data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48851/488514cb0361910b6f52eea8bd283808293524b4" alt="Linux Business Linux Business"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22d0b/22d0bff25e24a87c84e7a3bd01f59f0d96652862" alt="Operating Systems Operating Systems"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/114a3/114a3ad76461bddbf2afa583782f630551f7277a" alt="Software Software"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/984c6/984c60d74404ea77c942fa90be9deb558cc4594c" alt="Windows Windows"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87aff/87affa045ab7f9eb297408bf8d8594376980f72b" alt="Linux Linux"
Germany Publishes Windows to Linux Migration Guide 221
Bombcar writes "This Migration Document is also available. It has details on going from WinNT to Linux/FLOSS/Samba et.al, with less detail on RedHat/Ximian/GNOME and more on SuSE/Mandrake/KDE. See Kurt's post to Samba Technical for more details."
woot! (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:woot! (Score:2, Funny)
woes along the way (Score:3, Interesting)
afaik, Samba supports even the more advanced domain controller features, but it's not all very straight-forward or intuitive. this should make the PHBs with anti-commercial-solution tin-foil hats breath a little easier. documentation goes a long ways in a managed environment.
This is great (Score:2, Insightful)
my guide (Score:4, Funny)
2) get refund from microsoft
3) unlearn everything you thought you knew
4) read, read, read
5) install the penguin
6) read, read, read
7) tinker, tinker,tinker
8) convert others
9) goto step 1
10) pay the SCO guys
Re:my guide (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:my guide (Score:2)
And the worst part is that after the divorce proceedings, she'll most likely get a cut of your salary, which you've earned by doing all that reading and tinkering.
wbs.
Re:my guide (Score:2)
The IDA Open Source Migration Guidelines (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:The IDA Open Source Migration Guidelines (Score:5, Informative)
I read both quite carefully, the EU as as well as the German one and I came to the following conclusion:
The EU one does not:Another important aspect of the German migration guide was that it always kept the comparison to the "continuing migration" which shows the trade-offs and advantages of OSS migration and thus gives a balanced picture. I can't really blame the EU guide for this, since it simply didn't have this goal.
But I think there is a very significant point of critisism left: The German migration guide had co-authors from experts (see co-authors section in the PDF for reference), which ensures that the descriptions are more in-depth and exploit all features of new version (This is very important for Samba for example. The EU guide is more a list of applications with features listed "as advertised". The EU left out Debian completely. While I am not a Debian zealot, I know of quite some successful migrations to Debian and the German migration guide acknowledges this. It doesn't take a RHAS or SLES to migrate to Linux!
available? (Score:2)
Google Cache to the Rescue (Score:3, Informative)
Here you go. [216.239.37.104]
Migration = Salvation (Score:4, Informative)
Like many techies, I help friends and family with their PCs. I've started saying, "it's Linux or nothing", and we install a nice distro like Xandros or Knoppix on the PCs. No device problems, no viruses or spywarez, no calls to the "help desk".
The only problem is that people are used to just switching off their machines, and don't shut down correctly. This seems to have caused a couple of machines to loose configurations. So I'm looking at using a pure CD-based install like Knoppix with a USB key for
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:1)
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2)
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2, Interesting)
I usually use vfat for compatibility, ext2 for deliberate incompatibility, or a raw device/partition for a bestcrypt container.
Even though modern [USB|IDE]/FLASH bridge chips use tricks to spread writes across cells(to stop bits wea
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:1)
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2)
Wal*mart will surely take back the copy.
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:1)
Windows doesn't like it that much better (Score:2)
The only problem is that people are used to just switching off their machines, and don't shut down correctly. This seems to have caused a couple of machines to loose configurations.
Windows machines have enough issues as it is, without the users making it worse. "Crashing" Windows on purpose on each shutdown is bound to create trouble in the long run. It's simply a matter of habit, it doesn't take more than a few seconds to shut it do
Re:Windows doesn't like it that much better (Score:1)
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2, Interesting)
can't say I blame them, while PC Unix was great because they didn't get viruses and I could do software upgrades and minor fixes remotely (they have DSL), it meant that they were entitled to pester me about it as much as they wanted. I got pestered a lot with
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:4, Informative)
If the corruption is caused by the applications leaving things in an inconsistent state if they don't get closed properly, then obviously no filesystem can do anything about that. Using a USB key for
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2)
Actually, that makes me think: if the HD uncludes enough of its own cache RAM to let the OS disable its own caching, and also its own little power supply backup, it could just dump its cache out to disk as soon as it detects its "official" power has gone off, and the OS -- and the user -- don't have to worry about a damn thing. It could be marketed as the "non-corruptible" hard disk...
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2)
For PCs where the off switch is an ACPI power button you can get the system to interpret this and execute a proper shutdown, I did this on my laptop a while back, unfortunatly I've forgotten how now.
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2)
If you are running Ext3, make sure you're mounted with data=journal so you get full data journalling. My wife and I have been operating several machines for more than a year that way, without problems. Standard nighttime shutdown is, just hit the power switch. Every now and then I run a forced fsck just to be sure nothing b
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2)
And it's just so convenient to take an old unused box from somewhere and put Linux on it.
And there are few complaints because it just works. Surf the net, do some hotmail, check some porn sites, maybe write a letter in OOo. That's the most that a lot of people use their PCs for.
A Mac would be complete and total overkill.
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2)
Don't forget P2P and listening to MP3. Both are adequately covered in Linux. Perhaps even better, because of the more powerful TCP/IP stack.
Re:Migration = Salvation (Score:2)
It's mostly a hunch, but networking on Linux seems to be faster and less resource-hungry. I don't know how much this relates to general resource consumption of the OS.
As far as P2P, it stresses the networking subsystem quite a lot. Various eDonkey clients, for example, can and will use hundreds of connections at once. And MP3 playback is intimately tied to P2P, obviously
Network effect (Score:5, Insightful)
This marks the beginning of a new Europe. Now we should just start teaching Python at elementary schools, and we could be kicking some serious US ass as far IT goes
Re:Network effect (Score:5, Interesting)
Consider a bank paying interest at 5% and run along traditional lines, but with just three investors: Anna, Bob and Charlie. Anna invests $1000. Bob invests $200. Charlie invests $3000. A year later, they get their interest payments.
Anna receives 5% of $1000 = $50.
Bob receives 5% of $200 = $10.
Charlie receives 5% of $3000 = $150.
With a bank that worked the way Open Source works, Interest Calculations would be done more like this:
Anna has $1000. Bob has $200. Charlie has $3000.
Anna receives 5% of $4200 = $210.
Bob receives 5% of $4200 = $210.
Charlie receives 5% of $4200 = $210.
Re:Network effect (Score:1)
Anna has $1000. Bob has $200. Charlie has $3000.
Anna receives 5% of $4200 = $210.
Bob receives 5% of $4200 = $210.
Charlie receives 5% of $4200 = $210.
I guess the Open Source Bank would give each of them a third of these 5%, so Anne, Bob and Charlie would get 30$ each (I'd get the remaining 120$ as a consultation fee)...
Re:Network effect (Score:2)
Anna invests $1000. Bob invests $200. Charlie invests $3000.
Anna's interest rate is 1%
Bob's interest rate is 0.5%
Charlie's interest rate is 3%
Anna receives 1% of $1000 = $10.
Bob receives 0.5% of $200 = $1.
Charlie receives 3% of $3000 = $90.
If the three work the open source way and invest their money together, making it $4200 the interest rate is 4%:
Anna receives 4% of $1000 = $40.
Bob receives 4% of $200 =
Re:Network effect (Score:5, Insightful)
I respectfully suggest you keep reading until you understand.
Re:Network effect (Score:2)
On the other hand, if I have a lit candle, and someone else lights another candle from it, that does not make my room any darker, yet we both have lit candles: the light is not diminished by the act of sharing.
You betry your lack of experience and credentials in IT.
Anyone that's really been exposed to decision-making processes in corporate IT knows that we live in a restricted oxygen environment where 2 candles will simply kill us off twice as fast as one candle.
People coming out of meetings, blue-face
Re:Network effect (Score:5, Interesting)
That's because banks operate on a scarce resource (money). Knowledge/code/data is a scarce resource only artificially, and therefore sharing it increases the total amount that is available.
Obviously, this reduces the bottom line of huge corporations that charge lots of money of what should/could/is starting to be a commodity (OS and Office Suite vendors). Most of them are in the US (MSFT and SUNW), so Europe doesn't really have that much motivation to preserve their status. Europe loses nothing and gains jobs, expertise, openness and wealth.
Bad for economy (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Bad for economy (Score:3, Funny)
I am deleting my Linux partition and i am buying WindowsXP as we speak.
I too want to take spending away from trivial items and spend all my money for WindowsXP.
Re:Bad for economy (Score:2)
Re:Bad for economy (Score:1)
Re:Bad for economy (Score:2)
Plus, all our CS students are trained on Linux, so there are plenty of Linux-savvy folks around here. Who will get paid for _developing_ stuff (on the Linux platform), instead of making money by holding companies hostage [microsoft.com].
Re:Bad for economy (Score:2, Funny)
Indeed! I'm glad you brought this up, because the REAL damage to the economy is being done by people using supposedly "free" air instead of buying proprietary Canopy canned air. I thikn a lot of people have no idea how many jobs are being lost over this.
But it's even worse than you may imagine. When people do use our proprietary canned air, some of it can leak into the atmosphere and mix with so-called-free ai
Re:Bad for economy (Score:2)
-russ
Re:Bad for economy (Score:1)
Well thank you for the lesson in capitalism.
Just a few problems with your short essay though.
First of all, these "bleeding-edge innovations" you're so very fond of don't exactly have the greatest track record for reliability, stability, and last but not least security. Of course none of these things are an issue if you're only concerned with the pretty pictures on your desktop called icons, and yes I'm sure all of us in the linux community eagerly await the nifty new
Re:Bad for economy (Score:2, Interesting)
I suggest you try tunning a distribution from 2 or 3 years ago, maybe Red Hat 6, and then comparing that with Red Hat 9. Or the equivalent Mandrake numbers or whatever else. There is a huge difference.
Oh. Sorry. I have been trolled, I have lost
Re:Bad for economy (Score:2)
-russ
Now... (Score:3, Funny)
Sounds like a good idea (Score:5, Insightful)
As the migration progresses in Germany, so it will be copied in many other places - and mostly without the mistakes Germany will inevitably make {though, arguably, none of them will ever come close in magnitude to actually ever letting closed-source software anywhere near their machines in the first place}. Once somebody with some real clout has made a hard commitment to GNU/Linux on the desktop, then we will see real change.
I wish every success to all who choose to wrest back the control of their destiny from the hands of the evil corporations. Theirs will not be an easy journey. I, too, have a little experience of what they must be facing; and yet, my humble effort - to do without Windows at any price, even if that prevented me from using a computer at all - just seems so insignificant compared to Germany's task.
I'm also more than a little humbled at realising I don't know how to say "Good luck!" in German.
Re:Sounds like a good idea (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Sounds like a good idea (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Sounds like a good idea (Score:1, Informative)
"Viel Gluck!"
Re:Sounds like a good idea (Score:1, Informative)
Viel Glueck! (It should really have an umlaut by Slashdot isn't non-english friendly)
Never satisfied... (Score:2)
You're never satisfied are you? "Geez, RedHat/Ximian/GNOME is so much better, I can't believe they wasted their time on S/M/K..." It's linux -- better yet, it's not Microsoft. So just be happy people are looking at open source, even if it's not your particular brew.
Works for me except for (Score:1)
Re:Works for me except for (Score:1, Informative)
boosts open source culture (Score:1)
great move...
but it wouldn't wipe M$ from the planet...
A dreamer, who thinks so...
and a dangerous one on top of it (economically)...
Re:boosts open source culture (Score:2)
No, but it's a start. We are just seeing the begining of the "snowball" effect. It starts out small, but starts growing exponentially. If the U.S. doesn't watch it, it will be the little cartoon house at the bottom of the Alps, with a snowball 5 times its size bearing down on it at an unstoppable pace. Germany, Brasil, other Latin American countries, the E.U....
Hopefully the U.S. won't get bought and paid for too soon, or it will become the world's Former Sup
This paper is long overdue (Score:4, Insightful)
The number of times our company (large retail group) has tripped up because of decisions based on convincing salespeople rather than technical merit make for shameful reading.
This document has a stamp of officialdom though. Better still, a government stamp! Written by bureaucrats for bureaucrats! Yippee!
There will be a copy on my Director's desk Monday. Whether I can get him to read it is another matter. But that's a different battle. I imagine there's a few UK government bureaucrats swotting up using this document too. I'm amazed and rather humbled that it's written in English as well!
stop the conversion! (Score:5, Insightful)
i like the fact that because i run linux, i have more capability than the average windows joe.
i like the fact that i am part of a technical movement that helps each other in times of need (newsgroups, forums).
i like the fact that when my rights are threatened or otherwise, that it's this same group of folks that stand together (SCO?).
one of the things that MS doesn't have is the 'comminuty closeness' that *nix users have.
this closeness is why linux innovation is an par with the biggest software company in the world.
i'm afraid that if linux were to ever win the desktop war, this closeness and community won't be as friendly or as helpful.
sure, we embrace IBM now, but for how long? you do realize that the way we feel about MS is similar to the way our fathers felt about IBM in the 70's.
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:2)
But then there's the philosophy. I really love the idea of sharing knowledge, sharing information. Luckily, the free (speech) software movement, the community, the openness doesn't impede the practicality.
I remember the early days of the Net. There w
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:3, Insightful)
It's fun, we like Linux and want other people to be able to enjoy it as much as we do, more users == more apps == more users etc
i like the fact that because i run linux, i have more capability than the average windows joe.
Running Linux should not be a status symbol, period. If you want the respect of your peers, if you want to be seen as "elite" then learn to hack code - THAT is the right way to demonstrat
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:1)
Then they will be so upset with things not working so they will start to get a life instead of sitting online 10h/day !
That is really a good thing!
If I were forced to switched to windows, I'd give up on computers....
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:2)
With Linux, the community controls the product, so the community has reason to care about the product.
With Windows, if they make a decision you don't like, you just cope.
This means that Windows help==learning how to use what they give you while Linux help==learning how to find what you want to use.
This is the difference which will not go away, thanks to the GPL.
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:2)
i like the fact that because i run linux, i have more capability than the average windows joe.
Fine, I accept that. I suggest you move on to the BSDs if you want to preserve your feelings of superiority. Or, even better
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:2)
look, i make a lot of money because there aren't many linux developers in comparison to windows certified folks.
I suggest you move on to the BSDs if you want to preserve your feelings of superiority. Or, even better, make some contributions to projects.
i don't need to use any of the BSDs. linux does exactly what i want, and if it doesn't, then i can make it act/feel exactly the way i please.
contributions? i maintain 2 sourceforg
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:2)
You've agreed with my positive consequences, and not disagreed with my points arguing your po
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:2)
And if MS ever were to change the way IBM has, we would embrace them, as well. These are corporations, not people. Though slow and clumsy, theoretically only the name stays the same over time.
We are fighting a war of ideals, not companies or people.
Btw, regardless of how many people switch to Linux, the knowledge that you have gained over the years will a
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:2)
I can't believe some people still hold this viewpoint. Linux usability, stability, and usefullness has improved several times over from 5 years ago at least in part because it has reached a critical mass in mindshare. I would like to see more people use and support Linux.
In fact, I think it is critical that more people use Linux, as many hardware vendors still seem shy about supporting it. With more supporti
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:2)
You don't have extra capability merely because you run linus -- you have it because you *know* stuff. This would be true even if 100% of computers ran linux. Your average joe would just stick with all the default settings and whatever window manager does the most babysitting. Anyone who bothers to look behind the scenes, use the more advanced-but-estoteric interfaces, etc. will still be among the "l33t".
Re:stop the conversion! (Score:1)
Not liking something just because other people like it is hardly any different than liking something because other people like it.
Something tells me.... (Score:2, Funny)
Misleading intro (Score:2)
The German article linked has more details on going from WinNT to Linux/FLOSS/Samba et.al, with less detail RedHat/Ximian/GNOME/SuSE/Mandrake/KDE.
The [eu.int]
EU article mentioned in Kurts mail, has more focus on RedHat/Ximian/GNOME than Suse/Mandrake/KDE.
linux user @ 56years (Score:5, Interesting)
I am a PhD. candidate. My work is wrapped around simulations for which I trust Linux/Debian. At house i've Suse 8.2 simply because it was the most painless installation of any OS i had ever made in my life.
My mom has an incurable habit of reading and writing. When she arrived i thought i would use the holidays to teach her to "use-the-mouse" and if that succeeds then treach her to do "google and surf" . I thought internet would probably catch her interest. I have to admit what follows was a lesson for me too.
Agreeing to the user-friendliness of Windows, i contemplated of installing XP as i thought it would make the job easier for her. It took some days before i could do that so for the intermediate phase i exposed mom to the already installed Suse. Partly because of my under-estimation of her IQ, and mostly because of her determination to prove to me that PhD is "just another degree" she could do "mouse" and "google" in a couple of days (half an hour after her first lone journey into the internet, i found 50+ empty mozilla browsers running!).
About a week later i installed XP (partition) and asked her to use it instead. Here is the summary of her questions/discussion before i switched her back to Suse!
1. Who are Carina, Angelaxxx, SusyDeep, TOM, etc? and why do you have friends like that??!?!?!
I use t-online. Unsolicited messages are norm. People familiar with these messages would know the content of these messages! No matter how much i try to convince mom that i have nothing to do with "those friends" she is still suspicious of me
2. "People have lost fortunes in gambling. Its the slippery back of the snail. Stop gambling."
You see, when she opened a website in Explorer she recieved web-advertisements. A lot of them. I do not know the reason and i do not have the statistics to back it up, but i have also felt that the number of advertisements/pop-ups are far more in MS Windows/Explorer as compared to Mozilla/Linux. She had seen advertisements from online casinos!
3. There is something wrong with your computer because i can not read the text?
It is one of those things that is almost unbelievable but the website (our local newspaper in Urdu language) which she could read in Mozilla simply did not show the text in Explorer. I know you would say "font" but hey which OS had all the fonts on its side!
4. There is something wrong with your power-supply plug!
Thats what she thought was the reason for the machine "rebooting" itself every now and then. Honestly, i have not had the time to figure out why XP does this on my AMD Athlon machine- auto-reboot 2/3 times per week? Till the time i know the exact reason i would just think that there is something wrong with power-supply cable!
etc. etc.
You get the picture why i simply switched back.
I will add one thing before i pen off. I installed Suse 8.2 from DVD and it was the most painless installation experience of my life... 14-15 minutes and everything was working, including nVidia card and the DSL! I got to tell you that it went so smooth that i really thought that something was wrong! Once the system was running i could update everything (patches etc.) within half an hour with 2-3 clicks of mouse. I love Debian's "apt-get" now i love YAST too.
I have a much better opinion now. Thanks mom.
p.s.
Back home, she is insisting that my younger brother install the "soosey" too
Re:linux user @ 56years (Score:1)
Hurray for inherent disability (Score:2)
But, seriously, that is so sad. Does anyone realize that we've already lost the war against viruses and are now to the point where we are trying to overthrow firmly entrenched tyranny?
(Likewise with spam and Microsoft)
Re:Hurray for inherent disability (Score:4, Insightful)
(Likewise with spam and Microsoft)
And DRM (I knew it was coming, never thought it would be Apple...) And ISPs limiting what you can do with an account. And proprietary file formats. And software patents.
Re:linux user @ 56years (Score:2)
Re:linux user @ 56years (Score:2)
For the love of God (Score:5, Insightful)
If we learn anything from the likes of Microsoft, I hope we learn a little about self-promotion.
Help ! - I need to migrate ! (Score:3, Funny)
Of course, if anyone could supply me with information on getting the following working under linux, I'd be very happy !
1. Microsoft Encarta
2. Microsoft Golf
3. Internet Explorer 5.0
4. Windows Media Player
5. Zonealarm
6. Adaware
7. Nortons Anti-Virus
I'd really love some help - I need these quality applications to run in a Linux box, otherwise I just can't migrate !
Arrhghgh !
Re:Help ! - I need to migrate ! (Score:1)
Sigh - it was a joke (Score:2)
I wish myself better luck next time !
OOoSwitch (Score:1, Informative)
Hentzenwerke [hentzenwerke.com] publishes a book called OOoSwitch: 501 Things You Wanted To Know About Switching to OpenOffice.org from Microsoft(R) Office.
Dunno if it's a good book but I'm glad someone wrote it.
No Exchange Killer Yet. (Score:4, Insightful)
From an administrator's point of view, it is refreshing to see an analysis of OSS alternatives that does not gloss over the difficulties of migrating away from the Outlook/Exchange groupware architecture. Too many "analyses" by OSS advocates seem to say, 'Oh, go ahead and give this cobbled-together approach a shot - - you'll work things out one way or another.' If it is your responsibility to guide executive decision making where your company's groupware product is concerned, you know that this is one place where a misstep could easily cost you your job. As much as I would like to look at something like Kroupware or OpenExchange, this report bears out my own investigations - - there's nothing in the Open Source world yet that can take the place of a well-managed Outlook/Exchange infrastructure. This is the crown jewel of the Microsoft monopoly, and they guard it well. When OSS can provide a confidence-inspiring mailbox mass-migration tool and a back end that fully supports Outlook, that's the day you can sell your Microsoft stock.
Re:No Exchange Killer Yet. (Score:5, Insightful)
When you start your migration with the assumption "the new product must do everything the old product did plus possibly more" you will not only limit your options, but you will also migrate to more and more complex systems.
Instead, you should look at the requirements of the organisation, and define the properties of the system that will be implemented. Maybe Outlook/Exchange implements them, but that does not mean that it is the only solution to the problem.
Don't try to implement an Outlook/Exchange replacement, but define what your company needs and implement that. Possibly it does not need all the features of Outlook/Exchange and thus they do not need to be present in the "replacement".
We run an IMAP mailserver on Linux, with LDAP address book, and a separate web-based calendaring system. All are accessed from Mozilla on the (Windows) desktops. It works fine.
The only thing I would want to be improved is the maintenance of the LDAP address book by nontechnical users.
Re:No Exchange Killer Yet. (Score:2)
I think you're absolutely correct on all counts. At one point in my investigation of alternatives - - I'm a Linux guy from about 1995, by the way - - I built a Postfix/LDAP/Squirrelmail testbed on a little test network. We invited managers to play with the system, using Outlook, Outlook Express, Netscape Communicator, and the Squirrelmail interface. While some people seemed intrigued by the Open Source concept - - meaning they were amazed that all this cost essentially nothing to put together - - no one saw
Re:No Exchange Killer Yet. (Score:2)
We are running a system like that for over three years now, and our managers are very happy with it. In fact one asked me last friday to replace the Outlook program on his personal (home) system by Mozilla.
They not only like the fact that it is free, they also like that it has never been down except for scheduled maintenance, and that we have never had a virus or trojan.
For scheduling we use Maoron
Re:No Exchange Killer Yet. (Score:2)
I really don't think Exchange is about to die any time soon. The real-world reports about OpenExchange don't make for encouraging reading if you're an Exchange admin hoping to depart from the MS platform. In my work, I take care of only two mail systems, but I call in consultants for, well, consulting from time to time. And I'm hearing that there are LOTS of folks who are doing just fine with Exchange 5.5, Outlook 2000, and NT4. The thing is, once you've spent the bucks for the add-ons that make Exchange re
Re:No Exchange Killer Yet. (Score:2)
"That's right - if it gets hacked anyone that has EVER logged in as postmaster to that box is a suspect, great fun for contractors."
True, but finding a rootkit on your Postfix box is every bit as scary.
"The complex and time consuming process required to recover backed up mail without disrupting the current mailboxes puts it beyond the means of any nefarious folk that don't have a spare server or are prepared to shell out for another Exchange licence."
With Veritas Backu
.Net alternatives (Score:2)
Conversion my ass (Score:2)
Re:morons publish hostage to participant migration (Score:1)
Re:They didn't migrate yet... (Score:2)
please re-read this post [samba.org] again:
Re:biased? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:biased? (Score:1)
Re:Why not... (Score:2)
Re:I did a 180 (Score:2)
Man, are you screwed. I know some guys I went to high school with who now work at Microsoft. Oh, and they write code for XP. Oh, and above all else, they are Mormons. Look