neal writes
"Fortune has an article that selects Linus as one of the'people' to watch in 2000! " Just another sign of the recognition that Linux and Open Source as a whole has garnered over the last eighteen months or so. Here's to 2000 being even better than 1999.
Positive feedback (Score:2)
Even MS boosters don't rally behind Bill like this. (I should know.)
Re:Hmm...I guess (Score:1)
Or didn't you read the article?
doesn't surprise me (Score:1)
Re:Yawn (Score:2)
I care. When I have the need to use a strange new hardware device that I don't know much about, I find that the kernel Mr. Torvalds shapes is easy to configure, debug, and fix. Might I mention that the kernel is very flexible and most reliable. So, I'm not surprised when a kernel he hacks creates a great impact on the computing industry. If you don't watch what he does, you might be in the dark.
free? (Score:1)
Ooh, Aah. (Score:2)
Boy, this is liable turn into an illuminating thread... NOT.
It would have been more interesting if... (Score:2)
Why this *is* important (Score:2)
So let me get in my $0.02: it does matter. Your marketroids and PHBs will look at Fortune, and say, ooo, Linux! A new buzzword! And maybe, just maybe, they'll ask their sysadmin to try it out, instead of attempting to install it themselves on their ultra-new winmodem-equipped laptop. One can wish, right? Especially in this season?
As for AE on the cover of Time magazine, maybe they'll say, ooo, Einstein. Isn't he the E=mc^2 dude? and then take a few moments to learn about some of the radical and cool stuff physics / astronomy has accomplished in the last fifty years. (And let me assure the unconvinced - long after the Civil war, India's independence and even WWII have faded into obscurity as long-ago provincial conflicts, Einstein's accomplishments will be remembered and used on a daily basis!)
Or maybe the PHB's will pick up a few more unemployed physics grad students? That wouldn't be so bad either... :)
Re:free? (Score:2)
Eric
in good company? (Score:3)
Jeff Bezos- Amazon.com
Mike Armstrong- AT&T
Jill Barad- Mattel
Jeffrey Immelt- General Electric
Michael Eisner/Steve Jobs- as Disney/Pixar and not as Apple CEO
David Komansky- Merrill Lynch
John Reed / Robert Rubin / Sandy Weill- Citicorp
Bill Ford Jr- Ford Motor Co.
Mary Meeker- Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
Chris Gent- Vodafone
Nobuyuki Idei- Sony
Bill Gates- Microsoft
Lou Gerstner- IBM
Peter Drucker- business management guru
Carly Fiorina- HP
Linus was listed last in this list.
Re:Hmm...I guess (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:in good company? (Score:2)
Every good ship needs a figurehead. (Score:3)
Another example of this in American history is General George Washington. He hardly ever won a battle in our Revolutionary War, but was hailed a great leader of men and was pretty much offered the position of King of the United States of America, if he wanted it. (He didn't.) It doesn't matter too much what he did and didn't do, because he was a cultural icon. He symbolized a great freedom in the minds of the residents of a struggling group of colonies, and later in a young nation. Einstien also falls into the category of cultural icons for the twentieth century.
Linus is stepping into the same role (on a smaller scale for now) in the concept of open source. People outside the open source community see him and say, "Oh, that's the guy who wrote Linux. He represents that free software movement." Whether it is good or bad, this is the path that I see before us.
B. Elgin
Re:free? (Score:2)
Re:free? (Score:1)
- JoJo
Re:free? (Score:1)
=======
There was never a genius without a tincture of madness.
Re:in good company? (Score:1)
Of course it's business people, but then they shape the business.
Linus made it into the list I suspect as symbolic of the Linux dot IPO dot frenzy.
BTW, Steve Jobs? You may have noticed him on the list, had a little to do with Apple. Nobuyuki Idei, Sony president, they do plenty with computers and more importantly consumer electronics. Mary Meeker's an internet analyst;
isn't that computing related enough either? And Mike Armstrong, AT&T... nah, they have nothing to
do with computing...
The list shows computing and it's uses are all pervasive.
Re:free? (Score:1)
=======
There was never a genius without a tincture of madness.
Re:Positive feedback (Score:2)
----
Re:free? (Score:1)
I think that the point was supposed to be that he works on Linux freely, and for Transmeta.. Odd way of wording that though.. I'm sure Transmeta pays the man.
---
Re:free? (Score:1)
Buckets (Score:2)
But good for him, nonetheless.
Re:Hmm...I guess (Score:2)
--
BluetoothCentral.com [bluetoothcentral.com]
A site for everything Bluetooth. Coming in January 2000.
Re:doesn't surprise me (Score:1)
Re:in good company? (Score:1)
Disagree (Score:1)
And for the GPL, the media has selected Linus Torvalds.
No, they didn't. The article didn't say anything about the GPL. If you were to poll the media, I'd say that a good number of them will have heard of Linux, and that the vast majority will have never heard of the GPL. The reason for the Linux hype is because it's quality free beer -- the "free speech" aspect has almost nil to do with its overall popularity. Why did you mention the GPL in regards to this article, anyway?
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
RMS has insisted (Score:1)
He is also running off photocopies of the magazine because he of course touts Free Magazine through the GNU project.
Re:Positive feedback (Score:1)
I think it has a lot to do with his personality. If you've ever read any interview with Linus, you get the impression that he is a frank, straightforward man who has nothing to hide. He has his principles and plays by them. Contrast this with most top businessmen, (and please don't misunderstand, I'm not putting them down) who usually speaks in techno-babble (or is that biz-babble?) and try to sound "deep" with big words. They may not be insincere in any way, but somehow the "professional" and "biz" manner makes people feel they are far away. With someone like Linus, I think people can identify with him more. You almost feel like he is very approachable and won't turn up his nose with a "what a stinky beggar" attitude. (No, I'm not saying biz people have this attitude, but I'm talking about people's impressions here.)
If I were to choose between the "Linus type" and the "big CEO type", I'd choose the former, even if the latter has bigger bucks. I think many people would do the same.
Re:free? (Score:1)
=======
There was never a genius without a tincture of madness.
On Trolls. . . (Score:1)
Come on buddy, you giving all us trolls a bad name.
Free Linus Labor? (Score:1)
Since when? So basically Mr. Linus works for free, and then lives off stocks that CEO gave him? Nothing wrong with that, I would like some sweet Linux tech stocks.
IIRC he got paid a crap load of money for developing a new generation CPU. I though he was still getting paid, maybe not.
I would work for free if I got a crap load of differant Linux stocks and didn't have to worry about money and paying the bills.
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use Joke()
or die ("You can't take a joke!\n");
But I think this is wrong. We need to take a stand and say "NO MORE SLAVE LINUZ LABOR! SET HIM FREE! NO MORE SLAVE LINUZ LABOR! SET HIM FREE!"
Free Linuz
Free your source
Free your mind!
Re:Disagree (Score:1)
You are right. When I was writing my comment, I was doing something of a mad lib. People outside of the open source community tend to use the words GPL, Linux, free software movement, and open source VERY interchangably, when they know more than one of the words. I know this, because I spent a while at the outermost fringes of vague knowledge myself. I would still consider myself as a semi-knowledgable observer of the open source community more than a member of it.
I simply used that random lack of knowledge in my comment to place terms where one of these buzzwords would go. I apologize for not making this clear in my original comment. I like to write comments that point out the perspective of those who are less knowledgable than the average /.er, and sometimes forget to document what I am doing.
B. Elgin
Re:free? (Score:1)
The point he was trying to make while saying it (in an interview last summer) was that even though he hasn't made any money off the actual Linux source, Linux and the fame it brought him has gotten him a nice paycheck at Transmeta.
And yes, very odd wording indeed.
- JoJo
Re:Wonderful news! (Score:1)
-----------
"You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."
Re:Every good ship needs a figurehead. (Score:1)
I think you're short-changing Washington here. In military terms, he was responsible for the Trenton/Princeton campaign of 1776 (which had a crucial impact on colonial morale), and the final campaign of the war which ended with the surrender of Cornwallis at Yorktown. In less tangible terms, he inspired a great deal of loyalty in his troops, which no doubt enabled the army to endure in very difficult circumstances.
The point of this is that while Washington may be mythologized, he really does have some pretty important accomplishments to his name. Hope this didn't get too far off-topic, but I thought it was worth mentioning since you were comparing Washington and Linus.
Once you're branded a computer person... (Score:1)
Bill Gates used to be a computer person he even wrote some useful programs... Of course that was before he went to the dark side.
But that would make 2 actual computer people on the list, and a lot of buisness people related to computers.
To be exact:
Linus, Bill Gates, Carly Fiorina, Jeff Bezos,
Steve Jobs, and Lou Gerstner
who? (Score:1)
Re:Every good ship needs a figurehead. (Score:1)
I agree with you.
Washington did some very important things for the American Revolution, but I was trying to illustrate that the public faith in him outstripped his actual accomplishments. Similarly, Linus is often credited as if he is solely responsible for everything that Linux has become.
Important figures they both are/were, but their actions did not correlate with the full degree of respect and credit they are given. This is why they are cultural icons. Their great actions inspired further actions that led to a great result. Culturally, they are often creditied with all the results of people who followed their examples. This is also true of Ghandi, Einstein, even Hitler, and countless others, good and bad.
B. Elgin
Re:Hmm...I guess (Score:1)
I work for a company that builds .com businesses, and we laugh whenever we hear about Bezos, etc. He typifies the American "get rich quick" Dream which has been exponentiated by the ridiculousness of Yahoo's $400+ stock price. He ran what would have been the greatest e-commerce business model into the ground because he was impatient. Amazon will not be profitable for at least 3-5 for years (and that's generous). That is, unless they reincarnate Sam Walton to run their warehouses, or merge with FedEx or UPS. Watching Bezos strip Amazon's gears gave me more respect for *gasp* Bill Gates and what he was able to do business-wise in a new field with technology back in the day.
Sure, I'm jealous. But he still ain't Man of the Year.
Re:free? (Score:1)
Re:who? (Score:1)
Re:It would have been more interesting if... (Score:1)
Re:Disagree (Score:1)
Heh, I gotcha, no problemo. Re-reading what I wrote, I didn't mean to be so brusque with you -- I had some dog barking in my ear and took my annoyance out on you. Take care.
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
people to watch..makin' no sense (Score:1)
Bill Gates, the visionary (Score:1)
my new girlfriend read about him (Score:1)
i *knew* she was meant for me, asked her out again. and the rest is history. thanks OpenSource and Linus for providing this litmus test.
Re:in good company? (Score:1)
m$ support ? (Score:1)
!?