Mandrakelinux 10.1 Official Has Arrived 20
joestar writes "After 2 months of 10.1 Community polishing, Mandrakelinux 10.1 Official packs are now available for pre-ordering, but Mandrakeclub Members can already download these packs as CD or DVD ISO images. 10.1 Official provides improved hardware support, especially in the mobility area - with for instance full support of Intel Centrino-based laptops - as well as many other features. All in all, it's also certainly one of the most up-to-date Linux system currently available, and one of the most easy to use both for Linux beginners and Linux experts."
After a quick look at the features list (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't want to troll on Mandrake because the features list also included some nice features for laptops, specifically ones that follow the Centrino specs.
For someone who's considering switching to Mandrake 10.1, it's been my experience that while Mandrake 10 was easy to set up, it's slow and the packaging system is pretty slim and gets outdated soon if you don't pay for the membership. Though Fedora seems the opposite, very up to date packages, but things won't always work correctly out of the box (firewire) and their packaging system is very up to date.
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:5, Interesting)
I can't see myself doing this for my servers though. Fedora has me pretty happy and RHEL is my choice for mission critical boxes. It doesn't support some of the more windows-like features out of the box (mp3, etc.) but it is rock solid and stable and that's all I need for a server. Updates come fast and furious if necessary as well. I want to have my servers at an N-1 patch level as quickly as we can manage it. If our regression testing is the holdup that's OK. If the provider is the holdup, that's not.
I think a Mandrake front-end with a Fedora/RHEL back-end is where we will end up. Don't you love OS choice?
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:2)
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:2)
For me, I probably won't use OpenBSD (or any other BSD at this point) because I'm a little lazy and don't like having to build from scratch, or even use tarballs that may not work 100% right away, when the RPMs usually do.
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:2)
Part of the cost of support, in my opinion, includes the fact that building the binary packages has already been done and tested. I see no need to repeat these activities. Although I really have no preference between BSD and Linux, the time saving and initial quality control are well worth it.
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:2)
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:2, Informative)
Oh, and it's free to all...
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:1, Informative)
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:1)
I don't find they get outdated too soon, but I'll sometimes switch to the cooker (development) packages. Not only that, but Mandrake comes out with a new version every 6-9 months it seems, so
Re:After a quick look at the features list (Score:1)
MDK puts a lot of guff in to try and keep your machine running smoothly. Msec is the one thing that springs immediately to mind. It runs once a minute and does a lot of security related checks (including firewalling newly installed network cards if you're in the higher security modes). It can become ann
Re:Mandrake Criticism (Score:3, Interesting)
Keep in mind, though, here's the versions I've used of each distro:
RedHat 8 (didn't seriously use it, just played with it, and didn't like it one bit)
SuSE 8.2 (HATED that thing - RPM hell in the worst way - then again, if you aren't RedHat or Mandrake, there just aren't any packages for you)
Mandrake 9.2 (liked it, and I didn't even have URPMI working right (didn't know about Easy URPMI))
Mandrake 10.0 Community (I do agree that the GUI tools were slower, but
Anyone know (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Anyone know (Score:3, Informative)
Check out www.rage3d.com for more info...the linux forums have gotten really good.