Do LUGs Still Matter? 155
Joe Barr, writing for NewsForge asks, "Do LUGs still matter? Back in the day, LUGs were rowdy, popular, and highly contagious centers for aficionados of Linux. Install fests were a big deal. Members came from all walks of life, united only by a penchant for something new and cool, and a chance to place a bet on the impossible notion of world domination by an operating system hacked together by a ragtag bunch of students on the Internet. It's different today. Linux is now mainstream, it's being spread by slick corporate marketing, and with most distros, installation is a snap. So the question arises, do LUGs still matter?"
Do they still matter? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Do they still matter? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Do they still matter? (Score:1)
Esotericism (Score:1, Interesting)
As far as user groups are concerned, however, their relevance is directly proportional to Linux' esotericism: as it becomes mainstream, every office and class will become a spontaneous LUG.
Re:Esotericism (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Esotericism (Score:2)
Yes! (Score:4, Interesting)
In some ways, LUGs are one of the only places for someone new to get training and learn without spending thousands on classes. They also serve as a great place to meet fellow enthusiasts.
There is plenty of activity going on on the bleeding edge as well and this makes for great meeting presentations.
Re:Yes! (Score:3, Informative)
Meeting Chicks (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, in the sense that you'll meet the "chicks" you've been having virtual sex with.
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:2)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:2)
But don't think LUGs are just boring, here is a group in Davis, CA that combined the fun and excitement of open source, with MAGIC!
see the pictures [lugod.org].
You can't tell me that LUGs aren't cool.
Keep looking at the rest of the pictures on the site...here is another example [lugod.org] then tell me how a bunch of computer geeks managed to use photos that are 640x480 pixels, yet had a file size of over 150K each.
Actually, I know a lot of the people there, and a lot of them work
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:1)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:2)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:1)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:1)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:3, Funny)
That pretty much covers it
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:2)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, you bitter quasi-misogynistic sod!
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:4, Informative)
Just look at our cousins @ BSD, there are lot of girls... and women do also like Mac...
--
I dream of a united Linux, xBSD, Mac OS X, UNIX world... and with no room for M$ !
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:2)
Try and remember, minority != non-existant.
Re:Meeting Chicks (Score:2)
It's attitudes like that kept females like me away from my local lug even when I was hopelessly stuck. The same attitude pervades Linux chat rooms where I have occasionally gone for help. I'm tired of being patted on the head, when I'm not wading through hot grit jokes.
I have managed to figure this shit out myself (started using linux in 99, when it
Oslo PILS and Linux User Group (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Oslo PILS and Linux User Group (Score:2, Interesting)
Oslo's part of Norway. Scandinavia is just by default cool. Score one for Norway (and Oslo)
Oslo is where Opera comes from. I'd have to be using some less awesome browser if it weren't for Oslo. Oslo is damn cold, here I am having to use my air conditioner on Christmas Day.
There are many more reasons that Oslo rules, these are just a few.
Signed,
Uman, wh
Here's the answer from TFA (Score:5, Informative)
"I guess my answer is that yes, LUGs do still matter, but not as much as they did in the early days. They are not the primary drivers of Linux adoption that they once were. Improvements in the ease of installation of modern distributions, Linux's widespread adoption, and its acceptance as an enterprise tool have all combined to lessen the need for what LUGs offer. Today's LUG is less a vibrant beacon of a community of users and more of a professional/social club for admins."
Yeah, sounds pretty reasonable to me.
Re:Here's the answer from TFA (Score:2)
Where I live, Linux has zero visibility outside the university and college campus, no presence, no spokesman, no involvement in the community whatever.
Yes, there is employment for the big-system Linux administrator. But Linux in the home, Linux in small business, not in
LUG Concept Outdated (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:LUG Concept Outdated (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:LUG Concept Outdated (Score:1)
Re:LUG Concept Outdated (Score:1)
Sure they do. (Score:1)
If the community knows what's good for it, YES. (Score:5, Insightful)
I remember my days in a user group. It attracted lots of people because there were always things to learn. Even experts could pick up tidbits of valuable information, and more often than not the novices picked up help from the experts. In that way, everyone became a little more expert. And lemme tell you, there are few things more satisfying than telling people something they don't know, and watching their jaws literally drop.
That "slick corporate marketing" will convince you to buy into a particular software and hardware solution, but buy-in and installation are only the beginning. There's later configuration, installations on top of your existing system, new peripherals, and plus you may just want to do new things with it. The original seller can't afford to hold the hand of every novice that comes along and gets their system. Trust me on this, in that case the user group is a godsend.
And now for the twist: note that at no time did I actually mention Linux. That's because the user group [wap.org] I was talking about dealt with a different platform, one that still values its user group network [apple.com].
Take the hint: easy to set up and easy to install, and it still supports its user groups. There is power in community.
People get together (Score:5, Insightful)
Having said the above, the nature of LUGs will change as the technology matures. A successful group will probably have one or two core members who keep it going. Otherwise, the group will die out.
Hot rodders are similar to Linux users in many respects. In the early days, everyone had to be a bit of a mechanic because cars were primitive. It was easy to make improvements on your car for the same reason. As cars became more sophisticated and laws became stricter, most people quit working on their cars and left that to the professionals. You still have hot rodders though. They still get together at the burger joint. There are still hot rod clubs. I think it will be the same with LUGs. Certainly as a proportion of the population of Linux users, the number of Linux geeks will decrease. However, in absolute numbers, there will probably be just as many of us or more.
LUGs and interst. (Score:4, Insightful)
Another issue is Linux gaming. This year. I'm hosting a purely Linux LAN war this X-mas Day. No Windows. All Linux. I've done this beforee. But I expect this year to be one of my best.
There are alot more Super Windows Users who can build complex Windows networks (Such as Actiive Directory) than there are Super Linux users to match and thats with technologies such as OpenLDAP, due to intrest, and goals. To make LUGs more effective, more Super Linux users need to be produced so Linux that Linux improves, and the education about Linux improves.
Thumping our own chest , are we? (Score:5, Insightful)
If you really think you have something interesting to say, I think nobody will stop you if you prepare and have a little presentation about a subject of your choice. But keep in mind that you need to supply reason why other people should be interested in your subject, so approach it from a general or newbie point of view. 'because I can' is not a good reason, for the most part because 'I' is the most important word in that sentence and most people are not interested in your 'I'.
In short: stop boasting, start teaching or shut up.
WWSUDO! (Score:2)
Lug Radio (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Lug Radio (Score:3, Funny)
LUGs don't matter to home users anymore... (Score:2, Interesting)
Now, with near-automated installs of most distributions, the average user who wants linux just has to pop in the CD and answer some (mostly easy) questions.
The LUGs have been supplanted by forums for users. Why wait until a LUG meeting to ask a question or trouble shoot a problem when you can ask it on your distribution's forums and get a knowledgea
Re:LUGs don't matter to home users anymore... (Score:2)
I agree that for many problems you can merely google the answer or find a forum to get an answer or three, but for the more detailed problems where else can you go to get an entire room full of knowledgeable people focused on finding you the answers for free?
They're good (Score:2)
Re:They're good (Score:3, Interesting)
I have never heard of a LUG (or Mac User Group, which is the other OS I use) in my area, although if there was an active one I'd probably join. That begs the question -- where and how do people find out about LUGs in their area, and how many users are muddling along (as I am) on their own, wishing they knew more people in their local area who also used Linux that were willing to help them?
Re:They're good (Score:2)
Re:They're good (Score:2)
There are several [google.com] lists of LUG's. Be sure to search multiple LUG lists in case the chairperson hasn't listed his LUG on every list. The list at Linux International [li.org] is the only one I've recieved a continuance ping from since listing my LUG [dlslug.org] so it's probably the most accurate.
Well... (Score:2)
Not being part of a LUG myself, I couldn't tell wether they still matter or not even though I'd like to say "YES they do". Not sure about the other slashdotters, but I'd rather be tutored by a friendly human next to me than having to read half-done (the other half being outdated) HOWTOs.
I co-founded GrUMF ("Groupe d'Utilisateurs Macintosh Francophones") back in '99, it's a french-language Apple User Group based in Belgium (but our mailing-list and active
Re:Well... (Score:2)
Of course, once being tutored by a human you DO go and write up the documentation so it's now current, don't you?
Well, actually I DO write some documentation (especially covering the usage of a terminal and various command-line utilities under Mac OS X); and I've hosted a few presentations at my AUG's mettings. As my docs and presentations are written and done in french you wouldn't get much from them, but my numerous english-illiterate readers really appreciated my effort.
Of course this is not exactly
I became aware of Linux (Score:2, Interesting)
Yes, LUGs are still relevant (Score:5, Insightful)
6 years on, we have what has got to be one of the most vibrant communities in a LUG anywhere. We teach one another, we help with downloading distros, we do activism, we hold installfests, we go out for coffee, dinner, hold LAN parties where one unnamed individual always beats us into submission at bzflag, and we work to bolster the bottom line of Egyptian beer manufacturers.
Since when was a LUG about helping people install Linux? It's a community Goddamn you. Communities will always be relevant. If there was no community there would be no free software: a LUG is simply the most evident face of this community.
Lugs are groovey. (Score:3, Interesting)
LUGs do matter ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Networking. And I'm not talking about the TCP/IP kind. I'm talking about meeting each other, getting to know other linux professionals and people of the tech community. Instead of overly peppered resumes with mindless certifications, you get to meet people who actually can talk about the technologies, the issues, etc. You should see the number of head-hunters, hiring agencies and etc that come to a LUG meeting with the hopes of meeting real intelligence. (Recently my LUG (NYLUG [nylug.org]) and Google threw a big party at a fancy restaurant in Manhattan in an attempt to attract the tech community, but python developers in particular. Google's Alex Martelli was the speaker (you python guys should know him)).
Additionally, networking doesn't just mean the kind that gets consultants hired and what not. I'm talking about building a community. Letting people meet new people and become friends. Every time our LUG has a meeting, you can always see various circle of "LUG-friends" get together and talk amongst themselves. Its brilliant. At a LUG meeting you aren't talking to someone overly concerned about mindless shit like the latest Pop music star, but people who take to the same issues that matter greatly to yourself (DRM, DMCA, kernel stability, PHP security, source compilations, etc). Its quite a treat to be able to sit down and have a beer with someone else who actually knows what a buffer-overflow is.
LUG's are also are great because they can tap in from a pool of talent to get a single effort going. The president of my LUG is also one hell of a salesman. His ability to be a people person is like no other, and so we get great speakers all the time (Ie: Google, XenSource, Novell, Chris DiBona, etc). But our president isn't a super technical guy, so we leave server management to someone else. We also leave mailing list management to another guy, who is incredibly level-headed and thus handles flame-fest situations very well. For an individual to do all of the above would be nearly impossible. A group of people OTOH, can do this very well without sucking up a too much of a single person.
While Linux isn't brand spanking new, it does not mean LUGs are not useful anymore. It means they've adapted, re-focused their energies, and aim for a new direction. Gone are the days where many LUG presentations were introductions about the technology. Today we talk about new technology, but more important what you can do with this technology. (IE: Xen virtualization.)
This January is our LUG's 7th year birthday. And we are strong as we have ever been.
Sunny Dubey
Officer
New York Linux User's Group
LUGs are still very important! (Score:1)
The big drive for the LUG I am in is making Linux known to more people in the community, and help others with hardware and software under Linux/GNU based operating systems. There are people who come to the group for help, from all walks of life.
When it just doesn't work for you (Score:1)
the members of your LUG will still be there to help. The slick marketteers will be off marketing a new wave.
LUGs are the great Linux learning centers. They matter a lot. I may be biased because my LUG [pdxlinux.org] is a particularly good one.
Sure (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course they still matter! LUGs are great! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Of course they still matter! LUGs are great! (Score:1)
Overexaggerated relevance. (Score:1)
They have value, but only to a small subset of people. They're great things, but 9 times out of 10 if you know about the existance of a LUG it's something like preaching to the choir. They appeal to and are accessible by university students, or tech geeks. Definitely an invaluable resource for helping each other through configuration/installation, and a lot of fun but not really any more or less valuable than any o
Of course! LUGs serve to reinforce the geek ethos. (Score:2)
After the LUG meetings people usually head out for a burger/pizza and socialize a bit. It's good for geeks to get
$0.02 USD (Score:5, Insightful)
User groups, regardless of what the primary focus is, are an integral part of our world. Look at popular sports, for example. The social companionship is enhanced exponentially when there's a common primary subject of focus, whether it is an operating system, a particular footbal team (American, British, Martian, etc.), or a certain league of motorsports. The amount of social bonding that takes place when fans of any topic come together is simply amazing, and is beneficial to our species. Additionally, when groups of like-minded individuals come together on a certain topic, the collective knowledge exceeds that of what could be learned in any individual instance.
Now consider for a moment the explosion of the use of Linux. It is becoming the sole server OS on the internet, intranets, and that small 4-node LAN you have running in your house. Linux is free, stable (for the most part - this is not going to be an OS war), highly configurable, and easily administrated from a remote location. Being that it has so much that it can do, there is so much knowledge to be had about it -- more than what a single human can and should know.
By gathering some of your closest affectionados to set up a load-balancing, caching, super-cool-illegal-ninja-moves DNS server, several things happen. Firstly, the social bonding takes place. Secondly, the knowledge of the group as a whole allows for the task to be completed quickly and properly. Thirdly, everyone knows something that you don't: Everyone learns something new from the time spent.
Now, you're probably thinking, "What good is that if you're not doing it for hire?" The answer is simple. By simply living, you need to be ready to take on a new walk of life at a moment's notice, just for your own survival. Certain walks of life have certain benefits. This walk of life that we have all considered taking (if you're reading this, you're in the IT field, considering it, or retired from it) is needed for other walks of life to function. Since it is a rather large dependancy in itself, success and knowledge are rewarded by fairly decent financial reimbursement -- your salary. To be successful and knowledgable, you need hands-on learning, discussion with other knowledgable individuals, and the above mentioned social bonding. In addition to the primary skills you gain from such events, the secondary skills are equally as useful.
Now that I realise I have been babbling for the last 20 minutes (It's early on Christmas. Give me a break.), I'm going to stop there.
In short: Yes, LUG's still matter.
As long as culture matters (Score:3, Insightful)
And sometimes I just need an egyptian to talk to, explain to him my linux problem and get his feedback
Other times I just feel like talking about the presence and the future of free software in egypt
So I think, my conclusion is, as long as distance and culture matters, lug, (local linux help) will continue to matter.
Re:As long as culture matters (Score:1)
I did that myself for a while, when I got sick of ploughing through all those SLS/Slackware floppies, but am happy to be able to say Slackware is still where it's at for me.
LUGs do matter (Score:1)
What are you smoking? (Score:1, Interesting)
Seriously what are you smoking? Linux is not mainstream. In a company with over 4000 employees, I'm the only one using Linux. Outside of server admins most people don't even know what it is. The only slick corp marketing is found in geek mags.
As for the "do LUGs matter" question. I went to one once. It was the biggest waste of time. Some idiot talked about doing stupid things all
Re:What are you smoking? (Score:1)
If you average my yearly salary, and Bill Gates salary, the average American earns how much per year ??
regards
dbcad7
It's the social part that matters (Score:1)
They may not, but (Score:5, Interesting)
Free Software User Groups
or FSUGs.
Those groups can promote free software on proprietary platforms (such as firefox and open office on windows), generally as a transitory stage to reach a free platform. Various free platforms are embraced: GNU/Linux, *BSD and why not GNU (that is, with HURD).
Here, the local LUG is very important and they make huge events each year bringing thousands of people to learn about free software, there's no marketing of any company that can replace that.
Re:They may not, but (Score:2)
So i don't care for groups like that anymore. There are much better communities online, and more interesting things to try than wasting the time dealing with rabid fanatics.
If the idea of free software groups really takes off here, i might gro
Some do, some don't... (Score:3, Interesting)
ttyl
Farrell
Re:Some do, some don't... (Score:2)
The nice thing about living this area is that there are ~7 LUGs to choose from within a 100 mile radius of my house. Each group has their own atmosphere, and there are several big names that visit once in a while.
Lost User Groups (Score:4, Insightful)
Im one of the "oldschool" geeks that grew up with an Atari 2600 and wrote my first assembly code games on a Commodore 64 way back then when an electronics kit where all the buzz and computers where something that banks used.
I was a part of a local computer club in Stavanger in Norway where we met once a week to bring our beloved computers together and exchange code and just marvel at the "cool" computers we had. You could see a range of Commodore 64, Vic 20, Spectrum, ZX-81,BBC and many more there. It was passionate fun - and basically every day of our lives revolved around our home computers.
Not too sure where all that went - but I had an "idea" about LUGs being somewhat the same as "back then"...unfortunately it seems like that no longer holds true (at least not to me). Im a Long time Linux user myself - using Slackware (an derivative self-compiled version of it that is).
But Ive tried several times to get in touch with such groups, I now Live in Denmark in an small town called Odense. I tried to meet with the local LUGs over here and most of them where elitist-snobs to say the very least. It consist of mostly System-administrators and incarnate Linux professionals that seems to be very good friends - but shun any outsiders. If you dont know your way around Bash - then youre frozen outside and no one would even dare to talk to you. Funnily enough - theyre not the only example
Oh-boy - times have sure changed. Maybe its just me that is getting to be an old geezer and stuck in the past, either that or it actually could be why theyre getting "less important"...at least to the "commoners" like me.
Just my 5.14" cents.
Re:Lost User Groups (Score:2, Funny)
Now I'm surrounded by these young arrogant zealots at work all day, telling me there's no reason to run anything other than Linux and that I don't understand it. Why would I want to go and surrround myself with even more of them at a LUG?
"Hey, I was installing Yggdrasil Linux from floppies downloaded via UUCP when you were still in nappies (diapers), bucko."
Re:Lost User Groups (Score:2)
Hopefully teaching them a thing or two in FreeDOS or something instead of windows.
Re:Lost User Groups (Score:1)
lugs (Score:1)
still relevant in Omaha anyway (Score:2)
I hope so! (Score:2)
Victoria Linux Enthusiasts LUG (Score:3, Informative)
Heck yes! (Score:3, Insightful)
If there'd been a local LUG, she'd have had a working printer (and probably have the Wacom Graphire 3 going) a long time ago.
Corporate movement towards Linux is great, but don't forget the home user.
LUGs are like distros (Score:3, Interesting)
When people disagree about how to use computers, they may split whatever organization they have to do this a different way,
Both sides of a fork win by involving new users in whatever obsessions they share.
It's all a plot, well, a bunch of plots really, to make users, not all, but enough, into developers.
Whether you're speaking of software, news sites, blogs, email lists, or LUGs, with Open Source forks are more often than not good things for Free Software, including the fork between Free Software and Open Source.
Any fork produces new developers, and more ways of doing neat things.
What I don't understand is why there are no Open Office User Groups.
Austin is probably not typical (Score:5, Insightful)
Some issues:
During the early years of the group is was usually hosted at sites that had two rooms. One for organized presentations, and the other for freewheeling conversations and people were able to wander between the two. The site had some form of open net access. The moderator (Stu Green, or others) usually started the conversation going with a 15 minute rant on current events, and elicited questions, inform the group on what people were working on and what they needed to find out. This helped match people together by interested and really jump started the socialization.
Later the group moved to venues that had one room, and on days where a presentation was less than interesting there could be no social aspect until dinner after the meeting (Katz's, Starseeds or some other late night venue.) Also, the new venue's were at City and State owned buildings, and some core members had such strong political views that they refused to attend meetings in those buildings. The meetings also for a time alternated between a North Austin and South Austin location instead of a central one, meaning most people only attended whichever meeting was closest.
The Internet Bubble hit Austin hard in 2001-2002, and many core members were jobless, and could no longer afford to eat out. The dinner group dwindled to just a few, and we found many people were attending meetings just for the dinner socialization.
There were a lot of ongoing ego battles... many of the original founders of the group held strong political opinions but did not frequently attend meetings. They were also typically older, and had some of the grumpiness generally expected of people in their age bracket.
In both computer and social networks there are true benefits in the number of nodes/people. The more people, the more interactions, and the more useful and interesting the group becomes. The Austin Linux group died the death of a thousand small cuts.. the increasingly mainstream use of Linux is only one of those.
bringing my kid to one (Score:3, Interesting)
Just recently however I started attending the one in my city, to bring my oldest there (7 years old). It's really wonderful, gives us some nice time together, and exposes him to linux and part of linux culture. After the first time (which was an installfest, where some fellow there let him play a bunch of linux games on his box) my son asks about going ahead of time and looks forward to it. If something less than interesting for a seven year old is being discussed, I just bring my lappie with free games on it anyhow to keep him entertained (loves wesnoth). That and the the free food of course
You must be trolling (Score:5, Insightful)
And the idea of Linux being mainstream is just a mite hopeful. It may be mainstream among network administrators and computer science grads reading Slashdot, but I can guarantee you that the general public wouldn't know a Linux box from a linotype machine. And what they do know is probably wrong anyway. Macs get lots of press and misinformation about them is the norm.
I've attended a couple of local LUGs and can testify that their members are just as avid and cultish as Mac users, and just as welcoming and eager to share. As long as Linux remains an underdog users will band together against the Windows world. You may loose a few members who only were proud of Linux because it was so difficult to make work but they are leaving because of some other need than the one to share and learn from each other.
LUGs are the last bastion of computer user groups (Score:1, Interesting)
There are no other *user* groups in our city than our LUG. At one time we had old-school groups just like any other city, but once PCs were no longer rocket science/magic to the general public, those groups died out.
Our LUG thrives today because it's changed to what TFA talked about - a professional/social/educational group where the local techies and admins can get together and talk tech vs. just pat asses and shake hands like the other "professional" technology groups. We actually learn and do things
LUGS are not CORPORATIONS (Score:2)
I think there is a misconception here that Linux is being led by slick marketing campaigns and corporations. Sure, you can find slick marketing types who are extolling the virtues of such products as Linux 9.0 when they really mean RedHat 9.0 but are to fucking stupid to actually know anything.
But there are an aweful lot of people who use Linux, regardless of the distro, and are much more useful in getting things to work, problems solved, interesting things done, tried, and learned. The corporations have
No (Score:2)
It was disappointing. A group of unmotivated academics/geeks with no real drive to do something.
Same for the Unix Group at my University.
IRC has much more value for me.
Indian LUGs (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Indian LUGs (Score:1)
Looks like I messed up on the Formatting options tab up there.. Sigh, tab keys are hateful sometimes.
Winnipeg (Score:1)
Unix users groups are a broader subset than Linux users.
And in Winnipeg, a city of 650.000 - we like our MUUG - the Manitoba Unix User Group.
After all - some are Unix by day and Linux by night (and vice versa).
Lugs (Score:1)
The Evolution of User's Groups (Score:1)
Never know who you'll meet (Score:2)
What is it like to live in lala land? (Score:1, Troll)
Hate Linux? Declare that Linux is dead! Worried about your Microsoft stock plummeting when free OSes take over the world? Insist that Linux can never make it on the desktop or that no sane person can ever adjust to the complexities of Linux. Right, well, let's improve the Linux experience by having Linux user groups. OH NO! NO NEED FOR THAT! LINUX IS PLENTY
Re:What is it like to live in lala land? (Score:2)
Yeah, well, in simpler terms: I'm pointing out the irony of how we all went from ten years of denying Linux is anything but a piece of shit to insisting that Linux doesn't need any more promoting because it's succeeded already, without ever acknowledging that it had any viability at all. And of course, we'll go back to saying how rotten it is tomorrow.
This ties in with this morning's discussion over MediainLinux, where we went right from "LINUX-WILL-NEVER
Users Groups (Score:2)
I Stopped Going to my local LUG years ago. (Score:2, Interesting)
1. Become a Tax-Free Non-Profit Organization in order to be a Cheapbytes or Linux Central Disk Reseller (heaven forbid they burn their own disks and give some proceeds to linuxiso.org).
2. When given a choice between involving the me
Dude (Score:2, Informative)
LUGs for InstallFest: success! (Score:2, Interesting)
Why? Because folks who have any sort of trepidation re Linux want personal attention and communication. The Cornell Student LUG filled up with e-mails soon thereafter because people who installed and had questions wanted help f
Mainstream?? (Score:2, Informative)
Mainstream? You guys really need to get out of the Slashdot Universe and look around. Linux is far from mainstream.
And which distros make installation a "snap?" When installing Linux, I still have to TELL it what kind of Keyboard and Mouse I'm using. Go ahead, ask your mom or sister or girlfriend or the star athlete at your school/college what kind of mouse they use. Wait for the blank st
Not new and not all that cool (Score:2)
This would be quite impressive if the OS in question was actually designed from the ground up by the students and represented a significant advance in OS technology. Instead, they took the position that a decades old OS was the ultimate that could be achieved a