DebianEdu Announced 63
Bill Kendrick writes "There's been an announcement on debian-devel-announce about a new subproject, DebianEdu, which "aims to make Debian the best distribution available for educational use." As a developer with some stuff in Debian Jr., I'm happy to see some focus on an honest-to-goodness education project!"
Nice! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:We aren't getting the whle story (Score:1)
It's about time (Score:5, Insightful)
Everyone I knew had a Turbo compiler. Microsoft lost major ground. And, since the students were most comfortable with Boreland, that was, of course, what they recommended to their future employeers.
But, for some reason, companies have recently been neglecting the educational market. Kudos to Debian for re-starting the trend.
Re:It's about time (Score:2, Informative)
Debian isn't exactly the first.
kde have had a educational thread for ages, with libraries etc.
Re:It's about time (Score:3, Insightful)
Kudos to Debian for re-starting the trend.
Dude!
Redhat has been doing ed stuff for a long time. They even have a K-12 [redhat.com] program. Here at our university we went to Redhat several years ago. We get good support and have been happy. Debian is a bit too late. They will have to be extremely aggressive if they would want folks like us to switch over.
Re:It's about time (Score:4, Insightful)
Debian, aggressive?
ROTFL
Debian GNU/Linux got to be the one true distro (TM), and the most popular with admins, simply by being the best :-)
;-)
That's the only strategy Debian has ever had (backed up, of course, by its social contract [debian.org] and the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) [debian.org]) - and that seems to have worked just fine
In all seriousness, it's great that Debian are doing this - and great that Red Hat do something similar. When every child has access to a Free *nix at school (or even access to a school - never mind a computer) will be the time to start bickering about which GNU/Linux distro has the biggest dick in the edu world ;-)
- Derwen
Re:It's about time (Score:2)
In the September edition of Linux Pro - the mini-magazine that comes with Linux Format [linuxformat.co.uk] - The Positive Internet Company [positive-internet.co.uk] have a two page advertorial singing the praises of Debian GNU/Linux, and all that it has done for their company, and their customers.
Random example 2:
The 2 tera flop 512 node SDU Supercluster [dcsc.sdu.dk] at Syddansk Universitet, in Denmark.
- Derwen
Re:It's about time (Score:2)
Debian is a non-profit entity. It wouldn't matter to them if you switched or not, except maybe on a technical level.
And who said Opensource lacked leadership? (Score:1)
Re:Was it so hard? (Score:3, Insightful)
The problem is that Debian isn't intended for the person who is replacing windows, but as a tool for the admin who needs to setup a server every few days and who knows exactly what he / she wants and what they are doing. Apt is a powerful way to remotely install software over a shell, without having to be present at the machine to search for FTP sites, etc. And it can keep you *reasonably* up-to-date with security patches.
Yes, that doesn't preclude having an easy installer... and by all accounts they should work on that. But if they have limited funding (which they do), they should use it in the way that is best for the people who use their system every day. They should keep their software updated, they should work on auto-detect routines, and they need less babysitting in the apt and installer procedures. They also could use a simple way of handling kernel modules. Debian is not about being 3133t, it's about doing your job as an admin as well as you can without having to be on site. If you know exactly how to use it, it's great. And if you kind of know what you are doing, Woody is great too.
And if you haven't touched Linux before, there is no reason not to instal Mandrake or Red Hat. I know a lot of sysadmins who put Mandrake on their desktops because it is just bloody easy. Why waste the time if you aren't going to use Apt? And why not with Mandrake's new Apt-clone?
-Chris
P.S. There is only one excuse for Gentoo: it is a very young distro. It is not intended for you, it is not intended for me. It is intended to show that software and computers can be faster if people take advantage of open sources and compile all of their software for their chosen platform. It is a proof-of-concept. At some point, it will probably be easy enough for anyone to use, or the concepts behind it will be integrated into other distros. In the meantime, not all distros are intended for you or me. Some of them don't fit our needs. I'm impressed when someone can install Gentoo, or for that matter linux from scratch, but there is no reason for me to want to.
Re:Was it so hard? (Score:1)
SOOOOO if you want some help just ask I'll be happy to offer a nickels worth of free advice when I can, and I'm sure other will too.
Mandrake all over again? (Score:2, Interesting)
"GD: For one year, we had a so-called "World Class Management" team that left us in a very bad financial situation, and engaged the company in ventures (such as e-learning) that we should never have been involved with. But that's all part of our history now, so I'd prefer to not dwell too much on that. "
I wonder if this is the kind of project he was talking about and if Debian have taken on board the Mandrake experiance.
Re:Mandrake all over again? (Score:3, Insightful)
That's not to disparage the community of Mandrake users and developers, but Mandrake as a company have to do things that make money. A sub-project of Debian will succeed or fail depending only on the level of enthusiasm and interest in it.
Re:Mandrake all over again? (Score:1)
If some one in the same business as you gets it wrong, whether they are commercial or open source, its a good idea to make sure you dont do the same thing.
If this project gets off the ground and then stalls because it was badly thought out or under resourced, then it will make Debian generally look bad to those outside the community. Look at Mandrakes experiance, learn from it and avoid their mistakes. They may not cost Debian money, but they could still do harm if they are repeated.
Security (Score:2, Funny)
good stuff (Score:2, Informative)
What *kind* of education use? (Score:2, Insightful)
'Education' can mean so many different things... I don't mean this as a troll, but I hope they realise that mere mortals can not use Debian as it is. It'll have to be made alot easier before it can be used in non-techy educational environments. Maybe something like http://www.bluelinux.org [bluelinux.org].
Need to outperform closed source options (Score:5, Informative)
As commercial vendors tend to provide schools and universities with cheap or free licenses for educational uses - to make the students familiar with their products so that they would buy them when they finally graduate and enter work-life. So, am I terribly wrong if I assume that there is not the cost benefit or atleast it is not very significant?
Re:Need to outperform closed source options (Score:2)
You are right to assume that cost is not significant, as the 'market' is skewed by all sorts of factors (special site licences, donations tying hardware to software, support deals, education authority incompetence, overworked and poorly-trained teachers , etc).
The real strength of Free Software in education is - Freedom to share, study, understand, modify and improve the code matters everywhere, but it counts double in education, which is based on foundations of openness, experiment and passing on of knowledge.
- Derwen
Re:Need to outperform closed source options (Score:2)
As commercial vendors tend to provide schools and universities with cheap or free licenses for educational uses - to make the students familiar with their products so that they would buy them when they finally graduate and enter work-life. So, am I terribly wrong if I assume that there is not the cost benefit or atleast it is not very significant?
When pitting Free Software against commercial counterparts, it only makes sense to go for the commercial counterpart if the difference in functionality between the Free Software and the commercial software is worth at least the cost of the commercial software.
At my school, Microsoft Office is available to students for $65. Thus, for it to make sense for students to buy Microsoft Office rather than use OpenOffice, there must be some aspects of Microsoft Office that OpenOffice lacks which are worth at least $65 to the students. It turns out that frequently, the polished spelling and grammer checking, the 100% compatibility with MS Office files, or simply brand name recognition alone is worth $65 to most students.
However, buying something like Microsot Office under an educational license is somewhat short-sighted. For example, if a student is married, then that student's spouse (who isn't a student) is not supposed to use the software, according to the terms of the EULA. In addition, when you leave school, you can no longer use the software. If you want access to all your data, you must purchase the full retail version of MS Office, since educational versions are not elligible for upgrade prices.
Plus, you lock yourself into the ``Perpetual Upgrade Cycle.'' Your lifelong costs for using that software will long exceed the up-front cost while you're in school. When you look at it in these terms, it just doesn't make sense to purchase commercial software in most cases while you are in school.
teach linux (Score:1)
The big problem Debian is going to have to cope with is convincing the educational system to start making a switch to Linux.
Good luck guys!
A Little Late (Score:4, Informative)
Re:A Little Late (Score:1)
RPM at current doesn't even come close... you ever tried to install over 5-10 packages? RPM doesn't upgrade easily at all... Redhat has made some nice tools, but it is slower a 12th grader waking up for school....
And to mention the whole
Re:A Little Late (Score:2)
Re:A Little Late (Score:1)
Re:A Little Late (Score:2)
> I'm happy to see some focus on an honest-to-goodness education project!
There's at least 2 other Education oriented distributions already.
To clarify - good to see some focus in Debian
Thanks for the links, though (BTW, I learned about DebianEDU from Seul)
yeah that's just what they need. (Score:1)
Perhaps some good will come of it, maybe some
Re:yeah that's just what they need. (Score:2)
- Derwen
logo, oregon trail (Score:2)
Logo? Squeak!
Oregon Trail? I dunno. Are there any reasonably complete, complex-scenario text simulation / adventures with a learning slant (not just nethack) like this ready for kids / teachers to apt-get?
There are a lot of other things I'd like to see of course, but those two came to mind first.
timothy
Re:logo, oregon trail (Score:2)
apt-get install ucblogo
ucblogo looks just as awful as what I remember using
But LOGO is a great way for children to learn a different kind of abstraction: command/effect.
(and I say 'command', not 'click' !
I remember programming a turtle on acid, with the 'random' function !
Re:logo, oregon trail (Score:2)
I also liked to name my people after diseases:
Measles has typhoid.
Typhoid has typhoid.
Snakebite has dysentery.
K12 (Score:2, Informative)
Great! FDL the Course Material! (Score:1)
Free Software for Schools is the way of the future. It is a good business model for that purpose. Payback in 20 years, like all good or bad things in Education.
I also think it would be useful for teachers to FDL their Materials. No need for all the teachers to reinvent all the materials.
How are the installations (Score:2)
I for one would develop a graphical installer for these projects and leave the text based one for the regular distro of debian.
Awesome! (Score:1)
It's great that they have these educational distributions. The only condition that we'd need, really: being able to get a good compiler for java, c++ and a good graphics library. Any suggestions as to which distro to get, or compiler/lib? Thanks
Thailand also have SchoolNet Internet Server (Score:1)