Linux on a Floppy: Intro to Mini Linux Distros 189
GonzoJohn writes: "If you've ever been stuck on the freeway with a flat tire and no jack, you know what it's like to have a Linux system crash and not have a boot disk. And although nearly every Linux distribution company asks you make a boot/recovery floppy when you install Linux for the first time, many users skip this important step. Out of the boot/recovery disk concept was born the Mini-Linux distribution." Read this article on Linux Orbit, with a brief intro to some of the mini-distros available.
Gateways (Score:2, Interesting)
Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2, Insightful)
*MY* development box consists of a floppy with the following:
1) io.sys
2) msdos.sys
3) 4dos.com (renamed command.com)
4) turboc 3.0 (with the IDE)
5) Nasm
6) symdeb
Ofcourse, I have a dedicated mp3 box, another with all sorts of "visual"
development crap, and yet another one running all the Unix desktop rivals out
there.
But I use my DOS box for meditation. Small is beautiful, small is good for
you. I know the exact size of occupied diskspace, and I am proud to say that
I can account for every byte of memory. How often do you do a memory grep to
search for in-core strings? I do that on a daily basis, and it is very reassuring.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:4, Funny)
You know there's help for people with OCD [ocdonline.com]
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2, Insightful)
The last time I actually personally _needed_ to use a floppy disk was installing Debian on a 486 with no cdrom. For older machines, you can' t beat the 3 disk net install. This, however, is 2002. We have cheap burners, media that costs no more, if not less than floppy disks, and BIOS's that boot from CD as a standard feature.
Why has the floppy survived this long? I work at a helpdesk position at my University between classes for extra cash...I've seen firsthand the horrors of the fragility of this ancient storage media. Ever lost your thesis due to lost clusters, bad sectors, etc? (But it worked at home this morning...)
Please: Consider abandoning the floppy!
-Ben
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
It is still not common to find a motherboard with a BIOS that will boot from a SCSI CDROM. That is why I still need a floppy drive from time to time. Am I just choosing the wrong motherboards? Or are you just talking about IDE CDROM drives? (IDE? How vulgar!)
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
Well you can. It's a standard 3.5 bay you could mount a harddisk in that.
not every computer has a CD (Score:1, Informative)
Re:not every computer has a CD (Score:2, Informative)
No Floppy drives are a wast eof space on every computer.
You can easly slip in a laptop style cd-rom drive onto a 1U server.
I't takes up so little space that it dosen't nead it's own drive bay.
A floppy OTOH neads it's own drive bay.
Re:not every computer has a CD (Score:1)
Re:not every computer has a CD (Score:2)
All I know is that the I can just beraly rember the last time I use a floppy for anything. What I do remember is swearing under my breath the whole time about how slow it was.
Low quality floppies (Score:1)
Re:Low quality floppies (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, quality has fallen because:
1) Who is going to pay a premium for a good floppy?
2) Data density has increased so each bit has a weaker field and smaller footprint than the old 720 Kb disks - easier to demagnetise or scratch.
Michael
Re:not every computer has a CD (Score:1)
I've got several old cd drives around somewhere, but not a single floppy drive! I guess it's because floppies are floppies, they've stayed the same. CD drives, however, have constantly increased their reading speeds, therefore we have bought new drives every now and then. It is much more likely a computer has a CD than a floppy. I don't think I've used a floppy for several years! Except when installing Debian on my 486 laptop, but that's an exeption...
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:3, Insightful)
Great! I'll just chuck my firewall and fileserver boxen on a landfill and buy some newer hardware then!
Thanks for the info, but some of us like to keep hardware in service until the magic smoke gets out (for environmental as well as cost reasons), and a decent boot floppy is an integral part of that. "Buy new hardware!" is a Microsoft strategy, and that's one of the reasons why I've given up on their upgrade-or-become-unsupported OS's.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
You shouldn't have to get all new hardware to read a cd even my OLD 486 sx/20 could do that.
Plus a cd is AFAIK a LOT more reliable then a floppy.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:1)
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:1)
If your spending $40-$50 on a cheep cdrom drive your getting ripped off.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:1)
For those who are still doubting their worth, I once tried tripple booting Win98SE, RH5.2, and BEOS 4.3...everything went great for the first day, but when I woke up the next morning my Master Boot Record was hammered beyond repair. I didn't know about SuperRescue back then (did it even exist?) so I ended up having to boot from a DOS 6.1 install disk and do a format
BTW, MOD the parent post up as informative! I'll shamefully admit I had never even heard of SuperRescue until I read his post. I could have used it back then.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
For those who are still doubting their worth, I once tried tripple booting Win98SE, RH5.2, and BEOS 4.3...everything went great for the first day, but when I woke up the next morning my Master Boot Record was hammered beyond repair. I didn't know about SuperRescue back then (did it even exist?) so I ended up having to boot from a DOS 6.1 install disk and do a format /MBR and work from there. I've never had a repeat of losing the MBR, but I've also never been without the boot disks just in case.
If you had a redhat install floppy around you could have stuck that in and typed:"vmlinuz root=/dev/hda1"
That would cause you to boot the kernel on the install floppy and use
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:1)
dirt cheap. Besides when was the last time you could find a blank floppy in less then 10 minutes?
I agree. I use LNX-BBC [lnx-bbc.org], which fits on a credit card sized CD. Meaning you can carry it round in your wallet or whatever, and have it at hand for all occasions.
It has an X window system, which even includes some games (to play when you are waiting for that fscking fsck!), and a full browser [browsex.com].
What is really useful, beyond the usual suite of maintanance/repair tools, is the comprehensive network tools. This is why it can be quite useful to carry around. It means you can put it into a windows box (e.g. on a windows only network) and use it for debugging a network problems. Or l337 activities.......
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2, Interesting)
Personally, I hacked the iso to boot to win95 dos rather than isolinux, then added loadlin and ntfsdos to the filesystem. All the same great Linux functionality, and now I can use it to fix win9x boxes and bypass security on NT/2k boxes. I never leave home without it.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:1)
1%warren looks at his box - gosh! no cd burner! Picks up blank floppy from pile under his monitor stand - gosh! took ~1 second! Sigh... I'm a decade behind the times.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
As opposed to trying to find a specific CDR in a huge pile of them, in less than 10 minutes?
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
Eh.
You need to make two piles. A L1 cache of CDs for frequently used/important ones and a main pile fo the rest.
That way you will reduce your access times considerably.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
I was talking about BLANK media all of my blank cdr are in the packadge right next to my desk.
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:2)
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:1)
I work in a computer lab with around 30 Pentium systems that don't have CD-ROM drives at all, so boot floppies are the only way for us. And for a simple network troubleshooting disk, for example, why bother with a CD (and the potential for wasted space) when you can put your kernel and drivers all on one floppy?
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:1)
Re:Floppy disks are so 1992 (Score:1)
Freesco (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Freesco (Score:1)
Lunix crashes (Score:2, Insightful)
You mean that Linux crashes?
What is next? Blue screen's of death?
[/lame windows weenie troll ends]
The truth of the matter is that in a Windows NT or 2000 server you can boot the box off the install CD and run a repair utility. freeBSD can be installed off two floppies and over the network, and it cannot be that hard to add to the floppy images enough functionality to add a repair program.
Re:Lunix crashes (Score:2)
To fix problems, I've had to boot from a floppy... but wait... no generic floppy boot is possible with W2K. To get a boot disk that would work, so I could get into DOS, so I could fix the problems, I had to download one from here [bootdisk.com].
Being able to boot off a floppy can be really handy sometimes.
Re:Lunix crashes (Score:2, Informative)
So can all the linux distros I've tried.
freeBSD can be installed off two floppies and over the network, and it cannot be that hard to add to the floppy images enough functionality to add a repair program.
Again nothing that's not possible under your standard Linux distro.
Just because you don't know how doesn't make it impossible
Re:Lunix crashes (Score:1)
(actually I am losing my faith on Windows, and BSD is welcoming me with open arms)
Yeah, its one of those things that would be nice if they make them more visible.
Re:Lunix crashes (Score:1)
I do get a lot of anti-Linux FUD from the BSD crowd (they just stole the code from BSD
So I'm a little touchy.
Re:Lunix crashes (Score:2)
every linux distro cince 1998 has been able to boot from the install CD and choose a rescue option.
Only those that know most nothing about linux would think you require a special "rescue or boot floppy" to recover from a hardware crash.
NT/2000 if you dont have an emergency recovery floppy then a rebuild is horribly painful. it's easier to format the partition/reinstall NT/ reinstall tape backup software/ restore from last backup. Linux? simply boot from the install CD, mount the hadr drive partition that is your root and then do a simple tar from your tape backup, or 99.997% of the time you have a linux "crash" tell lilo to use your backup kernel and reinstall it's self (if you had a head crash on the boot sector)
NT? you cant do any of the above. no way to boot to a minimal OS to do low lever rapairs... NT just isnt advanced enough to have this feature yet.
Re:Lunix crashes (Score:2)
I have my main drive as a Win98/WinXP/Linux. After I update WinXP with all my software, updates patches, I ghost it. Then I have a perfect image of WinXP fresh with updates. Dont have to sit through a re-install every again.
Remember September 11th? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Remember September 11th? (Score:2)
Thank you.
Support your fellow man.
Best recovery disk! (Score:5, Informative)
This thing has saved my ass several times.
Not any more! (Score:1)
Re:Not any more! (Score:2)
fli4l - floppy router distro and more (Score:2, Informative)
Re:fli4l - floppy router distro and more (Score:3, Informative)
There is a side-project of the fli4l [fli4l.de] developers called Eisfair [eisfair.org], which aims to become a "one-disk-server". It is still very Beta and not ready for everyday server-use, but it's the most extensible mini-distro around.
Eisfair Beta Download [eisfair.org]The article does not mention fli4l (Score:1)
Hal 91 (Score:1)
... Well, actually, most ppl seem to think I've booted into Dos anyway, and/or complain about the lack of a GUI and stuff, but I once in a while, there are actually ppl who think I'm some sort of über-hacker when I say to them with a monotone and mystical voice:
"No, it's not DOS.. It's Leenooks.. It's a superior operationsystem that have now taken over all your hardware.. resistance is futile.."
Try this (Score:3, Funny)
know what it's like to have a Linux system crash and not have a boot disk.
I know what it was like to have TWO flat tires on a country road, with nothing but
a $1500 Presario lap top. It was "Redneck Rampage", those fuckers even took my boots.
Linux Router Project (Score:2)
Actually ... (Score:1)
The trouble with floppies is that they are just too unreliable to make a decent rescue system.
b.
Custom disk (Score:1)
http://wam.umd.edu/~kefferb/floppy.html [umd.edu]
Toms Root/Boot is configurable (Score:2, Informative)
And lets not forget BusyBox - which makes most of these distributions possible. Even Red Hat boot disks use BusyBox these days.
Ra for Tom.
Cheers, Andy!
Ripped from my bookmarks: other distros (Score:5, Informative)
(this ones based on BSD IIRC)
Re:Ripped from my bookmarks: other distros (Score:1)
Oh, but nice try, anyway...
Re:Ripped from my bookmarks: other distros (Score:1)
Re:Ripped from my bookmarks: other distros (Score:1, Interesting)
http://www.qnx.com/demodisk/index.html
Rescues more than Linux (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Rescues more than Linux (Score:2)
I work in a Windows shop myself, and am wondering, what single-floppy distro do you use that has NTFS support? I only have the magical NT password changer (great tool btw).
If I had time, I was going to try to hack NTFS into tomsrtbt, since I really like that distro myself.
Business Card CDR (30mb) Linux Distro (Score:5, Interesting)
Then, last year, I found some Business Card CDRs [google.com], which hold 30-50mb and fit in your wallet.
Naturally, I wanted a super-utility boot disk. My ideal was high; mix tomsrtbt with a standard Win98 boot disk (essential for flashing) and a few other tools. Multiboot? Now there's a tough subject. Even with the best guide to making bootable cdroms [nu2.nu] I could find, it was hopelessly difficult.
When I saw this post on Slashdot, I knew I had to post this little story. In researching it, I actually found an answer to the question I wanted to pose to all of you; does anybody know of a linux distribution for these business card cdrs.
LNX-BBC [lnx-bbc.org] is just that. Anybody tried it? Anybody know of another one? Anybody made a multi-boot linux/dos businesscard cdr?
Re:Business Card CDR (30mb) Linux Distro (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Business Card CDR (30mb) Linux Distro (Score:1)
Re:Business Card CDR (30mb) Linux Distro (Score:2, Informative)
I did. It's actually really simple; put LOADER.BIN, DISKEMU1X.BIN and DISKEMU.CMD into the root directory of your CD, create a directory BOOTDISK where you put all those floppy images (my CD contains those: W98 bootdisk, MemTest86, Grub, PXE flash disks for Intel and 3com, Recovery Is Possible, TECHW0RM, a DOS network bootdisk, a floppy to reset the NT admin password; the rest, about 35MB, are filled with lots of tools). You then have to adapt DISKEMU.CMD to show a menu where you can select those images and finally call
mkisofs -no-emul-boot -eltorito-boot LOADER.BIN -hide boot.catalog -v -N -l -no-iso-translate -relaxed-filenames -J -R . > /tmp/bootcd.iso
to create the actual ISO. I can't give you mine (well, perhaps a stripped-down version), as it contains non-free software, and a few of those disks contain a German DOS, but I can help you with creating your own.
Re:Business Card CDR (30mb) Linux Distro (Score:2)
Unix is dying his hair. (Score:1, Offtopic)
Yes folks, my very own FSMOS is able to do just that.
To demonstrate the amount of hackishnes envolved, I used the following off
the shelf concepts -- so not to lock you guys into propierty stuff:
1) A finite set of input symbols (you can increase this all you want, but the clock
cycles are inversely proportional to it.)
2) A finite set of internal states (yes, you can have as many internal states as you want.
TIMTOWTDI, same problems as 1 though)
3) A finite set of out put symbols (it will "say" anything you want
4) a highly polished initial state, s0 (the first one is on the house.)
5) a next-state function (so you can tell it where you want it to go today.)
6) your very own mouth piece, an output function (yay)
You just have to do a little configuration, and make sure you have balanced edges and you
are good to go.
{ the above lame joke was brought to you by, Star Fruit Brust, it is juuuuuuicy, and by
Ashcroft and Gereld, working for a bent over you }
Re:Unix is dying his hair. (Score:2)
Yes folks, my very own FSMOS is able to do just that.
Prior art man. 30 years ago I used to boot a PDP-8 off punched paper tape. Just load that tape into the reader and let it fly. 20 minutes later and the computer was ready to rip, all 4K of 12 bit work memory ripped to go.
linux boot disks (Score:1)
Re:linux boot disks (Score:1)
I used trinux (Score:2, Troll)
As well as stress test the IDS we were writing. Brilliant.
Redhat 7.2 Professional (Score:2)
linux on a whole disk, wow! (Score:1)
copy edit.* A:
copy fdisk.* A:
copy format.* A:
copy scandisk.* A:
Wow... my very own MSDOS SDCRK [that's super-duper-crash-recovery-kit for you laymen].
Tom
Re:linux on a whole disk, wow! (Score:2)
Re:linux on a whole disk, wow! (Score:1)
In the old days I'd copy a couple of
Tom
Bootable CD-ROM's are more useful (Score:2)
My two favorites are related branches, LNX-BBC [lnx-bbc.org], a spinoff from Linuxcare's bootable toolkit, found here [linuxcare.com]. Both have advantages over the other, and will fit on credit-card sized CD's, so you can fit 'em in your wallet (try that with a floppy
Another cool one, which also has the advantage of letting folks try a more full-bodied Linux without installing anything, is DemoLinux [demolinux.org]. It even contains StarOffice on a fully self-contained bootable CD-ROM. Very cool.
-me
SuSe LiveEval (Score:1, Informative)
muLinux (Score:1)
Yet another... (Score:2, Informative)
Although aimed mainly at redhat users, it's pretty comprehensive and you can debug/fiddle with your other partitions (win32, ntfs). It's fairly up-to-date, also.
Grab it here [redhat.de]
Ramfloppy (Score:3, Informative)
Details [ibiblio.org]
Contents [ibiblio.org]
Self extracting archive [ibiblio.org] - run unzip on it to extract it linux.
FloppyFW (Score:1)
why? (Score:1)
PicoBSD (Score:4, Interesting)
/usr/src/release/picobsd/
PICOBSD(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual PICOBSD(8)
NAME
picobsd - floppy disk based FreeBSD system
DESCRIPTION
picobsd is a script which can be used to produce a minimal implementation
of FreeBSD (historically called PicoBSD) which typically fits on one
floppy disk, or can be downloaded as a single image file from some media
such as CDROM, flash memory, or through etherboot.
The boot media (typically a floppy disk) contains a boot loader and a
compressed kernel which includes a memory file system. Depending on the
media, it might also contain a number of additional files, which can be
updated at run time, and are used to override/update those in the memory
file system.
Re:PicoBSD (Score:3, Informative)
I've looked into Pico BSD and the subject of floppy based BSD off and on for a couple of years. There's nothing going on there -or last I looked it was still dead.
Pico BSD is a defunct project and there were no surviving offspring. It's not being maintained, as the downloadable images all date from 1998. So it's unsafe in any setting you need a UNIX in, and pretty much useless unless you just get a thrill from loading a UNIX style OS from a bootable medium the rest of the world rememebers best as a vector for DOS viruses and typing 'ls' and marvelling at yourself. To handle and touch an OS this far fallen into decay and death has to be a kind of antiquarian's fetish. Before you sit down to type at the console, you should be sure to put on some harpsichord music and your favorite mauve satin smoking jacket. Atop your monitor should stand a seven armed silver candelabra and the room should be dark and cold as a tomb. Use a Ouija board to generate passwords.
Then my heart it grew ashen and sober
As the leaves that were crisped and sere -
As the leaves that were withering and sere;
And I cried: "It was surely October
On this very night of last year
That I journeyed -I journeyed down here! -
That I brought a dread burden down here -
On this night of all nights in the year,
Ah, what demon hath tempted me here?
Well I know, now, this dim lake of Auber -
This misty mid region of Weir -
Well I know, now, this dank tarn of Auber,
This ghoul-haunted woodland of Weir."
I've checked for a floppy version of OpenBSD. Mr. De Raadt has expressed an unwillingness for OBSD to be floppyized. Some people were talking about it anyway but there was nothing going on, nothing to use. Since you are into BSD and haven't mentioned it I will assume that the floppy based Open BSD is still sharing a bunk with OBSD
With Linux on the other hand there are a number of robust open projects and commercial products that answer to the description of "floppy based UNIX router, that is actively maintained". I don't have to imagine them as still living, and harangue strangers about not forgetting them. They manage to attract a fair amount of attention to themselves without strident evangelizing.
Re:PicoBSD (Score:2)
Well, actually the 2.2 series kernel is very much alive and maintained. There are plenty of Linux floppy distros that are keeping up with revisions of the 2.2 kernel. If you visit their pages, as on leaf.sourceforge.net you can see that they are also responding to security concerns in secondary packages, like libz and openssh.
No stateful firewalling for you.
If you absolutely need stateful packet filtering you can use Bering, a floppy firewall based on Linux kernel series 2.4
In fact, there are tons and tons of dead single-floppy Linux distros... whatever.
Which is just what you would expect to see anywhere in free unix where there is abundant life and tons and tons of open projects. It's an ecology.
I am glad to see ClosedBSD. A few days ago was the first time I read that name anywhere and I didn't get an idea of what the project was about. I won't rag on the limited package options for CLosedBSD since it's clear that they're just starting out.
I think all the current single-floppy distros suck (Linux or BSD).
I have to disagree. Sometimes you have to look on the bright side. Our options are great compared to Microsoft-only users. There are floppy routers based on DOS (I think) but that is a technologically stunted backwater of the MS world and there's nothing the open or closed projects for DOS firewalls can do to improve that situation. We have many vital projects that are able to make use of the best possibilities of the IA32 architecture, a wide range of configuration choices including hybrid CDROM/Floppy distros, multifloppy distros, wireless gateway distros, options for all kinds of services -not just routing- and we have large user support communities. Working with floppies is never going to be painless but really with all the choice, flexibility and support that's out there, these are the good old days.
Instead of starting a whole new floppy UNIX why not join ClosedBSD as a contributor? The best Linux-on-Floppy distros are ones that attract lots of contributors and people offering specialized versions of the main tree.
Re:PicoBSD (Score:2)
Making 1680K floppies shouldn't be a problem for anyone. There are Windows tools that format the floppy and copy the image file in one go for those lacking UNIX skills. The other "difficulty" of floppies over the usual 1440K size is quality. Bad quality floppies will frequently fail to format at 1680 but all modern controllers BIOSes and floppy drives will handle 1680, even MSDOS understands it without trickery. I say bad quality floppies because experience tells me that these are the same brands that develop errors early on when left in 1440K format. If you're using floppies that often fail to format 1680K they are going to bite you in the ass at 1440K within a short while anyway, which is not desirable for a router or other embedded appliance type UNIX server. It's best to replace a batch of bad floppies than cherry pick the good ones from a batch of low quality diskettes and hope they will last.
DyneBolic, the multi-media mini-linux (Score:1)
Note that it is presently Alpha.
It's a distro that boots off of the CD and gives you access to tools for making cool visuals set to music using FreeJ, or running a webcam off of hasciicam.
Check it out, and I know they could use a hand getting some of the USB camera stuff going.
Bare metal recovery (Score:2)
Boot floppy, brings up network, contacts backup server, partitions disks, creates filesystems and begins restoring all the data from the backup server.
Nobody's mentioned zip disks (Score:3, Informative)
It seems like the last time I tried to make a boot disk this way I couldn't get a basic install to fit on 100MB.
Removable IDE sleds sound the ideal solution, but so many boxes don't have room for them. A bootable CD seems like the most portable, although it lacks a writable filesystem.
Linux Photo player boot???? (Score:3, Interesting)
I am currently scanning very old (50-100 years)family photos for distribution to the family on CD. I want to create a CD that is bootable and will go from a cold machine to an X11 desktop and immediatly start doing a slide show of the photos on the CD.
As a bonus, it looks like to me that a CD like this would be a great way for Linux to get exposure running business slideshows or product demos.
Therefore, it would have to logon as root (?), autoconfigure X11, and start playing. In addition, I would also put a 'autorun.inf' and copy of 'iview32' (win32 viewer) on it for those who shove it in and use with Winddows.
The basic requirements I can think of are:
1. All opensource/freeware
2. Linux Autoboot, Configure, Play etc.
3. Smallest disk space requirement, saving CD space for the pictures.
4. Ease of use. Might be nice to break out of the slide show and view pictures under user control.
Any ideas on what to use?
Which of these distros being discussed to use?
What Linux program will do the slide show?
How to autoconfig X11 if the distro doesn't?
How to autologon?
Re:Linux Photo player boot???? (Score:4, Informative)
Why? what reason do you need to add the overhead of login and user systems? what do you even need a shell for?
autoconfigure X11, and start playing.
again why? do you really need X? why cant you use microwindows or PicoGui? both of which are 9000% smaller and easier to use in a small environment than any X11 release. they both use the Framebuffer interface so will work on 99.667% of all current hardware and 40% of the old junk.
In addition, I would also put a 'autorun.inf' and copy of 'iview32' (win32 viewer) on it for those who shove it in and use with Winddows.
Fair, that means your CD has to be iso9660 filesystem. (Yes you CAN have a EXT2 cdrom... I've made them) you cant use Joilet.. Why? because you need to keep your kernel small, and your ram filesystem small (your entire operating environment has to run in ram) a kernel,filesystem,busybox and picoGUI with a custom slideshow app is easy to stuff on a floppy let along in ram. use MicroWindows if you want that homey X11 look and feel. Or better yet screw the Gui... use a simple C app written with the SDL library.. There's no reason to bloat up your project with a useless GUI (Unless you want to add a fill in this form and click here to dial and send me your info.... bla bla bla...)
Reccomendation? learn C, learn SDL (only a little needed!) and not only show off something that is 100% impossible with any current microsoft product but you also can brag that you completely designed it.
finally, if you write it in SDL only, and write the C app correctly, you can ignore putting a silly viewer app on there, and run the C app under windows after you compiled it under the free windows Gcc... Same views under both linux AND winblows... Something else that cannot be done with any Microsoft product.
Some summaries of Linux floppy distros (Score:5, Informative)
Hopefully this list is helpful to those of you just starting to think about tiny distros.
My instructions (Score:1)
/sbin/mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 2.4.18 (Score:1)
ps, substitue your running kernel version for "2.4.18" in the above.
fd linux (Score:1)
Learn by doing (Score:3, Insightful)
I've only been using linux since December, but I think building my own system has taught me a thing or three that someone who has used, for example Mandrake for a few years wouldn't know.
There's much to be said for learning by doing. I was expecting a little more than a listing of ready-made distros.
People have been predicting that it will take a dumbing down of some sort for linux to become a viable alternative on the desktop. Is this it?
Why not recovery CDROMs? (Score:3, Insightful)
Why should I buy and install an archaic piece of hardware just for disaster recovery? The distributions should supply programs to help me make boot CDROMs.
Re:Why not recovery CDROMs? (Score:2)
Credit Card bootable recovery CD ROM.
Exactly what everybody needs.
heh (Score:1)