Qube2 Release 24
Harris
Vaegan-Lloyd writes "Cobalt networks have just
released the Qube2, with a whole lot of new features to
make everyone's lives easier, so why would you want a
netwinder now huh? New features are modem control, scheduled
backup to remote servers, DHCP server, better email alias
handling & better mailing lists and too much to type here..
Hardware is now 2 ethernet ports, a serial card and a new
250Mhz mips chip (Qunatum Effects Dynamic.). And a new
power connector to replace the old one that kept falling
out! Yay! ;). " An anonymous reader also sent us a link
to a review
of this new toy.
Over Priced.. (Score:1)
Do they sell separate casings?
I don't need the stuff inside,
but that Cube case is so cool...
Why you would want a netwinder instead (Score:1)
-Rasmus
Probably (Score:1)
What is... (Score:1)
Yes... new experimental feature (Score:1)
different icon? (Score:1)
--
URL problems - s/?/'/g? (Score:1)
Over Priced.. (Score:1)
Let's split this into two parts.
Performance:
I have to assume you mean CPU specs. Having run very I/O intensive applications on both PC hardware (dual PII 450) and a RaQ, I'd pick the Qube or RaQ for such applications.
You see, a PC simply does NOT have the I/O throughput necessary for a lot of today's applications. A PC can't keep up in many respects. I set up BigBrother to watch all of the workstations at our site, and it drove a PII 266 to a load average of 27. CPU, disk, memory, and network performance were fine. The internal I/O was overloaded. I can set that same system up with TWO instances on a RaQ and drive the load up to a mere 1.7 - 2.0.
Apples to apples:
Are you putting that Celeron into a rack mounted case? The cheapest I can find for a TWO rack unit high box is $550 for just the case. A Cobalt RaQ fits in ONE rack unit. How about into a 7.25" cube? That's darn small. Real estate is at a premium in most offices, that's one reason many folks work in cubes.
The Cobalt systems do not require a monitor, kb, etc, to be configured, maintained, etc. PCs do. BIG plus both in the modern datacenter and on the workgroup table.
> That means you're paying a real premium for convenience of setup which no self respecting
> Linux guru is willing to do.
1, You're not paying very much at all for what you get.
2. They're not aimed at linux gurus.
3. I'm a professional UNIX sysadmin, and I LOVE the convenience of setup. I'm sorry, but I don't have a lot of free time at work, and anything that makes my life easier is cool by me.
> remember the NeXT, BeBox, Amiga, Atari ST, Go Book
All too well. I'm a former NeXT admin. However, these systems ran proprietary operating systems. The Cobalt systems run Linux. Do you want a copy of the kernel source for a Cobalt system? Snag it from their FTP site.
All in all, I understand your points, but I have to disagree.
Reagen Ward
software? (Score:1)
- MbM
Raq, mod_perl/PHP, and Oracle (Score:1)
Over Priced.. (Score:1)
I agree (Score:1)
It works just fine if you can rely on the
generic conf. But on some special demands
it looses.
But hey! Consider the price!
Over Priced.? (Score:1)
I would guess there's a huge market for the latter -- in alot of companies the "system admin" is also the receptionist just cuz they use MS Word the most. They don't care that it runs linux, they want Internet.
FireWallable? (Score:1)
I would love to beable to easily configure a Qube or a Netwinder as firewall solution.