Linux Weekly News 2004 Timeline 46
Ridgelift writes "Linux Weekly News has made their annual 2004 Timeline available free to the general public. " Much happens in the Linux world over the course of a year. 2004 saw ongoing legal and political fights, new distributions, big releases of major applications, a new mode for kernel development, and more. This timeline is our attempt to separate out the most significant developments of the year and present them in a concise and enjoyable format. It continues an annual LWN tradition; it is the seventh in the series.""
Wow (Score:2, Funny)
Free to the general public (Score:3, Funny)
Kind & noble gestures (Score:1)
You sound like you're in a snit about it.
LWN is a going concern, paying its employees (a pittance, I suspect), ISP, and bandwidth from subscriptions. This is because when LWN announced its demise due to lack of funding, an outcry from readers, with offers of money, caused them to reconsider.
The one-week delay for certain juicy bits is an inducement for the general public to help by subscribing.
If you don't like it, don't read it, and in any case don't complain about how an excellent site stays in busine
annual 2004 Timeline (Score:5, Funny)
I wonder what next year's 2004 timeline will look like?
Re:annual 2004 Timeline (Score:5, Funny)
They do mention it's the 7th in the series though, which makes me wonder what 1998's 2004 Timeline looked like...probably a lot of flying cars and robot butlers and things like that.
All I can say is... (Score:2, Funny)
OMG (Score:3, Funny)
http://lwn.net/Articles/66669/ [lwn.net]
DeCSS, DVD Jon, Bunner (Score:4, Interesting)
Actually, a lot of this list has nothing to do with linux, some just barely have to do with OSS in general, like the DeCSS stuff.
Hell, news on OSS apps like GIMP doesn't have anything to do with linux. I've always used GIMP on Windows.
What does the Sun/MSFT settlement have to do with linux?
I guess without the cruft, the timeline would just be:
January: Kernel version X released
April: Kernel version X.1 released
Novermber: Kernel version X.2 released
It's rather sad (Score:1)
Re:It's rather sad (Score:2, Insightful)
January: support for architecture X included in 2.4
Febuary: driver tulip.o expands support for cards X, Y, Z
March: stratjakt's HP deskjet finally works like TFA says it will.
April: ATI drivers that don't suck come along
etc etc
I have a short list of hardware that I'm really eager to see supported under linux (mostly Hauppages PVR-500MCE so I can have dual-tuner MythTV goodness for ~the same price as the 250), and that can be some hard
Re:DeCSS, DVD Jon, Bunner (Score:3, Informative)
Yes it does, since DeCSS is a known way of playing DVD's on a GNU/Linux machine in the abscence of commercial DVD software.
and yes, I am aware [slashdot.org] of such offerings, but DeCSS still lets developers create their own open DVD playing software.
Re:DeCSS, DVD Jon, Bunner (Score:2, Insightful)
One could just as easily say "DeCSS is a known way of playing DVD's on a FreeBSD machine in the abscence of commercial DVD software".
The point is that a lot of stuff on the list is not specific to Linux.
LWN not only kernel news (Score:3, Informative)
what timeline? (Score:5, Insightful)
The link is over-billed. I'ts only a chronologically ordered table, not really a timeline.
The predictable objection (Score:2)
Re:The predictable objection (Score:1)
http://lwn.net/Articles/107110/
It appears that the overall quality of code, and more importantly, the amount of QA, on various browsers touted as "secure", is not up to par with MSIE; the type of a test I performed requires no human interaction and involves nearly no effort. Only MSIE appears to be able to consistently handle [*] malformed input well, suggesting this is the only program that underwent rudimentary security QA testing with a similar fuzz utility.
I wonder why I do
Re:The predictable objection (Score:1)
That was a popular article. See IE Shines on Broken Code [slashdot.org].
2005 -- Year of Desktop Linux (Score:4, Interesting)
We have continued to infiltrate the server room. We have rekindled the browser war. We have publicly proven that litigation and marketing cannot prevail over quality and enthusiasm. The open source model is reaching more mainstream audiences.
More are beginning to question The Beast and its minions. More companies are understanding our cause. Some are allies while others, envisioning their own demise, are trying to regain a foothold which they ultimately cannot.
It is a quiet night, but in that seeming calm we quietly fight. Slowly we position ourselves, quietly we make our way through it all until one day the opposing few open their eyes to see themselves surrounded.
Take heart, soldiers. We will win. It's only a matter of time.
Re:2005 -- Year of Desktop Linux (Score:1)
Like the year of the lan (Score:4, Insightful)
Back in the late '80s and early '90s every year was predicted to be the year that LANs finally exploded. Never happened. A few people here and there put in a LAN, but there was no massive explosion of installations. Then one day someone looked and low and behold everyone had a LAN.
Likewise the linux desktop will not explode overnight. Instead a few companies here and there will get sick of Windows, or need something special that Windows doesn't give, but linux allows them to write. Those companies will install linux. Perhaps not even all at once, just for the few people who need it. Slowly, slowly, slowly, linux will get better while it gets a few wins. Suddenly one day we will look back and see linux everywhere.
Of course on that day *BSD people like me will sigh and go on using our better OS that never gets any press... ;)
Some really bad humor, just for you! (Score:1)
Guess it's not that GNU then, is it?
The title for the page showing Linus going into the dunk tank? "Linus gets wet".
"KOffice 1.3 is released" - alongside KOfficeSyrup.
Sorry, but I really have nothing useful to contribute. I'm too busy trying to get Gentoo to install on a virtual machine without getting Flagrant Errors.
Re:Some really bad humor, just for you! (Score:2)
Re:Some really bad humor, just for you! (Score:1)
My 2004 timeline abttle 2005 looking bad! (Score:1, Interesting)
Summer: upgrade to 2.6.x, love it
Late Nov: upgrade to 2.6.9, love it
After Christmas: upgrade to 2.6.10 and buy new hardware with 2.6.10 support only
Jan 2005: Find both Vanilla 2.6.9 & 2.6.10 kernels crash after 2 days running (no acpi or preempt). Can't believe it. Can't downgrade as now need the hardware support in 2.6.10. Shocked. Try to file a bug report:
http://bugzill
Re:My 2004 timeline abttle 2005 looking bad! (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:My 2004 timeline abttle 2005 looking bad! (Score:2)
wow. (Score:1, Funny)
Is that so? Who would have thought that could ever happen??