Slackware 10.1 Released 167
wikinerd writes "Slackware 10.1 was released and it contains the Linux kernel 2.4.29/2.6.10, X.org X11R6.8.1, KDE 3.3.2, Mozilla 1.7.5, Xfce 4.2.0 and several other updated software, as you can see in the official changelog. You can download it right now via BitTorrent."
kernel (Score:4, Interesting)
I personally, have no problem with the kernel choice. They shipped 2.4.26 with 10.0 as it is more stable
Re: kernel (Score:5, Informative)
Re: kernel (Score:1)
Re: kernel (Score:2)
For some of us, it really doesn't matter.
As a matter of fact, I just got done putting 2.6.10 on a Slack 9.1 box. I would have upgraded it first, but I wanted to get it, and the 10.1 disks are still downloading.
Re: kernel (Score:2)
Re: kernel (Score:2)
I could.
I've been using Slackupdate [128.173.184.249] for a while, with great success. It appears to do pretty much the same thing. I have mine set up to hit my own repository, rather than the public ones. No need to abuse other people's networks with all my servers needing updates.
Re: How about... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: How about... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: How about... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: How about... (Score:1)
Dropline Gnome (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:2)
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:1)
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:2)
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:2, Interesting)
Why are you punbishing yourself? I use Slackware 10.0 with KDE. They gel well together for me. Of all the Linux distros, Slackware (for me) is the one that epitomises stability. Why not use KDE or FLuxbox. I use KDE for day-t-day tasks and Fluxbox for gaming. Gnome seems to go against the grain of what Slackware stands for. I would use Gnome wit
To summarize your post (Score:1)
"I like KDE better than GNOME. I see that you don't. Why on Earth don't you stop punishing yourself and just follow my viewpoint instead of your own?"
Why not use KDE? Well, why is your favorite color your favorite color? It's called personal opinion, putz!
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:1)
KDE looks and feels great. Have you even used it? And it comes fully loaded with a bundle of programs like CDr rippers/players kontact, xmms..
Gnome looks good.
Gnome uses many skins that are a copy of XP and the Windows paradigm ...yukk
That would be enough.
KDE feels like win
...you are sooo mistaken. For example, many of the motifs / skins do not look anything like Windows. eg. Karbon..try it!!!
Gnome doesn't.
...Maybe Gnome has non-Windows looking skins too but its slower than KDE as we
Ok, I'll rephrase (Score:1)
Gnome looks good. To me.
That would be enough. For me.
KDE feels like win. To me.
Gnome doesn't. To me.
KDE - _I_ don't know its shortcuts.
Gnome - _I_ do.
KDE - is not GNU.
Gnome - is GNU (well, maybe for most people that's bad, but for me it's great)
That's enough, for me, to keep using Gnome.
If dropline fails to satisfy me, maybe I will give a try to Debian, or that ubuntu thing, although I am very fond of Slackware, since 3.x.
And, about that FOSS thingy, I don't mind open source, the o
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:1)
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:4, Informative)
Well As For Pat (Score:1)
I would assume he uses Dropline GNOME either to make sure that it runs on the latest changes he's made to Slackware, or just for the sense of completeness. I know that I myself don't like -not- being able to choose which desktop environment I feel like. I just got KDE 3.3.2 finished up here on my AMD64 Gentoo, but I switch back and forth to whichever suits my tastes for the time being.
As for all the stuff about why PAM is against Slackware's ideals, I'll have to check that out, because I don't see what
Re:Dropline Gnome (Score:2)
No matter what you do, replacing a perfectly-working X is just crazy.
I went through the painful experience of installing Dropline Gnome in Slack 9, and then ending up having to uninstall it when I swaret to Slack 10 - its X is not compatible with the Dropline X.
Dropline should be modified to make use of whatever X version Slackware is supplied with.
Torrent Mirror (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Torrent Mirror (Score:2)
But go, legal torrents, huh?
Re:Torrent Mirror (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Torrent Mirror (Score:2, Interesting)
Mirror (Score:1, Informative)
Posting as AC so not karma whoring.
Damnit universe! (Score:5, Funny)
Bittorrent has Slackware 10.1 ISOs. Right now.
These things cause conflict in my brain . . . . .
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:2, Funny)
(and confirmed by both ross and chandler)
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:2)
"Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . ."
I was considering inviting a girl over to install FreeBSD. Does this mean I'm a necrophile?
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:2)
If she looks like this, [keltia.net] definitely not.
But from your words, I infer you would install Linux rather than FreeBSD and, instead of a girl, you'd invite a big fat penguin.
Now, just don't ask what *that* means.
--
Requiem for the FUD [slashdot.org]
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Damnit universe! (Score:1)
When will i get Yggdrasil 2.0? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:When will i get Yggdrasil 2.0? (Score:2)
Nothing like using a distro based on
Re:When will i get Yggdrasil 2.0? (Score:2)
Are you crazy? Yggdrasil is far too difficult to pronounce!
Personally, I want an upgrade to my SLS. That's the real distribution. Who does this upstart Patrick Volkerding think he is, anyway?
-- Steve
Re:When will i get Yggdrasil 2.0? (Score:1)
Bah. I use the first *real* distro: Caldera Linux! No updates in a while, though, but it's rock-solid.
Ok, self-confessed Debian lover, but ... (Score:1)
He hasn't put anything in the changelog (apart from a one-liner, "I'm looking forward to working with all of you towards the next one, too"). Are things getting better? Certainly hope so.
Re:Ok, self-confessed Debian lover, but ... (Score:5, Informative)
And about my status... I didn't want to have to bring this up again, but since a lot of people are under the impression that I've recovered and I'm just fine (and are beginning to make the usual demands of my time ;-), I'd
better clarify what's going on. Especially since I'm not exactly fine.
Back on Thu Nov 25, I posted in the ChangeLog that I thought I had infective endocarditis (and was promptly flamed for self-diagnosing again). After so much beating around the bush without getting a referral to a cardiologist, I finally called one myself and waited the two weeks it takes to get in. He is a top-notch doctor and heart surgeon (I was very lucky to be able get in to see him), and with no planting of any suggestion from me whatsoever came to the conclusion that it seemed to be infective endocarditis. I'm still waiting for more test results, but it looks like I finally have someone working on my side. So, lets hope that they get some conclusive diagnostics (I get another echo on Wednesday), that I make it until they do, and that it's not too late for this to be treated without a need for valve (or heart) replacement. I've had a rough couple of weeks (well, months really, but especially the last two weeks), and I have to say that while it's good to have a near-death experience every couple of years to keep your head clear and your focus on the important things in life, having one every morning is too often. With that frequency, they start to become a distraction. ;-)
So, this verson is going to be wrapped up pretty quickly. I hope people will support the release, because I'm sure I'll have a lot more bills before all of this is through, and I'm blowing through what little money I've managed to save. Again, I'm not asking for donations, but I hope that when Slackware 10.1 comes out that people wanting to help out will order it. Also, in case of emergency I've left instructions with some very trusted people, so nobody should have to worry that if something happens to me that their Slackware systems will be orphaned and unsupported. It may be a long road back for me, but there will be people taking care of security issues as they crop up (like the folks at GUS-BR and SlackSec), and if I should make an unplanned departure there is a basic plan of succession in place.
Thanks again to all the kind folks I've known over the years, and I hope to know you for many more. :-)
Your Humble Slackware Maintainer,
Pat
healthcare (Score:2, Insightful)
It's a shame that someone who is delivering real benefit to people could be crippled by health costs in one of the wealthiest and most powerful nations in the world. Bullets or bandages people?
Re:healthcare (Score:2)
CHANGELOG (Score:1, Informative)
http://mirror.linuxquestions.org/pub/distribution
--jeremy [linuxquestions.org]
Gentoo Users... (Score:4, Funny)
(sarcasm)
Re:Gentoo Users... (Score:1)
Re:Gentoo Users... (Score:2)
# mkreiserfs
# mount
# ROOT="/mnt/slackware" emerge =slackware-10.1
now we just need ebuilds and we can install whatever other distros we want
I suggest you buy it (Score:5, Interesting)
He doesn't ask for charity, only that people who use it, actually BUY it instead of just relying on BitTorrent.
Personally I don't use Slackware, but if you are a user, you know what to do.
Re:I suggest you buy it (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I suggest you buy it (Score:2)
Do what I do... Automatic donations! (Score:1)
By the end of the year, Patrick gets $120 from me (more than he would with subscriptions) and since it's only $5 per paycheck so I don't even notice.
(Then I download the images with BitTorrent and save him a little money on mailing and the disks).
SATA? (Score:2)
Re:SATA? (Score:2, Informative)
And there is a SATA kernel selection.
Re:SATA? (Score:2)
Re:SATA? (Score:2)
I'll have to try it out later since I already have a SATA hard drive
FYI, there's a SATA ISO floating around somewhere for slackware 10 that some kind soul made. It runs just fine, but I can't remember where it was hosted
Perhaps if SATA _isn't_ supported out of the box someone el
Re:SATA? (Score:1)
[insert Gentoo jokes here, hehe]
Re:SATA? (Score:2)
Re:SATA? (Score:1)
Subscription (Score:1)
Return of official security updates? (Score:2)
I don't really trust third-party packages, which is the only thing that was available for 10.0 and a long time on current.
Once Pat got nearer to 10.1, security updates for current were available, but I can't run a development branch.
I know that Pat was sick, and I don't blame him for this at all. But I really hope that with 10.1, Slackware will reclaim its status as the distro with the best security updates.
Slack Slowdown (Score:5, Insightful)
But this doesn't seem to be a real worry. Pat's dropped Gnome out of the core distro, which is really better for everyone - Gnome eats up huge amounts of Pat's energy, and Slack has been an Xless or KDE centric distro for a while now. Dropline Gnome is pretty sweet, so even after Gnome was included in Slack, most users I know used Dropline anyway.
Pat's made it clear that he has made plans for Slack to continue in his absence should anything happen to him, so no need to migrate my desktop just yet, and in light of Pat's recent illness the Slack community has really backed him up - and I also like seeing the third party packagers for Slack get included in the distro. It's nice seeing the Slack community gel over the recent trauma.
All in all, Slack seems as healthy as ever, even if of late, Pat hasn't been
He dropped gnome? (Score:2)
Of Course... (Score:1)
More server apps in Slackware (Score:1)
I really think slackware linux should include some BASIC server apps like PostgreSQL [postgresql.org], Squid [squid-cache.org], Socks5 [permeo.com], UnrealIRCd [unrealircd.com], etc.
do you ?
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:2)
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:2)
I'm with you on an irc server. That's just not basic server software (though that does not necessarily mean it shouldn't be included in and of itself). As for Postgres, MySQL is already included and I feel it would be redundant to include two SQL servers. SOCKS just doesn't seem to fit for me, but there's nothing like squid in Slackwar
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:2)
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:1)
its pretty clear that u didnt developed with postgres. its better over mysql in almost everything.
I continue to question myself "why do anyone can choose mysql over pgsql?"
ASK SLASHDOT: why can you choose mysql over pgsql ?
(the question is only for those who have tried 'em both)
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:2)
Except supported apps. I've seen many packages out there (i.e. phpBB2) that support MySQL and not pgsql. Never seen the inverse.
ASK SLASHDOT: why can you choose mysql over pgsql ?
See Above.
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:2)
Emphasis on "C" for consistency.
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:1)
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:2)
Ok, you and the folks who want Gentoo to distribute binaries, RedHat to be less commercial, and KDE to be more like Gnome.
Re:More server apps in Slackware (Score:1)
it would be really nice to see slackware include (at least in extra) the pgsql (at least the 7 series)
Dependencies?!?!? No, no, I use Slackware :) (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Dependencies?!?!? No, no, I use Slackware :) (Score:4, Funny)
Thats great, but . . . (Score:1)
Re:Thats great, but . . . (Score:1)
Re:Thats great, but . . . (Score:2)
Re:Thats great, but . . . (Score:2)
What is the eaiest way to upgrade from 10 to 10.1? (Score:1)
Re:What is the eaiest way to upgrade from 10 to 10 (Score:1)
Re:What is the eaiest way to upgrade from 10 to 10 (Score:1)
Basically, it is:
First upgrade package tools and glibc with upgradepkg.
Then, upgrade everything else.
slackupdate.sh script also allows upgrading, while swaret/slapt-get seem to be more sophisticated (I didn't use them).
My thing about slackware is... (Score:2)
strictly for myself, most of my boxes are 7.0, 8.x era, but I have all the
latest and greatest improvements. A lot of people seem to take Slack's lack of
package dependancy tracking (different from lack of package management) as a
negative, but I have always viewed it as a plus. You don't have to have the
latest and greatest slackware to have the latest and greatest slackware, if you
guys take my meaning.
Long live slackware!
SealBeater
Download recipe! (Score:2)
How to support Slackware (Score:2)
Slackware Seedifesto! (Score:2)
I kinda grumbled that the only way to get them was through bittorrent, and we all know how dumb lopsided home-internet connections are. My upload is 1/16th of my download bandwidth, so downloading the isos here at home might choke my uplink for my voip service (even with QoS).
So then I got thinking... there's 3 major ISPs in the are
Re:Real package management? (Score:2, Informative)
swaret is great (Score:2)
Actually, my last actual install was 9.0, and I've updated to each subsequent version using swaret and setting it to update against "current"
For more info... go to swaret.sourceforge.net [sourceforge.net]
But, I'll probably buy 10.1 just to do my part in helping Pat with his bills.
Re:Slackware Lives On (Score:3)
Looking forward to it myself - Currently running slack on my whipping-boy P90 box which is the test bed for any ideas I need to check out. It's a bit rattly - sometimes there's a bit of turbulence that'll have you hanging on for dear life, but slack has impressed me so much so it's replacing Ubuntu on this desktop - my main box.
I can't wait to play with that instal
Re:Slackware Lives On (Score:2)
Re:Slackware is great but... (Score:2)
The only reason I've had to grab tarballs and compile by hand is when I havn't managed to find a slackware package or I've wanted to play with the options to make it more hardware specific....or I just feel like it
So far I've
Re:Slackware is great but... (Score:1)
Re:Slackware is great but... (Score:2)
Re:No GNOME? (Score:5, Informative)
One that has recognized the quality that has come out of another project that provides the same desktop. Pat decided that Dropline was so nice, and there were so many people using Dropline Gnome that it wasn't worth his time anymore to package a vanilla Gnome.
Pat on GNOME (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Pat on GNOME (Score:2, Interesting)
1. Why doesn't he have someone else help package it for him?
2. Can the Gnome Foundation help him out somehow, perhaps by improving the build system?
3. How come I never hear about this stuff from any other distro?
I'm a Slack user myself...I've always used XFce, but find myself launching Gnome apps quite often, and I like the desktop itself starting with 2.8. The next time I wanna upgrade, it may not be to Slackware anymore. :(
Re:Pat on GNOME (Score:3, Informative)
2. Yes. He's asked them repeatedly, but they don't seem to care. If they could just get make install DESTDIR=/tmp/root work like it works for everything else then he could keep it in no problem.
3. Because Pat maintains Slackware *by himself*. Most distros can just devote a few people to managing the Gnome build, Slackware can't.