Terra Soft Offers Linux-booting iPods, FW Drives 213
Kai Staats of Terra Soft writes "We are pleased to now offer support for bootable iPods and FireWire drives, enabling a highly portable Linux on PowerPC environment." Note that this is about booting a Macintosh into Linux, not running Linux on the iPod.
Huh? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Huh? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Huh? (Score:2)
Re:Huh? (Score:4, Funny)
So... I'm guessing we can't get that with an automatic transmission, then.
Ah, but... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Ah, but... (Score:5, Funny)
Patents! (Score:3, Funny)
Can I patent normal things, but append "when done by Linus"?
Surely that will lead me to profit.
Re:Patents! (Score:3, Funny)
Honest journalism (Score:3, Informative)
Sad.
Re:Honest journalism (Score:2)
Commercials are not exempt from being 'news for nerds'.
Re:Honest journalism (Score:5, Insightful)
Do you really want to be stuck with stories only about "I got my X to run Linux!" articles and "How do I search the internet" ask slashdot posts?
Re:Honest journalism (Score:2)
(Please turn on tongue in cheek detectors before replying)
Stuart
Re:Honest journalism (Score:2)
Woah! (Score:5, Funny)
Woah! Leading developer of integrated PowerPC Linux solutions. That's impressive! I wonder if there is a second place?
Re:Woah! (Score:2)
Re:Woah! (Score:3, Insightful)
Honest Question (Score:3, Interesting)
Setting aside the "because I can" and "because it's Linux" arguments, what is the benefit of running YDL instead of OS X on one's Mac?
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Oh, I don't know, but not every Linux app is ported to Darwin, and maybe someone only wants to run Linux apps. I know if I had Mac hardware and only wanted to run OpenOffice and Evolution and the GIMP, I'd get rid of OSX and install Linux, just 'cause it's easier to get those working, and the interfaces would be more at home in Gnome than OSX (I like consistency).
Anyway, t
Re:Honest Question (Score:3, Informative)
OTOH, I have a Mac portable that I intend to get properly configured one of these days. (I need to clear a space near an internet connection that has enough headroom to open the case, and get MOL properly set up. Currently it's either Linux OR Mac, I can't boot into Linux and then open a Mac window for a game.)
And THAT's the reason that I have OSX installed. Games a
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Personally, as far as DEs go, my preferenc
Re:Honest Question (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Wow, you've got a Mac Portable running linux? (Score:2)
/royal wit cheese
Old world macs don't support OS X (officially) (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Old world macs don't support OS X (officially) (Score:2)
My mother-in-law is using OS X on a Beige G3 PowerMac.
She knows it's slow compared to modern machines, but it's a heck of a lot more capable than the 486/66 it replaced... for her uses, it appears to be fast enough, though I can certainly see why Apple do
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Terra Soft focuses on the linux on PPC arch. Maybe you think that is pointless but do we really need another live cd that is x86 only? Do you think it's a good idea that no one focuses on linux on other architectures?
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
I understand that people want to be able to boot their Macs into Linux without having to reinstall the internal drive. I might use this myself, just to play with Linux on my Mac Mini.
What I'm talking about is the idea of using this capability as a kind of "portable Linux". There are so few situations where one might find a free and unused Mac (since a Mac is almost always going to be actually in use: "People like to use the Macintosh"), but there's Windows-infested PCs everywhere.
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
The point is that there's 30 PCs out there for every Mac, and probably 90 unused PCs for every unused Mac, and 180 PC-based internet cafes for every Mac one... so a solution that gets you up and running on a PC is ninety nine and forty four hundredths percent* more likely to get you up on Linux at some random location when you need it than a Mac one. And once you're in Linux it doesn'
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Re:Honest Question (Score:5, Insightful)
Setting aside those two arguments ( which are fairly compeling, but we'll set them aside since you say so ) there is only one scenario I can think of where I'd run Linux on *my* Mac, but it's entirely likely. I currently use a Mac at home. What if, next month, I get a gig programming in a Linux environment? Am I going to go out and buy a whole new machine, or am I going to install Linux on my existing hardware?
If I can install Linux on my existing hardware, I'm going to. But I'm not going to want to boot my machine that way all the time, because OS X has a good number of apps that I use ( for non-work purposes ) which don't exist ( really ) under Linux, and I'm not sure the wife and 3-year-old are ready to make the switch ot Linux.
So doing the external-hard-drive thing would be neat. And using something as tiny as an iPod to carry my entire Linux world around between home and work? Even cooler.
Instead of buying a new mobo for my outdated PC that's been sitting idle for years now, I can buy an iPod, and maybe even write it off! Super-cool.
As for the market? It's probably not huge, but does it need to be? I thought OSS was about having options, not about having the biggest install base...
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Run MOL. You get MacOS X either fullscreen or in a window but with Linux running at all times. MOL is fast and stable. Even GUI effects like Expose are speedy enough. You can even
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Plus, you could simply dual-boot the machine. Adding a second hard drive would be a lot cheaper than buying an ipod.
I'm assuming the idea is being able to take all your work between locations where you have a computer(such as home and work), and being able to boot up linux...without needing a laptop.
Of course thats exactly why i bought a laptop: I got sick of using computers at school that didn't have the tools I felt i needed to get actually
Honest Answer (Score:2)
To be like Linus. [slashdot.org]
Asuming they can scrape up the money, how many crazed Linus fanboys do you think will try?
Re:Honest Question (Score:2)
Availability? (Score:2)
Re:Availability? (Score:3, Informative)
However, they cannot keep their customers from redistributing the code...
Chris
Re:Availability? (Score:2)
Seriously though, I cannot imagine they pulled this joke off without massivly reverse enginering the firmware on the I-pod !! And that will attract Job's Evil Eye..
Re:Availability? (Score:2)
Re:Availability? (Score:3, Informative)
So, they only have to give it to "members" or whomever they provide binaries to.
-Peter
Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2, Informative)
*unless you get a free one!
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:3, Funny)
You can get a free iPod ? Really ?? Where???
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2, Informative)
Thats easy. Just click on my foe list. about 90% of them are willing to give you a free iPod after they get one first and you pay money (their version of free, not mine) and register for a bunch of spam and other marketing ploys (again, their version of free not mine), and then you are the low man in the pyramid and you have to then sucker others to be the new low people.
Yes, people, if you have a free anything in your sig that is not free, I will foe you and filter you just
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2)
willing to give you a free iPod after they get one first
No one who's giving you a referral link is promising you an ipod. Rather, they are giving a link to a website that will give you an ipod in exchange for doing the legwork to do some "viral marketing" for them. Also, there is no requirement for me to get my free ipod before you get yours. You get five referrals, you get the ipod. What your referrer does means nothi
Add me! (Score:2)
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2)
You don't want to boot from a USB key, that would be incredibly slow. You also don't want to swap to it as flash memory has a much lower ceiling of re-writes. Not that you'd necessarily want to boot from an iPod, as those drives are slow, just not as slow as a flash key.
Given that a $200 iPod is 4GB, I don't know of any $29 USB keys that can store 4GB.
There really isn't a standard for booting from a USB key either. First, there is the issue of
Don't feed trolls! (Score:2)
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2)
All I had to do was attend a free Verizon seminar on VOIP and be lucky enough to win the door prize.
Easy!
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2)
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Uh, yeah, sure... (Score:2)
I'm not sure whether I should answer with RedHat or use my life-line
Yaaaaaay!! (Score:2)
One question (Score:2)
Specifically, why'd you pay so much for an iBook, just to get rid of the one thing that makes it valuable: the OS?
Why in the hell would you run Linux instead of OSX?
To me, that sounds like somebody who buys a Ferrari, then swaps out the engine for a Chevy 4 cylinder. It makes no sense, whatsoever.
Re:One question (Score:2)
Re:One question (Score:2)
Re:One question (Score:2)
Re:Yaaaaaay!! (Score:2)
-Don.
Linus says (Score:3, Funny)
Don't host from an ipod (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Don't host from an ipod (Score:2)
Re:Don't host from an ipod (Score:2)
Maybe a highly portable Mac (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Maybe a highly portable Mac (Score:2)
Sounds like a win-win to me. Sure the shuffle might not be as good as the regular iPod, but if he overheats his iPod he's gonna be out a harddrive and an iPod.
Re:Maybe a highly portable Mac (Score:2)
about time ... (Score:2)
And for the work I do, I don't see a huge performance hit running off the firewire chain, though I probably would off USB
So it's commercial. Deal with it. (Score:3, Insightful)
Personally I'd rather see more of this on Slashdot and less of the "New Star Wars III fanfict trailer released!".
not the only firewire trick with the firmware (Score:5, Informative)
OpenFirmware can also make your mac pretend that it's a firewire hard drive. Connect the mac to another machine (another mac or a PC that can read HFS+ partitions), and boot up the machine while holding down the T key. Before the OS loads, the computer enters target disk mode, and every hard drive attached to that computer appears as a normal firewire device to the other computer.
I don't see why this wouldn't work with an ext3 or ReiserFS partition... it's a VERY useful trick for restoring a trashed system (which in all honsety rarely happens in Mac OS, but is rather common on Windows and Linux if you're compiling your own kernels and such)
this will kill iPods (Score:3, Informative)
Re:this will kill iPods (Score:2)
This sounds right for older iPods, but I'm not so sure this applies to the latest batch. There have been specs passed around via forum threads [ipodhacks.com] that claim that the Toshiba drive used in iPods has a 20,000 hour MTBF (mean time between failure) -- which is a far cry from the 300,000+ MTBF for desktop drives. However newer (Gen 4) iPods use the Toshiba MK4004GA, which has a 300,000 hour MTBF [google.ca], just as good as a lapto
When Will the "Make it Boot Linux" Madness Stop? (Score:5, Funny)
External Firewire Drives Too! (Score:3, Informative)
"Terra Soft has created a hybrid Yellow Dog Linux v4.0.1 #1 Install CD that incorporates the changes required to install to an iPod or FireWire drive from the graphical installer. This hybrid is immediately available through YDL.net Enhanced accounts at www.ydl.net."
Now I can play around with Linux on PPC without touching my current setup! Great!
Now the problem becomes: how long before the new ISOs become available to the public?
Bad idea... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Bad idea... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Great! (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:Great! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Great! (Score:2)
You're using that term awfully loosely there.
Re:Great! (Score:2)
You have to go to the acronym finder. [acronymfinder.com]
Re:What was the CPM, Taco? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:My kid's lemonade stand needs more traffic (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Shameless plug (Score:2, Offtopic)
I know, but the thread had the word "shameless" in it, mod me down if you must.
Substantial challenges to FW install. (Score:2)
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
So you can't conceive of having $500 and an hour to spare?
Has it occured to you that since there are companies making money from selling and servicing Linux on ppc, that this must be more than an 'obsure hobby'? Did you see the article earlier today about Linus and his mac? And all the comments from people stating how they too would like to run Linux on ppc hardware?
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
Secondly, no, companies selling Linux products for PPC doesn't have any impact on whether or not this is an "obscure hobby". There are companies that do nothing but cater to obhscure hobbyists, and just the existence of a company doesn't indicate whether it's successful (remember the dot-com boom a few years ago)?
Yes, there are a handful of comments about people wan
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
From first hand experience there are several distros that take less than an hour to install
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe some people don't like OS X. It is possible, you know. I run deb on my dual 1.8Ghz G5.
In some ways, OS X is the worst of both worlds.
It's FreeBSD... but, well, it's not FreeBSD. It has linux ports... but, well, it's not really linux either.
Another analogy: OS X is to *nix what tofu is to meat.
It looks great- but is missing some fundamental stuff that 'just works' under linux. The end result is that I have a great looking operating system that doesn't really run much that I like or do what i want it to do. Here are some quick examples off the top of my head:
* Finding a free FLAC player takes some work (MacAmp) whereas, under linux I have several choices.
* Apple's Java is seriously broken and I don't really have much of a choice. Under linux, I can use IBMs Java.
* Multiple Desktops would be nice under OS X.
* File browsing with Konquerer is unmatched. Period.
* Lack of decent Office packages under OS X. MS Office? Well, I said decent. Appleworks? sorry. With the exception of Openoffice.org, the rest are overpriced (Mariner Write etc.). Openoffice under OS X simply blows. IIRC, their OS X project was cancelled.
In short, linux is much more usable for me than OS X is. Besides, i just plain like it.
That being said, some downsides to linux on ppc include: broken sound on newer G5s and 3d support non-existent with nothing in sight.
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
There's at least two free FLAC quicktime plugins that let you play FLAC from any quicktime-capable application including iTunes.
Apple's Java is seriously broken [...]
There's at least two implementations of Java available.
Multiple Desktops would be nice under OS X
There's three applications for this, two of them free.
Lack of decent Office packages under OS X. [...]
All the open source ones, plus all the Classic Mac OS ones, plus Office X and Pages..
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
On searching, I found the FLAC links. Thanks- when I first got the machine, I looked and there wasn't much out there.
'There's at least two implementations of Java available.'
Maybe I should be more specific about the Java thing. I've been looking for a 1.5 SDK. Apple doesn't plan on releasing that until Panther and I can't find another one.
'Theres three applications for
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
That answers half the question (the 'why run Linux' part). It doesn't answer the other hald (the 'on a Mac') part.
I originally bought the machine to run OS X and I've since found that I'm more comfortable and productive under linux, so I switched back.
That answers that part of the question. You're running Linux on a Mac not because you want to run it on a M
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
pretty much.
Portabality!!!! (Score:2, Insightful)
Maybe because they want a portable workstation. Basically, take the iPod to Workstation-1 and work from there. Then take it home plug it in to your Workstation and keep all your settings, files, etc.
Would it be better if it was a Mac-X booting iPod?
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
a) some people think that ppc processors are better than intel's.
b) some people like Linux over the Mac Os.
Some people belong to both these sets.
Other comments have questioned putting Linux on Mac hardware, but they didn't call those who did so idiots or masochists. That's probably why they weren't modded as trolls. I probably would've just modded them redundant since someone asks this question every single time there's an article about Linux on ppc
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
Well, yeh, they let you build a cheaper and lower-power system with the same performanve because you're not paying the x86 translation penalty on every instruction.
But from the user level, the instruction set is pretty much irrelevant. Paying extra for a PPC and running Linux on it doesn't make any objective sense.
Look, I'm not an Intel apologist. I'm a long-time Intel anti-fan who's got a NeXT, a PDP-11, an AT&T UNIX PC, and used to run
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
UseNET.
I die, I die, Oh the Embarassment!
Re:Who in their right mind... (Score:2)
I'm not saying that MacOS X isn't a useful operating system. You're not asking. ;-)
Re:nice, but .. (Score:2)
Re:So, to sum it up (Score:2)
Booting off an iPod or FireWire drive is incredibly useful for setting up a cluster of machines. You boot each machine with the FireWire drive which contains a distro that installs the cluster distro onto the cluster node. Essentially, plug it in, wait till it says it's done, reboot and move to the next node.
Re:Portability to the max (Score:3, Informative)