LinuxExpo Report 120
It's a pretty interesting show. As tends to always be the case, I can't really escape the show floor and actually see anybody speak, but there is enough going on here to scream about.
We're sandwiched in the back between the Free Software Foundation and Debian. Its a nice wall of geekdom- the suits seem to be staying near the front where all the big companies with actual budgets and furniture are located.
All the big usual suspects are here (Red Hat, Linux Hardware/VA Systems, Compaq, IBM) plus accross from us is a company called Patmos (they have parallel systems and very comfy looking leather couches scattered throughout their booth). There are several vendors with massive clustering and parallel systems- practical ones for web serving and stuff instead of silly things like predicting the end of the world or weather.
Nobody is giving away really steller stuff (except the ALS boys with their excellent OS Wars T-Shirts).
The most entertaining news is the homeless Turbo Linux models (can someone send a URL with pictures?). They hired models to distribute promotional materials at the show- but they got thrown off the floor for doing it outside of allowed spaces. So they sent the models to the front of the local hotels. All those attractive women without a home- its enough to cause total insanity at a conference with so many geeks.
Less amusing, but still entertaining is the rumor of Legal Action between Linux Care and Red Hat. The former is distributing a parody of the 3com 'Simply Palm' ads with photo of a woman in a bra covering her backside with a Red Hat software box. The slogan reads "Simply Supported". Apparently the Red Hat lawyers sent cease and desist orders to the Linux Care lawyers. I'm waiting for a scan of the picture and the letter- that hopefully will be up soon.
Ah well, thanks for to the LinuxExpo folks for giving us a chunk of real estate to sit on at the floor. More as it happens.
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? (Score:1)
If anything, we can expect more commercial game support on Linux to go along with lots of industry backing from the big companies. New and cooler hardware to run Linux on (ie. Voodoo3 based 3D cards, dual Celeron systems, etc) for the hacker.
Mozilla should once again be a hot topic when Netscape finally releases a 5.0 Beta in a couple of months. NetWinder still seems to be a flop, although they garnered a lot of attention at LinuxWorld in San Jose in March.
Maybe now that Linux has infiltrated the industry and people can actually admit to using it professionally, all of the exciting stuff is gone? I doubt it, though.
Mike.
Re:ADMITTENLY OFF TOPIC!!!!!!! (Score:1)
I think that AC posting should be kept. It used to be REALLY annoying, but with the new moderation system in place, it's great! Anonymous postings that are stupid I never see and ones that are spectacular I do see. And, as it should be, anonymous postings are given slightly less initial weight.
Cmon!! Not all moderators are f*cking bad... (Score:1)
Notes:
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? (Score:3)
Not ten stories down you can see news that Linux will have a journalling filesystem and commercial distribution from SGI, the originator of that filesystem. You can also see a statement from Novell announcing the availability of NDS on Linux within the year. We've heard that sophisticated 3d software will be coming to Linux, courtesy (again) SGI, Precision Insight, 3dfx, and Daryll Strauss, and we've seen a new set of distribtution releases based on stable 2.2 kernels with a rapidly maturing GNOME/Enlightenment GUI complement to KDE. SAP announced R3 for Linux. And it's only May; what were you waiting for, MSLinux ?
You just gave me an idea (Score:3)
Top 3 Least Popular Linux Expo Giveaway Items
3. Bumper Sticker: "Mindcraft -- The best benchmark results money can buy."
2. Novelty playing card decks -- "The Heroes of Free Software Undressed".
1. Jock straps with "LinuxCare -- we support your software" on the front.
(Sorry I didn't have time to think of 10)
Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs. Log in as AC when you're being silly.
Rumour (Score:5)
I think Red Hat certainly has a right to ask LinuxCare to stop doing this. I think LinuxCare has a responsibility to then stop. I don't think either side should seek legal action, though.
Re:Yeah, but... (Score:1)
Re:We got IBM (Score:1)
Well linux support all the formats windows does..
Um.. no it doesn't. There is no Quicktime 3/4/Sorenson support for Linux. Xanim sure as heck doesn't have it, neither does mtv.
-= NJV =-
"A better burden can no man bear
on the way than his mother wit:
and no worse provision can he carry with him
than too deep a draught of ale."
The Havamal [pitt.edu]
We got IBM (Score:2)
Oh yeah, that XFS thingy. Wow, wouldn't that be cool on a Beowulf?
Whut else... um, Time Digital is now running a series on Linux... Mozilla is actually GOING SOMEWHERE... and people are saying "Hurd" again.
Intel investing in VA... Compaq supporting Linux on Alpha... Sun supporting Linux on Sparc64... SGI selling boxes with Linux on them... IBM selling boxes with Linux on them... HP selling Linux support... TUCOWS putting up Linux crap (?)...
What new media formats are there for Windows? I haven't booted into it (except in vmware, to test some client-side SSL stuff in IE4) since 1998 so forgive my asking
Re:The Stage Is Set For Battle (Score:1)
>same scratching-to-stay-alive heap as Apple.
Oh yeah, apple has no money, no assets, and no cutomers... nobody is buying their products, they'll be gone tomorrow!
Compamies of that size just don't disappear, I bet most people though DEC would be around longer, SGI seems to have an identity crisis... Apple is doing pretty darn good...
Re:Things you can get me.... (Score:1)
Problem solved [cheapbytes.com]
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? (Score:1)
I went right from DOS 5 to Linux.
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? (Score:1)
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:5)
Re:I though people would learn... (Score:1)
Huh? ;) ) and I've only used the privledge once to bounce a -1 comment that I thought was on topic back up again.
FYI, I'm a moderator (very few points
I'm of the opinion that conversations have improved greatly since moderation has started.
If you're afraid you're going to miss something, do what I do, set your threshhold to -1 and look at everything.
Re:I though people would learn... (Score:1)
In the rush for corporate acceptance.. (Score:1)
Yeah, but... (Score:1)
Re:Yeah, but... (Score:1)
So, where have you seen the RH images?
Nothing stellar in 1999? (Score:1)
Like a steel keg rolling on concrete (Score:2)
--
I noticed
Re:Where the hell is the moders? (Score:1)
Re:Lay off the poor "SUITS" (Score:2)
How so? The only people who care about how much money is being thrown at a company are the suits. So we should be grateful to the suits for throwing money at Red Hat to satisfy the suits?
We are geeks. We use Linux because it is the best tool for the job. Not because someone threw money at it.
The Stage Is Set For Battle (Score:5)
If 1998 was the year the Linux took the world by storm, 1999 will be the year that the corporation takes Linux by storm. It's already begun to happen and people are already complaining. The big names are up front. Small upstarts are using hot models and naked pictures to sell product. In the back sit the timeless veterans: Slashdot, Debian, FSF. Who will win?
If people stop worrying about who is making money off Linux, everyone will win. Companies are working within the established framework to do what they need to do: make money. Linux programmers are still hacking away, developing strong systems and code that works. This code is still free. Does it hurt you to know that Redhat is moving forward with plans of world domination? No, it helps you, because they're putting money into the development of Linux, as are IBM and Oracle. Why? Because those companies will have better systems and products if the platform they're working on is more stable, more open, and more extendable. Companies don't want to commercialize Linux, they want to commercialize products. Companies love Linux because Linux deals with standards vs. Microsoft which deals in proprietary ideas.
If Redhat sues Linux Care, it's business. If IBM pays more for the front seats, it's business. Linux is a business, not a product. Let the companies make their money. Let the developers develop the foundation. Seeing IBM and Oracle front this Expo is a great sign for Linux's viability in the marketplace. Seeing Redhat flex its corporate muscle is a great sign for Linux's strength in the business world.
Keep hacking. Keep programming. Enjoy the fruits of your labor and let others build upon your foundation. If the Linux community fights this, I'm afraid that they're going to be reduced to same scratching-to-stay-alive heap as Apple.
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:5)
Re:Lip service. (Score:1)
- Not speaking for IBM of course
I was there (Score:3)
It was funny when I actually met the guy behind linux.com and themes.org. Just another ordinary person. He seemed just as surprised when I told him I was the guy behind ML.ORG
You can tell this is a low budget expo since things that most other expos give away the vendors were charging for. But if you looked you could still get a free t-shirt (I got one) and buy a nice one (I bought one) and also get a nice stuffed penguin for my wife's collection and several cool bumper stickers..
And yoyos too..
To those who aren't around I can't say you are missing much and I don't know if I'd pay $20 for the exhibition badge... maybe... I guess I'm just spoiled by attending PC Expo many years.
Re:*nod* (Score:1)
No, spell-checkers are there to catch typos. If you don't know how to spell words, then you can't decide which, if any, of the spell-checker's suggestions is correct.
Re:Like a steel keg rolling on concrete (Score:1)
Re:Why does slashdot crash every time Malda travel (Score:1)
You're right that the Slashdot crew didn't seem to be all that mobile, and were pretty absorbed in their laptops: but Hemos was trying to fix the ad server, and I'm sure both he and CmdrTaco/Rob were trying to read the daily emails, and get some posts up, since the Slashdot community doesn't take kindly to a few days sans-(without)news.
Oh, I don't know (Re:Not cool) (Score:2)
That being said, Red Hat certainly has the right to decide how its image is used, and if it thinks the humourless masses will take it the wrong way (evidently quite possible), that's their call to make.
TurboLinux has no such excuse for using spokesmodels, on the other hand, so bad karma in their general direction.
Steve 'Nephtes' Freeland | Okay, so maybe I'm a tiny itty
Re:Things you can get me.... (Score:1)
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:2)
> instead I would seek revenge with a bigger and
> better trick.
Redhat isn't suing anyone. They just sent a 'cease and desist' letter. This is a long way from a lawsuit and they only want them to stop using their name and trademark, which could lead others to believe that this ad is actually for RedHat.
Perfectly reasonable, if you ask me.
Re:Not cool (Score:2)
Very much within their rights and very mature.
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? HuH? (Score:5)
-Linux 2.2 (this year)
-New Major versions of every distro.
-Loki Software and Civ: CTP
-Mozilla will be mostly done by Fall, Gecko
already kicks butt.
-RealAudio G2 player (in beta)
-VMWare
-Commercial support/investment/reaffermation from
several large companies, including Dell, IBM,
Oracle, Compaq.
-StarOffice 5.x (and released as no-cost software)
-Gnome 1.0 (this year)
-EGCS as the standard compiler
-WINE is going like gangbusters.
-Linux is being discussed by people in suits as an
option, whereas it was dismissed almost out of
hand last year.
-Many more things I am forgetting plus lots more
to come
And one note. Mozilla isn't a flop. The project has a really great CSS1 compliant engine (gecko), and it is on schedule. Plus several other companies besides AOL/Netscape have recently put programmers on it, and the number of 'outside' programmers is coming up.
Remember, they threw away a LOT of the code and rebuilt the thing from scratch. It may be taking them some time, but when it is finished, it will be a VERY nice and accurate platform for Web based applications, as well as being a complete web browser in itself.
Life is still good in the land of Linux.
Re:Not cool (Score:2)
Shame on you, linux care, for being sexist. Shame on you, redhat, for trying to scare people with legal action rather than acting like a mature adult (corporation).
I would have nothing but freezing contempt for both groups if they went to court over this, and jeopardized the reputation of the linux on account of sexy models and bad advertising.
--
Original post? (Score:4)
- Redhat has every right to be upset. If you saw YOUR name on promotional material before having a chance to look / approve it, you'd be upset too.
- Linuxcare made some very kick-ass looking graphics, which everybody likes.
- Various threats made about redhat being the next "microsoft" for sending the lawyers in.
--
Things you can get me.... (Score:1)
A.) A box from VA.
B.) A Parallel system or two.
C.) Some Slashdot Tee Shirts.
D.) A Copy of RedHat 6.0 (I'd rather not pay $80)
E.) One of those Turbo Linux models.
F.) One of the Patmos Leather Couches (To go along with the Model, of course!)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
Re:ADMITTENLY OFF TOPIC!!!!!!! (Score:1)
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
What's your idea of stellar? (Score:1)
Paying the piper (Score:1)
--JT
Spelling (not flamage) (Score:1)
All I want to do is present my ideas to you people.
In order to effectively present your ideas, you have to be a good communicator. The unwillingness to take the time to spell correctly, or typing out "2" for "to", or "ppl" for people reduces the impact of what you have to say.
Many simply won't bother to read such mess, especially when there is a glut of information to process. There are too many good ideas, and well presented ideas, to try to gleen nuggets of wisdom from things that are so difficult to read.
If you don't take your words seriously, no one else will.
Re:Is sexism an issue among geeks? (Score:1)
had to deal with sexism among geeks. Classic example:
http://x21.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/getdoc.xp?AN=455
_Deirdre
Re:Not cool (Score:2)
Linuxcare.
There was a movement in the marketing dept to use
BOTH the ad that was done AND one similar to what
you proposed. I don't know why it wasn't done that
way. But living in San Francisco as we do, it's a
logical choice for an ad around here.
_Deirdre
Re:Like a steel keg rolling on concrete (Score:1)
Re:Why does slashdot crash every time Malda travel (Score:1)
Re:Yeah, but... (Score:1)
Try here [magenta-logic.com]
(Fastest from UK).
URLs pop up on usenet from time to time... checkout dejanews for an image near you.
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:1)
Well, actually, almost all were around before 98.. (Score:1)
note:more emphasis on Debian, Slashdot, etc!!!!! (Score:1)
Read for the half I forgot to include :) (Score:2)
Imagine a comic book or a car convention, where Pepsi had the diggest spot on the floor only because they had tons of money to blow..... And there's Todd McFarlene, sitting in the corner, smashed between the restrooms and the snack bar.
Lip service. (Score:5)
Linux is still a "hot" name going around. But I wonder how many people at one of the "big name" booths, take IBM for example, even understand what's going on, what Linux is about, or have even used it for more than a 24 hour time period...
I live down near Austin, Texas, where the only Linux-related convention is that thing ZD is going to put on later this summer. Admission is around $500, explaining Open Source software concepts to the suits.
Wow. Closed doors and open source. What a combo...
I enjoy working with Linux, doing my little projects, working on development software, submitting patches whenever I get time. But, lately (esp in the past year), everyone's been jumping on this bandwagon because it's what's "in". I believe most of the commitments made by the suits lately almost as much as you can believe that most men listen to Brittany Spears because of her musical talents.
It's one thing to actually contribute to the movement. It's another thing to set up a front and milk it for all it's worth.
Get off the f***ing bandwagon and try pushing it for once.
Re:Yoda is Annakin's father. (Score:2)
Re:*nod* (Score:1)
If you want to say this had nothing to do with what they were selling, well.. yes. But it had to do with who they were selling it to. They were selling it to people. Dogs would have ignored it.
In a way it's like the joke about the mule and the two-by-four. First you have to get their attention. (But Red Hat *was* right to object.)
re: Re:Is sexism an issue among geeks? (Score:1)
This is a sort of apology. I'd do better, but I don't know how.
Unfortunately, intellectuals tend
I experienced being shunted aside from the social scene, so I got even less practice at acting civilized toward women than other men. This tended to cause rage, which was surpressed because I was ashamed of it. There were times when it slipped past my guards. I hope I apologized sufficiently for those, but of course I'll never know. Some people have had a rougher ride than I did. I'm sorry, but folk are not basically rational animals. Basically they are mammals, and living in large groups with high technology strains their instincts. I'm relatively certain that the individual who circulated that letter would be ashamed of the action, if he could bring himself to look at it. Sanity is sometimes in short supply.
Linuxcare ad isn't even original. (Score:1)
Jarod
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? (Score:1)
Why don't you check on Freshmeat and see if you still think we haven't gotten anything. There is tons of new stuff coming out all the time, and new versions of existing stuff coming out daily.
I think it is way to soon to think that Mozilla or the Netwinder are flops. Despite JWZ's disenchantment with Mozilla, I still think that it will end up with us getting a great open sourced browser. Sometimes you just gotta have a little patience.
As for multimedia formats, if they become anything important they will come to Linux. I am inclined to wonder how many new multimedia formats we need.
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? (Score:1)
I went from SunOS and MacOS to Linux. I was subjected to MS-DOS some at work, but I never really bought into it at home. I started out with the Apple II (back in the early 1980s), and started working with various *nixes (beginning with 4.2BSD on VAXen) in the mid 80's). By the time MS-DOS became very popular I was already learning UNIX, and in comparison MS-DOS seemed pretty pathetic.
I still use Solaris 2.x and SunOS 4.1.x pretty heavily (I use Sparcs at work and also have a couple of old SparcStations at home -- but my primary home platform is Linux). I still have a couple of Macs, but they don't get used very much anymore, pretty much only for some occasional PageMaker use. The newest Mac I have is an old 68k based IIfx.
Crash or attack? (Score:1)
Re:*nod* (Score:1)
This is especially nasty because this advertisig brings gender focus where gender really doesn't matter. Why bring it in at all and chance losing some market share? It gives me the message that women's business is not important to Red Hat or LinuxCare.
Not cool (Score:5)
Red Hat has every right to say STOP THAT.
*nod* (Score:2)
"Windows 98 Second Edition works and players better than ever." -Microsoft's Home page on Win98SE.
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:1)
But its an another thing to use it in a sexual derogitory way. I'm sure they meant it in good humor but redhat is most likly afraid people will assume the ad came from redhat and that thier anger over the ad will come back to redhat.
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:4)
But its an another thing to use it in a sexual derogitory way. I'm sure they meant it in good humor but redhat is most likly afraid people will assume the ad came from redhat and that thier anger over the ad will come back to redhat.
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? (Score:2)
In 1999 we got 2.2 (it came out late Jan IIRC), piles of proper companies supporting us, an enterprise class JFS, Gnome/KDE will become more and more standard, Mozilla proper will be released, Q3/Civ CTP the first commercial games EVER to be released (on linux) in parallel to the Windows versions and
--
Re:Nothing stellar in 1999? HuH? (Score:1)
The Linux version will ship the same time sa the winblows version (my local EB better have one waiting for me the day it is released!)
Alpha Barebones are being given away! (Score:2)
Oh yeah, Alpha Processor, right next to Loki Entertainment, was also giving away a FULL Alpha system (just, though, folks).
Yesterday was the first Linux conference I have ever attended, and I was pleased with its organization, exhibits, and conferences (the APEmille super-computer and the MOSIX cluster conferences were PACKED! You couldn't breath!)...
Anyhow, just wanted to alert you to some things that the
-G.
Slackware 4!! (Score:1)
Yay! 3.6 was really, really starting to show it's age. And I can't stomach what those other distributions have been doing to
Or being hurled headlong into a maze during package selection with Debian.
The Subgenius must have slack.
Re:ADMITTENLY OFF TOPIC!!!!!!! (Score:1)
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:1)
>Red Hat is a trademark that they have to protect.
There is a useful distinction between "protect" and "act like children".
>The law, unfortunately, has not room for witty.
This is false. Parody is specifically protected in the law. I grant that LinuxCare should have altered the logo in some way in order to qualify as "fair use", but RedHat needn't have jumped on it with all four feet.
>And from the sounds of them, these ads do not parody.
This is also false. They are very effective parodies of the PalmPilot ads.
--
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:1)
>Well if someone created an AD that advertised your product in a manor
Advertisements are out of place in manors, as any English lord could tell you.
"Ads in the manor! Damned cheek!"
>that you felt might get you in problems with certain segments of the population,
Hint: As you grow more prolix, the weakness of your argument becomes more obvious, not less. LinuxCare's only obligation was to distort RedHat's logo in some way in order to comply with fair use laws. If they did, they're within bounds. If they didn't, they'll know better next time. However, it is not incumbent upon RedHat to bash LinuxCare for displaying a better sense of humor than you yourself possess.
>I believe you would be mad also.
You believe quite a bit about someone you do not know. Is that why they call you "Mindstalker"?
--
End of the Innocence (Score:5)
Red Hat suing LinuxCare? God. I know it's been said at many points during Linux's evolution, but for me, this is the end of the innocence.
Commercial Linux distributions didn't bother me, since nobody violated Linux's GPL in the process. Fractiousness didn't bother me -- where's a programmer who won't argue? Non-open-source tools for Linux bothered me a bit, but I wasn't being forced to buy them and preferred the open-source alternatiuves on their own merits.
However, the Linux community always had an appealing irreverence. People in general are far too serious nowadays; you can pretend to be serious, but you can't pretend to be witty. The LinuxCare spoof ads are witty. They should have been left alone.
--
Is sexism an issue among geeks? (Score:1)
Re:I though people would learn... (Score:1)
Anonymity is important. If you go around telling people that you have moderator access, I'll remove your access. It is essential to the system that moderators don't operate for ego inflation or fame or to promote their ideaology. We must be fair or the system just won't work.
Nuff said.
Breace.
Re:Things you can get me.... (Score:1)
From that link:
24. Red Hat 6.0 Official Release i386 Version SHIPPING $ 79.00
I imagine (s)he'd also rather not pay $79.00
Try this instead: LSL [lsl.com] - you only pay shipping.
(We received it last week, and it's up and running, although pretty slow on a 233MMX w 32MB RAM).
Breace
Re:Things you can get me.... (Score:1)
Uh, no not stupid or funny, just blind.
Breace.
Just remember, there are no stupid questions, just stupid people. - SP
The two faces of Red Hat (Score:1)
---
Lay off the poor "SUITS" (Score:2)
SUITS make the world go round. No one would have taken Red Hat seriously until money was thrown at it. Not everyone who uses Linux needs to contribute to the kernel. I'm glad that someone is trying to explain to the suits what open source is all about, because the sooner they learn, the quicker this movement will fly into high gear. We are in a grass roots movement - but it is currently only applicable to those who don't mind getting dirty. The great mass of people don't want to get dirty, they just want their lawn to grow green and fresh. Remember that and get off your technological high-horse. Thats why AOL and MSFT are technologically some of the worst, and monetarily some of the best.
~mnj
Re:I was there (Score:1)
Maybe not, but it'd be fun to see all those companies pushing Open / Free software and hardware in one place.
Despite claims to the contrary, I think a complete "typical user desktop" can be assembled right now - there are Free / commercial applications now for word processing, graphics, spreadsheets, etc. (When I say "typical", though, I do mean folks who use their computers as I observe *most* get used - as a typewriter, desk calculator, calander, e-mail and Web browser, doodle pad, etc.)
I bet the Expos for Linux will only get better (as in more luxurious, whether that means better for the avg consumer is a question I won't get into here!). It'd be interesting to chart the graphs of attendance, entry price, entry 'prestige', total money generated (tough to pin down), jobs gained, etc. at various Free OS expos now that so much is rolling in this area.
I wish there was a market for ticket futures to Linux Expos, because I'd buy a few hundred entries
timothy
haha, it's funny how things happen. (Score:2)
oh, how the mighty have gotten their noses pulled.
Re:Read for the half I forgot to include :) (Score:1)
San Francisco and Hunky Male Models... (Score:1)
How's about this. When a conference come over here to Sodom By The Bay, then you'll do one with the hunky guy.
Gay geeks need soft-core ads too.......
IBM DOES understand what's going on... (Score:3)
Yes, there are some firms that are just jumping on the Linux/OpenSource bandwagon. But to say that all firms that don't have an exclusively Linux focus are just paying Lip Service to the movement is a bit of an overgeneralization. They support the movement in many ways, including making it acceptable for a bigger corporation to play around with Linux. IBM or another large firm using or supporting Linux gives the movement credibility in the eyes of the people with the money. Who's to say whether those people will actually buy their solutions from IBM, or from Debian? Once the movement is legitimized, brand name lessens its grip on the thoughts of the people with the control to help world domination.
You can't expect a firm that takes in over $10bn a year in revenue to only sell Linux solutions, just as VA Research doesn't only sell Linux solutions (or at least they didn't....are they still offering Dual Boot systems?). Until World Domination (tm) is achieved, we need to make sure that the legitimization of the movement is one of the goals.
And even if it isn't, as Linux is supposed to be a happy little community that accepts all comers, why are you harping on the fact that some of those comers have a money-making agenda?
It sounds like your problems are more with those people setting up conferences and then charging exorbitant fees for them rather than with the big companies that are helping the movement along. I agree with you. But you probably wouldn't find much to do at a ZD conference anyway: it's by suits for suits. Head off to the Gathering or something if you want a more geek-friendly conference.
Kirk
Dead right. (Score:1)
Come on, there's got to be a million and one ways of advertising something as exciting as a real alternative to Windows - I can think of a few original ideas myself - and they don't have to include the word 'Microsoft'.
Re:End of the Innocence (Score:1)
Where the hell is the moders? (Score:1)
Re:You just gave me an idea (Score:1)