data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87aff/87affa045ab7f9eb297408bf8d8594376980f72b" alt="Linux Linux"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/114a3/114a3ad76461bddbf2afa583782f630551f7277a" alt="Software Software"
Linus & Maddog on panel with MS and DH Brown 26
Anonymous Coward writes "
Linus and maddog will be on a panel, along with a Microsoft guy (Jim Ewel) and someone from DH Brown (Tony Iams).
This will be in Atlanta at the AIIM '99 conference.
" The actual date will be April 14, 9-10 AM.
Actually... (Score:1)
A study by D. H. Brown was used as a source for John Kirch's NT Server 4.0 vs. Unix Page [unix-vs-nt.org]. I don't know where they get their funding, so I can't say for sure whether they are objective or not, but this is at least one in their favor.
Otherwise a good article (Score:1)
-----
Coverage? (Score:1)
Whoops.
Anyways, is there any coverage on-line for this? I want to listen in. How about a Real Audio feed?
Tag Team (Score:1)
Linux at the AIIM Show (Score:1)
--
Blake Sorensen
Registration and Volunteer Coordinator
Atlanta Linux Showcase 1999
USENIX Tutorials, October 12-13
Conference and Exhibition, October 14-16
Jim Ewel - watch for FUD (Score:1)
It is finding out who works for Micros~1 that
makes it difficult to seperate FUD from reality.
Locutus
FUD alert, but.... (Score:1)
Locutus
FUD alert (Score:1)
It also says that Linux is less suitable for general business purposes than any of the commercial UNIXes or even NT, without giving much of any details on what criteria were used to make that determination.
DHBrown (Score:1)
DHBrown (Score:1)
Got any other unsubstantiated rumors you'd like to bet on?
reports... (Score:2)
i think in some ways it's nice to see, especially in light of esr and bruce parens little war of words. it will be a nice example of parens "hydra" marketing approach - both linus and john representing linux (and free software) instead of a single esr.
and no offense to esr, but i think linus and john will make a better impression. as opposed to the rms and esr approach to marketing (weird outfits, and outrageous statements), this pair will present a very toned down yet persuasive message for people to consider. not so much "in your face" as "in your head."