New List For Linux in Government Initiatives 7
nullbyte writes "We have created a new
list
to discuss open-source integration/migration for governments. Our aim is to gather knowledge of successful or unsuccessful migration attempts and set up a public facility to pinpoint the key issues for a successful migration to open source.
If you have heard of any migration that went sour we would like to learn about it as much as hearing reports from successfull migrations."
Why bother? (Score:1, Offtopic)
--Mike--
PS: Got Prozac?
Re:Why bother? (Score:1)
Ignore the first four words of the above comment; does that make it more relevant? Microsoft pays lobbyists big buck$ to convince politicians that commercial software means jobs and revenue and growth and apple pie and all things good and American, while free software means communism and no jobs and no revenue and other evil, un-American stuff.
It doesn't matter what's true and what's FUD. You can't avoid dealing with politics and politicians and lobbyists if you want to make changes in the way governments
Re:Why bother? (Score:1)
Sources? (Score:1)
FLOSSpols conference on the subject (Score:3, Informative)
any european folk interested by this subject should come to TheHague on nov the 18th to attend FlossPols [flosspols.org] :
take a look at the speakers list [flosspols.org] to get an idea of how "high-level" this event can be.
representatives from the European Union, the IDA (the organism from the EU responsible for an excellent "opensource migration guidelines" report), and from various state-ministries from all around europe will gather there around "FLOSS in government", giving concrete experience-returns and precious advise i think...
Re:FLOSSpols conference on the subject (Score:1)
Gobierno del Distrito Federal (Mexico), 1999-2000 (Score:3, Interesting)