Mandrakesoft: 10.1 Official, Good Financial News 18
joestar writes "Lots of good news from the publishers of Mandrakelinux. Mandrakelinux
10.1 Official for x86-64 was released today. Yesterday's financial release announced their best year so far (turnover up 33%). ZDNet UK has an article. The company also recently announced that it had been granted a research grant for mobility R&D. All in all it looks like Mandrakesoft is back on track and doing
great. Good luck guys!"
Its the plush toys (Score:1)
Re:Its the plush toys (Score:1)
It would be great (Score:2)
Re:It would be great (Score:1)
What do I do with my Sparc32? Suse 7. It works fine, the only thing that run are xeyes, xterm, X itself. Rest is done on one
Re:It would be great (Score:2)
ftp://ftp.pld-linux.org/dists/2.0/PLD/sparc/PLD/RP MS/ [pld-linux.org]
http://www.pld-linux.org/ [pld-linux.org] (web page not working at the moment as they have some problems, but distro is very active).
Why choose Mandrake? (Score:1, Insightful)
I've heard many good things of SuSE as of late; Debian is known for being rock solid; Gentoo for up-and-coming zealots (read: documentation).
The only thing that stuck out to me when I tried Mandrake in the past was that it used RPM. So, what's Mandrake have to offer?
Re:Why choose Mandrake? (Score:4, Informative)
MandrakelinuxTM is a friendly Linux Operating System which specializes in ease-of-use for both servers and the home/office. It is freely available in many languages throughout the world.
There's more info on their concept page [mandrakelinux.com], but they're basic pitch is Linux for Newbies and switchers from Windows/Macs. I'd say they're going after the end-user market like Linspire [linspire.com], but they're also going after business/government businesses that don't want to spend a lot on "retraining" their users for Linux.
Re:Why choose Mandrake? (Score:4, Insightful)
But while easy to use and install, it's still very suitable for experts, more so than for example Suse, who expect you to use only graphical tools (Yast) to configure stuff.
The main problem with mandrake is lack of focus and lack of manpower to achieve their ideals more quickly.
Re:Why choose Mandrake? (Score:2)
I agree. It's a mistake to think of Mandrake as just for newbies. I've used Unix since 1982, GNU/Linux since 1995, and I've been using Mandrake for several years. I've found it easy to install with good hardware detection and configuration and a good selection of software. In lots of little ways, I prefer it to Red Hat.
Re:Why choose Mandrake? (Score:2)
Never used apt, but is it really that much better than portage?
not unless portage sucks (Score:2)
I used mandrake a very long time. But I got sick of the difficulty in upgrading, the long time delays, the lack of decent support. Mandrake is very easy to install, but I have always found it a pain in the ass to upgrade or even install anything that's not included on the CDs. The urpmi installer is an improvement on rpm, but that ain't saying much since rpm sucks so bad.
The main th
Brainwashed by KDE (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Brainwashed by KDE (Score:1)