Buy Lindows, Get Fedora and Mandrake Too? 234
tacarat writes "Lindows has an interesting deal going on right now. If you go to Linuxshootout.com, you can get Linspire/Lindows 4.5, Mandrake 10 and Fedora Core 2 or a mere $29.95 download or $39.95 for the 8 CD set. Yahoo! News covers this story. Quoting Michael Robertson,'Our emphasis on Linspire is ease of use -- making Linux quick and easy to install and use,' he said. 'Other products may have a different focus. That doesn't mean they aren't great products, just that their focus may be different. Every new Linux computer helps the Linux desktop industry, regardless of what company's product you choose'. Also, 'We want to encourage side-by-side comparisons of the latest Linux products.' Interesting strategy. Will their sales go up because people are buying Lindows plus the other two distros, or will it be the other way around?"
Well... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Well... (Score:3, Insightful)
Incidentally, I'm reading _No Logo_ by Naomi Klein and it's very interesting. In depth look at marketing, branding and the concepts governing both.
No help at all. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:No help at all. (Score:5, Insightful)
Paul B.
Re:Well... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Well... (Score:5, Insightful)
Their "fact sheet" seems a bit inaccurate. I use Mandrake 10.0 and it came with flash support. I wonder if it's the old trick of compairing their version that you pay for with Mandrake's version that gets downloaded.
User's really need to compaire boxed versions of equal cost.
Re:Well... (Score:5, Insightful)
Both "boxed Mandrake" and "Mandrake from MDK Club" (that is, paying Mandrake) ship with Flash player, RealPlayer, J2RE, nVidia drivers, Winmodem drivers... all that non-GPL stuff.
I have yet another problem with this 3-in-1 distribution. They are distributing Mandrake 10.0 **Community** edition, that is, the "preview" version for the Official Mandrake 10.0. The Official version (the one that goes into official mirrors (in the form of ISOs and rpms) and into the boxes that you can buy.
The Community edition needs a ton of updates to fix all the bugs found during the development step "Community-to-Official". So they are kinda giving Mandrake a bad name (insert your conspiracy theory here), as they are shipping a "kown broken" (release candidate with already located and fixed bugs) distribution, when there's available MDK Official version, with all those bugs corrected.
Aside from that, it's a nice thing to ship 3 distros together. Lots of PC users are still on POTS+Modem, and all those ISOs are a pain to download.
Peace!
Re:Well... (Score:2)
I think what they mean by flash support is:
1. Stick USB flash drive into USB port
2. Icon appears on desktop.
I'm not familiar with Mandrake 10, but with Mandrake 9.2, as well as Fedora Core 1 and 2, using a flash disk involves editing your
Re:Well... (Score:5, Interesting)
InfoMagik (Score:3, Informative)
All Linspire/Lindows is doing is what InfoMagik used to do, only without the Linux FTP site on a few CD disks.
I wonder if they can include a Linux version of the OpenCD or some other OSS installer disk?
Linspire/Lindows has some customized code to run the same data and media files a
End of an Era, Infomagic's web page is kaput! (Score:2)
It was great for people who could not download the ISOs, or did not have access to a CD Burner to make them if they did. IIRC they also had a subscription to their CD set for newer CDs.
Ah, well at least I still have my memories of them.
Re:Well... (Score:3, Interesting)
If you check my ebay auction... (Score:5, Funny)
For only $4.99 + $2.00 service charge, I'll email you a very secret link, not found anywhere near www.redhat.com or www.mandrake.com.
Or... something...
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:5, Interesting)
For that matter, ISPs should see value in mirroring major OSS distros on servers within their network... let customers use local bandwidth without having to the real "Internet" backbones, and that saves money for the ISP in the long run.
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2, Interesting)
There's also an office on campus that burns Linux distros for CDN$1.50/CDR (or free if you bring your own), but that's a different story.
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2)
I wish my ISP would mirror porn locally too, thus alleviating all of the bandwidth problems they have because of me
I'd be willing to bet a large amount of money that any given broadband ISP sees a much larger usage because of porn than they do because of any OSS.
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2)
Ever heard of usenet?
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:4, Funny)
>Ever heard of usenet?
Too dangerous. The odds are too good of getting an underage hermaphrodite bisexual bdsm-practicing beastiality freak with a cookware fetish...
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2)
Forking again? (Score:2)
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2)
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2, Informative)
BitTorrent alleviates the whole problem.
Yeah, it alleviates the whole problem, except that it doesn't :p.
How exactly does bittorrent keep traffic on the ISP's network, and off of their internet pipes???
Re:If you check my ebay auction... (Score:2, Interesting)
There is a business model available in somebody creating a pay-for-access server full of OSS software... the feature being that you don't have to fight the rest of the world to get what you want when you want it.
Of course, the ISPs could sense BitTorrent files going through their pipes and start their own temporary tracker. That would seemingly take care of the second half.
Promotion (Score:5, Insightful)
Better Promotion (Score:2, Funny)
Ditch the Linshit/spire/whatever, drink the beer, and install the two linux distros. Trust me, you will be happier in the long run.
Order (Score:2, Funny)
and extra cheese please.
May Not Be A Bad Plan... (Score:5, Interesting)
I applaud their initiative on this one. (Score:5, Insightful)
When you can encourage consumers to compare your product with others of similar caliber, it must mean you feel you're doing some things right yourself. An interesting move, at the very least.
Nice, but... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Nice, but... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Nice, but... (Score:2)
They say : How easy it gets to install software not included with the distro?
Mandrake has urpmi. You set it up with "Easy URPMI" (google for it) and you will have available more than EIGHT THOUSAND packages (see http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/twiki/bin/view/Main/Re l easesHistory), installable either through a mouse-click interface or through a command line utility (urpmi) that works like apt-get.
Also, the Shootout claims that Lindows installs way faster than the other distros. Well, if you install prac
Re:Nice, but... (Score:3, Interesting)
Kind of stupid, in my opinion. Still, it's an interesting way to persuade people to try them *all* out -- ain't the GPL great?
Re:Nice, but... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Nice, but... (Score:2)
Of course they're biased. I'd get real suspicious if anything like a shootout list looked friendly toward their competition.
Any distro will have its own set of priorities and biases and will attempt to optimize its own distribution according to that set of priorities and biases. This makes for a mind-set and they will view everything according to that mind-set.
why pay for free downloads? (Score:5, Interesting)
Retail-box is also useless because one order mandrake and fedore CD from chapbytes.com and host of other websites for less $$
Looks like lindows is having hard time selling their *own* product
Re:why pay for free downloads? (Score:2)
I know plenty of people who don't believe that any piece of software that is downloaded is of any worth. Retail boxes are the only way that these users will buy a piece of software.
Backwards perhaps, more expensive certainly, but that's the way they feel comfortable.
Discriminatory pricing (Score:2)
Slightly OT. I miss the boxed RedHat Professional Server. Nice box, although they got smaller and thinner after 6.2. Never mind that I only used what was on the first few CDs. Never mind that I could just about as easily downloaded what I was using for free. I can't really blame RedHat. Those boxes were profitable but not lucrative. RedHat's main asset is its name, and they aren't selling it so cheaply anymore. CheapBytes may we
Not Too Bright (Score:4, Insightful)
He better hope that the people who buy this package try Lindows first and decide not to install Mandrake or Fedora Core otherwise there won't be too many CNR subscriptions coming his way.
In summary, he's going for the wrong market. Stick to bundling it with cheap Wal-Mart PCs, Michael.
Re:Not Too Bright (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Not Too Bright (Score:2)
Re:Not Too Bright (Score:4, Interesting)
This weekend I bought my father a $150 Great Quality machine from Fry's. They used to come with Thiz-Linux, and now they come with Lindows preinstalled. I actually went ahead and installed FreeBSD on it instead, but I did take Lindows for a test drive, and in some ways I was really impressed. Heck, maybe my dad would have been better off if I'd left Lindows on it. One cool thing was that it automatically configured itself correctly for my piece-of-**** LCD monitor, which, e.g., Knoppix choked and died on. Although it was a little disconcerting to find out that typing `man' in an xterm gave `bash: man: command not found,' it really looked like a reasonably nice system for people who just want a GUI. The desktop was configured a lot like Windows, which I'm sure would be comforting for a lot of switchers. I mean, not everybody is a slashdotter -- there are secretaries where I work who still are afraid of Word three years after being forced to switch from WordPerfect.
This doesnt seem right... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:This doesnt seem right... (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah but let's face it, until there's an entry in the list that says "relays 3,000,000 pornographic spams to a harvested list of users" (tick) it'll never really replace Windows.
Hmmm... (Score:3, Interesting)
I agree in that this seems to be a great idea. However, it would be interesting to see the "comprehensive" checklist they've included with that bundle. Notice how the screenshots on the Web site only show pictures for Linspire.
I think it's clear that Michael Robertson believes in Linux. I don't think he intends to compete with other distros in a dishonest fashion. Lindows are clearly entitled to use this bundle to promote Linsipre not only over Windows but over said other distros... I just wonder how are they doing it? (If they are doing that to being with)
In any event, it's a great marketing trick. Hope they manage to attract enough customers with it!
Re:Hmmm... (Score:2)
"Have your own shootout ..." (Score:5, Insightful)
Rather disengenuous (Score:5, Insightful)
Then there's the supposed comparisons in their "shootout", which are just opinion in the top section, while the middle and bottom section are just outright lies.
Kinda scummy, in my opinion.
Re:Rather disengenuous (Score:2, Insightful)
Guess what - a company advertising their product extends the truth and bends the rules for truth in advertising all the time. Is it "scummy" [as you put it]? I suppose but why would you rely on the manufacturer/retailer in the first place? There's a reason organizations like Consumer Reports exist and they didn't just crop up overnight after this whole Lindows report came to light. This has been going on a
Re:Rather disengenuous (Score:2)
Doubtful, since I made no grammatical errors.
"We" is actually first person plural, not third person. Third person would be 'he', 'she' or 'it'.
Indeed, but that's an irrelevant comment in the context of what I said. The sentence reads along the lines of '"We" chose to include Lindows because'. The "we" is first person and "Lindows" is third person. That deliberately implies that "we" and "Lindows" are separate entities because no one would
Root Power anyone (Score:2, Interesting)
Can anyone explain to me why I would want to give someone a distro that runs the root user as the system default (a.k.a. windows baggage).
In fact, I went to Frye's the other day, saw the Lindows demo, brought a manager over and showed him how to foobar the entire distro in 10 seconds by changing the /etc/passwd file (with the default root environment)
Re:-1, Wrong (Score:2)
Debian hasn't had such behavior since 1999, at least, which is when I started using it. I seem to recall distros such as redhat and mandrake not automatically prompting the user to create a user account during setup prior to that time, as well.
Re:-1, Wrong (Score:2)
Re:-1, Wrong (Score:2)
I can see Microsoft Doing this (Score:2)
Who's the market? (Score:3, Insightful)
1. Hardcore geeks on dialup, a set that's getting smaller all the time, or
2. A corporate IT center who wants to elvaluate multiple distros for a production environment, and it's just easier to buy three distros from a single source.
Moreover, this would seem to be exactly the opposite of Lindows/Linspire's current target market, i.e. people who want a computer that sorta/kinda works like Windows, but is cheaper than paying the Microsoft tax. Joe Blow picking up his $299 Lindows box at Walmart is the last person who needs multiple distros (or, for that matter, even knows what a "distro" is).
What am I missing? Who's the market for this package?
Learning curve? (Score:2, Interesting)
- Lindows for the newbie
- Mandrake for the more novice
- Fedora for the more expreienced and experimenting
This could be the package for people new to linux wanting to try it out.. And ready to blow their machine up some times.
Lindows is indeed a soft switch for those migrating to linux from windows. But somewhat locked into that position.
This would perhaps mean that the user buys at least one CnR licens
Re:Learning curve? (Score:2)
Thanks, but if I want problems to crop up, I'll use Windows. I don't think I'll be dabbling with the mess that is Fedora anytime soon for that very reason.
RPM is just a broken system, anyway. Fedora has no advantage over Mandrake, as far as I'm concerned (and I don't use either regularly).
Its silly FUD/Proganda against real distros (Score:3, Insightful)
If you go through the site it seems to be a pathetic means of pointing out Lindows as a better distro.
By pointing out the fact that Fedora takes WAY TOO F'ING LONG to install, and that mandrake and fedora are "harder to use" and lack things like flash, support, and effective auto device finding (I still can't get my prism2 based wi-fi card to work under mandrake 10)
True things like apt, urmpi are freaking easy to use, but they have to be configured, and lindows is a "newbie" os.
The target market for this is newbies, and press/tech editors who don't know any better.
For a real Shootout may I recomend modified fedora and mandrake distros like
Blag Linux - A live Fedora based distro with the stuff you really need, and is only on 1 cd.
PClinuxOs- a live mandrake distro with synaptic, a front for Apt-get
Knopix- A debian based live cd, that has tons of great stuff, and dosn't use the root acount for everything like linspire (which is debian based)
PS. Someone AIM-daphreak07, icq -17654783 if they can help me get my wi-fi card working so i can be free of winblows XP once again... Help a poor college student
$49? whatever happened to cheapbytes? (Score:3, Insightful)
Nice, but.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Nice, but.... (Score:2)
Every distro needs to include knoppix... (Score:3, Insightful)
I think that is much more clever than including a installable distro...
That does not say that the intention is very well indeed...
Not cheap (Score:4, Informative)
Of course downloading is even cheaper. YMMV, but when I can get a CD set in my mailbox for only a few dollars more than downloading and burning one myself, that has always had my preference.
Re:Not cheap (Score:2)
Clever... (Score:3, Interesting)
Were I a newbie looking to try out Linux, I would probably test drive Mandrake or Fedore before giving Linspire a spin, so this seems like a clever way to profit off that tendency.
I've made up my mind (Score:5, Funny)
I'm thinking a big no on Linspire.
When will Microsoft do the same?? (Score:3, Funny)
That'll be the day!
Re:When will Microsoft do the same?? (Score:3, Funny)
*cough*
Re:When will Microsoft do the same?? (Score:2)
and yes, it is virtually impossible to reall
My own shootout (Score:3, Informative)
Lindows. I got this back at an Osnews promotion a while ago. While it was easy to install, the software selection was limited and if you wanted more you had to pay for click and run. It was just a spiffed up KDE and a few flash demos. Didn't stay on my system for long
Mandrake. The best out of the three, very easy to use, large software selection. I used the cooker for a while but I got bored of Mandrake and tried Fedora Core 2 instead.
Fedora Core 2. Easy to installm but takes a long time. Uses GNOME by default but a castrated GNOME. KDE was screwed too. The Nvidia drivers on it sucked so out it went.
I now use SuSE 9.1, which in my opinion is the best Linux yet. It so easy to use, with a massive software collection, including loads of GAMES, the NVIDIA patch makes it easy to set up, so this is the distribution that has won the shootout.
I have also tried Debian (too hard), Gentoo (too easy to smash the portage tree), Ark (weird), Xandros Open Circulation (Too strange), Windows XP (worst of all, uninstalled in less than an hour).
Re:My own shootout (Score:2)
While I concur that SuSE is an awesome distro, I disagree about Debian being too hard. My first Linux install was a purchase of 4 Debian Potato 2.2r4 CDs. While I did mess up my system very quickly (ahhh newbie meets the power of root), 2nd install was great. Woody even easier. I must say though, my distributor gave me a printed guide on how to install Debian. Following that was a doddle. Real easy.
I use SuSE on a Laptop, just for a quick install with oddball har
I think it's a good idea... (Score:2, Insightful)
Lindows has more extras than other Distro's (Score:2, Informative)
Lindows has many packages that provide features that WindowsXP provided such as a pictures organizer and other stuff available to the users.
Other distro's who want to target the desktop enviroment would do well by taking a look at how Lindows/Linspire, Xandros, and Lycoris are pushing their wares.
SuSE did a similar thing long long ago... (Score:3, Informative)
They should fix CUPS while they're at it (Score:3, Interesting)
Stuff like this is why OSS software will have a tough time displacing software from Redmond.
Chip H.
Insiders got a special deal recently too (Score:2, Informative)
Michael Robertson (Score:3, Informative)
Michael, here's a clue: concentrate on one thing until it's done, before you jump on to the next thing. And keep your personality out of it!
I've drunk the Lindows/Linspire Kool-Aid. It seems like a worthwhile project. I actually went out and bought copies, and I've installed them on friend's and family's machines. It's a nice distro, as far as it goes. Few Slashdotters would be happy with it, but for someone whose whole world has been Windows-based, it's perfect. And CNR is darn near brilliant.
For a couple of months, a lot of the Lindows developers' focus was going into one of Michael's pet projects, NVU [nvu.com], which was going to be a free, open-source replacement for MS FrontPage. Great idea, right? Well, it got to version 0.2, which almost-works but appears to be completely stalled. The announced 1st-quarter release date has long since come and gone.
This month his focus seems to have shifted over to this silly "shootout" between distros. Hey Mike, another clue: Lindows is a pretty nice thing, but you haven't got a chance in Hell of competing with Fedora or Mandrake. They're aimed at a much different target audience, and that audience doesn't need a pre-installed GUI. And your average Lindows user is going to take a look at Mandrake and run away fast.
Last month it was his VOIP startup, SIP-phone or whatever it's called. It sounds like a great idea, but I'm not buying it, because I don't know if his focus is going to shift to something else while this one falls by the wayside in a month or two, half finished.
Posting anonymously so I can mod you down too. (Score:4, Informative)
apt-get is still in there. You only need to pay if you WISH to use Click-N-Run.
If you know how to use apt-get, then use it. If not, and want an easy graphical way to install software and see value in the service, then pay for it.
Sheesh.
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:5, Interesting)
Apt-get is free and great for experienced users, but it can be tough for new users to understand. Packages aren't always organized cleanly, and there is lots of old kruft on the Debian tree (How many text editors would a non-techie need?).
I've easily spent more then $49/year of my personal time dealing with problems from Apt-get.
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:3, Informative)
lots of old kruft on the Debian tree [...] How many text editors would a non-techie need?
How is providing choice "kruft"? Nobody, non-techie or otherwise, has to install the 500 text editors Debian provides. Most non-techies don't really know what a text editor is, whether they have any installed, etc. So how again is this "kruft" or otherwise some failing of Debian?
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:2)
Not that it really matters. Debian is not, and should never be, a desktop distro for non-technical users. I run it on my servers and I am very happy.
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:2)
Yes, yes. Choice. But there is a lot of "cruft" in the official Debian package respitory. Subscribe to DWN (Debian Weekly News) or check out the archives [debian.org]. They have a section at the end for orphaned packages. There's quite a few [debian.org] now. And no, it's not a failing of Debian. It's human nature. Debian is a community-run organisation. People become disinterested, or no longer have free time, and move on to other things. Simple.
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:3, Informative)
It's also free.
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:4, Insightful)
FOSS is free, get used to it (Score:2)
Why not? If they are licensing it free then that EXACTLY means I shouldn't pay.
If I feel like I *want* to donate, that's fine. But that goes without saying. I may want to donate new helmets to my local fire department or blood to the local blood bank. But if I walk into Costingtons and they are giving away some widget I shouldn't feel obligated to tip anyone because of some BS guilt trip you think we all should be sharing.
What Lindows is doing is
I emailed Lindows about this (Score:5, Informative)
"You can backup your programs to your hearts content. Just so you know, once you download a program, you will have access to that file forever. Under Click-N-RUn, on the Left, My Products -> All Categories. You will always be able to get these even after your subscription expires."
Oh, and if you want legal DVD playback, they've gone to the trouble to buy the licenses. For home users this isn't really an issue (yet). For system builders, you can't just go bundling libdecss with you're machines (it's also illegal to tell them to download libdecss on their own, btw).
So, no, Lindows isn't Microsoft in the making.
Re:I emailed Lindows about this (Score:5, Funny)
Customer: I can't play dvds
Reseller: Well, you just need something to decrpyt them *wink**wink*.
Customer: Why are you winking at me?
Reseller: I didn't just wink, and I said absolutely nothing about libdecss?
Customer: lib what?
Reseller: Exactly.
Re:I emailed Lindows about this (Score:2)
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:5, Insightful)
That is the single most damaging mindset in the OSS camp. The goal is not for software gratis, but to have software libre.
The ideal Free Software scenario is when companies, governments and indiviuals pay people to write good, quality software. Maybe not a whole project, sometimes even just for minor improvements and bugfixes. It may be even implemented as a subscription model.
The value of software is created when the programmer programs. To make OSS succeed and suplant the commercial model we have to find ways of rewarding this activity. You can't do away with money in this society, maybe in some arachist utopia, but not in the present. For programmers to survive, we need to find ways for them to be rewarded for their time.
CNR is optional (Score:2)
apt-get install gcc
apt-get install man
apt-get install mozilla
No need to run the CNR program at all. Just watch out for KDE updates that can corrupt the Linspire/Lindows code.
Also they crippled RPM too.
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:3, Informative)
Why not? I use it daily, I get tangible value from it, so I don't particularly mind paying some money for it.
I've given money to Red Hat and Mandrake in exchange for using their "free" (gratis) distributions, since as a software developer myself, I know it costs them time and money to produce them. My paying them money makes the software no less "free" (libre) and hopefully helps it become better - and that's in addition to my own contributions to open source software.
Yes, you
Re:Don't be fooled. (Score:2, Informative)
Actually, if you decide to stop paying for CNR you *can* still use the programs and you *can* still download the programs you have already downloaded if you have to reformat or whateve
Re:quick! (Score:4, Funny)
Linux is free as in speech not as in beer (Score:3, Interesting)
Finally a Linux company with a workable business plan, find a way to make Linux pay off besides just charging for support and Tux Dolls.
Have you actually read the GPL license? (Score:2)
Windows is free, to the Internet Pirates, just that the security updates for Windows are locked out on pirated copies. This allows worms and viruses to spread faster when critical service packs cannot be installed on the Pirated Windows workstations.
BTW Microsoft was toying with a subscription model for Windows Updates not too long ago.
Keep XP and Longhorn, free the other versions o
Re:I thought Linux was free? (Score:2, Insightful)
it is free. free as in speech. it's free as in beer as well, but in my experience, if somebody offers me free beer, i end up having to work for it.
free beer linux just means you have to learn your distro's quirks (after i spose you poke your head over the *nix learning curve). i really like free beer, so i run debian/sid on my desktop. that's 200 bucks worth of free beer for me, my desktop box came with winme preinstalled. plus i don't have to buy and/or subscribe to virus dealies. whoa, i can spend