Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope Now In Beta 180
An anonymous reader writes "To little fanfare and not much news coverage, Canonical released the beta of Ubuntu 9.04 'Jaunty Jackalope.' I tried it on a Dell Mini 9 using the Ubuntu Netbook Remix (UNR) and it's fabulous! Much better than the sad 'Dell Desktop' that it shipped with. Finally, someone has broken the 25+ year old too-many-open-windows-and-chaos desktop paradigm with UNR's task oriented layout, which is perfect for small netbook screen sizes."
It's a beta.. (Score:4, Informative)
That's why there's not much fanfare.
It's for people willing to experience a few issues, or a few bugs, to make the product which comes out with lots of fanfare more solid.
Re:It's a beta.. (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't see any reason to make a huge deal about any "new" Linux release.
Well, two things:
1. Yeah, that's the kind of news only Nerds would care about! Can't they find an appropriate forum for that?
2. This is not about a new "Linux" release. It's about a new Ubuntu beta. By contrast, This is a story about a new Linux release. [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Alright, Stallman. We get it already.
Re: (Score:2)
This release may even be the final kick in the pants I need to try and dual boot my laptop. (I tried a live CD of 8.10 and the CPU and fan seemed to be pegged while it was idle for some reason so I never went for it).
Re: (Score:2)
It certainly is a Linux release.
The kernel by itself doesn't do anything and a distribution with the latest software is a major release just like Vista is windows even though it comes with more than just a kernel.
Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:5, Funny)
What the heck is a Jackalope?
A mix between a Jackolantern and an Antelope.
Re:Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:5, Funny)
Wrong! It's a mix between Hugh Jackman and a Cantaloupe.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:4, Funny)
Wrong again!
Its a mix between Jack Nicholson and....your mom.
(Happy Friday folks)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't it something Michael Jackson bio-engineered in Neverland?
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't that what Hugh Jackman is?
A jackalope is... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:5, Funny)
Citty-frakkin'-slickers... Jackrabbit and an Antelope. We've got them all over western Nebraska...
Re:Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:5, Funny)
Citty-frakkin'-slickers... Jackrabbit and an Antelope. We've got them all over western Nebraska...
You Rube! It's a myth!
There's no such thing as western Nebraska.
Re: (Score:2)
Please! There are kids reading this site!
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I'll get you one. Those, we've got TONS of in eastern Nebraska.
Not quite (Score:2)
Re:Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:5, Funny)
I dunno, but it's probably going to break my sound drivers... again (sigh).
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackalope [wikipedia.org]
"The jackalope -- also called an antelabbit, aunt benny, Wyoming thistled hare or stagbunny -- is a fictional animal and a cross between a jackrabbit and an antelope, goat, or deer, and is usually portrayed as a rabbit with antlers."
Re: (Score:2)
"a fictional animal and a cross between a jackrabbit and an antelope, goat, or deer, and is usually portrayed as a rabbit with antlers."
I knew I had been drinking too much when I saw one of those...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Actually, a JACK rabbit with antlers. Ordinary rabbits or bunnies are too small to grow antlers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:5, Funny)
I'm still waiting for the "Gracious Goatse" release of Unbuntu.
Re:Let me be the first to ask.... (Score:5, Funny)
There were plans for that version but the release slipped through the crack.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I'm still waiting for the "Gracious Goatse" release of Unbuntu.
Rumor says it will ship as soon as "Horny Herring" is out the door.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Netbook Remix Interface (Score:3, Informative)
I've been running it on my two EEE's for a long time. That interface is the bees knees for those things. That was distributed on the UbuntuEEE fork that later turned in to EasyPeasy. I'm really interested in trying out 9.04 though.
Re: (Score:2)
Bees knees are far to easy to break. ;)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Have you been bitten by the bug where netbook-launcher sits at 100% CPU utilization? I had to remove it because it was making my EEE unusable.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, so that's why my Acer suddenly became so slow?
Re:Netbook Remix Interface (Score:4, Informative)
Yeah, open a terminal and run "top" or use the System Monitor and check processes. Then kill netbook-launcher and watch your machine spring back to life.
I've just uninstalled it for now and installed gnome-menu and am using a normal, but slim, desktop/menu and it works fine. If they fix the launcher, great. If not, so be it.
Screenshots (Score:4, Informative)
Not that they will be all that different.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
You can see the new wallpaper anyway.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Ubuntu-9-04-Beta-Screenshot-Tour-107809.shtml [softpedia.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've "burned" the beta on a pendrive - the wallpaper is different than @ these screenshots. The new one is kinda ugly, AFAIR even the GTK theme is different (back to human).
BTW, it's funny how they always release those super hot screenshots some time (1 or 2 days) before a new release is made. And it always gets to the front page of digg, linked from lifehacker and so on. I could never understand the point of doing this, apart from an obvious reason, which is getting visitors cheaply. They show a few d
Wrong color desktop? Re:Screenshots (Score:3, Insightful)
I thought they "fixed" the brown desktop theme? There are blue desktop screenshots but that's for KDE or some such.
Re:Wrong color desktop? Re:Screenshots (Score:4, Informative)
I thought they "fixed" the brown desktop theme?
These are screenshots of the Alpha version. From my past experience Alpha releases do not change the default theme from that of the previous release. When I set up an Intrepid Alpha system it just used Hardy's desktop. When it upgraded itself to Beta the theme changed to some sort of generic polkadot wallpaper with everything else kept the same. When it went into full release the theme changed to the real Intrepid one.
Wait another month, and by then you'll certainly have your new colour scheme.
Re:Wrong color desktop? Re:Screenshots (Score:5, Informative)
I thought they'd change the brown in 9.10, Karmic Koala. Shuttleworths announcement of KK: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2009-February/000536.html [ubuntu.com]
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought they "fixed" the brown desktop theme? There are blue desktop screenshots but that's for KDE or some such.
WORKSFORME
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There was a slashdot article two months ago about how ubuntu was moving away from the brown theme as standard to something a little more inviting. I pointed out that the blue theme was KDE: either I wasn't very clear or your reading comprehension is very low.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's very functional, but something blue or green would have been a better choice IMO.
Re: (Score:2)
Thing is, those are too common. Brown, on the other hand, makes Ubuntu unique. It also gives it a certain "ethnic" image; as I recall, african art traditionally uses a lot of brown and orange.
I know, to some new users it may be scary to see those colors and realize: 'This is not Windows. It does not even tries to look similar. It's a completely different thing.' For the same reason, I find it very comforting.
Bluetooth networking w/ Windows Mobile??? (Score:2)
I love 8.10 on my Dell Mini 9 w/ Ubuntu Netbook Remix. The only thing I need still is to be able to use my Windows Mobile Phone as a modem over bluetooth (currently USB only).
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I have problems with 8.10 on my somewhat ancient Dell Dimension 2100 - lots of problems with latency and task switching - and I've yet to get the kernel to build from source for it. (Given I've built Linux kernels since the 0.9 days, it's not from lack of experience.)
(The latest Fedora won't install on it at all. Hard lock-up when booting the GUI installer.)
Sure, you expect support to decay for older machines, but this is hardly a Viglen 386SX we're talking about (Pentium IV is still in-vogue), I've upgrade
Intel regressions not yet solved (Score:5, Informative)
Users of Intel video chipsets have reported performance regressions in Ubuntu 8.10 compared with previous releases. (252094) Although these performance issues have not been resolved by default in Ubuntu 9.04, a new experimental acceleration architecture option, DRI2/UXA, is available for Intel graphics users. Our testing has found this provides significant performance improvements for many users, but has also shown risk of severe stability problems, thus we are not yet providing to the general public. You can opt-in to enable this by running "sudo gedit /etc/X11/xorg.conf", and adding Option "AccelMethod" "UXA" to the Device section of your xorg.conf. Users wishing to maximize stability should stay with the standard default acceleration method, "EXA".
Re: (Score:2)
Heh... I'm running Ubuntu on an old computer with a VIA chipset. For this Unichrome Pro IGP, EXA [wikipedia.org] is unstable and I have to use XAA.
Looks like I need a new IGP. :D I'm two generations out of date.
Re: (Score:2)
Since I bought my Sony VAIO VGN-FW140E/H last August I have been using Mandriva 2009 PWP, featuring KDE 4.1.3. It did not support the G45 video chip, so I had to settle for a VESA video setting at 1440X900 and was one of many who posted a bug report at the xorg bugzilla site. The fix for the grey screen was found in February so I expected the fix to trickle down to Mandriva in the late summer.
I heard that Jaunty Jackalope was sporting KDE 4.2, so I booted the LiveCD to check it out. I was STUNNED to see
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks. I guess I'll be sticking with 8.04 again.
On AAO? (Score:2)
Have they solved the problems of wired networking on the AAO? Since they broke it with a patched up Intrepid (though the original unpatched Intrepid works).
Yeee! (Score:2)
I got a Wind a month ago and the first thing I did, and I seriously mean first thing, was install Ubuntu (8.04) on it as a second boot. Last week I clobbered the restore partition and Windows entirely and now it's all Ubuntu.
I got the version without bluetooth. Last week I managed to take the adapter I got for it, http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833242001 [newegg.com] and put it inside where the stock adapter would go. There was even a harness for it taped inside of the unit, so I just cut down the
Webcam (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Webcam (Score:5, Informative)
Pidgin will be replaced by Empathy in future releases. It's still needs some work, but looks promising - it's very modular and integrates nicely with the rest of GNOME. It has video chat support.
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly, Empathy has Jabber video chat support. Their MSN and ICQ chat is still handled by libpurple, which is pidgin.
Netbook remix? For Intel Atoms, it would seem (Score:5, Informative)
Find out more here:
http://www.canonical.com/projects/ubuntu/unr [canonical.com]
Selected quotes:
"Ubuntu Netbook Remix is optimised to run on a new category of affordable Internet-centric devices called netbooks. It includes a new consumer-friendly interface that allows users to quickly and easily get on-line and use their favourite applications. This interface is optimised for a retail sales environment."
Wonder what that last bit means? It flashes 'buy me now!!!! 50% discount!!!' on the screen?
"A remix is a 'respun' version of Ubuntu built for a specific purpose. Although Canonical has encouraged community projects to use this terminology for some time, this is the first time that Canonical has used it. We are using it to differentiate from an 'Edition' which we consider a complete version with daily builds suitable for the average user with no additional work beyond installing the CD."
"All of the initial Ubuntu Netbook remixes combine optimisations from the Moblin project for Intel® Atomâ processors and it is specially designed for netbooks. Intel and Canonical are working to create a new computing experience across a rapidly expanding category of portable devices."
Wintel is dead, long live Buntel?
Re: (Score:2)
The Atom CPU is listed as a minimum system requirement, it should run just fine on a 'normal' Intel CPU (and I'd wager it's fine on AMDs as well).
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
"Ubuntu Netbook Remix is optimised to run on a new category of affordable Internet-centric devices called netbooks."
Not so much optimised, that the installer would allow me to see any buttons (such as "next", "back", "cancel" or whatever they may be, I can't see them!) on the 800x480 screen of the eeepc 701...
I managed to install it by pressing tab and enter blindly at appropriate times, though.
lpia? (Score:2)
Does this version come with the lpia kernel? I recently got a Dell Mini and am still using the lpia-enabled 8.04 distro it comes with. I'd like to give Netbook Remix a go but I'm concerned that the stock x86 kernel will reduce battery life (which is already not quite as great as I'd hoped for).
Anyone know the status of the lpia stuff?
Re: (Score:2)
Does this version come with the lpia kernel? I recently got a Dell Mini and am still using the lpia-enabled 8.04 distro it comes with. I'd like to give Netbook Remix a go but I'm concerned that the stock x86 kernel will reduce battery life (which is already not quite as great as I'd hoped for).
Anyone know the status of the lpia stuff?
I have 8.10 running the lpia port on my mini 9. I found some site online that showed how to install and configure the UNR components so that it looks like the 8.04 version.
8.04 had a few serious issues (like using ssh over wireless) that made me drop it pretty quickly. The 8.10 kernel doesn't like one of the WPA modes and will hang hard if you try to connect, so I'm looking forward to 9.04 and upgrading to that.
On a side note, I wanted to compile some software for my mini without wasting its SSD with gcc
Random Ubuntu/Linux question (Score:2)
Anyone know of a remote desktop solution for Ubuntu that can connect to a Windows 2k or newer box? I've been thinking about making the jump, all of the other tool I need to do my standard work at home I know where to get. But I need to be able to remote into work over a VPN to Windows servers.
-Rick
Re: (Score:2)
Not the best solution, but I run VirtualBox inside Ubuntu to get access to my legacy apps.
Re: (Score:2)
rDesktop is the equivalent to Windows Terminal Services Client, never had any trouble with it.
Ubuntu on my mini-9 had this this, and 'tsclient' a graphical frontend, pre-installed.
Re:Random Ubuntu/Linux question (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Install Windows in that VM.
Download and install your VPN client to your virtual Windows.
Worked for me
Useful link: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/VirtualBox [ubuntu.com]. The VirtualBox configuration bit is useful here: as I said, VirtualBox (Open Source Edition) is available in Ubuntu Package Manager, so you don't have to do the apt-get stuff...
Re:Random Ubuntu/Linux question (Score:5, Informative)
Anyone know of a remote desktop solution for Ubuntu that can connect to a Windows 2k or newer box?
Yes. Ubuntu. RDP works out of the box--I use it nearly daily. Applications->Internet->Terminal Server Client. There's also an panel applet front end if you'd prefer that--very handy if you have several Winboxes you need to connect to on a regular basis.
Re: (Score:2)
I connected to work via the VPN and used KRDC to connect to my desktop XP machine running the Remote Desktop dealie for about a year. Finally I traded my desktop at work for a laptop so now I just use the laptop to VPN to work directly. It always worked fine for me, although I could never get the PTPP VPN to work with Linux. However, I was able to use the Java-based Juniper VPN with Linux... sometimes. Getting Java stuff to work on Kubuntu has always been hit or miss for me, but I blame Java and its "wr
Re: (Score:2)
I'm using Ubuntu 8.10 and PTPP VPN works fine with the VPN at work which is running Windows 2003 Server.
There is a bug in the network manager that handles the VPN connections in Ubuntu. They fixed that in 9.4.
So give it another try. Google it!
Kubuntu with KDE 4.2.1 (Score:3, Informative)
Kubuntu with KDE 4.2.1 looks fabulous too! Just installed Kubuntu Beta and KDE is totally sweet in this release. There is even a native KDE4 Network Manager that looks great and works well.
The Plasma widgets remain a bit crashy and buggy - Comic Strip won't take the configure button off even after Strips are added, Moving widgets crashes Plasma etc.
But yeah, getting there. By KDE 4.3 release things ought to be totally rocking.
Try it out people - you won't be disappointed.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Sure I will try it this time. I tried Ubuntu 9.04 Alpha AMD64 the good thing it's that the new kernel supports all my hardware and it's a lot faster but I have problems with the nVidia 180 drivers on an integrated GeForce 8200. Not even editing the xorg by hand can get the stuff to display properly.
Err, theres only DVD download option via torrent but since you can update to stable release from beta I think it's worth it.
http://torrent.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/jaunty/beta/dvd/ [ubuntu.com]
I hope it works fine with une
!Ubuntu (Score:2)
Finally, someone has broken the 25+ year old too-many-open-windows-and-chaos desktop paradigm
Palm? DOS?
I've been using this for a month with ext4 (Score:3, Informative)
I installed this a month ago almost by painstakingly finding the i386 iso of Jaunty and installing the netbook remix stuff independently.
I've got a eee 900 with the 16GB SSDHD and let me tell you: this thing boots and runs quick! I've tried XP and the UNR Ibex version and the Jaunty build using ext4 filing system blows everything else out of the water with all variations of start-up times. There are problems, however, with certain aspects of the remix.
There is significant lag issues with the interface itself. I believe this may have something to do with the size of my swap partition, but thus far I've been too lazy to format or change anything since the partial upgrade a few days ago.
Its only the remix that reacts slow, everything else is fast, fast, fast! ext4 certainly adds something to boot times and it looks like this Ubuntu build will really be one, coupled with netbooks, that can somewhat pierce the Microsoft stronghold on the general public....eh, probably not.
Re: (Score:2)
What can you possibly need swap for on a Netbook?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I've been running my Eee 901 without swap ever since I installed Ubuntu over the godawful Asus distribution that came with it. I don't notice any performance issues; however, without swap, hibernate doesn't work. I understand it needs a swap partition large enough to dump its entire RAM state when it hibernates, so that it can switch off completely and pick up again where it left off; without that it can only suspend, which saves a lot of power but still ha
Finally??? (Score:4, Informative)
Umm... tiling window managers have been around longer than non-tiling ones. You can blame apple for making windows overlappable. The 'task-oriented layout' is nothing new or innovative - see wmii, awesome, xmonad, dwm, etc. etc. (even fluxbox, with its 'tabs', actually) for examples of modern X11 window managers that offer similar functionality, plus much more...
Personally, I started using wmii a few months back and haven't looked back since.
I'm using it (Score:2)
I'm running the AMD64 version since Alpha 2 and I love the bastard. I've been using Ubuntu since 8.04 and it's the best since that.
Fast boot, fast operation, Java works, Flash works, Wine works, tho I still use WinXP to have the occasional left 4 dead funfest. :-)
I wonder what Ubuntu Zesty Zebra will be like if they keep this pace up. Very exciting.
Ubuntu Netbook Remix - Great on desktops too (Score:2)
I downloaded the alpha 6 netbook remix, put it on a USB stick, booted it on a Dell Optiplex 755, installed it, patched it, and am running it right now.
I think the "netboox remix" interface actually suits a lot of what people use computers for today... a glorified web browser... while not distracting the user with all the other windows, window decorations, virtual desktops, etc.
I'm a power user who loves those things, but I'm surprised how I feel somewhat freed up by not having to worry about them.
credit where due, I guess (Score:2)
Yes, Nokia did [wikipedia.org], 4 years ago.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You could look at http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/beta [ubuntu.com] to find out.
Or wait until Saint George's Day.
Note: This is a beta release. Do not install it on production machines. The final stable version will be released on April 23rd, 2009.
K.
Re: (Score:2)
That page specifies what has changed compared to 8.10, but not compared to the latest alpha.
Re:So (Score:4, Informative)
Maybe this will be more use, then.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-9.04-beta
It wasn't really difficult for me to find it, starting from the page whose link I posted...
about three click and twelve seconds, all told.
And if that is still not good enough, then I suggest you go back to whatever you usually do when you don't get everything spoon-fed to you.
K.
Re: (Score:2)
if you keep your machine up to date,
then you have the beta already
you don't need to reinstall or anything
Re:So (Score:5, Funny)
Worst haiku ever.
What you should be asking... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
what happens if *ubuntu becomes profitable?Most likely means that at least one major monopoly has been broken...
What, Red Hat and Novell aren't profitable?
Re:What you should be asking... (Score:4, Funny)
He's talking about the RPM monopoly :)
Re: (Score:2)
(Score:1, Troll)
Stupid mods...
Re: (Score:2)
It's pretty close: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/business/11ubuntu.html?pagewanted=3&_r=2&ref=business [nytimes.com]
Re:What you should be asking... (Score:4, Interesting)
Or not. The quote says "we are creeping towards $30 million" and that this would make Canonical "self-sustaining", for regular updates, which is their current model of very little development and a lot of marketing.
So, yeh, it's possible that "creeping towards" does actually mean "really close to, and getting closer every day" and not just "going from 1 to 2 million this year". But I bet against that, personally.
And who is paying that $30 mil, is it desktop people ... or self supporting server users like the French govt. / Wikipedia. My guess is that any money is coming from the later.
So at the end of the creep towards $30 mil, what do you get? Still not enough money to fund actual development (feel free to log bugs and RFEs at bugzilla.redhat.com), and a focus on servers instead of the desktop for what little work they do (because that's who is paying).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
what happens if *ubuntu becomes profitable?
For a normal company, it would mean that it would become easier to pay their employees. For Ubuntu, it would mean that Mark Shuttleworth will have to find some other sink for his billions. :)
Most likely means that at least one major monopoly has been broken
Nope, doesn't mean that at all. There are already Linux companies making a profit. Making a profit simply means that you take in more money than you spend. It doesn't say anything about the size of your market share (although a large market share means you can take advantage of economies of scale, which can help mak
Re: (Score:2)
Ubuntu is MOSTLY geared towards the desktop. If he is profitable, then the Linux desktop is profitable. If that is the case, the monopoly is broken.
Re: (Score:2)
Ubuntu is MOSTLY geared towards the desktop. If he is profitable, then the Linux desktop is profitable. If that is the case, the monopoly is broken.
MS has never had an absolute monopoly in that there have always been people making money selling desktop Linux, even if all they did was repackage another company's work and resell it. In terms of economics or EU law, MS won't be at risk of losing their monopoly status on desktop OS's until their market share drops to about 70% and they're currently at about 99%.
Re: (Score:2)
No. Being profitable still only means that income > expenses. It has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with market dominance, which is what's used to determine monopoly. I can sell a single Linux desktop system, make a profit, and not affect any monopolies that may exist in the desktop market whatsoever. Apple's been earning profits in the desktop market all along, and that hasn't affected the reality of the 800-pound monopolist in the desktop market.
Furthermore, Shuttleworth has enough money (and
Re: (Score:2)
Why would he stop funding it? It's starting to make a profit so there really isn't a reason to stop, in fact, if it's starting to make a profit maybe he's already stopped funding it.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Will this Ubuntu release be using 2.6.29?
I doubt it. Aren't the odd-numbered point releases the "development branch"?