Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Linux Software

Linux 2.2.10 118

Posted by CmdrTaco from the its-stable-we-hope dept.
John Campbell writes "Linux 2.2.10, the next in the stable kernel series, is out. It's about a 300k patch, and it contains the fix for the DoS bug recently reported here (if you've already patched it, don't let patch back the fix back out... you are using patches, right?), as well as assorted other stuff. The new kernel patches can be found, as usual, on ftp.xx.kernel.org, where xx is your country code. "
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Linux 2.2.10 More

Linux 2.2.10

Comments Filter:
  • Posted by NJViking:

    Even easier:

    In /usr/src:

    bunzip2 -cd patch-2.2.10.bz2 | patch -p0

    (if you downloaded it in bz2, which I do 'cause it's less.)

    -= NJViking =-
  • I tried to patch Red Hat's kernel 2.2.5 source (to 2.2.6), but it did not work correctly. Something they did (in their 15 revisions, i.e. the fact that it's version 2.2.5-15) appears to clash with the 2.2.6 patch. How do I do a 'diff' to see what they changed? Has anyone had success getting around this when patching? Is it safe to just do a new install of pristine 2.2.10 source, and go from there?

    If need be, I can try again and post a list of errors.

    Thanks for your help.

    Ryan
  • Posted by NJViking:

    I have to agree on this. My buddy wants to use Linux, but it just won't work with his Diamond M80 sound card. Go figure..

    -= NJV =-
    .. happy with his AWE64 Gold

  • I think he's trying to say that it's been a lot more than 72 hours since he last upgraded his kernel...

  • I know this, but I was also testing just te regular kernels. Then the ac's. It may have sounded like I meant just the ac's, but I also meant the kernels and ac's also tested. So I don't know what it is, o well. :) Maybe I will try a newer kernel sometime soon.
  • How can you possibly assume that *any* code is completely stable. Marking something as stable just means that it isn't prone to crashing and that the system is worthy of production usage. There will still be the occasional bug in "stable" kernels and the process of finding them is called "testing" -- its an ongoing effort.
  • I don't think it was a hanging problem, more like really slow and tons of errors on boot and stuff not working for some weird reason. So, I don't know what the problem could be. :)
  • I understand that, but the problem is that this is not the case with Linux 2.2.x. The bugs are far from "occasional," and the system is certainly not worthy of production usage. A kernel with serious flaws leading to DoS attacks and filesystem corruption is not what I want on my server. Either use Free/Open/NetBSD, or use Linux 2.0.36.
  • ARRRRGH!

    From KernelNotes - 09-Jun-99: I'm leaving to drive to Arizona today which will take about a week. Expect some delays for the 2.3.6 and 2.2.10 changelists. Sorry.

    *sob*

  • Anyone else noticed that the sblive module seems to do odd things under .10? Like not work at all? I hate binary modules too, but I like the sblive... thou at this rate, i may swap my ensonique back in.. Grrr, wish creative would at least release a module compiled against the right kernel ver... shouldn't take that much effort, imho.

    Also, anyone know of good changelogs besides edge.kernelnotes.org? single point of failure is never good....

    David
  • Does anyone know if this (or any other patch) will fix the problem that prevents >2.2.7 from building on a ppc?

    It seems that 2.2.8 broke a bunch of stuff with IDE for PowerMacs. When trying to build 2.2.8 or 2.2.9, I get errors like this:

    syscalls.c: In function 'pmac_init'
    syscalls.c: 'ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD' undeclared
    syscalls.c: 'DMA_MODE_READ' undeclared
    syscalls.c: 'DMA_MODE_WRITE' undeclared
    make[1]: *** [pmac_setup.c] error 1

    I tried commenting out the three offending lines in pmac_setup.c (ISA_DMA_THRESHOLD, etc.), but it only goes slightly farther before erroring out on kernel.o.

    I found a partial fix in the mailing list archives:

    Add
    #include
    to arch/ppc/kernel/syscalls.c
    Seems someone forgot to include this.

    With that change, I can compile, but IDE support is broken (probably because I just commented out that stuff since I don't know how to fix it).

    Since I have an iMac (IDE-baed), both IDE support and USB support are extremely important. I can't get either the usb stack included in 2.2.7 or the uusbd stack to build on 2.2.7 or later (will 2.3.x kernels work better?).

    Yes, I could stay with my 2.2.6 kernel, but this is really bugging me. The main reason I'm using linux is to learn it. As far as I can tell, nobody (with the possible exception of that one guy who posted to the mailing list) has gotten >2.2.7 to work on a PowerMac.
  • It is fun to watch linux users reconfigure their systems every 72 hours though. Most linux users spend more time configuring their systems than using them.
    What a snotty troll comment.

    Personally, I take great pleasure in spending endless hours tweaking my system. I wouldn't want it any other way.

    The same thing can happen with your oh-so-superior FreeBSD. As a matter of fact, very, very little time is spent tweaking the kernel for me; most of it is on programs on top of the kernel. If I were using your precious FreeBSD, it would be exactly the same thing.

    P.S. No disrespect meant towards FreeBSD, only towards this silly little troll...
    ----------

  • > Actually, I can think of some instances in which sound card drivers could be vital for a
    > web server. How about streaming audio over the 'net from a live sound source?

    When you do live streaming audio, you use don't use your web server to encode the audio - you use a separate, dedicated machine for that. This is true for Real Audio [real.com] as well as Shoutcast [shoutcast.com] and the open-source Icecast [icecast.org].

    (I'm not talking out my ass here - I geek for Technostate [technostate.com], an internet radio station that broadcasts live events.)

  • "Stable" is a relative term. Name a commercial OS that is bug-free, and which will never develop "issues" for one or more of its customers. There aren't any.

    Put another way, 2.2.X is "stable," and getting more so as hundreds of millions of hours of experience in hundreds of thousands of different environments accumulate.

    Look at the case with commercial OS's. Solaris 2.X is widely regarded as one of the most stable general-purpose OS's out there. MS doesn't even pretend that WinNT is as stable as Solaris. Yet Solaris 2.3 was only barely usable. (God help anyone using a version before that.) 2.4 had thousands of reported bugs before 2.5 was released, and 2.5.1 came on 2.5's heels to fix some serious bugs in it. After more than five years, Sun finally released a version of Solaris 2.X that would fit your definition of "stable."

    Compared to this, Linux is doing amazingly well. Free software can't defy the law of gravity any more than commercial software. A few bugs that remain latent with a community of a few hundred developers will almost always manifest when released to a few million users. But the great majority of those users will never see those bugs. They'll get fixed anyway, and responsible sys admins will upgrade when they see sufficient benefits in doing so vs. any disruptions or other risks. It seems vaguely neurotic to upgrade to a new kernel just because it's there. And it's naive in the extreme to claim that any software several hundred thousand lines long can be "bug free."

    -Ed
  • How about some open module sources so that users can compile in their own environment.

    As good of a card as the live is it sure has a lot of driver issues, probably the main reason I haven't gotten one yet.

    matguy
    Net. Admin.
  • I thought Alan Cox said he'd go up to 2.0.38 a while back in his diary.

  • It's fun to watch stupid FleaBSD users pretend they have no serious bugs in a kernel which is used by about 1% of Internet users... FreeBSD 3.0 and 3.1 exploit of the week [rootshell.com]
  • 2.2.7-ac1 is my baby. Has anyone else had this same situation? I was following the ac's pretty steadily and 2.2.7-ac1 came across. Nice, works good. But as I tried the next ac's of the next kernels, something happened. Stuff started to not work, went weird, or was just plain dumb working. So I ran back to 2.2.7-ac1 and that's where I am now. With the release of 2.2.10, I still feel behind the times, but as Linus said at the last Linux Expo, you don't need to be cutting edge to have your stuff work good. He suggested that people even stay with 2.0.3* if that works good for them. So, I think I'll be staying with this for a while until like 2.9.0 comes out or something. :) Anything have this situation also?
  • Try this, changing the ftp site, and zImage to bzImage if you have to.

    -snip here-
    #!/bin/sh
    cd /tmp
    wget ftp://sunsite.org.uk/Mirrors/ftp.kernel.org/pub/li nux/kernel/v2.2/patch-$*.
    bz2
    cd /usr/src/
    bzip2 -dc /tmp/patch-$*.bz2 | patch -p0
    cd linux
    make xconfig
    make dep && make zImage && make modules

  • Re:2.2.7-ac1 (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    AC kernels are not always just pre-patches. Some of them contain some very UNTESTED test code. USB, large file support, large fd support, etc all were in the ac kernels long before they were in the standard, in fact some may still only be in AC. Alan Cox even warns people to be careful when using his AC kernels.
  • Upgrade your version of the patch utility. I upgraded to 2.5.3, and those errors disappeared. Get it from alpha.gnu.org
  • You are absolutely wrong. And not just because 2.2.10 is a stable kernel release, not a development release.

    Anybody can contribute to kernel development, whether stable or dev. It is absolutely wrong to think that only people who can code and find/fix bugs can contribute. All that is needed is the ability to file a useful bug report. That's all.

    Obviously being able to submit a patch fixing the bug is even better, but that's not a requirement to being useful.

    Where you might remotely have a point is if someone uses a dev kernel and expects everything to work beautifully. People downloading dev kernels should expect problems. But they don't have to be coders to be able to report them.
    ----------

  • I guess edge.kernelnotes.org [kernelnotes.org] will have the changes listed pretty soon.
  • I currently run 2.2.9, and when the DoS bug came out I edited the source myself to fix the problem. How do I make sure the patch doesn't mess that up?
  • > hate to sound like a snob

    No, you sound like an ignorant, self-important snob.

    You have no business wagging your finger at people who have trouble compiling kernels when you don't seem to know the difference between a stable (2.2.x) release and the current development (2.3.x) tree.

    The guy was just asking a question, which someone else was able to answer simply. Seems a lot more constructive than your comment (IMO).

    (sorry, I couldn't resist the urge to lash out. People like this make it hard for newbies to join the linux "movement" or "community" or whatever you want to call it.)


  • I understand that any OS will have bugs. However, the Linux 2.2.x series has an unacceptable number of bugs, including unacceptably serious ones such as filesystem corruption. Windows 95, as bad as it may be in other ways, does not corrupt my filesystem.

    My statement was mainly in reply to the "you're a beta tester" comment. If it's a stable release, then I'm not a beta tester. If the authors expect me to beta test their software, it should be labeled "beta" so I know what I'm getting into.
  • Same thing here!

    It seem that ESD don't like sblive.o for kernel version 2.2.5 with theb kernel 2.2.10... :/ esd crash, take 99.4% of the CPU, cannot be killed and Enlightenment cannot load because of this... freeze when esd is in use.... :/

    Creative.. open the source of you drivers!!! :)
  • Well, from what it looks like, as usual, RedHat made their own revisions (they did the same thing as KDE) so it looks like you'll have to d/l the full source, and then work your way from there. D/ling the full source shouldn't cause problems, it's just that patching it saves a lot of bandwidth.
  • Nver mind, it's been too long since I've read the diary.

  • Posted by wMaVerick:

    Thanks for the tip - you've just saved me a lot of typing!

    I had problems going from 2.2.6 to 10, patchfile 7 didn't want to patch properly, but with your tip, I was able to easily apply all the patches on a clean 2.2.0

    Cheers :-)
  • Good Morning fellow Slashdotters!

    I just want to inform you that L1zard_K1n6 is speaking of Linux the same way too many Linux Advocates speak of Windows.

    What is good for the geese is good for the gander.

    New Moderator Guideline: Anyone who says something bad about Linux is a Troll. Everyone knows that Linux is perfect and there is nothing bad to say about it.

    Of course what L1zard_K1n6 is simply untrue. Linux is very tested. But some of these couter-flames are unwarented.

    I thought slashdot was OS agnostic?

    (Sure, leave it to me to go against public-opinion. Boy, am I gonna be flames!)

    --

  • Anbody willing to share the secret to unlocking ES1688 sound cards with 2.2.x kernels? It worked fine under slackware 3.6 after "modprobe sound." but not after upgrading to a 2.2 kernel. Wouldn't work with slackware 4.0 either.

    I heard of some people who used RH were able to get it to work with the sndconfig utility. I'll probably be switching from slackware to RH6 soon anyway, but before I do that, if I could get it to work with a 2.2 kernel in slackware, it would save me the trouble :)

    The card card is an ISA, non pnp card. I've tried changing the settings (io, irq, dma) when modprobing the sb module. I've used both A) the settings windows control panel lists and B) the actual irq io and dma that are set by jumpers on the sound card [yes, that's right, my non pnp card has jumper settings that windows ignores, yet the card works under windows!]
  • True, but you still have to have a machine with sound card support to do it, whether it's the same box that's running the httpd or not. My point was that there are legitimate uses for a sound card in a server. Maybe not a "web server", per se, but close enough for government work.
  • plus, very useful resource is http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/linux/docs/kernel -newsflash.html. it is a collection of patches for the kernels which are not very willing to compile or run. (although it does not mention the mmap problem of 2.3.6).

    announcements of kernels and weekly digests of linux-kernel mailing list always appear at http://www.linuxtoday.com.
  • no problem. patch proggie either will ask if this is already applied patch (answer y) or will dump that fragment into *.rej file.
  • Go for the full tarball - the jump 2.0.36 to 2.2.0 was not really diff'able, as too much stuff changed (changes that were built up thru the 2.1.*'s).

    As a quick indication of what you would be in for if a patch did exist:

    linux-2.0.36.tar.gz 7098 Kb Mon Nov 16 00:00:00 1998 Unix Tape Archive

    whereas 2.2.10 is

    linux-2.2... 13577 Kb Mon Jun 14 05:33:00 1999 Unix Tape Archive

    so if (say) around half the 2.0.36 stuff was reused, the diff would contain ~3.5M of stuff to be diff'd out and ~10M of stuff to be diff'd in. This would make your patch ~13.5M. Better to have a nice shiny new kernel for the same dload.

    Minor disclaimer I don't pretend to be an expert on diff --recursive, so I may be wrong in a trivial way.

  • Huh? If the year is 2050, and you don't have a direct input to wire your internal PCs into the global net you'll be sorry.

  • USB is already supported (Score:1)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Try 2.3.x for USB...

  • What are you talking about? This security hole has been around since 2.2.x. The kernels are quite well tested with the pre-patches and the ac patches.

    How long does it take to get a bug fix into Windows once its been found? You just better hope you're not the only one affeted. There's certainly no shortage of bugs.
  • Geez guys, thats what we've been doing wrong! All we need to do is spend the next eon testing this kernel and then we can be sure that it has no bugs. Whew, its a good job there are clever people around to point us in the right direction huh?

    *END SARCASM*

    Moron.

  • And how would you propose that people test a given kernel against every possible DoS, error, and bug before it's released? If it were possible to synthesize all possible attacks in a test environment, we'd be using a flawless version of Linux 1.0 (as 0.99.x was tested using our mythical Uber-Workbench).
  • well at least we aren't spending more time restarting our systems than using them like some other os's.

    matguy
    Net. Admin.
  • Not on all the mirrors yet, the us and uk mirrors are still on 2.2.9. Found it on nl, though... odd that ;)
  • or act on them better yet.

    matguy
    Net. Admin.

  • How to patch your kernel. (Score:3)

    by InvisibleCraterFunk ( 29222 ) on Monday June 14, 1999 @03:17AM (#1851990) Homepage
    Please use patches instead of downloading whole archives, saves a lot of bandwidth (bandwidth costs money for the mirrors).
    Here's how:
    First, get the patch (duh)
    now "cd /usr/src"
    and then
    "zcat /path/to/patch-2.2.10.gz | patch -p0"
    You will be required to have linux-2.2.9 installed in /usr/src/linux. If you have an older version patch incrementally.
    Now, "cd /usr/src/linux" and "make menuconfig".

    Thank you.

    PS. zcat is the equivalent of "gzip -d -c"

  • Re:How to patch your kernel. (Score:3)

    by phazer ( 9089 ) on Monday June 14, 1999 @03:25AM (#1851991)
    You should run 'make oldconfig' after you patched
    the kernel, it checks the kernel for new options
    and asks you everything that's not configured in your old .config
  • I like FreeBSD, but I personally like linux better. FreeBSD and linux develop similarly, but FreeBSD simply more rarely slaps a version number on it.... It's more a matter of taste as to version number slap or not, in FreeBSD you can spend that much time rebooting, recompiling if you run a current cvs snap...
  • You forgot "make modules_install". BTW. Can you make wget print contents to stdout? like "wget -stdout ftp://kernelorg/linux/patch.gz | zcat | patch -p0".

  • Re:Nitpick (Score:1)

    by Yarn ( 75 )
    i didnt put modules_install in on purpose, if it fails during build for some reason, you want to be able to look at the output before you actually "commit yourself"

    What I *did* forget is make clean :)

    Thanks for the wget tip tho
  • Your version of patch needs upgrading. This also happened on a Suse6.0 machine next to me here at my workplace. We were scratching our heads for five minutes or so until we noticed Suse6.0 came with patch v2.1. You will need patch v2.5.3
  • The best solution is to get the kernel-2.2 source RPM, update it, and build your own set of 2.2.10 RPMs. Then everything is properly installed including pcmcia, and its easy to back out if something goes wrong.
  • Anyone knows where to find a patch for 2.2.9 or .10 to get a VGA framebuffer? The VESA refuses to work with my gfx-card, guess mine isn't vesa2.0 compliant.

  • Actually, I think if the make modules fail, then a modules_install will first try recompiling the modules and fail again. So you'll still get the error message and nothing installed.

  • 2.2.10 is a stable release, not a development release.

    And you are right, you do sound like a snob.
  • who doesn't know the difference between the development and the stable kernels. Snob.
  • Oops, the partial fix didn't show up properly because I forgot things in angle-brackets are treated as HTML

    The line to add to arch/ppc/kernel/syscalls.c is
    #include [linux/file.h]
    but using angle-brackets instead of the square brackets.

    Thanks to pochini@denise.shiny.it for this.
  • Where's the best place to find a collection of kernel news, i.e. reported bugs, security holes/features, etc.
  • the site formerly known as linuxhq would do you fine.

    the site address is www.kernelnotes.org [kernelnotes.org]

    -herb
  • Actually, I can think of some instances in which sound card drivers could be vital for a web server. How about streaming audio over the 'net from a live sound source?

  • Shall we point that FreeBSD use a lot of code that is 20 years old (from BSD 4.4). FreeBSD may be more young that linux in this incarnation but they use a lot of code that is older and then more tested. Linux is still maturing and have a lot of default, but it is maturing very fast.
  • No I'm not. Linux 2.2.0 was marked as a "stable" release, not a "beta" release "for testing purposes only." If it's a buggy beta release, it should be marked as such, rather than being mislabeled as "stable."
  • i have RH6 now but when i was installing my old ESS1688 is:
    1) look for free IRQ
    2) switch this IRQ on that ISA sound card
    3) tell the 2.2.X kernel i have ESS1688 with IRQ X, I/O Y and compiled it
    4) reboot

    now i'm enjoying sound :)

  • the OpenBSD people seem to be able to do it. Why can't the Linux people?
  • I don't know. There's no way you can compare 2.2.x to Windows 95 in all honesty and say that Windows is better.

    I have 2.2.x running on servers for over 2 weeks and counting and it's been very stable.

    Sure, it's not as good as 2.0.x, but it took 2.0.x years to get the same stability.
  • "testing a stable Linux kernel" is a contradiction. Either is it a beta version that needs testing, or it is a final version that is stable. You do not release beta versions as "stable" software.
  • Stability greatly depends on hardware: I have had 2.1.126 running for some 220 days now on SMP P2 machine with SCSI and ATA software RAIDs and 512M memory. (Ok, that is not 2.2.x, but as close to it as it's possible with this uptime ;)). Based on that, I would call this kernel stable, on _this_ hardware configuration.
  • I built 2.2.10 on a 604 StarMax last night (minimally patched LinuxPPC R4.1). No apparent problems so far. It also appears to have the fix for the offset framebuffer display. With a couple of small patches, I've been running 2.2.9 for a couple of weeks.

    My StarMax machines have IDE disks and SCSI CD-ROM/Zip, but no USB.

    Looks good so far. Now I just have to wait for LinuxPPC R5 so everything works nicely.
  • The LinuxPPC port (R5 just released) has excellent USB support on iMacs and B&W G3s. It seems to be quite stable. I know it supports mice and keyboards at least.
  • Isn't /. just great. I had the same problem, so I just kept reading 'cos I knew the answer would be here. And it is.

    Well done fella. I think /. should be officially listed as a 24/7 Linux support site! :)
  • 72 hours? 2.2.9 came out more than a month ago and if you don't use Linux why are you worried about it? Good to see your putting all your valuable time ("I can't spare 15 minutes to recompile the kernel *wahhhh*") to good use.
  • I am not sure whether it is heritage, but fi usually is up to date.

  • patch-kernel (Score:3)

    by Booker ( 6173 ) on Monday June 14, 1999 @03:34AM (#1852025) Homepage
    There's a file in the scripts directory called "patch-kernel" (or something similar... I always forget) which will automatically apply successive patches in the correct order. So if you're going from 2.2.5 to 2.2.10, you can just get all the patches (they can even be .gz'd I think) and run patch-kernel, and it'll bring you up to date.

    Someone please correct me if I have a couple details wrong. :-)
  • Out of sheer curiosity, are you one of those people who would rather pay $300 US plus taxes for testing the 'final' version of Windows 2000 versus $0 for testing a stable Linux kernel? Or are you one of those 3l33t3 haX0r d00ds that pirate all their software?
  • it's on ftp5.us.kernel.org, the first mirror i checked.. all the ftp.us.kernel.org seem to have it by now..
  • where is the changelog ?? I want to know what has changed. 300k probably not much. I knew this would be out soon.
  • In 2.2.9 usb was supported somewhat.
    I believe you can use usb mice and keyboards
    now.. I think. Its something you have to
    enable specifically though in the kernel source
    to compile it in.. and it is very very alpha.

    Malice95
  • It's on sunsite already :) Not on ftp.uk yet
  • The way I understood it, they are considered very unstable and can cause frequent crashes on your system. So use at your own risk. Anyone know of any major success stories?
  • Look at this guy's user info; almost all his posts are anti-Linux/GPL trolls.

    So, don't get too worked up.

    --
    Get your fresh, hot kernels right here [kernel.org]!

  • Sixth of September 1998...
    Linux Version 2.0.34
    What exactly were you trying to show?
  • Yes, and they're all for old kernels, just like the FreeBSD exploits he posted (2.x and 3.0 series).

    All software has bugs; responsive developers fix them faster. More frequent releases of fixes means users can have better software at the expense of typing "patch".
  • > they can even be .gz'd I think

    they can even be .bz2'd (and mixed). i put my patches into one directory, cd into it, and say

    sh /usr/src/linux/scripts/patch-kernel && cd /usr/src/linux && make xconfig && make dep clean zlilo modules_install && /sbin/shutdown -r now

    sure, i have a lilo-entry with the previous kernel (make zlilo moves it to \vmlinuz.old) and some older kernel(s):

    ...
    image=/vmlinuz
    label=linux
    root=/dev/hda3
    read-only
    image=/vmlinuz.old
    label=linux.old
    root=/dev/hda3
    read-only
    image=/vmlinuz-2.2.5
    label=linux-2.2.5
    root=/dev/hda3
    read-only
    image=/vmlinuz-2.0.36
    label=linux-2.0.36
    root=/dev/hda3
    read-only

    this works like a charm. ;))
  • No, It won't make a lick of difference to a webserver, but if Linux is going to become popular on the desktop, it needs to be able to support Joe Users soundcard so he can play Quake etc...

    Linux already has the server market as far as technical superiority is concerned, but people won't even consider it an alternative to the "other OS" if it can't support their brand X hardware.

    Just my $0.02

    ------------------------------------------------ -
  • cp /usr/src/linux/System.map /boot will solve this cumarc

  • Also 2.0.37 (Score:2)

    by Anonymous Coward
    ...for those of us who still care.

    This would seem to be the end of line for 2.0.x barring disaster.


    R.C.

    http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html

  • travelmate:~$ cat /proc/version
    Linux version 2.0.34 (root@travelmate) (gcc version egcs-2.90.29 980515 (egcs-1.0.3 release)) #4 Sun Sep 6 23:10:57 EDT 1998

    Yesterday was the sixth of September?

    Woooooohaaaaaaaa! I thought the whole Eastern Daylight thing was messed, but geez, do we have some weird time problems up here!
  • I think you may be confused, sir. In my experience, the boy who pays for a beta release of Windows and the boy who spells his name with numbers are often one in the same. They'll pay for a pre-release of the buggiest, least capable, slowest and most oversized operating system choice out there and claim they can't afford the software they "need"; like AutoCAD, Photoshop, and the latest 3D render studio fad of the week.

    \\/1nd0Wz 2| 0w|\|z j00 -- or something.
  • I have a very similar problem. I went to 2.2.9 and I keep getting something about "Incorrect kernel version in System.map". I just ignore it since it's been running fine. It is annoying though.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Being against torture ought to be sort of a multipartisan thing." -- Karl Lehenbauer, as amended by Jeff Daiell, a Libertarian

Close