Linux in healthcare computing 37
CsJmn writes
"I came across this short article on Linux in the January
issue online edition of Healthcare Informatics magazine (a
healthcare computing industry trade magazine). The story is
about half way down this page ."
The story is about the sucessful introduction of Linux to
Huntsville Hospital in Alabama. Apparently, John Carpenter,
Microsoft's worldwide healthcare industry Marketing manager
is worried "It will certainly drive us to put new stuff
into our products."
Not with it yet (Score:1)
"Users that have customized Linux to run their apps must also maintain and support it, which requires staffing."
Windoze does not require staffing? And huge wastes of precious time to baby-sit?
"Given Windows' dominating presence..., combined with healthcare's traditional conservatism
regarding new technologies, Linux is a long way from mainstream."
Doesn't NT mean "New Technology"? Isn't Windoze 98 new technology?
And W2k, what about that? Is it Ok to rush out to migrate to this crap
but Linux - I don't know, that's "new technology"...
"The days of having enormously expensive, proprietary systems
is going away because the information is now in everyone's hands."
I'm glad to see more people are beginning to view "proprietary" as a dirty word.
M$ strikes again (Score:1)
"Stuff"? In Microsoft's case, "stuff" should probably be replaced with another "s" word..
Q: What are the system requirements for Windows 2000? .. Stuff..
A: Uh..
"It will certainly drive us to put new stuff into (Score:1)
go "stuff" it up your............ (Score:1)
GPF in module life support (Score:1)
Re: It will certainly drive us to put new stuff... (Score:1)
Come on MS, that's how you compete in a free marketplace! You INNOVATE! Make a better product or sell a comparable one for cheaper.
I wonder what they would put into their products if it weren't for competitiors like Linux, WordPerfect, Intuit, Netscape and others... IMHO, not much.
-Derek
Re: the KKK (Score:1)
I'm sure they'll agree with you completely.
Idiot.
axolotl
ANOYING FREEWARE! (Score:1)
Maybe it's my mood lately... But something about hearing GNU/GPL stuff refered to as "Freeware" just rubs me the wrong way.
more stuff in our products (Score:1)
Same old MS - it's innovation, we didn't break that guy's stuff on purpose... sure....
more stuff! (Score:1)
"It will certainly drive us to put new stuff into (Score:1)
YAY ALABAMA! (Score:1)
What century are they from?
Stuff (Score:1)
and the Micro$oft reply is, "we better add some
stuff"? To agree with a previous post, "Why not
fix the OS"? It's getting too funny!
"It will certainly drive us to put new stuff into (Score:1)
About time. (Score:1)
However, an NT crash in a hospital is still a major headache. The typical large hospital has one cluster of operating rooms (for the prescheduled surgeries) next to a large recovery room (pre-op right next door as well, as well as a waiting room). In the recovery room's desk area is an NT server that handles room bookings with all of the hosptal's wards. When the LAN is working, it's awesome. By the time the patient ir out of the RR, the nurse station at his ward has staff knowing exactly when to expect him, what specialists to call in an emergency, diet, prescriptions, and as an added benefit, the patient's friends wait for him by his room, rather than outside the RR (where only one or two should stick around -- a crowd around there would be in the way). The patient's paper records arrive with him.
When the LAN crashes, this we enter nightmare land. Paper records have to be copied and delivered by hand, as well as confirmation that the ward is ready for the patient. (forget about doing it over the phone -- too many details to convey) The hospital can't divert too many staff for this, and can't use the tube shoot (it's mostly for delivering samples and drugs). The recovery room gets crowded with patients who aren't cleared out, and the hospital may have to postpone prescheduled surgery (I saw this happen as a volunteer in one place.)
So, knowing Linux has made an inroad is very good news. There was only one real impediment: you can't ask nurses to start learning Unix commands, or they will give you a very dirty look
Decommotized Protocol w/ crypto (Score:1)
That's about all they could do at this point.
The FDA is capable of barring their entry to anything they could seriously munge up.
Name confusion! Larry Walls != Larry Wall (Score:1)
--
Off Topic...the next article on y2k (Score:1)
argh! open sores! (Score:1)
Innovation? (Score:1)
"You mean we actually have to COMPETE???" And with free software at that! Oh I get a warm fuzzy feeling.
And WHAT DO patients records belong on? (Score:1)
I would trust my life to Linux and just about any commercial unix I have ever dealt with. Also VMS. I have the experience that tells me that these are stable and can be trusted.
I wouldn't keep recipes on RedmondWare.
Of course, you are perhaps refering to patient record confidentiality? That is another issue.
If I'm in the hospital, I'd like some degree of certainty that the staff knows what my lab results are and what meds I'm to get. If they are keeping that info on NT, they had better give me lots of prozac.
-- hgc
Huntsville is on the cutting edge everyday (Score:1)
Linux Users of North Alabama (Score:1)
http://luna.huntsville.al.us/ .
LUNAtics -- to arms!
Unxmaal