Ubuntu 11.04, Slackware 13.37 266
Approximately one billion Slashdot readers wrote in to tell us today that one of two distributions had releases:
the new Ubuntu sports the Unity interface, marking a 'radical departure' from its UI of old. Now the more ancient and bearded amongst you might be interested in Patrick announcing the latest Slackware release which clearly has the most 1337 version number to date.
Both? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
It's easier to condense them into one post than trying to weed out the best individual topic. Check the firehose, it's littered with submissions.
Re: (Score:2)
No problem at all, both are clearly for totally different user targets, each side will mostly ignore the other... of course there will be always some black sheep's, but those will troll both storied, no matter if nested or isolated... ;)
and everyone knows that slackware is the best!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think there's any animosity between Slackware and Ubuntu users. Or even Gentoo or Arch for that matter.
There's probably a rivalry between Ubuntu and Fedora users, though.
Re: (Score:3)
.. and that is the problem. Instead of that bullshit flame wars between distros, why not just concentrate on making the whole system better for user. Imagine how childish it would be if Microsoft and Apple did that.
Don't you mean bullshit flame wars between _users_?
Congrats on the new release, Ubuntu!
Re:Both? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm amazed there was any space left on the front page after all those troll articles about the "tracking" "scandal", some even dupes from 2010 trying to pass off old information as new news. Anything to keep the FUD machine going.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that and the endless US bashing, eh?
Could be worse: Imagine US tcshing! :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Normally, I'd dog on the editors for this too, but I just noticed the, the "OMG wyte ifone" submission has almost twice the comments as this announcment...it'll be interesting to check back on the comment count in a few hours to see what /.'ers really care about these days!
No, the purpose is to argue about which is better (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Gaahh! Ever more forking!
A radical departure? (Score:4, Interesting)
Most of what it does is Compiz, it has a menu bar and a dock. You still log in through gdm and it still pops up on the wrong monitor when I have 'em both active.
On the other hand, it is awfully more mac-like, what with Unity stealing menu bars left and right, but not always.
Still the same theme from Maverick with the gadgets on the wrong side but now it makes sense because it makes sense for the gadgets to be on that side when they get snarfed into the top bar.
I'm just glad that they managed to get the dock pop-up/click behavior ironed out before the release, I noticed they finally fixed this in the last day or two. And the Applications place seems to actually have stuff in it every time I click it now. For a few days there I had to type to see anything the first time I used it.
All in all if you're not married to a particular interface it's not an unpleasant change, and it does look nice. Amusingly, to me it is reminiscent of the Zune Desktop Theme [cnet.com] for Windows XP. That's nice for me because I'm a dual-boot user again, and that's my XP theme of choice :)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Why upgrade? (Score:3, Insightful)
I find Kubuntu Lucid LTS stable enough for me these days and cannot really see any reason to upgrade to Natty. I think I'm going to stick to the LTS releases from now on since the new features just aren't compelling enough. Anyone else feel the same?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, except that "It appears your machine does not have the hardware needed to run unity." It just comes up with the classic gnome interface in my VirtualBox.
That was a waste of time.
Re: (Score:2)
Unity 2D ('sudo apt-get install unity-2d') works under VirtualBox (if any version of Unity can be said to 'work'). Then you can have fun ticking off how many of these mistakes it makes:
http://homepage.mac.com/bradster/iarchitect/shame.htm [mac.com]
Re: (Score:3)
While the OS itself might not change, usually app versions get frozen to a particular level per release and only get updated in the repositories (aside from security and major bugfixes) on the change of the OS version. You can get around this by using PPA's, but IMHO those often cause some issues.
All in all, for me it's worth upgrading just to get new versions of most of the applications. I might would stick to the LTS releases if I used my system for "real work", but in reality at work I'm stuck with Win
Re: (Score:2)
Yep. :-)
I stick to the LTS releases because I am too lazy to update (yes, even if it is just a click in the update manager, and a 10 minute wait).
My 10.4 has all the functionality I need, and I can wait for the next LTS which, if I am not mistaken, is the next 11.10 in October. I'll probably update by January or March 2012.
I am one of those mainstream desktop users which comprise 90% of the desktop market, using only 10% of the functionality of the computer for 90% of the time.
Re: (Score:2)
My 10.4 has all the functionality I need, and I can wait for the next LTS which, if I am not mistaken, is the next 11.10 in October.
Next LTS is 12.4 as per the 2 yearly sequence 8.4, 10.4, 12.4, 14.4 etc.
Re: (Score:2)
I find Kubuntu Lucid LTS stable enough for me these days and cannot really see any reason to upgrade to Natty. I think I'm going to stick to the LTS releases from now on since the new features just aren't compelling enough. Anyone else feel the same?
For me, I'd rather wait for the almost certain hardware problems to be discovered and fixed by someone else before I make the switch. I've got an Nvidia card and a Bluetooth keyboard/mouse that always seem to break with each new Ubuntu. I've already dug through my closet enough times getting out an old keyboard and coping with VGA for a few weeks to have learned my lesson. And don't get me started on sound.
Call me selfish, but I don't want to wade through support forums in 640x480 looking for just the right
GPT Support (Score:2)
Do either of these support installing to a GPT partition? I've been looking around for a Linux distro that actually allows me to install to a GPT disk without much fuss and haven't had any luck so far. It would be nice since my main reason for wanting GPT is Linux obsession with using up all my primary partitions.
Now if only Win XP could be made to boot from a GPT partition without sacrificing all the extra partitions I could have with GPT.
Re: (Score:3)
Do either of these support installing to a GPT partition?
Yes, but you need a BIOS that will boot from it. I have my Ubuntu 10.04 MythTV server installed with a GPT partition table, but I have to boot it from the other disk which has a DOS partition table because the BIOS can't find the GPT boot partition.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Um. Debian has for... a while now. So has Ubuntu. I've not had any problem with either. Just remember to leave a 1MB chunk at the bottom and set the bios_grub flag so grub has somewhere to install to.
Re: (Score:2)
That's good to know, I've been googling this for a few days now, and finding out which Linux distros really support it and which ones can be made to support it by following a series of arcane and ill defined steps has proven to be quite challenging. I've found utilities that will do it, but in general not all of the distros include GTP fdisk on their installer and going manually like I had to for FreeBSD isn't possible for me at this stage without actual instructions which cover the entire process. At prese
Re: (Score:3)
Re:GPT Support (Score:4, Informative)
IMHO there's no very strong reason to have separate swap and boot partitions and so on.
There's at least one good reason to have separate / and /home partitions: Linux really, really hates bad blocks on the / partition, so if you use the entire disk for / then one bad block can stop you booting until you manually perform a long fsck to fix it.
Re: (Score:3)
Not to mention that, although it's not needed often, it's great when you can wipe out all the system partitions but leave /home intact during a reinstall.
I learned a long time ago how helpful it could be to move My Documents on a Windows machine to a separate partition from the Windows and Program Files folders. Reinstalling is much easier without having to back up personal stuff first. Even though I use it a lot less in Linux old habits die hard and I always try to keep personal files separate from system
Re: (Score:2)
However, one recent version of Kubuntu managed to mess up my father’s /home nonetheless. Separate partition, don’t touch anything, but most of his picture and document folders were simply gone. I managed to recover quite a bit, but the filenames and organization were lost.
Still, it’s generally a good thing.
Re: (Score:2)
That is interesting, I always assumed if you didn't reformat the system partitions (or the single if that's how it's setup) then you'd get a crazy mix of old system/program files and new...
Re: (Score:2)
IMHO there's no very strong reason to have separate swap and boot partitions and so on.
And when you wipe that partition, or "something" accidentally wipes it, there goes /home (which should *always* go on it own partition).
Re: (Score:2)
Unless they accidentally wipe your home partition...
Re: (Score:2)
In which case you still have all the apps in / to to restore /home from backup.
Re: (Score:2)
If anything, it's having to futz with partitions in the first place that leads to mistakes involving them. And there's less futzing if you keep it simple. (An example would be resizing partitions because you need more on /var and have empty space on /home).
Re: (Score:2)
You need a backup of home regardless of partitioning strategy, so there's no advantage there.
Of course there is: "safety backup" is a hell of a lot faster than "mandatory backup + restore".
(An example would be resizing partitions because you need more on /var and have empty space on /home).
I know I don't run a server, but it's been a decade since /var caused me any real problems.
Re: (Score:2)
One of the file systems needs more space? Unmount the file system, resize the logical volume, resize the file system (a separate tool like resize2fs), then remount the file system and you magically have more space without having to do a huge backup/restore.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm so glad you don't have exactly the same needs, wants and desires as everyone else in the universe. It's more fun when life is diverse. Can you accept that someone, such as the OP, probably has some good reason why he wants GPT and can't be convinced that "You don't need it because I can live without it" is an acceptable alternative?
Re: (Score:3)
So, it seems obvious to point out that Linux doesn't need to use up all those partitions if that's not how he wants it.
Re: (Score:2)
One of the key strengths of Linux/Unix is that you can put any part of the tree onto a partition with a file system that makes sense for that part of the directory tree. Or where you need the system to not barf completely if one file system encounters severe errors or runs out of space. Even better, the proce
Re: (Score:2)
This is precisely why I do that. Filesystems like /boot and /root which don't change very often but are critical shouldn't be affected by filesystems like /var and /tmp which change frequently and are relatively unimportant or easily recreated, and I definitely don't want to lose the information in /home because of one of the other filesystems barfing.
Plus, wanting to dual boot with at least 2 other OSes, I would prefer not to have to mount my entire install just in case something goes wrong during the proc
Re: (Score:3)
You can't boot from an encrypted partition, so there's a good reason to have a boot partition. A swap file can get fragmented, so there's a good reason to have a swap partition. As for "and so on..."
Filling up root can cause all sorts of undesired behavior, so it's best to keep the subdirectories that are most likely to grow on their own partition. That tends to be /usr, /var, and /home. You want to keep /home on another partition anyway, in case you need to reinstall the system without touching /home.
Re: (Score:2)
I've tried that in the past, and my only saving grace was that the partitions didn't last long enough for me to create my own files. Literally for a while I was reinstalling the OS every single time I needed to reboot because of filesystem corruption. Granted that was a while ago, and IIRC ext3fs, but still, it's not a good practice to be in.
Who else is waiting for the "got yah" of Unity? (Score:2)
I'm waiting for the overly keen to discover the pain for me and report it faithfully to /.
Just getting to old to beat my head into the keyboard any more. Well in this case touch screen.
Re: (Score:2)
(Inserting from elsewhere AC said: I'll keep my work desktop on 10.10. It's pretty stable right now, and my last two upgrade experiences with this machine have gone poorly. I'll probably upgrade my home machines sometime this weekend.)
You said "I'm waiting for the overly keen to discover the pain for me and report it faithfully to /.
Just getting to old to beat my head into the keyboard any more. Well in this case touch screen."
See, this is what troubles me. What should be the absolute heart of slashdot,
Re: (Score:3)
Nobody is forcing you to use Unity. Sure it's the default, but the "classic" Gnome 2 desktop is still there.
Xubuntu for me (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I was playing with it myself about a week ago. I can honestly say that though it takes a bit of configuring, you can get XFCE looking much like the Gnome2 UI. My only show stopper issue for the time being was the XFCE's compositor just wasn't as good as Compiz (it caused some issues playing videos), and my dock-bar of choice (Docky) won't work without one. I can enable Compiz naturally, but it was trying to take over control of the desktop icons and such.
It's probably something that could be worked aroun
Unity vs. Gnome-Shell (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I've found both of them rather crappy, to be honest. Hopefully by the time Ubuntu stop supporting Gnome 2 one or the other will actually be usable or I'll have to switch to Redhat.
Ubuntu - Debian (Score:2)
Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.
Why go to Fedora when you go to Debian?
I've gotten rather used to the Debian way of doing things, not to mention the repositories are much better.
The latest Debian has the same easy installer as Ubuntu.
Re: (Score:2)
Um, why? If you think gnome-shell is crap then switching to fedora isn't going to make the experience any better.
RH6 will be supporting Gnome 2.x for... ooh.. about the next decade, because it's vastly superior to either Unity or Gnome 3 for anyone who actually wants to use their computer to do productive things rather than Facebook. By then maybe there'll be a usable alternative.
Re: (Score:2)
Since you're using Fedora 15 maybe you could explain something to me that I don't quite get about Gnome 3.
I played around with a Gnome 3 live CD based on suse, and I couldn't for the life of me figure out how to put items on desktop. It seemed like there was no right clicking on the desktop to create a file. Putting files in ~/Desktop didn't show up where I thought they should. Is the Gnome 3 desktop just for displaying wallpaper now? Or is there some new paradigm I'm completely missing?
I mean, I can kind o
Re: (Score:3)
" Is the Gnome 3 desktop just for displaying wallpaper now?"
Bingo. The new paradigm is that windows will always obstruct the wallpaper and so icons on the desktop are pointless. I personally agree with that notion, but it may not suit everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
So, Gnome is rediscovering Enlightenment?
Re: (Score:2)
Supposedly, they're making all these changes to make it easier for noobs who have never touch a computer before.
But, ironically, the easiest thing you can do for noobs is to put their programs on the desktop. 10x10 matrix, 100 programs. They like stuff all right in front instead of in menus, regardless of whether they're called Applications or "Activities".
Not to mention the utter stupidity of having newbs search for programs that they don't even know exist instead of a nice menu organized by category.
Re: (Score:2)
http://osdir.com/ml/general/2011-03/msg20339.html
Re: (Score:2)
Ah! Thanks for that!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
What I find particularly annoying about the single menu there is no way to change the behaviour in the UI. I appreciate that in a small netbook with a touchpad that a single
Beards (Score:2)
It looks like Ubuntu Netbook Remix. (Score:2)
The release looks very much like the desktop on the Ubuntu Netbook Remix distribution.
Re: (Score:2)
Congrats to Pat but ... (Score:2)
... I hope 13.37 is better than 13.1. I upgraded to the latter from 13.0 on my laptop and stuff just stopped working properly so I had to revert back to 13.0.
Fingers crossed for 13.37 and kudos to Pat and the guys for still doing Slackware in the face of all the corporate competition (no I don't mean MS or Apple, I mean Novell, RedHat AND Canonical).
Unity (Score:3)
Almost makes me want to give Slackware a go.
Re: (Score:2)
11.04 NVidia Warning (Score:3)
one billion Slashdot readers? (Score:2)
> Approximately one billion Slashdot readers wrote in to tell us today that one of two distributions had releases:
You have a million million or 10^12 readers ?
looks like. . . (Score:2)
a little bit like. . . OpenStep? eh?
Ubuntu minimal CD (Score:2)
Ubuntu 11.04, Slackware 13.37 (Score:2)
Cannot resist t3h l33tne55 (Score:2)
I was a Slackware user from the very low single digit versions until I decided I really wanted 64bit then never got back.
The 1337 version number is a clear sign. I am tempted to give it a go.
Re: (Score:2)
oh haaaaa you interpreted hyperbole literally ohaaaaaa i just died laughing oh man thats the funniest thing i will ever read in a million years
Re: (Score:2)
" thats the funniest thing i will ever read in a million years"
Well, yeah. You certainly won't live to be a million.
Re: (Score:2)
I told you a million times Vivyan, do not exaggerate!
Re: (Score:3)
While you're at it, ask the guy what is he doing on a linux powered website, inside a linux story thread, if nobody cares.
Re:It's Linsux (Score:4, Interesting)
I care, but mostly because the new unity interface is goddamn retarded. I installed the beta a couple weeks back. Gave it a couple hours to try and get used to it, and just couldn't. I could see it working well for a tablet, but for my laptop it's completely useless.
The only good thing is that they give you the option to switch back to gnome, but metacity seems to be completely broken for me, and hardware acceleration no longer works. As far as I'm concerned, Ubuntu 11.04 is a step backwards. Now I'm looking at either switching to XFCE for the interface, or maybe ditching Ubuntu entirely and going with a different flavor.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
There were _some_ improvements. In general, Unity is stable, fast and adjustable, but it lacks polish. Its size, inability to provide decent management for absolute paths (I have more favored applications than allowed by Unity default space, and I like them in groups, just fine) make for quite bad user experience, even with improved System Settings menu.
I wish I could access my little app park the same way I can do that with System Settings...
Anyway, there are fallback options, without Unity. They work fine
Re: (Score:2)
It must be nice being Pat right now. Since he no longer bundles Gnome, non of this mess is a problem for him.
Someone else can bundle Gnome 2 and Unity, or bundle Gnome 3 with the Gnome Shell.
Either way, Pat does not have to worry about it.
Re: (Score:3)
Only if you suck at arithmetic.
Re: (Score:3)
"This is the only way for Slackware to remain relevant in 2011 onwards"
Slackware is still relevant. Plenty of people still use it. If you don't like the way its done then pick a different distro. I use it precisely because it doesn't use rpms or yum with all the attendent dependency hell. I can use slackpkg if I want but I'm perfectly happy with tar and administering my system manually thanks.
"I am sorry but the fact of the matter is user(non geek) don't want to run make clean install in 2011"
A non geek use
Re: (Score:2)
slackpkg update - refreshes your mirror
slackpkg install-new - installs any packages officially added to the core
slackpkg upgrade-all - updates packages with updates (bug fixes and security updates)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
With Gnome, you have a perfectly working desktop with version 2, which they are now completely throwing away for their UI that looks like it was made for a tablet, and with KDE you have 100,000 settings to tweak, which all seem to conflict with each other, and it still can't do something simple like auto-mount a network share on the fly.
Re: (Score:2)
We should recognize that there is no "One True Way" to use a computer. Due to my habits OSX has the worst interface I ever used. I never liked the Mac GUI, not even in the '80s, but I concede that the global menu was a good choice on the tiny screen of the first Macs.
But it's OK that what's good for me is not good for you. That's why I'll probably switch my Ubuntu desktop to xfce and you'll use a Mac or a Mac-like Ubuntu desktop and we'll both be happy.
Re: (Score:2)
Developers would be wise to lose some of the ego. If car makers (here comes the car analogy!) required you to install your choice of stick shift mechanism after you purchased your call, a lot of people (including developers!) would just stay in 1st g
Re: (Score:2)
For the bearded folk
I'm gay and I just asked my wife what this meant.
We still don't know.
Re:I was online at midnight CDT (Score:4, Interesting)
Um, Unity is just another move toward cloning the Mac interface:
1. Global menu? Mac has had that forever
2. Monochrome notifications on the top right? Check
3. Dock? Check (except its on the *side*!)
The only differences I see so far are annoying ones:
1. The global menu is not always active, so it is non obvious how to access it ... not sure I want to attempt it on my main system
2. On mouseover the global menu obscures the window title
3. The maximize behavior with the close/minimize/restore buttons in the panel is just ugly and unweidly
4. The dock hides and appears in a nonsensical, semi-random fashion. It should be always on or auto-hide -- "dodge windows" is just weird
5. It has the dash, which is completely useless once you get the apps you use pinned to the dock
6. It crashed like crazy when testing in VirtualBox
I got an upgrade notice this morning and for the first time in 3 years I declined.
Re: (Score:2)
i've been saying the same thing since forever but no one seems to notice! unity is just a step further in ubuntu's attempt to clone osx. from the abrupt change of the titlebar buttons to the new and shiny dock, everything is just parodying osx.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unity is DEFAULT, not ONLY. You can turn unity off and on just by changing a couple settings and logging in again.
The global menu isn't going to work with everything right off because this ISN'T OSX we're dealing with - it's open source software written from a variety of apis and toolkits. The most important ones seem to work well, and firefox is being integrated which will solve the most glaring and annoying niggle.
Unity is intended to save screen real estate - which it does quite well. I use my pc in the
Re: (Score:3)
I realize there is a classic mode, but that's being jettisoned in 11.10. I've tried classic mode, and all it does is add an extra click to get to everything.
And when I said "the global menu is not always active" I should have said "not always visible". Most apps I played with use the global menu, but unless you spasmodically throw your cursor around the screen and accidentally hover over the panel you would never know there is a global menu in the first place.
For the record, I like the global menu on the
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, I had wondered why they moved from the nice colored network icons to a monochrome set in 10.04.
Reason: their designers all use Macs. No kidding.
Re: (Score:2)
I actually kind of appreciate having a not-too-hackish OS-X like interface, mostly because I use OSX as well as Ubuntu -- and first thing I do is move the dock to the side in OSX.
Unfortunately, this has one glaring problem for me. I expect applications to behave in a 'application-centric' way like OSX does now, rather than the 'window-centric' way. I keep closing my browser and having to restart it because I keep thinking it should keep running after I close the window. Since the beta was slow for me and
Re: (Score:2)
Roger that.
For me GNOME jumped the shark with this new "feature" intended to help newbies who don't know about alt-dragging windows.
If you alt-drag a window's title bar off the top of the screen (I guess they must anticipate this can happen WITHOUT alt-dragging in some other scenario, otherwise it's clear the user knows how to do it) then attempt to resize the window using one of the edges or the bottom left corner, you instead get the window's menu.
And of course, the arrogant GNOME devs knew that this impr
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I see what you did there...