Lawyer Continues Android v. GPL Crusade 155
jfruhlinger writes "Edward Naughton has been insisting for months that Android violates the GPL because Google created a new set of Linux kernel headers that it hasn't released the source code for, despite the fact that it incorporates open source code. While numerous commentators, including those who helped write the kernel headers, claimed this code isn't copyrightable, Naughton in persisting in his crusade, saying that the questions need to be resolved in court for the good of the open source movement."
Re:No legal standing (Score:2, Informative)
Much of the code (type definitions, macros, and function prototypes) contained in those headers are essentially in the public domain as a result of being part of either the ANSI C standard or the POSIX/SUS standards, or both. There could be a violation beyond that, but Naughton nor Miller seems to be bothered enough to post actual snippets of infringing code. Instead they adapt the Darl McBride/SCO approach: I tell you, megabytes of my client's intellectual property have been dumped into Android without the appropriate license. Only it probably wasn't their client's IP, since it belongs to the FSF and the glibc or kernel developers. Oh well.
Re:Headers are Facts (Score:4, Informative)
Re:No legal standing (Score:2, Informative)
Shut-up and go on with life?
Re:Even if he's wrong, he's exercising his rights (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Header files are like phone books (Score:5, Informative)
But header use alone does not trigger a GPL requirement.
From the second link:
Torvalds responded to my inquiry on March 21 and had this to say:
"It seems totally bogus. We've always made it very clear that the kernel system call interfaces do not in any way result in a derived work as per the GPL, and the kernel details are exported through the kernel headers to all the normal glibc interfaces too.
Re:Tilting at windmills? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:No legal standing (Score:4, Informative)
Actually, more likely the SFLC which exists specifically to take such cases. But let's be much more specific. I also live in Europe and if you can name a decent sized set of lines of original work which Google has copied without license and you are willing to sue them then I'll give you 500Euro to start it off with.
And please note, there's no reason to go to the US. Google has presence in Europe and if you wrote your code here you can sue them here. Germany is probably quite a good place for that.
If you (the grandparent) can show that Google copied your orignial work. Which I doubt.