Launch of OSS For Mobile Phones 75
Linux Mobile Phone Guy writes "Members of the open source GPE project (GPE Palmtop Environment) today announced a new offspring project to create a fully open source software stack for mobile phones, GPE Phone Edition.
GPE Phone Edition is a fully open source project based on developments from
the GPE project adding necessary components for mobile phone usage. Based on
standards defined by the LiPS Forum a complete application software stack is built. The current implementation is based on code contributed to the
LiPS Forum by Orange/France Telecom's research and development lab located
in Beijing China in collaboration with GPE project members.
The result is now an open sourced software stack which can handle a GSM
compliant mobile modem for making voice calls, handling the SIM address
book and sending and receiving SMS. Also some additional application
exists e.g. for media playback, instant messaging and email.
They have some screenshots there and even a downloadable VMware image
using which you can try the whole thing in a virtual phone on your PC — if you connect a GSM Modem (like an existing phone) to /dev/GSM-Modem
you should probably even be able to use the full phone functionality
(access SIM card, send/receive SMS, make a call!)."
I wonder (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
There's also the unique number of each phone (not the sim card or the phone number, but the IMEI number which is what is used to block the use of
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:1)
Which supported phones (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Which supported phones (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Hoping to get ones of those, some day.
The trolltech greenphone might be an alternative, but it seems there are issues with the hardware that cause even trolltech to not advise it for general use.
I'm hoping the Neo1973 doesn't have similar problems, although I'm prepared to stomach a small reduction in battery life for the extra freedom.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
DRM (Score:1, Interesting)
So where is the DRM in this? All mobile phone stacks are rushing down the "Trusted Computing" (or ARM's TrustZone) route with locked down software and DRM built on top of that. So where in this stack is the rights management stuff (or the placeholder for it)... since all of this software will be digitally signed and locked so it cannot be modified or changed by users.
It uses GStreamer, and since Fluendo (a company that touts itself as a Free software company) is committed to bringing the wonderful ness of
The Tunxphone isn't (Score:2, Informative)
Now, why this is all labled under the term "Tuxphone" is beyond me. It's misleading at best. But it's probably still the most open effort around, as there simply is NO completely open solution here. There are lots and lots of companies which claim to offer an Open Source cellphone, but they all lie. When it ge
Re: (Score:2)
Basicly the EZX phones contain a "baseband" processor and chipset and software that is a modified version of the hardware/software running on normal non EZX phones like the RAZR etc and then another more powerful CPU (Intel XSCALE I think) that runs the linux kernel and a bunch of userland stuff which communicates to the baseband side by sending AT commands to the BP side and getting responses back.
Motorola have released the source
Re: (Score:2)
How does this differ from Greenphone? (Score:5, Informative)
Greenphone [trolltech.com] from Trolltech already has a development device available, although it is a bit pricey for common usage ($695 USD). Does anyone have any information about the differences in the project?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
And then there's OpenMoko [openmoko.com].
How many open stacks do we need?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Looking Forward to the Day (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Coming Soon (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Spare of the Batteries! (Score:2)
Ah, hell, my poor little Treo 650 can't even manage to run all day on a single battery with its dumb little single-threaded OS checking my e-mail and you want it to start folding proteins? The poor dear would burn itself to a crisp in 23 minutes.
Virtual Phone (Score:5, Insightful)
I'll definately check this out on my PC.
Nothing new. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Nothing new. (Score:4, Interesting)
I must say, though, the idea of hooking asterisk to a real cellphone for calls like this is intriguing already.
Also, for those looking for a mirror, These finally loaded:
http://gpe.linuxtogo.org.nyud.net:8080/ [nyud.net]
http://gpephone.linuxtogo.org.nyud.net:8080/ [nyud.net]
Re: (Score:2)
That already exists on several platforms. The only ones I'm familiar with myself are the Windows Mobile ones, where the dev studio can emulate all of the target phones. You can just fire up the emulator and play about with the OS.
Also, an OSS OS already exists here, Linux was ported to the platform several years ago. It's still a work-in-progress and the user interface is as bad as you'd expect it to be for a project of this maturity. Unfortunately, IMHO the most important thing on a portable device is th
Re: (Score:3)
A GPL-only framework would be much more palatable to phone makers as it would allow them to use it in their commercial products without fees. If they have to pay to use it, they'll probably just continue developing their own solutions as they have in the past. I know I would.
I'm generally against GPL, but in this instance, I think it's a good idea. Phone co
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, they'll still be able to create proprietary apps just like the linux kernel allows you to. But they won't be able to take community code and modify it without returning it to the community.
They'll probably find some other way to subvert the system, of course. I've already thought of an obvious one as it is. *cough*tivo*cough*
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, sorry. Read that again...
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/downloads/qt/wi ndows [trolltech.com]
'commercialize' Means "To apply methods of business to for profit." This means that if you intend to make money from the project, and you use Qt, you MUST license the commercial 'version' of Qt, even if you open source and GPL your code.
Re: (Score:1)
Mobile Windows Migration for All (Score:2)
Not just because I want my phone to run the same apps on the same shared data as my desktop. But because the limited phone UI will force new paradigms in using these little mobile devices which will
GPE for all who want it. (Score:2)
I'm not really sure what you are trying to say here but I can tell you a little about GPE. You demand:
and shall receive. GPE already runs recompiled applications with good mapping of input from all available buttons and the touch screen. Xstroke is on of the best graffiti handwriting recognitions I've ever used. The average distribu
Re: (Score:2)
What I'm talking about is mainly drivers for phone touchscreens and other HW. And specifically, which Windows phones are most completely supported by GPE now. I ran the Handhelds.org Linux on some iPaqs without X (ethernet to stereo audio f
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Sometimes those battles are picked for reasons other than the ones stated, too. My first thought when I read this was, 'He just doesn't want a phone, and this is a good excuse.'
similar projects (Score:5, Informative)
OpenMoko [openmoko.com]
The GreenPhone [trolltech.com]
GNU radio for the modem (Score:2)
How do you get a SIM card into a PC?
Re: (Score:1)
USB connected smart card reader with a SIM adapter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
vmware (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
That's nice, but... (Score:5, Insightful)
This isn't like getting a PC onto the internet, where any software can be installed and anything that talks TCP/IP can connect. Like it or not (and I don't), many of the more recent phones, music players, etc. are not open platforms in that sense. And the service providers are more than a tad concerned about keeping control of what connects to their networks. (I don't know whether their worries are about a compromised device crashing the network, introducing some unreliability, or just bypassing one of their many ways to profit from every byte that gets transferred.)
Do we have any reason to think that this stack will be treated any differently?
But they won't subsidise the Phone ... (Score:1)
Martin
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Enhanced_Cor
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
MOD PARENT UP (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The control issue is only about selling you extras. They want you to have to purchase $2 wallpapers, ringtones, etc. from the carrier.
Symbian Signed (Score:1)
It's the same for Windows Mobile and will be the same for the iPhone.
And, of course: a network provider can ban the use of specific API's and or unsigned software on subsidised/branded phones.
Martin
[1] https://www.symbiansigned.com/app/page/dev/devcert Summary [symbiansigned.com]
All well and good... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)