SuSE 8.0 Now Shipping 298
MobyTurbo writes "Well, it's technically a day late, but SuSE Linux 8.0 is now shipping. The increase from 7.3 to 8.0 is due to the inclusion of KDE 3.0, a SuSE-modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM), an improved firewall, among other packages that have been upgraded or added. (Including a couple of new games. :-) )"
Eeezzzzy (Score:2, Interesting)
Suse is great (Score:1)
Re:Suse is great (Score:2, Insightful)
in 2 weeks... (Score:1)
I tried SuSe before, and it was really cool, but it's gonna have a hardtime beating debian as my desktop OS of choice.
it's determinate on whether or not they have the ISO's available... if they don't, they're losing out on me as a user. probably alot of others as well.
and yes, I do plan on buying the distro I decide on.
Re:in 2 weeks... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:in 2 weeks... (Score:1)
IMveryHO distro's like SuSE, Mandrake and Redhat (although I've never used recent versions of the latter two) will be what will open the mainstream (home computing) market a little more. Just because they are little easier to install and, after that easy installation, look a lot flashier than something like Debian, which requires a lot more work to look fancy.
Re:in 2 weeks... (Score:1)
Re:in 2 weeks... (Score:2)
Re:in 2 weeks... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:in 2 weeks... (Score:2)
In the past, SuSE hasn't provided distros - you have a folder with 7 CD-Roms and a DVD. All the packages are online, however, and a ftp or "download 'em and install" is possible, however, you then say...
I tried SuSe before, and it was really cool, but it's gonna have a hardtime beating debian as my desktop OS of choice.
You can apt-get it. No, really. Although I don't know how much of a stub of a SuSE install you need (and I *seriously* doubt you can go from debian to SuSE without much anguish). Technically, apt-get is for upgrades, and the repository base, or whatever you call it is on ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/, and you need apt4rpm at http://apt4rpm.sourceforge.net/. 7.3 and 8.0 are unofficially supported, but are reputed to work find, and that's an offical SuSE mirror site as well.
--
Evan
Re:in 2 weeks... (Score:2, Informative)
They do have an eval CD that is an ISO though.
Re:in 2 weeks... (Score:2, Funny)
You really ought to get DSL or something if it takes that long
I was wondering... (Score:1)
Lycoris... (Score:2, Interesting)
Any affiliation with MS? Just wondering, cause I saw this at the bottom:
Lycoris and Desktop/LX are Trademarks of Redmond Linux Corp. © 2001, 2002 Lycoris All Rights Reserved
Re:Lycoris... (Score:4, Interesting)
I have an order in for Lycoris Desktop Developer edition, (Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!) and I will probably comment on my experiences with the distro in my column at Low End PC as soon as I get some time with it.
I think it's hilarious that these guys are based in Redmond. I don't think that MS is quaking in their boots just yet, but if this is what the Lycoris site claims, they might have reason to in the future.
Oh yeah, just so I correct a mistake I made about this distro in the past...it is based on Caldera, not Corel/Debian.
First distro? (Score:2)
Re:First distro? (Score:1)
At least not according to Suse themselves. http://www.suse.com/us/products/suse_linux/i386/kd e3.html
First distro with KDE3? Nope. (Score:2, Informative)
If you take the word "shipping" literally, maybe.
But I've been using KDE3 for a while on my laptop, running Gentoo 1.1 [gentoo.org], which, btw, is the best distro I've ever tried.
rmstar
Can't update online to it yet. (Score:1)
Great! (Score:1)
new games???
great! well worth the download!
and I spose including KDE 3.0 is a plus point too...
RedHat (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:RedHat (Score:1)
Red Hat's major numbering actually makes sense (Score:1)
nic
Re:RedHat (Score:2, Informative)
Small changes - and I don't see a KDE 3.0 as such a BiG change to justify a major version increment for the whole distro.
Appearantly, they focused their efforts lately on 8.0 polishing, hence I feel it's better than 7.3. After all, the new kernel is worth the upgrade for my taste (that is if you don't go for Red Hat).
KDE 3.0 is as stable as the old version (ahem). And the installation speed is said to have improved (according to SuSE's advertisments). The latter I don't know much about, because I had to go for a coffee, and a snack and make some telefon calls until the installer gave me the obligatory error messages about some packages which I had to reinstall later by hand etc. (I mean after having tried the whole game 3 times in vain, with deinstalling and reinstalling via the cludgy YAST installer.
I should've stayed with Red Hat, but that could as well be my illusion, that the grass on the other side of my reality-fence is allways greener.
After one month (and 4 servers) experience I'd say:
You can use it, but you mustn't. If you allready have a SuSE, it's OK to upgrade. Especially if your servers are in Europe, the support for local ISDN and DSL services and hardware is probably (or should I say slightly) better than from US distros.
Acceptable.
Re:RedHat (Score:2)
Reviews... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Reviews... (Score:2, Interesting)
Like Red Hat, SuSE releases their own patched version of the Linux kernel which have always been extremely fast and reliable (in my experience) and their installation is easy. The other nice thing is the setup tool, Yast2, it's the best integrated setup/control center tool I've seen yet.
The nice thing about SuSE is that everything just works. SuSE offers upgrades to KDE and GNOME that can be downloaded and installed automatically with Yast Online Update on the same day that KDE and GNOME annouce their new releases. They are definitely on top of things. Also, Yast can be used to configure just about every aspect of the system, no need whatsoever to edit config files.
Another nice thing about SuSE is that it's Oracle certified. SuSE offers a nice rpm that sets the system up for installing and running Oracle, making installation as simple as on Windows (at least for 9i).
I've tried Red Hat, Mandrake, SuSE and debian and I am happiest by far with SuSE. It has easier config tools than Mandrake, the speed and reliability of Red Hat, and the advantage that it is commercially supported by many companies, meaning that if a product claims it will run on linux, it WILL run on SuSE Linux. :-)
Re:Reviews... (Score:2)
Do you upgrade your existing system (with the upgrade option) or back up your data and install fresh every time?
I am curious, because the last time I tried someone's "update" feature to upgrade my system (1997, Redhat 4.0) it made a mess. Since then, I have been backing up and installing fresh every time.
I currently run SuSE 7.2 and would like to move to 8.0 - so my question is, have you found SuSE's update to be clean, or should I continue to back up and install fresh?
Sun's Grid Engine comes with SuSE 8.0 (Score:4, Informative)
Already in store (Score:1)
Get the Whole Load (Score:2)
I'm running SuSE 7.3 and have bought their distros since 6.1.
I really like the way that SuSE comes with so many applications that you can install. With large disks, there's little reason to be without any of the many open source applications out there.
Yes, once in a while you can see the European origins of this distribution, like in the A4 bias for default paper sizes, but generally they're pretty good about providing "en" language users a good interface.
Re:Get the Whole Load (Score:2)
Metric paper is used in most of the world. There is also a simple mathematical relationship with A size paper, especially useful if you want to directly print booklets or to resize to a different paper size.
There is an "en_US" locale, does that have something like "US_Letter" as the default paper size?
Re:Get the Whole Load (Score:2)
That sounds like an outdated currency to me, kind of like shillings, farthings, and halfpennies!
Living in the US, saddled as we are with the onerous legacy of what used to be the British system of measurements (miles, feet, gallons, pints, pounds, furlongs per fortnight, other nondecimal abominations), I think it is only fitting and fair that the UK be dragged kicking and screaming into using the new &euro and giving up the dear £.
Re:Get the Whole Load (Score:2)
You do realise that what are called "English" measurments in the US are actually somewhat unique to the US? Some of them, such as the inch (25.4 mm) are actually defined in terms of metric measurments. Until 60 years ago the English (US) and Imperial (used in the British empire and later commonwealth) were actually different. Measuments of volume are different between the two systems.
Re:Get the Whole Load (Score:2)
Re:Get the Whole Load metrically (Score:2)
Assuming the the "we" equates to the US it's probably to do with the US like to doing things differently from the rest of the planet. An extreme case of NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.
The US did actually sign the "Treaty of the metre", but since when did the US signing a treaty actually mean anything
SuSE 8.0 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:3, Informative)
gee, I better uninstall those Redhat security updates, apparently they're not aware that they were supposed to be charging me for them. Thanks for spreading misinformation.
Red Hat update *IS* free (Score:3, Informative)
So what you're paying for is to be able to manage all your computers through one interface. SuSE's YOU last time I tried it (7.3) works like Ximian's Red Carpet, or Microsoft's Windows Update, in that all the work is done on the client's side.
Michel
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2, Informative)
AFAIK all Linux distros offer free security updates. And even not security related updates. Including RedHat.
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2)
I'm really looking forward to when Red Hat finally moves to LSB compliance. Maybe then we'll be able to take almost any RPM, be it Red Hat, SuSE or Conectiva, and install it on any linux distribution without worrying too much about wierd issues.
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2, Informative)
# Choose from among XFS, ext2, ext3, reiserfs, and others during install
Nope, Mandrake's the same.
# choose to encrypt your filesystem
Mmm, same.
# free security updates, unlike RedHat
Wrong.
# improved YaST2, the ultamite in system configuration utilities, let's you configure everything from a DHCP server to CUPS
Just what we need, and also covered (badly) by webmin/linuxconf on other distros.
# YaST Online Update, for automatic upgrading of your RPMs
Same as mandrake.
I've yet to see anything major to swing me. I'm far too used to the old tools (chkconfig, ifconfig) and the like that it doesn't make much difference which distro I use, linux or otherwise. That's one of the main reasons I'm against pushing things like YaST2 too hard, or people will simply turn linux into open source M$.
jh
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2)
One point with SuSE is that you get a very large amount of software supplied as standard in the box set. Where people do not have a high bandwidth Internet connection this can be desirable.
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2)
Also any kind of "wizard" type interface which attempts to enable someone to perform a complex task, which they do not understand, means that when it fails that person is left completly at a loss. Such an interface (or even a set of step by step instructions) cannot possibly cover every way in which things can go wrong.)
Combined with those who do understand what is going on having to work around silly assumptions. e.g. insisting on installing modem and ISDN utilities on a machine which only has a NIC.
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2, Interesting)
chess
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2, Informative)
Red Hat updates are free. It's called up2date, and the registration through Red Hat Network costs nothing for a single user.
And it's not just the updates, you can install new packages through up2date. Up2date will download and install the necessary dependancies automatically as well, again at no cost for a single user.
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:4, Informative)
>As a result, the users are now forced to use YaST 2,
>which depends on Qt.
NOT TRUE. yast2 has several frontends, you can use it with a curses interface.
Also, why anyone would use SuSE and be opposed to QT libs is indeed quite strange. No rational decision obviously.
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2)
Yes, I know. This was already the case with SuSE 7.3. But in 7.3, several YaST2 packages (modules) had a depency on Qt, so installing YaST2 also meant that I would have been forced to install Qt, which is something that I wanted to avoid. Maybe this dependency has been removed in 8.0, so that I can still install my system without the Qt libraries. I have the SuSE 8.0 CDs and DVD now, so I will check that soon.
As I wrote in my previous comment, this is a personal choice. But there are some rational reasons for that: some of the machines on which I run Linux are rather old and have a rather slow CPU and not much disk space. Avoiding Qt makes sense on these machines. Also, some machines are used for cross-platform application development. Avoiding the installation of Qt is the best way to ensure that nothing that we develop will have some accidental dependencies on Qt (because there are still some licensing problems when developing Qt applications for Windows).
Even if I do not want to install the Qt libraries, there are some good reasons to use SuSE: it has a very good installation process, it comes with tons of applications pre-packaged, it has a good support for internationalization and the filesystem encryption is included in the default kernel. The last point is important for me because at work we use Linux on several laptops. If a laptop is stolen, then we loose one machine but at least we can be reasonably sure that no thief will be able to find some confidential data on the computer.
Re:SuSE 8.0 (Score:2)
Got it! (Score:1)
I'm especially keen on seeing how they added Sun Gridware to the distro.
The 8.0 has me a bit puzzled: they still compiled everything with gcc 2.95.3.
Other cool stuff in 8.0... (Score:3, Informative)
Sun's grid engine software
Star Office 5.2 and Open Office 641c
Updated YaST2 and much improved YaST2 console mode
X 4.2
Alsa 0.9
One of the best firewall scripts anywhere
Fairly major changes in how admin settings are saved, with a lot of stuff moving out of
It is polished and solid, and as always, stuffed with so much software, you could not absorb it all in several years. The upside is that almost everything you might want is in there already. SuSE may not be perfect, but they contribute huge chunks of code to the kernel, KDE, Alsa, Xfree, and NIS projects and that's good for everyone.
Some updates to KDE3 and other packages are already posted to their ftp site, so fire up the YaST Online Update right after the install to get the new goodies.
x86 only? (Score:2, Interesting)
chris
.sig : bad command or file name
Re:x86 only? (Score:2, Informative)
They also claim that dropping 32-bit sparc support is probable....though I certainly hope not.
Re:x86 only? (Score:2)
Re:x86 only? (Score:2)
Yummy (Score:2)
Re:Yummy (Score:2)
Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... (Score:2, Interesting)
Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?
Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... (Score:2, Interesting)
Source: The SuSE 8.0 Professional box on my desk.
Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... (Score:2, Interesting)
Too bad that they were unable to strike a deal like Mandrake did with Sun. SO 6.0 would be a very good addition to KDE 3.0 and stuff.
Odd thing is that SuSe usually has a very good connections to other companies (read: SuSe Linux Database Server = IBM DB2 UDB + distro, SuSe Groupware Server = Lotus Domino + distro, SuSe Certified Oracle 9i
bb4now,
PMC
Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... (Score:2)
Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... (Score:2)
Why aren't any distros including OpenOffice?
The three CDs freely downloadable version of Mandrake 8.2 includes OpenOffice.org office suite. Default fonts look butt-ugly though. As the downmodded anonymous coward said, it's version 641. Suite contains:
Equivalent parts for KOffice are included too. A MS word document I tried opened fine in OpenOffice.org Writer but didn't look quite right with KWord.
Re:Mandrake 8.2 also shipping... (Score:2)
Does SuSE 8.0 include StarOffice 6.0 as well?
According to another poster on here [slashdot.org], it comes with StarOffice 5.2.
Version numbers (Score:2, Interesting)
Maybe companies should be forced to number their distros based on the average version number of the packages within; that'd cause an interesting non-linear numbering scheme.
jh
Linux math. (Score:5, Funny)
> The increase from 7.3 to 8.0 is due to the inclusion of KDE 3.0, a SuSE-modified kernel version 2.4.18...among other packages that have been upgraded or added.
7.3 + 3.0 + 2.4.18 = 8.0 ???
Maybe some of those other packages had negative version numbers.
Re:Linux math. (Score:2)
Re:Linux math. (Score:2)
Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! (Score:5, Informative)
See subject - SuSE 8.0 has been shipping for a while, I've been seeing comments about it in german and swiss newsgroups. These comments range from rather critical to absolutely enthusiastic.
Unfortunately, it's been "in" for a while to bash the "Windows from Nürnberg". IMHO SuSE is very easy to setup for newbies and gurus alike (no time to waste on configuring stuff, leaving time for tinkering on the non-obvious things) and gives you all the power of linux in a nice package.
Can't wait to get my hands on this new version, the features list is quite impressive. I'll get around to it this weekend, probably...
(using SuSE, Debian, RedHat, IPCop, ... on x86,
UltraSparc, Alpha)
Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! (Score:4, Interesting)
Amen - I want to develop the software I get paid for or I want to play with, and I want to have my servers working rock solid without devoting myself 24/7 to them. SuSE offers a very solid base, incredibly logically laid out system, very stable releases (I'm even trusting the x,0 release here), and not only fast security updates, but software version updates for quite a bit of software, even for releases several minor version old.
It allows me to get my work done, and provides a nice CLI, GUI and "install and ignore" server experience. Plus, if you're doing enterprise work, check out their more powerful packages (the ones that start at $1000 and move on up). They provide the packages for IBM's enterprise applications, not to mention the Linux for IBM's big iron. Simply having a team that can provide the necessary QA and support to big customers makes me feel confidant as a minor customer of theirs.
--
Evan
Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! (Score:2)
There have been 'beta' releases redily available, but the release is very recent.
Re:Been Shipping for a couple of weeks already! (Score:2, Informative)
No, as a matter of fact it hasn't been shipping for weeks.
There have been 'beta' releases redily available, but the release is very recent.
I am aware of the betas, and _yes_ the _official_ release _has_ been out for a while. True, not everywhere at the same time, but my first notice that it was out was from a _MediaMarkt_ in Switzerland, of all places... been out _at least_ for 1 1/2 weeks. And no, it hasn't arrived yet at the place where I usually pick it up, so the distribution definitely isn't uniform around Europe.
Already in shops here in .de (Score:3, Informative)
Just one comment: Installation went flawlessly on the Gericom Webgine 1630 Notebook. All of the hardware (expect AMR Modem) automatically recognized and initialized
bb4now,
PMC
RedHat to Suse (Score:3, Interesting)
I was hoping to wait for RH7.3, but perhaps this is a better option.
My real question is how hard will I have to work to move accross all my configs? There's samba/printers/sendmail/etc/etc. Anyone know of a good way of doing RH->Suse without any pain?
Using it since 14 days / kernel problems (Score:5, Informative)
Inquiring Minds Want to Know (Score:3, Interesting)
Thing is, I could never get these parameters set exactly right. It was always tempting to bypass this procedure and configure the system the old-fashioned way.
So here's my question: does SuSE still do things this way? And if so, do people really use these parameters, or do they just blow it off and edit the scripts?
They don't do it any more (Score:4, Informative)
Re:They don't do it any more (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Inquiring Minds Want to Know (Score:2)
Came on time for most people, for others it was ea (Score:2)
StarTux
Re:Came on time for most people, for others it was (Score:2)
StarTux
Another couple of reasons its version 8.0 (Score:2)
Also noticed a SuSe hardware boot time hardware detection utility, similer to that of Redhat's.
Gnome 1.4.1 is included too.
Promise IDE Raid controllers are fully supported.
Re:Another couple of reasons its version 8.0 (Score:2)
"The hard disk controller manufactured by Promise is currently found on high-end motherboards in numerous computer models, either as a [pure IDE controller (for UDMA 100) or as an IDE-RAID controller. As of SuSE Linux 8.0, these controllers are directly supported by the kernel and treated as a standard controller for IDE hard disks. The additonal kernel module pdcraid is reuired before you can acquire RAID functionality".
Guess there is you answer
StarTux
About the Update from 7.3 to 8.0 (Score:3, Informative)
like a Mercedes-Benz (not always good) (Score:3, Insightful)
I would say this is correct, but not necessary in a good way.
Like the car, It works very well when new, but anyone who tries to tweak of modify anything is liable to break it.
I have concluded that this would probably make a good distro for my Dad, who just wants a reliable set-up, and won't try to install the latest hot thing of the net, but for myself, I intend to switch to a more hacker friendly distro, probably Debian.
SuSE is a really good server platform (Score:3, Interesting)
SuSE is really good for those of us that are starting because it comes with a NICELY documented book(s) explaining a lot of the basics and the medium difficulty stuff.
They also usually have a tech in their IRC room who will answer questions for you.
In the end I really like SuSE. It's done everything I've required and more. I usually use it as a server without a graphical front end, but even on my two workstations with the graphics, it installed nicely and didn't require me to know more than I need to know to use the systems. And one of them was a laptop.
Two thumbs up!
Shipping or Available for DL? (Score:2, Insightful)
I've always had a bit of a pain downloading 7.3 and it'd be great if they included some
ISO availability (Score:2, Informative)
SuSE was my first experience with linux (i actually purchased it), and I would like to give it another shot, but there is no way I am going out to drop cash on the whole package without trying it. I would be delighted if they even released a minimal base install ISO for download, and I'm sure many other people would agree. If I could try out a base install of the new system I would gladly go out and buy all of the additional CD's for a complete system. Unfortunately this isn't the case.
modified kernel version 2.4.18 (with Andre's VM) (Score:2)
Ok, whats modified? Wheres the changelog? Is Andre's VM not included in 2.4.18?
Currently I am using 2.4.19-pre7 with preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre7-1.patch. Im very happy, stable as hell, smooth desktop now. Really would like to know what Suse has modified.
Re:8.0 should have 2.5 (Score:1)
Re:8.0 should have 2.5 (Score:1)
atleast while kernel.org is calling it a beta kernel
Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra (Score:2, Funny)
The basic differences are:
Suse is by fat, sausage scoffing crauts.
Mandrake is by irritating, garlic loving frogs.
Red Hat is by noisy, burger munching Yankees.
Take your pick.
Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra (Score:2, Funny)
Still I'm not sure if that's worse or better than frogs, wops or dagoes (French, Italian and Spanish respectively, but not respectfully).
Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra (Score:2)
Actually I regret posting this now. I have a lot of respect for the Germans and the Americans.
Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra (Score:2)
Nope, Red Hat is by barbeque-munchin', Confederate flag-wavin', NASCAR-lovin' rednecks.
You got the noisy part right tho :).
Re:What are the advantages of Suse over RH, Mandra (Score:2)
Re:A lot of changes... (Score:2)
Re:A lot of changes... (Score:2)
Re:A lot of changes... (Score:2)
YAST has gone, just YAST2 is left (as text and as X version). BTW: The text version is awfull to use
And gone am I as a SuSE user.
YAST1 had that KISS touch that YAST2 has not.
Re:Kernel (Score:2)
A couple of problems? (Score:2)
Repeat after me. dot-zero releases are buggy Linux distros. The basic attitude (and perhaps justifiable) is that these releases are showcase distributions and the
I remember 7.0 which handily would have metadata corruption with Raiserfs-- fixed in 7.1.
Don't even get me started on Red Hat's or Conectiva's
I will personally wait until 8.1 before upgrading.
I only use dot-zero releases when I have little other choice.