New Releases for Debian and SUSE 223
linuxbeta writes "With the recent SUSE LINUX 9.3 Live DVD ISO released, we get a sneak peek. (screenshots) of this much anticipated OS update. Cool updates in 9.3 includes Firefox 1.0, OpenOffice.org 2.0, Gimp 2.2, Beagle. Xen, VoIP client, and more." And while Debian's Sarge isn't here yet (give Branden Robinson a chance to find his plush new office!), wrochal points out that the fifth update to Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 ("Woody" ) has arrived. 3.0 (r5) "mainly adds security updates to the stable release, along with a few corrections to serious problems." Also, four packages were removed, three for license violations.
Grr. (Score:4, Insightful)
Word usuage.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Word usuage.. (Score:1)
Re:Word usuage.. (Score:2, Insightful)
I can't see in screenshots if a application is the best to use, if it haven't bugs. Any search in google brings me a lot of screenshots. [google.com]
The fourth package's removal reason? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The fourth package's removal reason? (Score:5, Informative)
I guess that's an acceptable reason.
Re:The fourth package's removal reason? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The fourth package's removal reason? (Score:2, Informative)
Do you know what these license violations were? The links to the packages are all broken, presumably because the packages have been removed.
Yes, the reasons are listed here at the very bottom: http://people.debian.org/~joey/3.0r5/ [debian.org]
Re:The fourth package's removal reason? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:The fourth package's removal reason? (Score:2)
Btw, Gadu gadu is a polish messenger. FYI.
Re:The fourth package's removal reason? (Score:5, Funny)
Ah, now that makes sense. I've heard a lot of people say that Debian lacks polish.
Re:The fourth package's removal reason? (Score:2)
Multimedia (Score:3, Insightful)
This strategy will not "draw" in the crowds - most people give up before tinkering with the system. It has to work smoothly right out of the install (mostly).
I generally think Suse is one of the most polished distros out there, but it still has a way to go with multimedia, to get it to appeal to joe-computer user and Grandma who are scared of "breaking" things on the computer.
Linux is on the cusp from going from "hacker" OS to main-stream, but still has some catching up to Windows in certain things - mainly multimedia. Yes I know there are plenty of programs that work great - but the average user, I think, would not have the expertise to get it to work easily right off the DVD.
Re:Multimedia (Score:4, Interesting)
These all work great on Debian and have for years, if you use the w32codecs package from a non-Debian package repository.
I'm sure SuSE can't ship it because it requires packaging some potentially copyright-violating codecs that are the byproduct of reverse-engineered streams and other "unscrupulous" things.
I can use mplayer, xine, xmms to play dvd, cd, mp3, mpeg, wav, ogg, ogm, avi, RealMedia, Windows Media, QuickTime, and probably a dozen of others that don't come to mind right now...
Just because SuSE doesn't have it, doesn't mean it can't be done with Linux.
Software everyone can use is better. (Score:5, Informative)
This is part of the reason why I'm anxiously awaiting Dirac and why I'm reading the Theora spec. I want to be able to point to a complete and competitive FLOSS codecs which are genuinely useful for movies.
We also ought to promote the use of these codecs and not be so eager to distribute copies of files encoded with proprietary or patent-encumbered codecs.
Re:Software everyone can use is better. (Score:2)
Once you have the p2p networks using the FLOSS codecs, you're set.
Re:Software everyone can use is better. (Score:2)
Nothing is preventing anyone from paying the one-time license fee for MP3 decoding. According to mp3licensing.com [mp3licensing.com] this one-time license fee is "US$ 50 000.00 - US$ 60 000.00". But there are some problems with that plan:
Re:Multimedia (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Multimedia (Score:1, Interesting)
I've just moved from Mandrake 10.1 to Ubuntu (Sarge in disguise) and it's beautiful. Almost everything I'm installing is saying "No, I don't want anything more thanks, I've got all my dependancies right here." The same goes for multimedia - most of it was ready for me, and the rest was remedied by a quick download and uncompressing of the essential codecs package at mplayerhq.
If we can just hold off the European patent laws a little longer then I think we've almost arrived at user-friendly linux.
Re:Multimedia (Score:2, Informative)
I think you mean Sid in disguise.
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
The biggest pain is that, without a convoluted chain of software installation that I can't seem to accomplish (I'
Re:Multimedia (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
Re:Multimedia (Score:4, Interesting)
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies
[ebuild R ] media-libs/xine-lib-1.0-r1 +X -aac +aalib +alsa (-altivec) +arts +cle266 -debug +directfb +dvd +dxr3 +esd +fbcon -ffmpeg +flac -gnome -i8x0 -ipv6 -libcaca +mng +nls +nvidia +opengl +oss +png +samba +sdl -speex -theora +v4l +vidix +vorbis +win32codecs -xinerama +xv -xvmc 0 kB
That's a pretty impressive list, if you ask me.
Re:Multimedia (Score:5, Insightful)
Survey says?!? BZZZZT
I am, buy far and large, NOT a "Gentoo zealot". It just happens to be the distro of MY choice. I usually reccomend MDK or SuSE to people.
it's really freaking easy to run "apt-get install MPlayer"?
Can't the same be said for
etc.....
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
to
Usually, out-of-Debian apt archives are of poor quality, but, as Christian Marillat is a Debian Developer himself, he knows how to make it work right. His archive is widely known as debian-non-legal.
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
Re:Multimedia (Score:2, Insightful)
At times, I feel we're always taking another step half way to completion. 5 years ago it was 50% there, later, 75%. Wasn't long until 87.5%... then 92%... the closer we get, the slower the refining a good desktop OS. the SuSE multimedia isn't too bad a problem all up, but as an oldbie I'm tired of
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
Re:Multimedia (Score:4, Interesting)
> polished distros out there, but it still has a
> way to go with multimedia, to get it to appeal
> to joe-computer user and Grandma who are scared
> of "breaking" things on the computer.
They removed some multimedia support (DVD, MP3? I think it is about it) from some *reasons* not just because they cannot make it right. These reasons are legal difficulties - namely MP3 codec distribution issues (it is not free, when you distribute more than 100000 copies you need to pay Philips AFAIK) and DVD-CSS issues (I think it is illegal in US). SuSE is now US based (Novell) and they need to be legal. I belive only free (as in beer) version is crippled without multimedia. If you actually *buy* boxed set it should play MP3 and so on (I don't know how with DVD-CSS but they just could attach some propertiary program to play DVDs). So if you wish to pay you will get paid multimedia features, if you wish not to pay you don't and need to get it running on your own (which is perfectly legal - it just cannot be distributed this way).
So it is not like Linux distributors don't want to distribute this stuff - they cannot.
> Linux is on the cusp from going from "hacker" OS
> to main-stream, but still has some catching up
> to Windows in certain things - mainly multimedia.
I use Linux on daily basis as my workstation and never had any problems (well actually there were some like 5 years ago - now it is close to perfect) with multimedia. Mplayer plays just about any file format you can imagine - I often find Windows Media Player to not play some files, mplayer does it all out-of-the-box - no problems with searching for codecs etc. with proper setup you just click on file and it plays - I don't have any problems with multimedia and Linux. There are some areas that Linux is lacking, but IMHO it is not multimedia...
My distro of choice is Fedora - it also comes without some multimedia support - but adding it is as simple as adding one line to config file and issuing one command. For grandpa or smth. it is a matter of opening terminal and copying and pasting
one command. And then it works so please don't dramatize. Or go get boxed paid distribution and you will get it all out-of-the-box.
> Yes I know there are plenty of programs that
> work great - but the average user, I think,
> would not have the expertise to get it to work
> easily right off the DVD.
Look it is like installing one program and running it and you got DVD running. It is exactly the same as on Windows (does Windows Media Player play DVDs?). Actually I usually recommend anyone using Windows to install VLC Media Player - from my experience it works best. It is like somebody IMs or calls me and asks "look I've got this AVI file from my mail and I click it and it does not play - what should I do?" and I just point them to website or give them setup.exe URL and it works for them, where Windows Media Player does not. And VLC is aviable on Linux too.
Excuse me? (Score:2)
If Linspire can do it, then there is no excuse for any commercial distro not to be able to play MP3s and DVDs. Just like real commercial distros such as Windows [microsoft.com] and OS X [apple.com] are capable of.
Re:Excuse me? (Score:3, Informative)
> DVD's. What's more, the Linsoire DVD player is
> Xine. Some how, little Linspire has managed to
> figure out how to legally play MP3's and DVD's.
So? It is exactly as I've said - you need to pay for it. They bought paid licenses for DVD support and distribute closed/propertiary version. And you need to pay for it. So what exactly is your point?
Re:Excuse me? (Score:2, Redundant)
The point is the SuSE/Novell have chosen to not pay for the license and there is no excuse for this. There is no DVD support in the paid-for version. There is simply no legal DVD playback support or MP3 encoding in SuSE. Yet little-ole Linspire was able to afford this "heavy" licensing fee and still ship its distro and DVD player for a lower price than SuSE 9.3.
Th
Re:Excuse me? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Excuse me? (Score:2)
On the other hand, it seems to me that Linspire does not allow you to copy and share the distribution with friends (you get a 'Family license' for
Re:Excuse me? (Score:2)
Obviously, they paid for the license. Which is why I meant that there is no excuse for any commercial distribution to not also pay for the license. I don't expect Debian or Gentoo to pay for licenses but, if Linspire can afford it, surely Novell can.
So that's quite simple if you don't care about your OS not being redistributable.
Provided the the distribution vendor has paid for the license, there should be no issue with re
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
> DVDs out of the box.
So this is exactly like with SuSE - you need to perform additional steps to watch DVD - namely install software.
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
Re:Multimedia - Your complaint in context (Score:2)
Getting multimedia to work with Windows XP is still somewhat of a pain. Yes Windows Media Player does a fairly good job, but there are still tons of files/formats that just don't play right off the bat..
Annotated Links: http://www.google.dk/search?hl=da&q=windows+%2B%2
Re:Multimedia (Score:2, Flamebait)
A little more on the multimedia debacle (Score:5, Informative)
1) Turbolinux, a distribution with a lot less mindshare and less money can afford to ship you a legal DVD player for $69 but somehow Novell cannot do so?
1a) Unless you are a corporate buyer, you see HP's Suse notebook comes preloaded with PowerDVD.
2) Slide two of the Suse silliness presentation is not that they not ship multimedia codecs out of the box. If that were our only problem. Debian, Red Hat and Mandrake do not ship libdvdcss or any of the other codecs, but once you add them, your existing Totem or Kaffeine players play.
2a) But no, Suse has to go way beyond what's required and actually goes into the source code for Xine and Kaffeine and cripples so that even if you add the missing codecs/libraries, it still will not play.
2b) So what do you do? You have to remove kaffeine, xine, xine-libs ad nauseam and then install apt-get and install those programs from a third-party and hope that it doesn't break anything else. Why is this bad?
Because you no longer get updates for those packages from Suse and because mixing apt and yast sources can often leave your system in an inconsistent state.
All of this is a damn shame, because Suse is an awesome distribution with some stupid, stupid, stupid policies that have no legal or logical basis.
Hopefully, this long response will serve as a permanent rebuttal to all of the Suse fanboys. Liking a distribution should not be tantamount to giving them carte blanche to screw you over.
Summary of facts:
1) Suse ships DVD-playing software whenever the hell it pleases it.
2) Other distributions manage to ship a dvd player for $69, yet Suse costs $85-99 or more.
3) Suse cripples standard libraries and thus has disqualified itself from the home market. I will not touch it for these reasons and I have stopped recommending it to friends and clients.
Re:A little more on the multimedia debacle (Score:5, Informative)
Re:A little more on the multimedia debacle (Score:2)
- I've bought DVDs, I've bought DVD reader (which comes with software for Windows). I don't accept the fact that I should pay 50$ more to watch them.
Other Distros (Score:2)
Example: Xandros3.
( oh, and they offer a community edition you can actually download and install, not some 'ftp only' garbage )
Mepis is also pretty far up there for 'well planned out'.
Both debian based, which is a plus for the future.
Re:Multimedia--BS (Score:2)
The parent said "I actually bought Codeweavers and have installed mplayer," not "I bought Codeweavers to install mplayer." Codeweavers can do stuff that mplayer can't, and vice versa, so it's perfectly logical to install both of them if you're looking for an ideal multimedia experience.
Re:Multimedia--BS (Score:2)
Please actually READ my post - YOU'RE WRONG (Score:2)
Get your facts straight before you jump all over some one.
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
Re:Multimedia (Score:2)
-standard gui. Nope, that's the distro's or
user's choice. Linux is a kernel, nothing
more
-standard cli. Nope, that's the distro's or
user's choice. Linux is a kernel, nothing
more. There's korn, bash, etc...
-standard sound package utility (WTF are you
talking about?) ALSA?
-standard install/removal. Once again, WTF?
apt-get? yum? rpm? autopackage?
As far as your little complaint about FireFox, yes you can upgrade it. Generic
OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still? (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, but Firefox 1.0 is positively outdated. So it averages out okay.
Re:OpenOffice 2.0????? Isn't it in beta still? (Score:3, Informative)
Congratulations editors! (Score:4, Funny)
Torrent anybody? (Score:2)
However, I haven't found a torrent for it. Torrent Reactor [torrentreactor.net] has some 9.3 versions, including a 5 CD set, but not this one LiveDVD version.
Re:Congratulations editors! (Score:2)
1+1=2 (Score:3, Insightful)
Let's clear something up right now (Score:5, Informative)
mp3s work out of the box using Juk.
I watch DVDs using MPlayer which I installed using the apt port for Suse.
There are 4 mulitmedia packs you can download from Suse using Yast.
Understand?
CAUTION: DO NOT UPGRADE SUSE (Score:2, Interesting)
As usual, Debian (with external install sources) upgraded just fine to the latest.
With "commercial" distros, WHY do I have to format my computer every single time?
I know these community distros Gentoo, Debian, Slack, etc. are a bit more complex to install (except for maybe Ubuntu), but at least I don't have to go through these damn versio
Re:CAUTION: DO NOT UPGRADE SUSE (Score:2)
Re: Let's clear something up right now (Score:3, Informative)
NEVER, ever do this again, editors! (Score:5, Funny)
OpenOffice 2.0? (Score:2)
Does anyone know where to get binaries of this little gem? A few higher-quality icons REALLY goes a long way...
Re:OpenOffice 2.0? (Score:4, Informative)
Keep in mind though, you need over 4gb of free disk space just to compile the darn thing. But I'll admit it looks nicer and integrates better into KDE.
Re:OpenOffice 2.0? (Score:2)
Torrent (Score:5, Informative)
torrent link [isohunt.com]
rats (Score:2, Insightful)
XEN (Score:2)
Oiee CPU0 is history.
No harm done but kind of a scary error message.
Re:XEN (Score:2)
Re:XEN (Score:2, Informative)
"Also, four packages were removed" (Score:2)
Torrent Available (Score:2, Informative)
what about people without DVD? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:what about people without DVD? (Score:2)
So, if you want to try Su
Re:what about people without DVD? (Score:2)
Max
Why screenshots? (Score:4, Interesting)
What do screenshots mean in such a scenario ? I know I'm being overly critical but any default X configuration tends to look like 1994 nostalgia. Why can't we style KDE to look like Panther or something ? Always that "blah" blocky gray bar nagging at my subconscious. No shadows/depth, no perception of interactivity. Yes I know I'm being overly artsy but if I'm looking at a GUI that's slowing me down vs the command line, that GUI had better make up for its inefficacies by being intoxicatingly sexy and curvy.
Re:Why screenshots? (Score:3, Insightful)
I too think screenshots don't do anything. How about a review of performance for the new apps rather than a change of the color of the title bar to the application?
Re:Why screenshots? (Score:2)
How would you know it still looks that way if it weren't for the screenshots? Would you rather have to install every distro in the hopes that it looks sexy, only to be pissed off at the time and effort required to find out it looks the same?
It takes someone with a capable system, the correct graphic acceleration drivers installed, X.org wi
Re:Why screenshots? (Score:2)
Debian (Score:3, Funny)
stagnation no doubt helped in part by it's so called "Debian Social Contract" and painfully slow release schedule. In later days it was surpassed by other more up to date distributions with other package systems with more flexibility and power.Debian R.I.P
I just upgraded SuSE (Score:2)
This upgrade was actually one of the smoothest SuSE upgrades I've done.
-Aaron
Re:I just upgraded SuSE (Score:2)
Re:Removed packages? (Score:1, Informative)
this is a maintenance release.
unfortunatly.
Re:Way to stay on the edge.. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Way to stay on the edge.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Way to stay on the edge.. (Score:2)
2.4.18 (Score:1)
Re:2.4.18 (Score:2)
Debian 3.0 (Woody) came with 2.4.18.
GGP wanted to know which kernel comes with the new (r5) for Woody. GP replied that kernel versions are not changed for a maintenance release (Which is true - some things are backported, but the API and a significant portion of the code stays at 2.4.18).
You've mistaken this debian thread for a SuSE thread.
HTH
Re:My Computer? (Score:2)
Re:My Computer? (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, but the icon is a picture of Tux in front of an iMac, so that evens it out.
Re:Clan? (Score:2)
Re:can we get a torrent for the Live ISO..? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Debian (Score:2)
Why?
Re:Debian (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Debian (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Oblig. New Release Post (Score:2)
Re:Reasons why Sarge shouldn't be released yet (Score:2)
If the next one is going to take as long as this one, I'd be concerned about such things, too. There will always be new releases of some packages, though, and the line has to be drawn somewhere. With any luck, Branden's going to be able to speed up the release process somewhat and it won't be an issue.
Re:Novell vs. SUSE = GNOME vs. KDE (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Left Out (Score:2)
Re:A lot of Screenshots (Score:2)