Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
EU Government Microsoft Open Source Windows Linux

German State Plans To Migrate 13,000 Workstations From Linux to Windows (zdnet.com) 325

An anonymous reader quotes ZDNet: The German state of Lower Saxony is set to follow Munich in migrating thousands of official computers away from Linux to Microsoft's Windows. As initially reported by Heise, the state's tax authority has 13,000 workstations running OpenSuse -- which it adopted in 2006 in a well-received migration from Solaris -- that it now wants to migrate to a "current version" of Windows, presumably Windows 10.

The authority reasons that many of its field workers and telephone support services already use Windows, so standardisation makes sense. An upgrade of some kind would in any case be necessary soon, as the PCs are running OpenSuse versions 12.2 and 13.2, neither of which is supported anymore.

According to the Lower Saxony's draft budget, €5.9m is set aside for the migration in the coming year, with a further €7m annually over the following years; it's not yet clear how many years the migration would take... Munich's shift away from LiMux -- the city's own Ubuntu-based distribution -- is expected to cost more than €50m overall, involving the deployment of around 29,000 Windows-based computers.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

German State Plans To Migrate 13,000 Workstations From Linux to Windows

Comments Filter:
  • No problem (Score:4, Funny)

    by TimothyHollins ( 4720957 ) on Saturday July 28, 2018 @09:37AM (#57023394)

    This should be easy. The German state has become quite the expert on migration as of late. Let's just hope no-one gets raped in the process.

    • I can see it now, a group of 7 rape a woman in the middle of a town square at midday in the middle of a parade.

      Sadly the police and media /and the victim/ reports that no one can describe the assailants with any more detail than "multiple men",........

      Of course the one guy who caught it on film is being charged for privacy violations and hate speech!
      Wait is this Germany or Sweden?

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Ich habe keine Teufeltommyenglanderpigdoggenversicherung fur meinem Strassenbahnhaltestellehandytasche!

  • Had they started using a windows is back in 2006, it's security would be no longer supported as well. If they can operate on Linux and are familiar, and I can't see why they would spend the money to change. I imagine they use them for basic tasks like email, typing word docs, excel sheets, and printing and not much else. In that case the free version will trump windows every time.
  • Shame (Score:5, Insightful)

    by 110010001000 ( 697113 ) on Saturday July 28, 2018 @09:47AM (#57023438) Homepage Journal
    It is a shame. Willingly paying for closed source malware and spyware isn't my idea of using money wisely.
    • Re:Shame (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 28, 2018 @10:01AM (#57023484)

      That should tell you how much desktop Linux sucks ass.

    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Tough Love ( 215404 )

      Who benefits by replacing inherently secure Linux with malware magnet Windows? Russia does most certainly. And just need to coopt as few as one official, a few weeks of over-the-paunch sex should do it, easier than winning at Russian roulette.

      • Please. Windows hasn't been a malware magnet for years. The vast majority of malware out there targets applications (Adobe is good for this) and silly users who will run executables with admin privileges. There's very little malware out there targeting any OS these days.

    • Willingly paying for closed source malware and spyware isn't my idea of using money wisely.

      Since when do enterprises get the malware and spyware version?

  • by Kohath ( 38547 ) on Saturday July 28, 2018 @10:02AM (#57023488)

    Idealism vs. getting shit done. It's no surprise that Germany's government is choosing getting shit done.

    They should try that for electricity generation next.

    • by Calydor ( 739835 ) on Saturday July 28, 2018 @10:33AM (#57023560)

      After dealing with German bureaucracy for the past eight years I can assure you, the German government's list of interests doesn't include "Get shit done".

      • I have dealt with German bureaucracy for more than 20 years now. They are way better than most bureaucracy around the world. And they do indeed get shit done, the problem is that they are stickler for rules, and many people dislike that and feel it is a waste of time. No offense but you seem to belong to that category...
        • by Kjella ( 173770 )

          And they do indeed get shit done, the problem is that they are stickler for rules, and many people dislike that and feel it is a waste of time.

          Rules as such are okay, the problem is when you've painted yourself into a corner nobody's the slightest bit flexible or helpful on how to get out of there. It could be because you've missed or misunderstood something, didn't understand the dependencies or somehow did it wrong. In other countries I've had some success with "Well maybe this wasn't the right way but this is where I am now so what can I do from here?" and get a useful answer. Germans like to reply "You should have..." and okay, I should have.

        • by Calydor ( 739835 )

          No, the problem is EXACTLY that they are a stickler for rules rather than getting things done. There is no flexibility, no grey area in which things get done unless the rules specifically allow it.

          Let me give you a very recent example. A year ago I had eye surgery to get a cornea transplant, and to help the cornea attach and not be rejected I'm taking a series of different medications and eye drops. Monday of this week I went to my doctor to refill my prescription for my eye drops only to find out he's on v

          • I'm really curious how this turned out. I am all frustrated on your behalf ready to threaten a pharmacist to prevent your eyes from falling out. I hate rules and authority with an irrational passion. And yet I rarely change panes without signaling and become irritated at people who do. Maybe that is a politeness thing not a rule thing. I do like politeness. Right up to the point someone is quoting rules at me while my immune system is removing my new corneas.

            • by Calydor ( 739835 )

              It turned out such that I am using some leftover eyedrops of a different brand I used to use before they swapped me to the current ones. Never got a reply to my second email asking if they understood the problem of telling me they couldn't help me while my doctor was away until they could get a note from the doctor who is away.

          • "They refused. Why? Because I hadn't been there this quarter and to do ANYTHING for me they need a new referral from my doctor."

            Actually no they can't do anything if it is not an emergency/enduring disease, because first you have to be referred by A doctor. They count as specialist and before you go to a specialist baring emergency & chronicle disease, you have to got to a doctor. This actually avoid abuses and flooding specialist when not needed. But note that I said *a* doctor. Not *your* doctor. Do
            • by Calydor ( 739835 )

              And thus you prove the point that is being made - that the Rules are more important than Getting Shit Done.

              This is not some random hospital I contacted. This is a hospital where I have a current treatment going, but because the last time I was there was in April they refuse to write ONE prescription in order to Get Shit Done.

        • There's no problem with sticking to rules. The problem is the formation and design of the rules in the first place. The Dutch are good at sticking to rules too, however the rules don't actually get in the way of progress.

          In Germany specifically sticking to the rules IS a waste of time and the rules result in very little benefit other than to keep the bureaucratic wheel turning and people employed. Japan has a similar culture and set of rules.

  • by mykepredko ( 40154 ) on Saturday July 28, 2018 @10:09AM (#57023512) Homepage

    That this is being done *without* a cost-benefit analysis.

    There is a certain amount of politics here, but if I were a citizen/tax payer of Lower Saxony I'd be mostly concerned that this is being done before an analysis is available.

    I understand that Open Suse 12.2 and 12.3 are obsolete, but I would think that migrating to Leap 42 or Leap 15 would would be a lot cheaper than buying Windows 10 licenses. In TFA, they cite the issue that telephone support is now being done on Windows - but I would think that it would be more cost effective to move them to Linux.

    But, without any kind of analysis, the people who are going to pay for this won't know.

  • by sanf780 ( 4055211 ) on Saturday July 28, 2018 @10:11AM (#57023518)
    If EU is not a friend anymore according to Trump, why does the EU allow USA software in their administration?
    • by PolygamousRanchKid ( 1290638 ) on Saturday July 28, 2018 @11:00AM (#57023666)

      If EU is not a friend anymore according to Trump, why does the EU allow USA software in their administration?

      Snarky answer:

      . . . probably because the EU is thinking long term, and that in six years, Trump won't be POTUS anymore.

      And then everyone will pretend to be friends again.

      Realistic answer:

      . . . probably for the same reason that the US government is using software from SAP, produced in Germany, an enemy state of the US in the current government's eyes.

    • by Kohath ( 38547 )

      Same reason China uses US-designed semiconductors: no viable homegrown alternatives, now or in the foreseeable future. With some noteworthy exceptions, Europe has been falling further behind in areas of technology recently.

    • If EU is not a friend anymore according to Trump, why does the EU allow USA software in their administration?

      Because the EU like the rest of the sane world understand that shit coming from Trump's mouth is just that. Also common, EU is not a friend? Where did you get that idea from? Tuesday? As of Wednesday we're besties working towards open trade and Junker even gave Trump a kiss on the cheek.

      Don't worry though, a stopped clock is wrong twice a day, and pretty much anything you think Trump thinks about something or someone is probably correct every other week too. Now that we're besties I fully expect him to lau

  • I hate it when an operating system doesn't charge me thousands of dollars per year to renew licenses

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by jonesy16 ( 595988 )

      You must not be using an enterprise version then. RedHat charges $299 per workstation license, per year, if you want support, $179 if you want to do it yourself. You can get the desktop version with no support, but you're still going to pay $49 / yr. Windows 10 is $84 / yr in comparison. So if you're going to compare apples to apples by comparing the pricing of enterprise licensing with support, then you're not really any better off in either camp.

      • You must not be using an enterprise version then. RedHat charges $299 per workstation license, per year.

        Somebody uses Redhat for workstations? Who? The vast majority of Redhat installs are servers. Stupidly expensive maintenance subscriptions imho, but it makes sense to somebody. I suppose, the cost is nothing compared to managing more machines with fewer admins.

        • You must not be using an enterprise version then. RedHat charges $299 per workstation license, per year.

          Somebody uses Redhat for workstations? Who? The vast majority of Redhat installs are servers. Stupidly expensive maintenance subscriptions imho, but it makes sense to somebody. I suppose, the cost is nothing compared to managing more machines with fewer admins.

          It's a lame debate tactic. Yeah, if you cherry pick the most expensive way you could use Linux, it's expensive. How about that.

          • I'm not saying Linux is expensive. I am saying, some server operators choose to pay a lot of money to Red Hat, when any serious Linux geek knows it's probably a dump idea because free distros are at least as reliable and usually have more up to date kernels. That's their business.

            The big boys like Google, Facebook and even Microsoft don't buy per-machine support from Red Hat, and for the most do not run RPM-based distros. They do however hire Red Hat for consulting from time to time.

            Speaking of lame, it's k

      • You must not be using an enterprise version then. RedHat charges $299 per workstation license, per year, if you want support, $179 if you want to do it yourself. You can get the desktop version with no support, but you're still going to pay $49 / yr. Windows 10 is $84 / yr in comparison. So if you're going to compare apples to apples by comparing the pricing of enterprise licensing with support, then you're not really any better off in either camp.

        And?

        Realistically, most places with Windows support it themselves. That's while still paying for the licenses.

        And you know perfectly well there are good usable Linux distributions that don't require paid support licenses. With Windows, you pay whether you use any support or not, no matter what.

        With Linux you can have any kind of custom distribution you want. Not so, Windows.

        Linux, "telemetry" optional. Windows, mandatory ...

  • Windows (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward

    Sorry I cant help you right now my computer is updating.

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • They have 13,000 linux-based computers, but after paying €50m to migrate they'll deploy 29,000 windows computers. This is bonkers. There has got to be conflict of interest here somewhere.

  • HAHAHHAHA

"Joy is wealth and love is the legal tender of the soul." -- Robert G. Ingersoll

Working...