Intel's Linux-Powered Mobile Internet Device 87
An anonymous reader writes "Intel is set to launch an ultra-mobile PC dubbed Mobile Internet Device or MID which will run on Linux. The PDA-sized devices will target 'consumers and prosumers' instead of mobile professionals. From the story: 'MID tablets will run a simplified finger-friendly user interface optimized for the small screens, based on the Gnome desktop but with an Intel-developed master user interface layer to serve as an equivalent to the desktop. Developers will next month see the first MID-specific OS -- a tweak of China's RedFlag Linux known as RedFlag MIDINUX -- while the IDF schedule itself includes a stream of ultra mobile sessions including one on Designing for Linux-based mobile Internet devices.'"
Linux? (Score:5, Informative)
HAHAHAHAHA! I guess intel saw how craptacular MS's other embedded devices were (think mobile phones) and decided to go their own way....
Oh - and what you all came to the comments to get (wtf link to a zdnet blog anyway?) a link to a gallery of pics [engadget.com]. It looks surprisingly nice.
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Origami was an interesting idea that was waaaaay too expensive.
Look at Nokia's N800 [nseries.com] for an Origami-like device at a much better price point. Fewer features, better price and it looks like it's selling ok.
If Intel can come out with their "Mobile Internet Device" for around $400 or less, they might have something.
Intel - Red Flag? (Score:1)
Re:Late April Fool's? (Score:4, Informative)
Are you MAD? Have you seen what Ultra Mobile Computing can do? [youtube.com] (for maximum comic effect, check out the UI in the lastish sequence with the two girls going to the party).
But seriously, I suspect from red flag being the software partner that the target market is Chinese - not you.
That said tho', I'd love to have one if they're anything near as nice as they look....
Re:Late April Fool's? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
"Just the hardware" or
"Just the software"
Hardware engineering isn't trivial, particularly in portable electronics where you have to weigh up battery life, form factor, robustness...
VoIP Phone (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
It needs all this stuff to succeed (Score:2)
Sure, to be a success in the market it needs some of the stuff you write about.
But success or not if it looks like the picture I'll buy several. Especially if it can command USB peripherals.
Re:It needs all this stuff to succeed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
A product's potential to become revolutionary, evolutionary or extinct cannot be separated from its price.
The Newton, while arguably too big, was certainly too expensive to take the world by storm. The Palm was much less ambitious but priced right. Two way pagers were popular for a long time because their cheapness relative to mobile phones created an application niche for them. Now that the scale of mobile phone adoption has tilted the table in that direction, people are more lik
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know about you, but my experience with Bluetooth is that is squirrely for *anyone* do deal with. I've got a Samsung SPH-m610, a MacBook, and a Nokia 770, and Bluetooth is pathetic on all three of these units. I've even tried the MacBook with both Mac OS X and Windows, and it makes little difference. Bluetooth, in my experience, has been craptacular.
Every time I try to pair from the MacBook to the phone under Mac OS X, it crashes th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
TFA says it's going to have dual core CPUs at 600-800 MHz. Sounds good enough to me, and with modern processes those CPUs should use very little power.
Poor old modding community (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe they'll try and install Windows on it instead.
Peter
Re:Poor old modding community (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't wary for us. Instead of that funny intel chinese redflag midinux I will surely install hardened gentoo on it.
Re: (Score:2)
here we go again (Score:1)
Nokia's Internet Tablets' Hildon UI too (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Presumably you will have your cellphone with you anyway and its connection can be used via bluetooth.
Some advantages of not having a HSPDA radio in the tablet:
* The cellphone allready have the account for the connection so you will not need another for the tablet.
* Battery life of the tablet will not be drained by the connection.
* Cost and size can be kept down
* The tablet does not need to be as extensively certified as a GSM/HSPDA phone.
The only downside is that Blueto
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm all for combining as much as possible into the phone.
But in this case we are talking about something that by necessity is too large for carrying arround every day in your pocket. What makes these things better than a smartphone is the big screen and until someone actually makes the rollable screens we have been tempted with by scifi movies for decades now, the device can't be smaller than the screen.
I look forward to the day when I can combine that feature in the phone to
Interesting (Score:3, Insightful)
Truly, though, as long as I can write my own programs for it, I'd run whatever linux variant that I had to.
A 6" screen and dual-core 800Mhz? Very nice.
The bad part? "next year's release of the products." NOW. WANT NOW.
Re:Interesting (Score:4, Insightful)
Device drivers... (Score:2)
This truly is the proof however that the Slashdot crowd will never be truly happy. No more is it "I'll just rip OSX/Windows/etc and replace it with Linux"... no the Slashdot folks aren't even happy when it is ALREADY RUNNING LINUX, they want their own favourite distro. I can al
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
And why would it not have the drivers? If Midinux has the drivers, there's nothing stopping Ubuntu/Gentoo/DSL/etc from having them also.
Truth be told, it's not Ubuntu that I want, but Kubuntu. I like a lot of the stuff that KDE has like KIO slaves, and I like the attitude of the Ubuntu distro people. They have a tendency to run their distro like I'd want if I were there, and I tend to stick to it.
It's not 'the Slas
Re: (Score:2)
And what's wrong with that?
The mere possibility of changing the distro for whichever reason is one of the points of the whole thing.
Linux users often are tinkerers... at least the /. crowd. And we don't like things that are locked down.
And don't worry: even if it ran my favourite distro (i.e. Gentoo), I'd still want to t
is this Maemo? (Score:3, Interesting)
I hope maemo catches up and that they get some more developpers working on that framewaork
Nokia 770 anyone? (Score:3)
If they hit the $199 pricepoint they will be a success. If they aim for the current pricing of the new N800 they will lose big time.
Re:Nokia 770 anyone? (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, I disagree... (Score:2)
I'm not so sure I agree. Look at how the Nokia N800 is being marketed. It's being marketed as a portable internet device.
That said, there are developers out there putting out things like GPE for PIM functionality, which is good. It's nice to see developers write software otherwise not found, but I would look at it more as something made for a primary purpose, much like the Archos PMPs... there are other apps you can load on the devices, but their primary u
Re: (Score:2)
I'd been considering the ModBook (Apple-based, third party tablet pc) at $2800, but I just don't have enough use for it. This would do most of what I'd want the ModBook to do, and at quite a lot lower price.
Nokia's stuff is interesting, but at only 320Mhz, it doesn't do what I want and isn't enough
beavis & butthead moment (Score:3, Funny)
Consumer instead of Professional device (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Someone like me, who finds a laptop too cumbersome to carry around on a regular basis and wants available wireless internet access where available. If a device can mix together multimedia/internet capabilities that takes c
Re: (Score:2)
How hard will it be for Intel to integrate a GSM or WiMax transceiver and an antenna, assuming it has a speaker and microphone already?
Maybe it's a good idea to demonstrate usability as a PDA first and put in the phone later. The other way around often hasn't worked well.
Alternative (Score:4, Interesting)
No Wireless tho' (Score:1)
It is an obvously good idea... (Score:2, Interesting)
I want one
Consumer I know (Score:1)
Re:Consumer I know (Score:4, Funny)
What you get when you cross a consumer with a prositute.
You see prosumer is the code word for consumers who're are whores for new & expensive products. It's a polite way of saying 'stupid early adopter'.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
All I want from such a device are... (Score:3, Interesting)
Here is my list of features:
Ability to play audio and video is optional — as is the ability to make phone calls. If they figure out, how to make reasonably fast IP-over-cellular, I'll buy it — and for a good price (not that of a phone/player, but for that of a laptop)...
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Obligatory (Score:3, Funny)
This Sounds Like a Winner (Score:1)
But, what does it do? (Score:2)
It looks cheesy (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
the 'ultimate edition' will have a case made from some expensive, flashy, but heavy (and soft) metal, such as gold. probably monogrammed with that horrible louis vitton thing, too. ick. plastic may look crap, but it's easily customisable.
Yes, it's all about size. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Pull all THOSE features together in the Sony form factor, and I'd buy it.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I know, it's sort of implicit. But I couldn't resist...
Re: (Score:2)
Why RedFlag? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It's far more likely that for a US version they will try to get something redhattish, suseish or possibly ubuntuish instead. (oh wait, redflag is redhattish..)
Nokia N800 (Score:2, Interesting)
I for one (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
But, can I install Linux on it? (Score:1)
If you can recompile and replace all the important parts of the OS (kernel, X, Gnome, touchscreen drivers...), then it's a viable competitor to the FIC Neo in my book. Otherwise, I'm worried the phone companies will get their hands on this thing and cripple it.
Also, why is some of the bundled software proprietary? That's so 1999...
Still, if it lets you install your own C software, it's a huge step forward. I'll be payin
Re: (Score:2)
but:
> Also, why is some of the bundled software proprietary? That's so 1999...
what's wrong with that? closed source software is an excellent way to get a platform started and make it economically viable for the future (look at the IBM PC
almost all of the software I've seen in the demo's are open source or replaceable by better open source software. You can choose now to use the closed source app or wh
Re: (Score:1)
If the device is unusable without the proprietary software, then it's difficult or expensive to customize. You lose the benefits of open source software, and scare off developers. Customization is the main competitive advantage Linux devices have over other products. It's always a shame when device manufacturers don't get that, and try to control the software stack or lock down the hardware.
It's one thing if they ship it with a binary-only f