world even before they had an IPO. Canonical are horrible shit lords.
I don't understand, at all, why anyone would believe anything but vendor lock in monoculture would come out of Microsoft. It's been their schtick for 20+ fucking years.
This is their attempt to get free developers. They would very much like their walled garden to be as popular as that of Apple and Google but they've already lost t