Adobe To Port AIR To Linux 218
unityofsaints writes "Up until now, Adobe hasn't done much in terms of porting its applications to Linux, as its only product to have recieved any kind of Linux implementation is Flash. This may be about to change because the company has announced a Linux port of AIR, its web application development software. No definite release date is mentioned in the interview with Adobe CTO Kevin Lynch, just a vague 'later this year.'"
I think we deserve an answer (Score:3, Interesting)
Adobe: FIX FLASH UPLOADS! (Score:3, Interesting)
Please fix Flash uploads in Flash for *nix.
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:4, Interesting)
Yes, I'm exaggerating... but only slightly. Currently Photoshop runs essentially flawlessly using up-to-date versions of Wine. Remember that Wine is intended both as a run-time compatibility layer, but also as a set of Windows API libraries that you can compile your Windows code against in order to make a native Linux application. (Well, some people might debate that the resulting app is actually native since it relies on Wine libraries being installed, rather than the more widespread Linux toolkits like GTK or QT.)
Given that the Wine project has already done 99% of the work, I can't imagine it would be very difficult to port Photoshop to Linux... The same is probably true for the rest of the suite. So, one wonders why they haven't bothered yet.
While they're at it... (Score:4, Interesting)
Question is this: is this a step towards (hopefully) Adobe going over their existing products and re-writing them so as to make porting easier? I know they're working with Codeweavers to get P-shop to work on a Linux platform (via WINE), but it would be cool to see some native implementations instead.
I figure once/if Adobe can get things like P-Shop and Illustrator to work on a Linux platform, other graphics companies would have that final impetus to follow. While the higher-end CG vendors usually have Linux ports or Linux-native apps (Shake, Maya, etc), the mid-range, amateur, and pro-am ones usually don't (Modo, Silo, DAZ|Studio and Poser, Vue d' Esprit, Carrara, Bryce, etc).
It'd be hella nice to see the CG/gfx companies take Linux seriously across the board, and not just as niche/custom items, or as "hey, that OS makes a great render farm node!" type of platform.
Re:Bzzt (Score:5, Interesting)
Lets talk about what it actually is. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:4, Interesting)
Yes, but who wants Wine if you can get a native app? Photoshop was designed to be portable, and was released for SunOS and SGI IRIX [wikipedia.org].
Amusing side note: In the nineties several popular programs were ported to Unix for reasons I didn't understand then, and don't now. In addition to Photoshop also MS Internet Explorer [wikipedia.org] and Outlook. Imagine my disbelief and horror when I found that nasty couple installed on a production HPUX server...
I wouldn't think Adobe has just thrown away the source portability. After all portable code is expensive to create in the first place, but once you're there it's pretty cheap to maintain portability. If this is the case then they have probably had a Linux version of Photoshop, and perhaps other products for years, they just don't feel like selling them at this point.
The point I want to make is that yes, indeed, Adobe could probably release Photoshop for Linux tomorrow. Wine wouldn't be necessary. It would be the real deal, a fully native Unix/X11 application. Unless of course Adobe hasn't done criminally stupid things to the code base in the past decade...
Don't forget about (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:People use Photoshop to Dev the Web too Adobe! (Score:1, Interesting)
Windows NT vs. Windows 9x? Naaw, let's just stick with the core of 9x.
OS X vs. System 9? Naaw, too much work.
Sometimes you really do have to start over. Or you end up like BeOS, AmigaOS, or in the applications side, Lotus 1-2-3, WordPerfect, and Corel.
Re:While they're at it... (slightly OT) (Score:3, Interesting)