Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Linux Business

OpenLindows.com: Wherefore Art Thou? 256

Posted by timothy from the apt-get-transparent dept.
Joe Barr writes "I ran across a curious website recently: OpenLindows.com. The name alone intrigued me. It gave rise to speculation about a weird mix of free-as-in-beer and free-as-in-speech alternative to the $99/year Click-N-Run software subscription offered by LindowsOS, the most Windows-like/proprietary Linux distribution out there. This is a report on what I found, and perhaps even more importantly, what I didn't."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

OpenLindows.com: Wherefore Art Thou? More

OpenLindows.com: Wherefore Art Thou?

Comments Filter:

  • OpenLindows.com? (Score:2, Troll)

    by dzym ( 544085 )
    Surely the best thing to do with that domain is to redirect it to www.debian.org [debian.org]? Or maybe knoppix.org [knoppix.org] at a pinch.

    • Re:OpenLindows.com? (Score:2, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      This is informative? This should be -1, Troll.

      Just because these guys choose not to run your idea of an uber-distribution does not mean that it's no good. These openlindows.com people should be commended for trying to bring the best of the linux community to the lindows buyers. Comments like: "UR dist SUXOR, debian RULEZ!!1!!|" are the worst thing about the linux community, and these kinds of comments should be viewed as what they are.

      • Re:OpenLindows.com? (Score:1, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward
        n00b, lindows is based on debian.

      • Re:OpenLindows.com? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by HiThere ( 15173 ) * <charleshixsn@earthlinkLION.net minus cat> on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:11PM (#6808841)
        Actually, he has it almost right.

        There's nothing stoping you from running apt-get on Lindows, except lack of knowledge. What you end up with is Lindows with some Debian packages installed. Not Debian.

        Personally, I don't think that any distro that encourages people to run as root deserves to live, but that's the main fault of Lindows. And that was a conscious choice. They did include apt-get, so there's no problem with upgrading from Debian. So you can't either fault Lindows for crippling their distro, or fault /.ers for suggesting that they redirect their /etc/apt/sources.list to Debian. It's a reasonable approach.

        FWIW: I currently use LibraNet Linux. Another distribution that's essentially Linux. And I have more Debian links in my apt sources than I do LibraNet. In fact, it installed itself that way. But I have the LibraNet sources listed first, which means that if there's a version on the LibraNet site, that's the one that gets picked.

  • sheesh (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:34PM (#6808573)
    "Wherefore" means "why," not "where." When Shakespeare wrote, "Wherefore art thou Romeo?" he was saying, "Why are you 'Romeo?'" As in, "Why did you have to be born the son of my father's enemy?"

    Basic literacy, you know?
    • "Wherefore art thou" is the most incorrectly used phrase I've ever heard.

    • Re:sheesh (Score:5, Insightful)

      by NanoGator ( 522640 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:26PM (#6808932) Homepage Journal
      "Wherefore" means "why," not "where." When Shakespeare wrote, "Wherefore art thou Romeo?" he was saying, "Why are you 'Romeo?'" As in, "Why did you have to be born the son of my father's enemy?"

      Well the article's been slashdotted, so all I have to go by is the submission itself. Given the author's comment about the site being OpenLindows, yet the OS is proprietary, I'd say his use of wherefore is bang on.

      Couldn't take a moment to make sure your assumption wasn't ill based?

    • Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)

      by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:55PM (#6809129)
      Comment removed based on user account deletion

    • Wherefore? (Score:4, Funny)

      by AJWM ( 19027 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @06:11PM (#6809240) Homepage
      Therefore!

    • Re:sheesh (Score:4, Funny)

      by fireman sam ( 662213 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @06:14PM (#6809254) Homepage Journal
      That word you use... you use it a lot... I do not think it means what you think it means.

    • Re:sheesh (Score:3, Insightful)

      by rleibman ( 622895 )
      A big question of course, is why Shakespeare didn't instead say "Romeo, oh romeo, wherefore are though Montague?". Much clearer. I highly recommend this season's version of R&J at the Oregon Shakespeare Festival.

    • Re:sheesh (Score:3, Interesting)

      by mindriot ( 96208 )
      Yes, and? The question is, "wherefore art thou?" -- in other words, "why are you?" -- which fits pretty well. Why does the site exist, practically? Wasn't that the point?

      Btw, wherefore is probably related to the German "wofur" meaning "what for," as in "what's that for?" -- similar enough to "why does that exist?".

      Hm. Why does /. replace the u-Umlaut in "wofur" with a regular 'u'? ..."wofuer," then. :)

  • awesome (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:36PM (#6808584)
    i ran across a couple random sites as well... why didn't my submission get posted on those?

  • My experience with OpenLindows (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    I was initially skeptical in testing lindows, but as i did it, i was surprised at what i saw.

    First of all, its not really a "hack" of windows and linux, it has got its own pecularities and nuances. None of them infringe on SCO's IP rights, so you can be sure of not being hassled by them.

    This apart, the greatest advantage with this system is its lack of gayness and the fact that it combines the user-friendlyness of windows and the technical gayness of linux.

    I really recommend this system to anyone who is
  • dpkg + synaptic achieves pretty much what lindows is trying to market with click n' run. Save the outrageous charge to install free software, of course.

  • My head hurts... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by JoeLinux ( 20366 ) <joelinux AT gmail DOT com> on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:36PM (#6808590)
    Let's pull this apart, shall we?

    This is:

    A free software, providing an alternative for people who don't want to pay for an alternate Operating system utilizing free software meant to emulate a common interface on proprietary software.

    Tell me, if you are tech-savvy enough to get this to work (Even as beta as it probably is), what are you doing wanting the lindows interface?

    My $.02 ($.03 Canadian)

  • Wherefore != Where (Score:4, Informative)

    by RimmerExperience ( 456643 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:38PM (#6808603)

    The article points to the lack of an Open Lindows community (e.g. 'where is it'?). 'Wherefore' in Olde English...e, however, means 'why' or 'for what reason'.

    Wherefore [realdictionary.com] [realdictionary.com]

    (Juliet laments "why are you Romeo", not "where are you Romeo?")

    • The thing is, lauguage evolves by errors that survive without being corrected. That is to say, if a misuse of the word gets used too much, dictionairies report that meaning has now been associated with the word, and adds it to the definition.
    • Umm I didn't think much of the headline. In modern English I'd probably say it means something like "OpenLindows.com: Why do you exist?" or "To what purpose are you?", which would be in line with the standard definition. Slightly more implicitly "Why do you exist if there's no community?"

      Kjella

    • Re:Wherefore != Where (Score:5, Interesting)

      by bperkins ( 12056 ) * on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:30PM (#6808955) Homepage Journal
      Excellent point, however your explanation of a misconception has a possible misconception.

      You say "Olde English," which if one takes to mean "Old English," would refer to the English spoken by the people in Britain before 1066.

      Although the word wherefore may have had Old English origins (the OED indicates that it does not), Romeo and Juliet is Elizabethan English.
      • Romeo and Juliet is Elizabethan English.

        And we all love our Elizabethan English. I love that Priate Sound.

      • On a sidenote:

        In Norwegian, we still use a variant of wherefore, namely "hvorfor"... "Hvor" = where, "hvorfor" = why. We also use "Derfor" = Therefore, "der" = there, etc. :)

        ... Modern english has borrowed more than a few words from old norse, which can be seen in the simmilarity of alot of modern Norwegian and English words, like f.eks. Norwegian word "Sky" = cloud, Norwegian word "leg", = The part of the leg that is below the knee, Norwegian word "kne" = "Knee", etc.. :)

        Probably has something to
        • German does the same thing, with is wo- (where) and da- (there) compounds. I try to use the English where- and there- compounds as much as possible, because they are both cool and useful. I like to write therefor and wherefor instead of therefore and wherefore, though:-)

  • Article summary (Score:4, Funny)

    by Fizzlewhiff ( 256410 ) <jeffshannon@@@hotmail...com> on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:39PM (#6808614) Homepage
    Just so you don't have to read the whole article like I did...

    There is a site called OpenLindows.org (or something like that) where Lindows users could download the same stuff Linux and BSD users can downlod. Only noone seems to know about it, or Lindows users don't care, or there aren't any Lindows users. Sorry to be so vague but I quit reading before any real conslusion was drawn because it didn't mention SCO or Kobe Bryant and I became bored.

    • Re:Article summary (Score:5, Informative)

      by jared_hanson ( 514797 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:56PM (#6808739) Homepage Journal
      You're summary hit the nail on the head, and you didn't even read the entire thing!

      I expect more stories like this in the future:

      Joe Smith sets up a website. No one knows about it, but I happened to stumble across. I take that back, it looks like his grandma posted something here a couple of months back. He links to some weird site.

      Man, how did this make Slashdot.
      • Come on, it's not like we could have found this information any other way, it's not like we have access to the internet or anything.

        Next on slashdot: There's a website named Yahoo.com, I'll explain what's on the front page.

  • My impression (Score:5, Insightful)

    by insecuritiez ( 606865 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:40PM (#6808628)
    Was that OpenLindows was a small group (one guy?), maybe one person that didn't like the idea of having to pay for click-n-run to get many free applications. Open Lindows isn't going to take off because there's allready a website for that. www.debian.org And the few Lindows users out there that want to stick with it most likely can compile the software and so don't need OpenLindows. Nice idea though.

  • For us Non-Lindows people (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Dareth ( 47614 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:41PM (#6808638)
    What keeps a normal Lindows user from editing their /etc/apt/sources.list and apt-get installing away?

    Is there some kind of design limitation in Lindows, obscure config file layout to keep these people clickin and paying?

    • Re:For us Non-Lindows people (Score:3, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward
      No, you can plaw right ahead. That's what a lot of the thrashing in the forums is about -- windows people trying to understand how to do exactly what you just described.

    • Re:For us Non-Lindows people (Score:5, Informative)

      by Craig Nagy ( 605528 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:03PM (#6808783)
      RTFC C=Comments

      We don't try to hide the fact that sites like this is exist in order to gain more revenue from CNR. If we wanted to do that, we'd simply make it impossible to use APT, and we don't - Apt is fully functional in LindowsOS and for those more technically inclined, they are more than welcome to use it instead of CNR if it meets their needs.

      • Re:For us Non-Lindows people (Score:5, Insightful)

        by LostCluster ( 625375 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:12PM (#6808852)
        Smart biz move, because here were their options:

        A: Sack APT, and get a backlash from opensource land.

        B: Allow APT to exist, but don't give it any easier interface than what it comes with standard. Those geeky enough to understand it may have it, but those same people are likely too geeky to want to buy Lindows anyway.

        Lindows' product is a closed source program that makes Linux a bit easier to use, frosted with a distribution of the open source programs it attempts to help you with. If you know enough to work around Lindows anyway... then what are you doing with Lindows in the first place?
        • > If you know enough to work around Lindows anyway... then what are you doing with Lindows in the first place?

          Complaining about its geeklessness, what else?
        • then what are you doing with Lindows in the first place?

          I haven't considered it seriously until recently where I want to run a windows application on linux, but I don't have time to learn WINE and Linux... Perhaps that is a good reason.

        • Quoth the poster:

          B: Allow APT to exist, but don't give it any easier interface than what it comes with standard. Those geeky enough to understand it may have it, ...

          Understanding "apt-get install <pkg_name> and editing /etc/apt/sources.list makes one an "Alpha Geek?" I don't fscking THINK so ... especially since there are explicit instructions what to put in /etc/apt/sources.list on the Debian website.

          Now resolving dependency conflicts with RPM's ... THAT's geeky!

    • What keeps a normal Lindows user from editing their /etc/apt/sources.list and apt-get installing away?

      lack of technical knowledge and desire to do so.

    • Re:For us Non-Lindows people (Score:4, Informative)

      by elgaard ( 81259 ) <elgaard AT agol DOT dk> on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @06:44PM (#6809416) Homepage
      Normal Lindows users don't apt-get. CNR is simper to use than synaptic, kpackage, dselect, apt-get etc.

      Technically the answer is versions and dependencies. I experienced Lindows 3 preinstalled on the laptop (http://www.agol.dk/elgaard/lindows.html). The Lindows specific programs were all cleanly installed as Debian packages, which make upgrading with apt safe and simpler. However the installed packages were an interesting mix of Debian/KDE/OO versions. Many programs were backported. I was not able to come up with a sources.list that matched what was installed and what I wanted to install. This means you get a lot of conflicts. You can resolve those, but then you end up updating _a lot_ of packages, and loosing most of the extra Lindows packages. It still works, but there really isn't much point in doing it compared to installing a fresh Debian, unless you have a preinstalled Lindows computer without floppy or CD drive.

      OpenLindows packages on the other hand matches the installed Lindows packages. I started trying out OpenLindows. I downloaded OO from Openlindows, put it on a CF card, met my girlfriend with the Lindows laptop on the way to a meeting, put the CF card in the laptop (it has a CF slot), apt-get install openoffice, and it was working.

      The laptop now runs debian unstable (except for Netscape), but that is just because I could do it. I liked a lot of things in Lindows (not the root thing) and $49/year (per family i think) could be worth it as long as you are not locked in---You have a way out (apt-get) if you decide it is no longer worth it.
    • What keeps a normal Lindows user from editing their /etc/apt/sources.list and apt-get installing away?

      You have to log on as root to do that .. oh, wait a sec..

  • Community (Score:5, Interesting)

    by vosbert ( 544192 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:43PM (#6808647)
    Interesting how the author mentions community. Does a great software program really need a community? Can't there just be a great product without community? I assume good software will automatically attract a community, but perhaps this is not the case anymore. Maybe it is just as important to produce a great product as it is to promote it.
  • Set up webpage

    Wait for developers to create product for you

  • this is what the lindows.com community liason said (Score:5, Informative)

    by atari2600 ( 545988 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:44PM (#6808655)


    From the article


    The skinny
    by LindowsBrian on 2003.08.27 15:07 (#67071)
    User #183638 Info

    I just contacted Joe about an hour ago and explained to him our take on this article and with Linux news in general. He was nice enough to send a very prompt reply requesting that I post here, so here goes nothing.

    First of all, this article isn't FUD, as a couple of our "hardcores" seem to be claiming. I apologize for that, but I love their spunk. ;-)

    I'm actually very glad to have seen this article written as Peter, the owner of LindowsDownload.com and OpenLindows.com has been very, very helpful to us in the past and has created a great site that deserves recognition.

    To keep this fairly short and as interesting as possible, I'll just sum up some things real quick instead of waxing philisophical.

    First off, a minor correction to the article.

    1.) Lindows Plus (CNR Memberhsip) is $49.95, not $99, although it once was. Then it included commercial software as well. LindowsOS and Lindows Plus together are only $89 now.

    And to respond to a few comments here:

    We don't charge for the free software - We charge for the delivery service. For any Linux company to have a shot at making money, you almost have to go the services route. We also offer deep discounts on Commercial software that you can't legally obtain for free-as-in-beer.

    We Do give back to the community. Our largest contribution came in the way of Wine. We contributed code as well as nearly half a million dollars. For more info:

    http://www.lindows.com/contributions

    Getting back to the article, we are not in any way affiliated with LindowsDownload.com, LindowsUser.com, LindowsClub.com, or OpenLindows.com, but I do have what I consider to be a good relationship with the owner.

    We don't try to hide the fact that sites like this is exist in order to gain more revenue from CNR. If we wanted to do that, we'd simply make it impossible to use APT, and we don't - Apt is fully functional in LindowsOS and for those more technically inclined, they are more than welcome to use it instead of CNR if it meets their needs.

    Most users of other Linux Distros have different needs and different mindsets than our users. Our users want to be able to install software at an affordable price with one-click of the mouse. They don't care if it's GPLed Software, BSD-Style software, commercial software... They simply don't care. So yes, we do market differently than most Linux companies because we are different than most Linux companies - We're going after the desktop space the MS currently owns.

    I'm sure we've done some things along the way that aren't in line with most Linux companies and have upset alot of you, but I assure you we do care about the community, we give back to the community, and are currently working with some members of the Debian Community personally.

    Brian Thomason
    Lindows.com Community Liaison

    P.S. Feel free to email be at brian.thomason@lindows.com or shoot me an IM on AIM at LindowsBrian

  • I hate to point out the obvious.. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:44PM (#6808656)
    But I think the poor chap who wrote this article found openlindows just a little too early.. Its nice of him to publicise them though, its a bit of a baptism of fire unleashing slashdot upon them so early :)

    The name suggests a free version of lindows - functioning similarly. Cute but I feel sorry for the Lindows guys myself - mainly because I think they have the right idea charging for linux (to the masses, not those of us who know this type of thing) - if you know anything about marketing you will know that selling a product for free or dirt cheap price does not really equate to "trust" (and more sales) from the customers. Linux undoubtedly is currently "too good to be true" to many people who might consider the change from MS products.

  • free and alternative (Score:3, Funny)

    by zerolives ( 548841 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @04:48PM (#6808682) Homepage
    Hey! I have a free, alternative, open-source way to simulate all of the stuff in that article: smash you head in with a hammer, and then pour lemon juice on it.

  • The Lindows market. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:04PM (#6808791)
    Seems to me the Lindows market is made up of non-expert users who either sick of Microsoft's inadequacies or saw a cheap PC in Walmart.
    Such a user is unlikely to discover apt, so sites like OpenLindows are somewhat redundant.
    This does not mean I disapprove of their existence - it's nice for someone with the know-how to have the option and it's an indicator of Lindows' good faith that they keep that option open.
    Myself, I wouldn't pay to download open source packages (other than donations) so, again, if you got yourself a Lindows box the option is there.

    --
    fuzzix posting anon. because of dodgy karma issues :/

  • Even more astonishing... (Score:5, Funny)

    by jared_hanson ( 514797 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:08PM (#6808820) Homepage Journal
    I was roaming Sourceforge, and came across a curious project: Open IP PBX [sourceforge.net]. It gave rise to this suspicion that I might be able to tie my two phone lines into one system. Here is a report on what I found, and more importantly, what I didn't:

    I went to the website, and it was completely empty. It was your standard "index of" apache generated directory listing, with no files. Using my extensive knowledge of sourceforge, I found their project page [sourceforge.net]. It looks like their is not much there, in fact, they have not even released any files. There is some stuff in CVS though. I conclude that probably not many people know about this project, or they simply aren't interested.

  • clarifications (Score:4, Informative)

    by pistooli ( 702126 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:14PM (#6808866)
    :-) openlindows.com is just a hobby where is can put my own applications... lindowsdownload.com is just a small place where you can get binaries for lindows os. nothing less, nothing more... cheers - pistooli ( a long time GNU/Linux and debian user )
  • Whence did the title of this story come? I pity whomever tries to use rarely-used inquisitives in English. "Wherefore" essentially means "why" (it's actually more like "for what reason" but that's roughly "why"). Hence when Juliet asked "Wherefore art thou Romeo?" she asked (in modern parlance) "Why are you Romeo?" She was upset that he had to be born of the sworn enemies of her family. She was *not* asking where Romeo was at that moment. So the question is, what did the poster mean by "Openlindows.co
    • If you want to sound correctly psuedo-intellectual, this situation calls for whence .

      Still, as a psuedo-intellectual myself, I'd suggest sticking to "where's". (IMHO, the time to lift the restriction in formal writing on contractions has come. OTOH, acronyms still don't belong there yet. ;-) or smilies ;-) )
  • sheesh (Score:1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 27, @05:34PM (#6808573) "Wherefore" means "why," not "where." When Shakespeare wrote, "Wherefore art thou Romeo?" he was saying, "Why are you 'Romeo?'" As in, "Why did you have to be born the son of my father's enemy?" Basic literacy, you know? Score:1, Offtopic, whereas: Wherefore != Where (Score:5, Informative) by RimmerExperience (456643) on Wednesday August 27, @05:38PM (#6808603) The article points to the lack of an Open Lindows comm

  • Maybe no one uses Lindows??? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by rindeee ( 530084 ) on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:34PM (#6808991)
    After all, every machine I've seen my peers purchase from WalMart.com or Tiger gets reformatted and Windows 98 installed on it from the old CD they have lying around. For $199 it's tough to bit...and Lindows blows.

    I have purchased a few of them, installed SuSE 8.2 and made Hylafax servers out of them. Blah.

    ER

    • For $199 it's tough to bit

      Bull... You can find great $200 computers from smaller shops, that beat the crap out of what Walmart offers. Also, you save a lot of money buying from a smaller company, that only has a presence is one state... If you are in CA, and buy from a shop out-of state, you are going to save at least $15 (enough to make up for shipping costs).

      I have purchased a few of them, installed SuSE 8.2 and made Hylafax servers out of them.

      Why? Better computers can be found, easilly.

  • OpenLindows made me think of Sun's OpenWindows. Just imagine olvwm and all the various XView apps, and that menu that could be edited with a simple text editor.

    Ok, maybe not.

  • First change I would make.... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gilesjuk ( 604902 ) <giles DOT jones AT zen DOT co DOT uk> on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @05:36PM (#6809001)
    Make Lindows run as something other than root, ludicrous to run as root with Linux.

    I think this site is just a way of cutting their development costs.

    • Lindows does not run as root anymore (Score:4, Informative)

      by David Jao ( 2759 ) * <djao@dominia.org> on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @07:23PM (#6809603) Homepage
      Make Lindows run as something other than root, ludicrous to run as root with Linux.

      Let's please put this myth to rest. This is the third time this month that I have posted to correct this misimpression.

      Lindows used to run everything as root, but current versions of Lindows don't run everything as root [lwn.net] anymore. You have the option to add regular users during installation, and the installation encourages you to do so.

      Just like in redhat.

      Just like in debian.

      I'm not advocating Lindows by any means (I don't even like their product), but I do think it is important to get the facts correct.

  • Why is Linux so anti-Lindows? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @06:02PM (#6809187)
    I'm being serious here. The Linux community seems to think that mastery of the desktop is an automatic thing. Distros like Lindows, Xandros, Lycoris - these are all frowned upon for mimicing Windows. Why? Sure, in the last few years, Linux has become more of what it should be, but there is a large, untapped source of people that would be willing to use it on the desktop, but are put off by the inherent dislike Linux users seem to have for Windows users. Don't you want them to switch? Well, to tell you the truth, you seem intent on damaging your own future, like using Linux is the only way, and anyone else is stupid.

    Windows sucks. I wish I could get off of it, but I still use it on a daily basis simply because it's what I know. I've been on MS since DOS 3.3, why is it a surprise that I, just like 90% of computer users out there - am just not comfortable with a community that assumes too much?

    Linux is great, Windows sucks, tell me something I don't know, like why one distro likes my sound card and another doesn't without tweaking. Why I can print on yet another distro, but the first two can't even see my server.

    Linux has a long way to go, just like Windows does. The difference is a basic usability in Windows that is intuitive for those of us that *only know* Windows. Sure, mom can use Linux (except for her bible stuff and her preferred Mah Jong app). Sure, if I wasn't taking care of two kids, I would probably have the time to learn Linux, but right now, I - and many many others - want to make the switch but get very little help from YOU. You even attack your own "approved" list of Distros. Mandrake lovers bitch about RH. Debian lovers hate them both. Where is the love?
    • You have a really good point. I was there for a long time. I started with DOS, then Windows 3.1, made the jump to apple for a few years and then came back to Windows when W2K came out. For the last year or two I have installed and reinstalled various different version of RH and Mandrake, along with attempting to install PPCLinux (a RH distro). Each time I would be okay for a few days, and then I would find some major thing I couldn't do that I needed to... and back to Windows I went.

      When RH 9 came out, I w
    • I personally have two problems with Lindows.

      The first is that IMO they charge too much . Though I just read that they dropped the price to click-n-run to about $49 a year which is not bad.
      The biggest problem I have with them is that they by default use the root user. This is a big no-no. This is just as bad as MS and having all users in the Administrators group. Using root all the time under Linux or any Unix is the biggest brain dead move a distro could make. It opens the user to all kinds of expl
    • "Sure, mom can use Linux (except for her bible stuff and her preferred Mah Jong app)"

      GNOME 2.x Mahjongg seems quite reasonable to me, and is quite sharp looking too. It should be included in your gnome-games package, er, that is, should hopefully be in the default install.

      GnomeSword [sourceforge.net] seems to be a fair enough tool for home Bible reference and study. There is a similar Windows version [crosswire.org] which she can use before switching to help determine whether it can meet her needs.

      GnomeSword anyhow still uses GTK 1.2 (
    • As a long-time Linux user, I agree completely.

      With one caviat: You are describing the Slashdot ecology, not the Linux community in general. People come to Slashdot because they want to rant about something. For reasons I don't understand (tradition? the moderation system? Hemos?), it attracts all the hotheads in, well, just about every software community I can think of.

      The wider *NIX community is actually pretty mellow, with a few well-documented exceptions. Theo de Raadt, for instance. He's a well known

  • Trademarks (Score:2, Insightful)

    by blang ( 450736 )
    The public relations strategy of LindowsOS seems to be to play to the general/Windows trade press and to ignore the Linux press. Given that their target audience is found among Windows users rather than those already using Linux, that may be not a bad plan. So maybe my query to Schwarzman went unanswered because of that reticence. Or maybe they just didn't want to say anything that might give OpenLindows more ink. That would make sense too.

    I would imagine the silence might be more of a legal nature. I i

  • I also like the fact that... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 27, 2003 @08:04PM (#6809809)
    there is a nice copyright at the bottom of the page, and the ENTIRE site is ripped straight from oscommerce.com [oscommerce.com]

    hmm WAY TO GO...
  • I am quite sure these websites are circling around on the "Lindows Insider" forums, a lot of talk goes on there.
  • As the article mentions, Lindows appears to be selling mainly to Windows users, which is not surprising.

    What's remarkable, though, is that a site like OpenLindows seems quite weak, with no strong community and strange discussions between bewildered users and pseudo-geeks who are assumed to be Microsoft shims stirring up the mud.

    Q: "Why can't I access my second partition?"

    A: "Since ext2fs does not allow fsck, you will find that only RedHat lets you check the free space on your partitions. Note that there

Slashdot Top Deals

Real programmers don't bring brown-bag lunches. If the vending machine doesn't sell it, they don't eat it. Vending machines don't sell quiche.

Close