
Knoppix for Rapid Desktop Deployment 343
heretic108 writes "From first boot to full desktop in 20 minutes! Knoppix has shot into the spotlight as a GNU/Linux distro suitable for demonstrating quality Open Source Software, standing out for its ability to self-configure itself into a vast range of hardware, and to run entirely off a CD boot without interfering with any existing system setup. That, plus its fat catalogue of pre-installed desktop software. But OSS enthusiast David McNab has poked a bit deeper, and found that Knoppix can install itself to disk, resulting in a completely configured GNU/Linux desktop system, ready to use, in 20 minutes, hassle free. CD no longer needed! Best of both worlds - use as a GNU/Linux demo disk, and if the user likes it, it's a snap to install permanently. I can't think of any distro that comes close to this, for ease and speed of setup. I found McNab's short Knoppix Installation Howto which gives a very brief and easy guide. With this rapid setup ability, Debian-based Knoppix makes a great contribution to the catalogue."
It will never catch on (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It will never catch on (Score:2)
Re:It will never catch on (Score:2)
It's got style, personality, charm... (-: (Score:2)
Haven't had one of those for aaaaages (and always on dodgy hardware). But you've got to admit, it is a lot more exciting (and informative, even the dumbest user knows the system has a problem!) than a nicely centered F0AD:4C696C6C message.
Stop! I might damage myself! (Score:3, Funny)
Perhaps a Windows install might have succeeded. Is that damaging enough for you? (-:
wonderful, but (Score:5, Interesting)
oops (Score:2)
Re:wonderful, but (Score:5, Informative)
Re: wonderful, but (Score:4, Informative)
> Other distros do. Mandrake, Red Hat, SeSU all have superb hardware detection. Knoppix is different only in that it detects hardware on startup, which is the only way to make a CD-only, no-install distro.
FWIW, since around 7.0, Red Hat has re-detected hardware on startup, and will notice if anything has been added, removed, or changed.
I don't mess with SuSE much, but I vaguely remember that they have been doing it even longer. (Don't quote me on that part, though.)
Re: wonderful, but (Score:2)
That should answer your question.
Re: wonderful, but (Score:4, Funny)
Re:wonderful, but (Score:3, Interesting)
If it screws up, then an advanced user could probably store some files that modify it (I guess this requires that it correctly detect the disk and file system these files are on...) Ideally the files should be of the form "If you are detecting xyz, well stop because you are wrong, the hardware really is this..." and not of the form "Don't try to detect xyz because really the hardware is this..." That way if the user pulls the misdetected hardware they can reboot because it will still check for the replacement hardware.
Re:wonderful, but (Score:3, Interesting)
This is sort of the Anti-Gentoo! (Score:2)
Gentoo is neat - but if you compile it all...
I'm on day three of install and config - Single 733MHz+ 1GB RAM and a 1.5Mb net connection!
Thought I'd finally dig into this guy, 'cos I was intrigued by out-of-the-box EVMS.
Looks like my next install will be Knoppix. Just to keepa broad perspective on things!
Re:This is sort of the Anti-Gentoo! (Score:2)
Including non-free? (Score:3, Interesting)
This might be a bit off-topic, but hey, at least I'm not wasting your time with an Ask Slashdot:
Can someone point me towards a live-CD that includes Flash, RealPlayer, and the ability to play as many multimedia files as possible? OpenOffice and some kind of Gecko browser are also required.
The reason is that Windows is just not cutting it on my girlfriend's computer. She's having all sorts of weird technical problems so I've decided something needs to be done. Unfortunately, my Debian is so wacked out and constantly tweaked into a semi-usable state that she doesn't trust Linux. So what I need is something she can use for a few weeks -- still accessing her docs on her Windows partition -- until she's sold.
Uhh... (Score:2)
Did I just get trolled?
Re:Uhh... (Score:2)
It's missing Flash, RealPlayer, and Gecko. Why didn't you just recommend I install VMS? Or perhaps you didn't bother to read my post...
Re:Uhh... (Score:2)
Yeah, you're right, sorry. Galeon'd be nice, though.
Uhh... again (Score:2)
The only thing it doesn't have is Flash and Real Player because of licensing issues with those products.
Re:Uhh... again (Score:2)
And Flash and RealPlayer are vital for her. I'm going to have trouble enough convincing her to live without QuickTime...
xine now does Sorenson quicktime. xine is included in Knoppix. There's a mozilla plugin in the works.
Re:Uhh... again (Score:2)
Alas, none of those have good web integration. She needs RealPlayer for listening to online radio stations and watching movie trailers. And I think Flash is just kinda required to see the whole net nowadays.
>(and their are howtos out there that explain in detail how to roll your on Live ISO from any distro)
There are? Point me to em! I'm not finding anything definitive (eg: discusses hardware detection) in Google...
Re:Including non-free? (Score:2)
Knoppix is a livecd that autodetects and sets up most devices automatically upon boot, it includes open office, mozilla (konquorer [sp?] as well), OODLES of games, graphics programs, utilities, fun programs, and just plain "cool" things. It doesnt contain Flash nor Realplayer (at least I never got them to work), but it does play most of my multimedia content I had on my hard drive (divx, mpegs, avi, etc).
It autoconnects to internet if you have the ability to use DHCP so thats a big plus. You can access the hard drive from the desktop, open papers/etc from there...
Best thing -- it doesnt change ANY files on the harddrive! No worries about a "livecd" turning into a "pseudo installation" to run. There IS a way to put a swap file on your hard drive but its buried in menus and I wouldnt even bother with it... Knoppix runs fast, reliable, and just looks nice.
(And the desktop? You can change it of course.. but I am sure you knew that =)
Re:Including non-free? (Score:5, Funny)
Dude, there's no need to sell your girlfriend just because she uses Word.
graspee
Re:Including non-free? (Score:2)
Believe it or not, she's trying to write a *thesis* in *Word*! Crazy, I know. I'm banned from mentioning BibTeX whenever she starts complaining about citation management. And she's already wasted days thanks to proprietary formats. It's a wonder people manage to get any work done in Windows...
Re:Including non-free? QWZX (Score:2)
She works on the thesis both from home and the library. Maybe she's not paying attention when the format conversion boxes pop up but for whatever reason she's shown up at either place and realised that the latest copy is in a format that can be read at only one of the locations. As a result, she either has to merge diffs or find something else to do until she can get back to a converter.
Re:Including non-free? (Score:2)
Not to mention the type behind of 10-15 characters at that length.
you say this is perfectly acceptable from a $300 word processor? I have a bridge to sell you...
Re:Including non-free? (Score:2)
irresponsible (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, Windows sucks. If it's having that many problems, see if you can roust up a copy of Win2000 or WinXP. But if you force your girlfriend to use Linux, she will probably end up frustrated and hating it (and maybe even hating you).
Then, in a few years, when Linux is ready for the desktop (if that happens) then she won't want to try it.
If you really think Windows sucks too much for her to use, maybe you should look into getting her a Mac. Forcing nontechnical people to use Linux is not the way to win friends, or spread good feelings for the operating system.
Re:irresponsible (Score:3, Insightful)
Do you have a good metric for testing whether Linux is ready for the desktop? I'm not sure that it is, but it's got to be better than the shit she's struggling with now.
We're starving university students, therefore Macs are entirely out of the question (she's wanted a Mac ever since reading Microserfs). I doubt her aging hardware's ability to run Win2k (or else I would have already tried it) and so it's even less likely to handle XP. But really, should a new computer be required just to word process, web browse (including multimedia content), and listen to music? (Seriously, that's all she does. But for some reason WindowsME can't even do that.)
Re:irresponsible (Score:2)
The big problem is that:
a) She likes windows products: flash, real, quicktime, word
b) She is not technical
c) You can't mention a single advantage of Linux for her uses
Anyway if she really wants a Mac you may want to check out the used powermacs on Ebay. For a grand you can get a system as good as the modern iMacs that comes loaded with software.
Re:irresponsible (Score:4, Insightful)
Wha? No, wrong. My mother ain't technical and can use Linux just fine.
What you should say is do not force a non-technical person to ADMIN a Linux box. But then again, you shouldn't let a non-technical person admin any box unless you want to have to fix it every other week. I have to keep cleaning all of the games off of my Aunt's computer because she doesn't understand the concepts of "limited hard drive space" and "uninstalling stuff" no matter how short I make the words I use.
Re:irresponsible (Score:3, Informative)
Nice troll!
Linux not ready for the desktop? Have you read the article? Have you tried the cd? It's amazing what a good distro can do.
Setting up printing as is as easy as clicking through a wizard, same with changing video settings, scanners, etc, etc, etc. How the arse do you justify spreading this kind of FUD? Do you get confused because the widgets look a little differently from your win98 desktop?
In the last several months, I've given away about 20 knoppix cds directly (indirectly, by running Linux training courses for which students use Knoppix, I've given away many more). It's all down to experience. Once users get used to a slightly improved (and hence, different) way of doing things, they're all over Linux.
Re:irresponsible (Score:2)
Huh? Isn't this a bit over the top? The guy can do the install and make sure all the right apps are installed and configured. He can get the networking right. He could even install Crossover and Win4Lin (If you have to reboot Windows it might as well take 15 seconds) if necessary.
Sure, Linux may not be able to fit into every fat32 formatted American mind just yet but it is stable and it is easy to use. Aside from the install and the interoperability issues (because MS Office won't play nice) Linux makes a fine desktop. (Yea, I know Linux is quick and easy to install. It's just that Linux installs offer more choices than most. People usually don't like choices when it comes to the computer.)
"But if you force your girlfriend to use Linux, she will probably end up frustrated and hating it (and maybe even hating you)."
Wow, that's a bit harsh. Boot a CD, loose a girlfriend. If that's all it takes then she won't last long anyway. I get your point but I think it applies more to Wal~Mart PCs. Those don't come with Debian hacking boyfriends.
Re:irresponsible (Score:2, Funny)
First - Clocks
Second - China
Third - Crystal/Glass
Fourth - Appliances
Fifth - Silverware
Sixth - Candy/Iron
Seventh - Desk Sets
Eighth - Bronze/Pottery
Ninth - Linen/Lace
Tenth - A MacIntosh
I think that's a little more commitment then our buddy is looking for here. Maybe a low-end PC would be okay for a "just thinking of you (and your computer troubles)" gift, but a MacIntosh? That's at least the equivilent of an engagement ring (and costs about the same, too!)!
Re: irresponsible (Score:2)
Sometimes. I have enough trouble myself getting Linux GUI programs to work reliably. Even stuff like Open Office will sometimes open a huge window that takes over half the screen, without revealing the close widget. Or when Mplayer ignores your preferences and won't respond to clicking the radio button? Do you want to explain to your girlfriend to how to kill and restart processes on the command line? How about working out dependency conflicts?
Girls shouldn't be exposed to such mind-boggling exercises.
You need to respect the fact that not everyone ones to mess around with their computers all day. Most people want the path of least resistance between them and the task to be done. They don't want to fight with conf files, GUI apps that lack consistency and maturity, and no tech support.
If you are there for her to fix the computer all the time, then it might be okay. But realize that the crashes that come with Windows are much less of a problem for the nontechnical than wrangling with the complexities of Linux.
Also, an environment like KDE which has the look and feel of Windows, but doesn't have the full functionality, can bring expectations. When the desktop looks like Windows, but doesn't work exactly like Windows (such as cut and paste), it is very easy for people to dismiss Linux as merely a third-rate Windows impostor. Which hurts your credibility as the "trusted computer person" and unfairly hurts perception of Linux.
SuSE do (Score:3, Informative)
Some other stuff it does well - it'll store swap, config and home directory on files in the first windows harddisk with enough space it can find. That means you can in fact use it as your primary OS if you're happy with not being able to add new software and slow bootup times. You can reconfigure, write docs and so on, and it'll all be saved to disk.
Re:Including non-free? (Score:2)
Wait a sec, I need a reason to convert someone to Linux?! You must be lost: this is *Slashdot*.
But seriously, her problems are more niggling than just BSODs and I've observed them with fresh installs of 98, 98SE, and ME in the last 4 months.
Re:Including non-free? (Score:2)
There's your problem right there. Windows 2000 (and I presume XP) is much more stable than the Win9x's. (Yes WinME is a Win9x.)
Re:Including non-free? (Score:5, Funny)
If someone shot you last week, but only stabbed you this week, you don't have to thank them.
-Paul Komarek
Re:Including non-free? (Score:3, Insightful)
The commenter's original problem was that Windows kept crashing. He was looking for an alternative that his girlfriend would be happy with. No one could come up with a suitable Linux distro given his requirements, and one person suggested he buy her a Mac or just reinstall Windows and not let her install the addin crap. He said he had the problems even with fresh installs of Win98, Win98SE and WinME.
I have 7 years of professional experience with Win95, almost 3 years of professional experience with Windows 2000 and Windows NT and various experience with the other Windows versions. Windows 2000 is much more stable than what he used and fills his girlfriend's needs.
I am pro GNU/Linux, but it's not for everyone, and it's not a multimedia desktop OS for someone who doesn't want to tinker, and if you want Real Player, Flash and "the ability to play as many multimedia files as possible" (from the original question) then any distro of GNU/Linux or *BSD requires much tinkering.
Personally I think she'd be better off with a Mac. I have a serious woody for Mac OS X, but I don't run it because Apple hardware is just too darn expensive. If someone has the money to burn I'd recommend a Mac with OS X now.
By the way, Microsoft says the latest version is better because that's how they make their money. God forbid everyone finds out that Word 95 makes docuements just as well and easy as Word 2002.
In one year, you'll still say "There's your problem right there, Windows 2003 is much more stable than Windows 2000".
Not me. Windows 2000 is the best Windows I've seen so far. Screw XP. It's Win2k with DRM and eye candy.
If someone shot you last week, but only stabbed you this week, you don't have to thank them.
Cute, but show me a desktop OS that you can convince my users to use and my Fortue 500 company IT staff will support and convince the world that MS Word
I did overlook one possibility for his girlfriend's problems: It might be the hardware. It could be a flaky power supply or bad RAM, and then no OS will help his problems. In fact a true 32-bit OS would exacerbate a hardware issue.
Re:Including non-free? (Score:2)
But her machine crashes less than it did with Nt and certain combinations of service packs! Woohoo!
That last bit was sarcasm. And it might not be true.
-Paul Komarek
Re:Including non-free? (Score:2)
1) Most people happy with Windows don't care much about crashes.
2) Most people happy with GNU/Linux don't care much about installation or desktops.
I know which compromise I'd rather make. =-)
The above summary is woefully inadequate, of course. There are things like functionality, application support, customer support, performance, etc. to consider. All the same, I think the above points provide a useful contrast.
-Paul Komarek
How much? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:How much? (Score:5, Funny)
Please submit ads using the "submit story" link on the side of the page. Things to include:
* A simple way for people to bash microsoft.
* Something that can be turned into a beowulf cluster.
Re:How much? (Score:3, Funny)
Taco you TURNCOAT.
So THAT'S what that server migration a few days ago was all about...
Re:How much? (Score:2)
How much does one anonymous
Knoppix is just that good... (Score:5, Interesting)
My fiancee was volunteered to teach a class in algorithm design and c++ programming at the highschool she teaches at (for honors credit) -- the problems, though, were numerous.
She had to deal with:
1) NO funds available for purchasing of any programming utilities
2) Computer ADMIN not allowing her to install ANY programming software (borland freeware, DJGPP, etc) to disk
3) NOT allowing students to write (even temporary files) to the hard drive...
We looked at a LOT of different ways to handle these problems. Finally we decided that maybe using a linux livecd and having a disk with gcc/g++ for each student. Looked at a few different types that were mentioned on slashdot but NONE seemed to work well... until we saw a VERY old article that some user mentioned Knoppix.. went to it, d/l'ed it, burned to disk, popped it in and rebooted...
*WOW*
Knoppix comes fully loaded with office utilities, games (PLENTY of games), graphics software, but most importantly DEVELOPMENT software already on it. We were in love with it (in truth, my other box is still running it from cd just bc we liked it =) -- even more important was that it ran without the need for ANY files or ANY changes to the hard drive.
It discovered all devices hooked to my computer and actually had them working (AS WELL as the internet connection from "straight to cable modem" or "over network using ICS" setups we have at my house).
She took it to her school, popped it in, rebooted the computers (after fidgeting with bios to allow boot from cd, laugh) and QUICKLY came up with the Knoppix desktop. It certainly didnt take more than a min or so to bootup...
Most surprising thing was that for a "ran from cd" linux it was REMARKEBLY fast. Lets just say I was VERY impressed with Knoppix and recommend it for ANY new person. Without the threat of "ruining their computer," they can just pop in knoppix to try out linux... if they hate it, pop it out and its finished.
So in the end, fiancee's school didnt have to shell out money, didnt "screw up the computers" (sigh), have a setup for students to write and compile programs, and exposed students (and teachers) to Linux. I would say the entire situation was a big WIN =)
Re:No writable hard drive? (Score:5, Informative)
Read the knoppix documentation... it does not, by default, install ANYTHING to ANY hard drive.. you have the option to put a swap file ont he hard drive but you have to select it =)
Look down the page http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/index-en.html and you will see about what it does and does not do. NO installation or modifying of the hard drives are necessary -- with computers without necessary ram it will run SLOWER but it will still run.
Besides, its a worthless argument =) Their computers most definately have 128 mb ram...
Re:No writable hard drive? (Score:2, Informative)
Think again dildo. Have you ever used linux, or even knoppix for that matter? Just because there's no swap file, doesnt mean that it doesnt MOUNT the drives. It doesnt modify the hard drive but it DOES mount every volume it can. Precisely why it makes a good diagnostic tool and recovery agent. Try it some time, and see if you can read your hard drive.
-D
Re:No writable hard drive? (Score:3, Informative)
Students each have a disk that they have their source code on (they write the code to the disk). We compile onto the disk and the executable remains on the disk. Students turn in their disks (along with algorithms (ie their funny little flowcharts)) to be graded.
It was a good question... we STILL have to have a disk even though now we dont have to put the development apps on there... I say it was a very good trade. =)
Re:Floppy size and reliability (Score:2)
Knoppix, on the other hand, rocks.
Re:No writable hard drive? (Score:2)
Oh yeah, schools teach children very carefully about saving everything to floppies. Unfortunately most teachers fail to mention that you should have your work saved to more than 1 floppy! I remember ScanDisking for mere sector scraps the floppies of many a future teacher while living in residence...
Re:Knoppix is just that good... (Score:2)
1) They dont want to frigg up their systems with apps like AIM, ICQ, etc so they dont allow anything to be ran... zero tolerance for software it seems =)
2) I believe they had an incident a few years ago when they still allowed students to write to hard drives. Without going into any details, lets just say that the admin strongly believes that students should not be ablet o change the hard drive in any way.
Re:Knoppix is just that good... (Score:2)
Now the INTERNET applications it has -- huge amount of them but not the kind the school probably wants students playing with -- just gotta make sure they dont start firing up the wrong internet apps heh..
wow (Score:2)
Re:wow (Score:2)
(I would download it, but my employers' net connection this weekend is downloading the Age of Mythology demo...)
Re:wow (Score:3)
But someone smart would go to www.google.com
type knoppix, and click i feel lucky.
then click the english link on the page.
there is a list of stores selling it.
You could have also succeeded by trying cheapbytes.com first, as they sell burned copies of most linux distros, and happen to be on the page.
Knoppix==Awesome (Score:3, Interesting)
What? Your Windows 2000 server's dynamic disk has crashed, again? No problem. Insert Knoppix. Copy
No. (Score:2)
However, Knoppix does a great job of detecting all present disks and sets up the FSTAB to allow you to access any of the disk partitions. This is read-only acess by default. Knoppix creates desktop icons for each of the disk partitions. Should you need to access data on the hard disk(read-only by default) simply click the icon and Knoppix auto-mounts the partition, ext2/3, fat, fat32, NTFS, what have you.
Knoppix is awesome and WELL worth the download! Although I suspect that the mirrors are being Slashdotted right now.
Re:a RAM disk for swap space (Score:3, Informative)
one of the pleasant things about knoppix (Score:4, Informative)
Also, if you want to show someone the sheer variety of free and Free browsers available with Linux, Scribus has konqueror, mozilla, dillo, not to mention text-based ones as well.
It's an amazing distro -- demoware that really works. Anecdote: I have used Knoppix, from the CD, as my only OS for several days when using a borrowed laptop on which I could not politely do an OS swap. Except a slight slowness with the CD up-and-down-spinning, it was hard to tell I wasn't just using a recent Debian system installed normally.
timothy
knopix worked great on my laptop...... (Score:2, Interesting)
VMWare (Score:3, Interesting)
Use Linux for any "private" work you want to do, use encryption tools (ssh, tunneling, etc.) to get out your corporate firewall to a trusted machine, and then simply run your other operating system inside VMWare for doing your work.
Does Knoppix make it easy to add new things into the cd image?
Re:VMWare (Score:3, Informative)
Yes, As long as you keep inside the size limit. I removed some of the Demos on the ISO and included a brainwave relaxing program AutoZen to run on my my Girlfriend's Windows machine. Worked fine.
WmWare workstation is only 11Meg so you should be OK.
Re:VMWare (Score:2)
OT: VMware alternative (Score:3, Informative)
Plex86 [nongnu.org] touts itself as *the* free (as in speech and beer) alternative. I have not tried this either.
Connectix makes Virtual PC [connectix.com], which is not free. I have not tried it.
Re:OT: VMware alternative (Score:2)
(Allows you to tun your Mac OS 9 on top of Linux PPC -- similar to OS X's Classic environment [mac512.com]. IIUC, Plex86 would do the same for Wintel... right? Given the potential audience, I never quite understood why there isn't a Win-on-Linux. Is it that much harder?)
Which leaves the question, is there anything like knoppix for the PowerPC?
I've got to respect this.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Personally, I don't care about having 10 different editors, but I'm sure some people do. I can almost live entirely off of the redhat 8.0 personal desktop (I have other machines to compile on), save for the lack of mp3-ability out of the box (freshrpms, I love you) and dvd-ability (again, go freshrpms). But the ability to do something like this, be able to just install it on to a hard drive, type a single command for updates, no registering or anything, and continue on, is very nice.
I think this years install fest will see a lot more debian installs than it will redhat or mandrake because of this.
There's another one (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.lnx-bbc.org/ [lnx-bbc.org]
Re:There's another one (Score:2)
For a really quality experience, modify the image to boot to a win95 boot disk image with stuff like fdisk and format, and include loadlin and NTFS dos drivers on the image. You can then use it to fix just about any system. Best of all, it still fits on a credit card sized CD that I keep in my wallet.
For rapid desktop development? (Score:2)
A rapid desktop deployment for Debian system is not "news that matter", a working rapid desktop development system - a competitor to Kylix can be that news...
I can beat that. (Score:4, Interesting)
Yeah, yeah, before you mod this down, just think a sec, I'm only trying to show how ludicrous this "time to first boot" is, as a measure of an OS.
Re:I can beat that. (Score:2)
I had a kaypro 4 which ran cp/m, hardly the oldest computer around but it illustrates a point. CP/M does jack shit; It does nothing but provide a system through which other applications can be loaded. It loads fast, but who cares? It gets kicked out of memory when you load an application. It hardly does anything.
Re:I can beat that. (Score:2)
Re: Maybe a stupid idea but... (Score:2)
> Would it be possible to take a snapshot of memory just after a sucessful first time boot and just load it for "speed boots"?.
DEC was working on that for VMS over a decade ago. Don't know how it turned out, though, 'cause that's when I got out of the VMS environment.
Knoppix is kool... (Score:2, Interesting)
It's come in handy a couple of times, like when my hard drive flaked out. I talked my non-techie wife through setting up KPPP and KMail over the phone so she had internet access. (Fortunately, it was just a loose cable)
I've used DemoLinux [demolinux.org] before that, as well as the SUSE demo CD, but Knoppix is much nicer. The only feature I miss is DemoLinux's ability to anchor part of the file system to the hard drive...
All in all, a very nice distribution.
This is just what I have been looking for. (Score:5, Interesting)
One of the major reasons I was very reluctant to try Linux out (I'm a dedicated Win2K admin) was that it would require me to re-partition a disk for an ext3 filesystem.
Well, seeing as how each and every one of my drives are NTFS Dynamic Volumes, there's no chance in hell that Linux is going to be able to read (or even repartition) them, and neither will most other software. So, it's a total wipeout if I wanted to try it.
I'm downloading the ISO of this right now; I can get a chance to use Linux without *installing* Linux this way. In essence, what I've wanted for a long time.
Re:This is just what I have been looking for. (Score:2)
A strong recommendation for something that takes no time to install. Only problem I've had with it is that the destkop doesn't handle passing arguments to the kernel at boot time the right way.
It was on NZ PC World (Score:5, Interesting)
We had to cut it down to 350MB to fit the sponsor's Windows games and so forth on the CD too (thanks Eaden at Opentech) so no OpenOffice, but the reader response we got was incredible. See this [pcworld.co.nz] and search for "Knoppix" for the feedback.
Vik
Knoppix as a Christmas gift (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm planning to bundle the CD with two sheets of paper, one showing how to start and use it and explaing that it won't interfere with the ordinary function of the computer concerned and the other David McNabb's HDD install HOWTO.
Then in January I'm going to apply for a position in the marketing department of AOL, I'll have all the required skills
Include Knoppix with magazines! (Score:2, Insightful)
Impressive, but... (Score:2)
good use at school (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:good use at school (Score:2)
But:
How do you compile in Linux?
Can be very useful, but... (Score:2)
Case in point: I went away this weekend to a fairly remote part of the north Devon countryside, armed only with a Win98-powered Toshiba laptop with built-in modem (and an external modem). I hoped that I'd be able to dial up to my ISP (handy emergency ISP for those in Britain: 0845 206 6050, username totalserve, password totalserve), download the Putty ssh client and read my mail. I was expecting some maybe-important messages.
In one of the bizarre screwups that occasionally reminds me why I normally use Linux and not Windows, I could dial up and ping things but not make HTTP connections to any host. I tried to investigate but there wasn't much I could do. Definitely a software problem (like I said, DNS and pinging were fine), and hard to investigate with only vanilla Win98 tools.
Realizing this I remembered the Knoppix CD I had at home. If only I had brought it with me! So I telephoned home and spoke to my brother, asked him to find the CD ('what? you don't keep it in a case? won't it get scratched?' - no, CD cases are AFAICT superfluous) and post it to me. 'Stick it to a bit of card', I said, 'and post it to me first class'.
That was on Thursday evening and I knew that the CD could not arrive until Saturday - that's today. I thought it had failed to arrive, but it eventually got here late in the morning. Sure enough the disc was stuck on to an octogon of cut-out cardboard using a single strip of masking tape across the diameter. (That's the kind of rough yellow tape that doesn't stick on very hard.)
I eagerly peeled off the masking tape, it was a bit harder to remove than I had expected but I peeled off the tape up to the hole at the centre of the disc. Then I peeled from the centre towards the other edge - and instantly the tape ripped off and with it the silver backing of about a quarter of the CD. I'm left with just transparent plastic where the silver has peeled away. I know that CDs have insane levels of error correction, but of course it would be futile to try sticking the tape back again in roughly the same place and seeing if the CD still works. (I tried it anyway.)
Like that story where the last man on earth's glasses get smashed when he enters the library. That's the cliche that came to mind.
So the moral of the story is: Debian and Knoppix may be very stable and robust Linux distributions. But the CDs on which they are distributed are quite literally 'flaky'. Don't try sticking them on to things with tape!
Epilogue - I found that the Windows installation sensibly had the original
live test (Score:4, Interesting)
I bought the box which caused the least trouble!
Knoppix was more than helpful
Swap Space on an existing partition? (Score:2)
Why is it that swap space can't be used on an existing partition? It seems that it'd be to knoppix's advantage if it (optionally) allowed you to use an existsing FAT32/NTFS/EXT2 partition for temporary swap space while it runs.
I mean, Windows does this and look at how great it runs!
OK, I was just kidding with that last part, but I'd still like to know why this hasn't been done
Re:Swap Space on an existing partition? (Score:2)
File-based is what you are used to, and what Windows tends to use.
Linux uses partition-based. It's faster, since you don't have to deal with a filesystem, and more space-efficient, same reason. However, it does mean that it completely consumes your partition and fills it with what will look like random garbage to anything trying to access it like the partition has a filesystem.
Thus, there is technically nothing stopping you from using a windows partition as a swap partition; in fact, I once did that as a joke, on purpose. But you should be aware that you will completely and unrecoverably blow away anything residing on that partition the moment you use it. (Later I re-partitioned the disk to shrink the swap down, as using the whole Windows space as swap was too much. It was just sort of funny, the idea of Linux using Windows as a scratch space...)
Re:Swap Space on an existing partition? (Score:3, Informative)
dd if=/dev/zero of=swapfile.dat bs=1k count=x
mkswap swapfile.dat
swapon swapfile.dat
Very Impressive. (Score:2)
But like I said, I had this confused for the UT2K3 disc, so I was looking for that and couldn't find it. This is when I found out what probably most "avid" PC users experienced with Windows find out, and is probably the real #1 threat to Linux on the desktop - the fact that it's all very different, and compared to Windows, difficult. I mean, with a Mac versus Windows you of course know there are differences in things like interface and file system structure, but after some work you've got it down. The way Linux uses and organizes files befuddled me, and I can suddenly see why most people are turned off by Linux - it doesn't seem worth it to learn a whole new paradigm when the one you're most comfortable with is used by 90+% of the world and (from a business standpoint) is more profitbale anyway.
So perhaps what is needed next is a good "So you've only ever used Windows..." guide. (and if one already exists, feel free to point to it)
Every PC an Idrema! (Score:2)
I was looking for the UT2K3 Demo LiveCD from Gentoo. I fired it up and ran it on my system. VERY impressive. Runs like a dream, and more importantly, it does what what Windows has done all along - it detected and used everything I had. I was online with DHCP, it knew my video card, everything.
Maybe I'm just a 'tard who didn't think of this earlier, but what a boon for game developers! "HERE you go! Just like your PS2, dump this CD (with live Linux filesystem & game of the week) in your PC and hit the power button..." Now, a REAL reason for game developers to develop for Linux! Control of the *PC* platform - no DLLs, MSIs, or DX crap to work with - THIS is the environment that your customer gets, every PC an Idrema with a live filesystem + app on CD. On the surface, it seems like a great leap back, but it appears that the benefits outweigh the fs overhead on each CD.
What a fsking GREAT idea! (Or am I missing something? Besides hardware, I mean, this is supposed to be somewhat tolerant in that regard, anyway.) It seems to work for Gentoo and Epic Games [gentoo.org], anyway.
Re:Every PC an Idrema! (Score:3, Interesting)
The idea is not without merit, and it would solve some problems but introduce others.
To run a game this way would mean that the end user can't do anything while they're playing the game. No e-mail checking, no downloading with Kazaa, no way to quickly get back to your desktop (short of rebooting), etc. The notion of multitasking is gone. In may ways this would be like the good/bad old days of rebooting just to play DOOM.
It also means saying goodbye to DirectX. Since we already have UT2K3 and all things Quake running on Linux already it's far from impossible, but many developers don't want to kiss DirectX goodbye. While Epic and id are two companies that favor cross-platform compatibility over ease of tools, many other developers think otherwise (witness Neverwinter Nights).
Back in the pre-DirectX days the developer would have to code for every concievable piece of hardware. DirectX shifted most of this burden to the hardware makers, but to do this LiveCD route would make the developer have to do it again. Not sure how big a problem this would be nowadays (since it might not be such a big deal to just throw every driver in history onto the disc) but it might be another Big Hassle for the developers.
Finally, this means that game developers would have to either become geniuses on making bootable Linux distros in addition to games, or else get cozy with Linux distro makers. Heck, this might even cause political distro wars as to whom gets used. Plus this probably won't do anything to further Linux on the desktop (if that's your bag).
But I can see this as an interesting option to do in addition to the install and run in Windows/Linux option. Kinda reminds me of when Windows wasn't popular yet and Adobe Photoshop 1.0 (I think) came out with a Windows Runtime.
Knoppix rocks! (Score:2)
Re:Big Deal (Score:2, Interesting)
-Rusty
Re:Big Deal (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Deja-BSD - and more (Score:5, Interesting)
To be honest, it also impresses the pants off Windows users and is very likely to convert them to Open Source software. There they are used to Windows products and have been told Linux is too hard. Then along comes this CD, they insert it, boot, and a fully-fledged Linux app with OpenOffice, Mozilla, network, sound and lots of toys rises before them without them having to type or do *anything*.
That's why I put it on the NZ PC World cover disk.
Vik
Re:Mini CD Version (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Easiest Debian install??? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:initial concerns (Score:3, Informative)
Unfortunately, that's correct.
It will allow you to save some of your settings to floppy. For example, I can save my network settings. However, I have to run the network setup tool (under the Knoppix menu) to get them to work.
I think so, although you can ckeck Knoppix forum [linuxtag.org] for a definitive answer. The people have been quite helpful there.