Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Linux Software

Sorcerer Review, and News of Impending Doom 225

Posted by timothy from the some-that-die-deserve-life-and-vice-versa dept.
osworks writes: "There is an review of the Sorcerer Linux distribution over at linuxworld.com that is worth a read. I've been running SGL on my Inspiron for a month now, and have the same impression as the author. It took a really long time to install, but was educational and rather fun. Some discouraging news near the bottom about how the maintainer needs some development help, or it will be the end of Sorcerer. This is one of the most exciting new distros to come along in a long time, and that would be a shame."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sorcerer Review, and News of Impending Doom More

Sorcerer Review, and News of Impending Doom

Comments Filter:

  • greatest idea ever... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by edrugtrader ( 442064 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @05:58PM (#3114933) Homepage
    i've used and loved mandrake for some time... sorcerer's update functionality is far better than mandrakes, and that is basically what open source is all about: GETTING THE SOFTWARE INSTALLED.

  • Is it better now? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by MindStalker ( 22827 )
    I tried installing sorcerer back when it was first mentioned here a few months ago. And I had nothing but problems (firstly that it wanted an internet connection for getting kernel patches before it had any idea how to connect to the internet (and it didn't want to sidestep this part) and then that its version of lilo wasn't really made for being in the MBR).
    Anyways, has anyone tried it sence, have these problems been fixed yet?
    • I too have been using it for a month with very little hassle. I installed lilo on the SGL partition so that I could use grub which I already had installed. I have only done this with a broadband connection so internet wasn't too hard to set up.

    • Re:Is it better now? (Score:3, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward
      It does work on the mbr if you follow their instructions, edit lilo.conf to show the last word on the boot line to read disc, and then install to the mbr. It's perhaps not highlighted as well as it could be in their docs, but it's there. I found the install time consuming, and it's easy to make a mistake by not RTFM carefully, but it's really a painless, well thought-out install process imho. I would hate to see this distro fall by the wayside. It's truly unique, exciting, very well thought-out.

  • Sorceror vs Gentoo (Score:2, Informative)

    by tongue ( 30814 )
    I just installed Gentoo [gentoo.org] last night--or started it, rather; the compile process takes quite a bit of time. What I'd like to know is how these two distributions compare, especially in the package management department. Considering that both compile the software on demand, it would seem to be a question of dependency resolution. Has anyone got experience with both of them? does one have any advantages over the other (aside from sorcerors cool nomenclature? :)

    • Re:Sorceror vs Gentoo (Score:5, Interesting)

      by krasni_bor ( 261801 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:22PM (#3115106)
      After the original Slashdot story [slashdot.org] on Sorcerer, I downloaded and tried Gentoo while waiting for Sorcerer's servers to become un-/.ed. I tend to be really impulsive about uninstalling and reinstalling different distros on my personal box. I don't want to think about how many times I've installed both of these on my fun box at home. I also put Sorcery a firewall and web server at the high school where I work.


      Both are source-based distros. Gentoo uses a Python and bash-based package system, influenced by the bsd ports system. It handles required dependencies automatically, and chooses optional ones based on a config file--you indicate if you want kde functionality in your apps, for example. Sorcery just prompts you for each dependency.


      That comparison is typical for the approaches to the two distros. Sorcery asks/tells everything in a very straightforward way. Gentoo is more automatic.


      On the other hand, Gentoo doesn't really have an installer at this point, just a shell and a bunch of well-written instructions.


      At this point I prefer Sorcery, because no other distro has made me feel like I really knew exactly what was going on with my box.

  • Did you check out the requirements on Socerer. I have looked at it in the past and it was something like 8gb hardrive and 256mb ram. That is an ungodly amount just to get things started. I can't afford to run that on my budget. I mean it seems like an interestnig distro but it's too much for my plate.

    • Re:requirements (Score:3, Informative)

      by spencerogden ( 49254 )
      I have sorcer installed with 256mb and a 2gb root partition in addition to my regular 500mb home partition. This does not seem excesive to me.

      Spencer
      • oh, I had read the minimum requirements on their page. Or maybe those were the suggested, anyway how did you do it? Right now I'm testing different distributions for my laptop. Each one is always missing something: Suse didn't want to detect my keyboard (really pissed me off), slackware doesn't want to do apm, mandrake doesn't like my pcmcia card, and debian doesn't like my video card. I'm giving mandrake another go but I'm open to anthing.

  • Gentoo's got it (Score:3, Insightful)

    by DrunkenPenguin ( 553473 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:09PM (#3115022) Homepage
    Gentoo has got the whole pack together. Excellent support and tutorials from the developers. Not to mention the 100% optimization.

  • Great Distro (Score:4, Interesting)

    by spencerogden ( 49254 ) <spencer@spencerogden.com> on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:10PM (#3115031) Homepage
    Like the submitter I have been using Sorcerer for a little over a month. This distro is exactly what I have been looking for.

    For one, I don't know if it is the optimized compiles, or the fact that it is a bare minimum system, but KDE feels fast!

    The project is in need of assistance. If you haven't tried it, give it a weekend, and you too will hope that this project does not die. The author has a paypal account linked to his email address.

  • Heh... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Picass0 ( 147474 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:10PM (#3115032) Homepage Journal

    Red Wizard needs food badly.
    • Microsoft has shot the food.

      come on, give me a break!
    • BSD is about to die...

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

      • Re:Heh... (Score:2, Funny)

        by kiwipeso ( 467618 )
        BSD is dying, but it appears that it will return like a phoenix with the arrival of the Kaos BSD operating system.

        Meanwhile, the best linux ever is now dead. Nevermind the fact it only had a few dozen slashdot geeks actually use after waiting all week to compile it.
        Ladies (all 2 of you on slashdot) and gentlemen, Linux is dead. Tux the Penguin is extinct. (no, it's not the stink of GNU hippies)

        • It's funny, laugh… (Score:2, Insightful)

          by kiwipeso ( 467618 )
          Please tell me how Kaos is offtopic, when it does the same thing as Sorcerer.

          The rest is a joke, but it could also be an accurate description of almost any /. topic. Face it, BSD is 3 times more popular than linux in terms of users.
          User numbers count more than the opinion of geeks, so it's fair to say Linux is dying. BTW, I hope someone metamods me up soon.

  • SuSE still takes the prize for sysadmins (Score:3, Insightful)

    by dlasley ( 221447 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:11PM (#3115035) Homepage
    i like the thought behind SGL, but i think SuSE has kinda beaten everybody (except perhaps debian) with the update/config tools in YaST2. `/sbin/yast2 online_update` with an internet connection and usually before you can get a 2nd cup of coffee, there's a nice list of packages to download and update/install, all pertinent to your system. my only desire is for http connections for high-security areas that don't have ftp access ...
    • You've missed the point. SGL, Gentoo, LFS, etc. are all about building your system from source, and getting the combined benefits of optimized binaries and a solid knowledge of *everything* that's installed. Someone who is going down the route of custom-compiled source isn't looking to "compete" with SuSE or Debian, because those distros are offering a binary update path.

      I find apt useful for grabbing source, but that does not put it in the same class as LFS or SGL when it comes to bragging rights or philosophy.

  • what about Rock? (Score:3, Informative)

    by _narf_ ( 21764 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:13PM (#3115047)

    They're at: http://www.rocklinux.org , They've been around a while, and much of the ideas are similar re: rebuilding the whole thing locally.

  • BSD & Rock Linux comparison (Score:3, Informative)

    by CajunArson ( 465943 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:13PM (#3115050) Journal
    Not being a BSD user, how does this distros 'spell casting' system
    compare to BSD ports? I've heard ports does a similar operation
    of downloading code and custom compiling it.

    Also, Rock Linux [rocklinux.org] puts out a distribution where you basically compile all the packages, but I don't think it has the update ability that Sorcerer has.

    It looks like a fun distro to try.
    • cd /usr/src
      make update && make buildworld && make kernel && mergemaster && reboot
      cd /usr/src
      make installworld
      portupgrade -a

      That updates *everything*, from docs to /bin/ls, on a FreeBSD machine. It assumes you have a /etc/make.conf appropriately configured (as in, uncomment the example lines), that you have cvsup and source installed and that you have internet connection.

      It takes a rather large number of steps because there are a few places where you must make SURE everything still works, or you may end up with an unusable systems.

      Let's dissect it a bit.

      /usr/src is the place where FreeBSD, the base system (as opposed to all the third party programs out there), is located.

      "make update" in this directory will call cvsup, a program that will check out a mirror of your choice on the Internet and download the diffs (instead of the whole files) for the whole FreeBSD source tree, FreeBSD documents and the ports tree. It need not download *all* of this, it's configurable.

      "make buildworld" compiles everything in the base system but the kernel and kernel modules. It does all the right things too, like first compiling a C compiler before compiling the C compiler. :-)

      "make buildkernel" compiles kernel and kernel modules. It uses the stuff compiled in the step before, so you get a kernel compiled with the latest tools even before you install them.

      "mergemaster" deals with /etc in a controlled fashion. It compare your files with the ones in the source, and those which were updated (infered from the CVS Ids) have their diffs displayed to you, and you have the option of installing the new, keeping the old, or merging the two of them selectively (as in, you control what and how).

      Though FreeBSD takes some pains to make this process painless, like having default configuration files and user configuration files, there's always exceptions (like the groups and password files).

      "make installkernel" installs the new kernel and modules. It keeps a copy of the old one.

      "reboot" reboots. :-) FreeBSD does not have to deal with LILO pains. If the new kernel is broken, all you have to do is interrupt the count-down and type "boot kernel.OLD" (or whatever other kernel name you may have chosen).

      If the new kernel works, you may install the new "world" without fear (some of the programs might be using features only present in the new kernel, which would have caused you problems if you installed world first). "make installworld" does that.

      Finally, "portupgrade -a" upgrades every port you have installed, dependencies first, and installing any new dependencies as necessary. Port's magic is rather complex, and there are whole articles on the internet about it. But it just works, so you don't have to concern yourself about it.

      Note that all of this is compiled according to the options you put in /etc/make.conf.

      HTH. HAND.

  • Hmm.. (Score:4, Informative)

    by Pope Slackman ( 13727 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:14PM (#3115059) Homepage Journal
    [SGL has a] script that locates the latest stable source code for the application, downloads it to your system, configures it for your machine, compiles, and installs it. Pure magic.

    Sounds familiar [onlamp.com]...

    C-X C-S

  • Great Stuff (Score:2, Interesting)

    by althalus ( 520424 )
    I've been running this one my inspiron also, for about two weeks, and love it. This thing is excellent. The only thing I don't like is how the everybody (the maintainer especially) won't stop talking about how doomed it is. Hello, sure it's tough to get started, and find help, but don't say "It's doomed" after every sentence! I think Kyle has done an excellent job, and I understand his reasons for trying to get help. I'm doing what I can. But quit it with the doom and gloom all the time!
    • But quit it with the doom and gloom all the time!
      For some reason this struck me as something someone would say to a sorcerer...Just before it hit the fan. ;)

  • Sorcerer, Gentoo, and FreeBSD (Score:5, Informative)

    by Badam ( 222642 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:18PM (#3115084) Homepage
    I have all three of these installed on my hard drive.

    Sorcerer is pretty interesting, and certainly easier to use than the others, but if you have problems... good luck. The web page is spare, and the mailing lists aren't really busy enough yet to make for a good replacement.

    As far as I can tell, Gentoo is made by Debian types who wanted to be able to use the BSD ports system to download and compile all their software. Perhaps they prefer the GPL to the BSD license. Anyway, like Debian, Gentoo has a "Social Contract". Functionally, you can do the same things that are possible in Sorcerer, although the commands are slighly more complicated, and less friendly to newbies.

    Finally, there's FreeBSD, which has many more programs in its software collection than either Sorcerer or Gentoo. Frankly, unless people are really against the BSD license, think the Linux kernel is much better, or need to play some game that's tailored for Linux, I would recommend going with FreeBSD. Not only does FreeBSD have many programs, but it has many more port maintainers to track whether the system is working.

    That said, I'm going to Sorcerer and Gentoo on my hard drive, and will periodically check to see if their software collections have become competitive. If either had ports for as many programs as FreeBSD, this would be a much harder decision.
  • I can see the educational value that such distributions have LFS, RockLinux, Gentoo, and Socerer! but when it comes to runing servers on them, What is the best? Rocklinux has that in mind, LFS is going back, and forth now, Gentoo linux dealing more with cosmetics, When can we have a powerfull build from source distribution that competes with SID, and woody, something I will be able to install, upgarde easily! or am I missing the point here
    • I'm running gentoo atm on my laptop, nice and clean.
      For servers I must say gentoo is good. No service is started without you telling them to: secure.

      With the command emerge --update --world every package you have installed is upgraded. Works nice. Put it in cron.

      And no etc files are overwritten so to add new features to them you run the nice script etc-update and just answer the questions.
      This could be better...

      Over all, gentoo is a nice dist but needs some development before all tools are at their best.

      • Thanks for the update, but still gentoo is known to break while sorcerer with it short life have been pretty stable, and I do belive the etc-update is also there in both and how about Drrobins, is n't he overworked, I do like his articles tho

  • self healing (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:25PM (#3115122)
    What everyone failes to mention is the self healing ability of sorcerer which is IMHO its biggest strength. Doing #cast --fix will verify all applications on your system, recompile the once whose depandancies have changed, put back in place missing files and symlinks.

    One of the big challanges for sorcerer was upgrade from db3 to db4. That one tooked me 2 #cast --fix till system self healed. Try doing this with any other distro and see what happens.

    • Shameless plug: Or you can use a ports tree [e.kth.se] that allows you to have several versions of libraries installed simultaneously. ;-)

    • One of the big challanges for sorcerer was upgrade from db3 to db4. That one tooked me 2 #cast --fix till system self healed. Try doing this with any other distro and see what happens.

      Interesting. On RedHat, all I'm getting are cryptic "bash: cast: command not found", but my system does seem to run _much_ smoother now. Anybody try it on Debian yet?.

      heh.

      • Uh oh:

        cast cannot open cast-dictionary file: /home/dwon/.glimpse_quick
        (use -H to give a dictionary-dir or run 'buildcast' to make a dictionary)

        It *does* seem to work better now, though. :)

  • Why do people start projects they can't possibly finish or even maintain? He had to know he would need to get a job eventually. How many irrelevant distro's are going to be founded and then abandoned once the demands of time and real life creep in?

  • Nightmare (Score:1, Insightful)

    by florin ( 2243 )
    This may be meant for system administrators, but maintaining more than a handful of sorcerer boxes sounds terrifying. I for one just don't have the time to compile Gnome every time Dell comes by to deliver another server box.

    Managability quickly becomes more important than that squeaky clean feeling once you've got more than 10 systems running. I guess that makes me a sucky admin, but I really can't care. I'll have to stick with the Red Hat network and up2date over this, thanks.
    • You can just copy an existing system. (I.e. keep a hard-drive around with your base config).
      If you've never done this before, the disk-upgrade howto [linuxdoc.org] gives you all the info you need.
      You can also have several configs TAR'd up all nice and neat and just pull down whatever you need with a 'nix boot disk (or have 'em on CD).
    • I dont know if Sorcerer has this compatibility, but you can use the command (in Gentoo) #emerge --buildpkg foopackage to install the package AND build a binary to roll out to your other boxes. So it might not be SO nightmarish...(at least with Gentoo)

  • Ahead of its time? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by morbid ( 4258 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:42PM (#3115194) Journal
    Sourcerer is a brilliant idea, but may be ahead of its time. Downloading everything from source and compiling requires a lot of CPU horsepower (not a problem nowadays) but also lots of bandwidth. Many people still do not have the bandwidth so binary distributions are invaluable. However, I must admit that over the years I have used Slackware as a base OS and then built all my updates from source as and when they appear. This guy has the right idea. It would be a shame to see it fail.

  • If you like Sorceror, try Gentoo! (Score:5, Informative)

    by Hornsby ( 63501 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:44PM (#3115207) Homepage
    Gentoo Linux [gentoo.org] is an excellent distro that is very similar to Sorceror in the fact that you compile everything from scratch. It uses a Free-BSD style ports system, and it has a command-line driven package tool that's similar to debian's apt-get. The portage tree is huge and contains thousands of apps. One major advantage over Sorceror is that Gentoo has a very active development community, and it isn't in any danger of dissappearing anytime soon. If you want a distro where everything is compiled explicitly for your hardware for blistering fast speed, you should check out Gentoo. It's my favorite distro, and I've tried virtually all of them.

  • SGL = excellent product, excellent install method (Score:5, Interesting)

    by dogas ( 312359 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @06:49PM (#3115224) Homepage
    It would really be a shame if SGL stopped getting support. I switched from Mandrake a month ago and I'm more than satisfied with the results. Yes, the install is more difficult and time consuming, but it was worth it for the experience I got out of it. I now have an intricate knowledge about how the inner details of linux works.

    I also believe that their method of installing applications is better than any binary install system out there (apt-get/rpm). Although it may take a bit longer to compile things, they're installed *right* and are compiled specific for your architecture. All dependencies are automagically downloaded, compiled, and installed without any user interaction (although you can interact if you want).

    No other distro provides more control, flexibility, or ease of use better than sorcery. I hope it doesn't go away.
  • Now, don't get me wrong. I'm all for choice. But I have to wonder if it's wise to keep creating new distributions instead of trying to consolidate the ones there are.
    I have been using Linux at home for over six months. Installed it myself, learned to use it myself; still, you guys might consider me a newbie. So let me tell you, as a newbie, once I decided to take the plunge, choosing distribution was a major headache.
    Check the Net. A lot of opinions, plenty of "favorite flavors", but not a lot of good advice, like "Mandrake is easy to install, but RedHat is easier to use".
    Maybe I'm ranting. What I'm trying to say is, it's hard to get someone to try Linux, and when they do and are faced with 10 choices, without a lot of help in making a decision, it is discouraging. So, turning those 10 into 11 hardly seems a great idea to me.
    Then again, IANALGY (I Am Not A Linux Guru... Yet) ^^

    • Re:Another distribution?! (Score:1, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward
      > Maybe I'm ranting. What I'm trying to say is, it's hard to get someone to try Linux, and when they do and are faced with 10 choices, without a lot of help in making a decision, it is discouraging. So, turning those 10 into 11 hardly seems a great idea to me.

      Your real complaint is not having too many choices, it's not having the info to make the best choice for a given need. That's a valid complaint.
    • I see what your saying, but how would you buy anything that gives you choices?

      Personally, If I know very little, or nothing, about something I wanted to purchase(TV, Stereo, widgets) I would see who has been at it for a while, and try their product.

  • Originality. (Score:1, Redundant)

    by saintlupus ( 227599 )
    This is one of the most exciting new distros to come along in a long time, and that would be a shame.

    Well, unless you're absolutely bound to the Linux kernel for some reason (hardware support and the like), you can get something very similar from the Net or OpenBSD products.

    (FreeBSD is probably similar as well, but I haven't tried it.)

    Just do a basic install of the system from the network, and then use the ports/package system to add what you want.

    --saint

  • As a semi-seasoned Linux-user, I'm very impressed with what I've heard about SGL over the last few months. I'm not crazy about further confusing the already maxxed-out lexicon of terminology though ('grimoire' does sound cool, but would make me really feel like a geek after awhile...I'd be forced to read Tolkien and listen to more Rush).

    I really hope the recent attention placed on SGL will attract some faithful maintainers/developers.

    Remember: there's always room for a new distro, so long as it's good :)

  • Goddammit! (Score:2, Funny)

    by Scooter ( 8281 )
    I thought Doom3 was imminent :)

    try not to used reserved words in your headlines :P

  • Distro comparison site (Score:3, Informative)

    by egrinake ( 308662 ) <erikg&codepoet,no> on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @07:40PM (#3115457)
    It seems that every few weeks there's some new distro-related story on /., all asking pretty much the same question, in one form on another ;

    Which distro is best for what, and why?

    A site that answers most questions one might have about pretty much any distro is www.distrowatch.com [distrowatch.com]

  • Cool distribution... (Score:4, Informative)

    by Junta ( 36770 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @09:00PM (#3115780)
    It can be a boon or a curse, depending on how much you really know about the packages you are installing. In theory, you get a pretty clean, smooth system as you only install the bits you specify, and you can hand tune the compiles and dependencies such that you don't have to install unwanted bits just to get what you want to work, and it will do all this without breaking the package manager (i.e. if you go from a non-RPM in redhat, those files are now kind of rogue).

    Unfortunately, there are pitfalls to be a ware of. One is that the occasional package is overlooked in terms of updates. For example, xmame is outdated in grimoire, so I manually edit the grimiore on every update to make sure it doesn't overwrite my more recent copy witha n older copy.

    Another thing is that by rolling your own custom configuration, you are really exploring brand new territory. No one has tested that particular combination of packages to see if there are any issues, and by mixing the latest and greatest of everything, invariably you get some mismatches that produce unpleasant results if you don't know what to be careful of.

    Also, the compilation of some packages on some hardware, particularly XFree. For example, if you have a Voodoo3, you need to get glide3 separate first. Even then you have to use tdfx for DRI rather than TdfxDRI or whatever is offered in the menu, as the ifdefs don't work in the .cf files.

    As to performance, yes it is highly optimized and you can omit debug symbols and such. However, it uses 2.95.3, which results in a more stable distro, but in a way counterbalances the advantages of compiling yourself, as the 2.95.3 doesn't optimize for x86 nearly as well as gcc 3...
    • If you have the skills to update xmame and manually edit the grimoire, why not simply submit a new xmame spell to the main grimoire? It seems that lack of that type of contribution is part of the problem. Then again, maybe I simply misunderstood what you were saying.
      • You got it right, I should flag someone down and have them notice, it is a simple change to the DETAILS file, the problem is, I can't find anywhere that makes it clear who to submit updates to the grimoire to....

  • A real-life sorcerer? (Score:3, Funny)

    by Rommel ( 33210 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @09:44PM (#3115930)
    I especially liked this line in the review (emphasis mine):

    A real-life sorcerer keeps his spells in a book called a grimoire.

    Where do I find a real-life sorcerer? I have some spells I wouldn't mind cast.
  • I like the idea of this, it reminds me of BSD Ports, which I think was ported to Linux. Perhaps a Linux distribution based on BSD Ports would be interesting.

  • Automated Linux from Scratch (Score:5, Informative)

    by capedgirardeau ( 531367 ) on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @10:09PM (#3116032)
    The fantastic and mature distro known as "linux from scratch [linuxfromscratch.org]" does exactly this.

    It builds and bootstraps a basic utilitarian GNU/Linux installation all from source packages.

    I think its great as both a production system and an educational build/install process.

    The nice part is you end up with a fully functional linux you have built yourself. You will know _every_ package installed and why.

    And all the mystery of linux will be revealed in your build process, its very educational.

    Now, there is an partner group with the linux from scratch folks called automated linux from scratch [linuxfromscratch.org].

    From the automated linux from scratch site:

    "Automated Linux From Scratch or ALFS, is a project that aims to create a generic framework of an extenable system builder and package installer using XML to describe the process.
    It's main goal is to automate the process of creating a LFS system."

    I have never used it, but I have used the straight linux from scratch [linuxfromscratch.org] and it is wonderful.

    • basically SGL is an automated linux from scratch. it uses the cast scripts to download and build as necessary the libs and apps required to build a mature system. solving hours worth of dependancies to install a source package is not only pointless but annoying. one more thing that's nice about sgl is the XDelta. With X-delta if available sgl downloads the DIFF patches for files, to save on both time and bandwidth. (this also makes the distribution ALMOST USEABLE by modem goers.)

  • my thoughts on sorcerer (Score:3, Informative)

    by trelaneopn ( 563678 ) <trelane@magenet.com> on Tuesday March 05, 2002 @10:29PM (#3116112) Homepage Journal
    (This will end up being almost an article/review in and of itself, some of which may be redundant, but I will attempt to keep that to a minimum.)
    SGL was created to automatically solve dependancies on a minimal system bootstrapped off a small cd iso. the entire distribution is written in dialogue/bash. from there they add 'sorcery', a dialogue app somewhat similar to the initial package selector in debian potato's installer. allows you to select and modifiy package groups in the grimoire. the packages are downloaded and the interface is similar to debian where you answer yes/no/maybe questions as cast downloads and processes the files. (note that since the last /.'ing the dependancy resolution and casting process have become MUCH more rebust and stable.) after casting the system a sorcery update will install the latest versions of the pacakage (some developers recommend doing this nightly, however I doubt that even on the computer I'm currently building that it would finish before the next night's upgrades).
    DOWNSIDES (and yes there are a lot)
    A: TIME: Sgl can take a week to do what a binary distribution can do in 30 minutes. a stable working system
    B: effort: you have to understand the system, or else you will break it during casting
    C: patience: this is a much and almost deserves to be capitalized with time.
    UPSIDES
    A: RPM: No messy RPM/DEB (and please debian purists I do like deb better but source is still more pure)
    B: optimization: from a custom kernel as a start to -fno-expensive-optimizations, it creates bulky code that runs REALLY fast and extreamly efficiently, and bulk in compiled code can be a good thing as the processor isn't used to remove the corners cut by the "optimization process"
    C: you know the entire system: from the libs installed to exactly what /usr/bin/ioahwoithjalwerh is, you have installed all of it and your knowledge of what's on the system is COMPLETE. this allows HUGE advantages
    D: creation of cast scripts: it's BASH, it's easy, and frankly even I can do it (gropes his bash howto) RPM is tricky if you've ever read through it, BASH makes it easy.
  • edit /etc/pcmcia/network.opts
    say "y" to DHCP
    blank the static values.

    Remove the networking scripts from the other run levels, since the pcmcia script starts networking for you. (both S and K, in the /etc/rc#.d dirs...)

    ln -s /sbin/dhcpcd /usr/sbin/dhcpcd so the pcmcia script can find dhcp.

    run:
    /sbin/dhcpcd -k
    /sbin/dhcpcd

    reboot
    viola, magic.

    I just submitted a minor fix for the install script relating to this yesterday =)
    (as the email sean dot power at uc dot edu)

    Arglesnaf
  • I've been wondering about this and kicking the idea of running sourcer on some non-Intel hardware I have.


    I have some alphas, of the 3, 2 run debian and one runs Mandrake. they are all fairly modern alphas, 21164s and a 21264. Running stock Debian, the 600Mhz 21164s run like crap. It feels like it's running like crap. I take a recent GCC, and start recompling some stuff and the system starts to perform better. I'm not joking. I don't know if it's Debian's compile or if the chip specific optimizations are that good or what, replace the kernel and the C library and the system get's snappier. It's noticable, now I admit I've never benchmarked it but webserver responses appear to be quicker, gzip seems quicker after it's recompiled everything seems to go faster once I compile it with optimizations for the specific chip..


    Remembering back to architecture and compiler courses at uni, I remember a few stunning things. I've hand optimized code on alpha and powerpc chips and I've seen the difference, it can be stunning. Big enough that it can easily make one chip outperform a similarly speced chip. So where am I going with this? Well x86 is hopefully starting to have a real competitor that will kill it. IA64 and other 64bit chips. I want it to die, it's time for it to die, or at least start to process of death. As I see it, one of the biggest hurdles is the code optimization thing, not not but wait until there are 4 IA64 chips to choose from. From everything I've seen, we can expect a pretty reasonable performance hit from not properly optimizing code for the chip it runs on. Is a distribution like sourcer or gentoo the solution to this?

  • Is Sorcerer redundant? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Ogerman ( 136333 ) on Wednesday March 06, 2002 @01:21AM (#3116794)
    Frankly, the idea of compiling absolutely everything from source 'just because' seems a little bit of a waste of time. The vast majority of software will only see very very minimal performance increase compared to a well built Debian package with the usual careful choice of compiler flags. (Note: compiling for your CPU's architecture vs. generic i386 makes little difference today since all modern CPU's do very extensive instruction scheduling and out-of-order execution.) Furthermore, from what I saw of Sorcerer, the chosen compiler flags are system-wide instead of being based on the individual packages needs. This is not wise. So, I personally think that Sorcerer is redundant considering the quality and ease of use of Debian source packages for the few programs that can really benefit from hand-tuned compiler flags (such as data compression or encryption software). You just edit the rules and run two commands.

    • Why Source Distros are Superior (Score:4, Insightful)

      by FreeUser ( 11483 ) on Wednesday March 06, 2002 @09:48AM (#3118262)
      Frankly, the idea of compiling absolutely everything from source 'just because' seems a little bit of a waste of time. The vast majority of software will only see very very minimal performance increase compared to a well built Debian package with the usual careful choice of compiler flags.

      Our enterprise is currently using Debian for many tasks. However, we are evaluating Sorcerer and Gentoo as a replacement.

      Why?

      1) Compiling everything from source 'just because' isn't a waste of time. What you overlook in your truncated 'just because' is that by compiling the source optimized for your hardware, against the library versions on your machine, you insure a level of compatability, and reliablity, that cannot be insured when mixing and matching binary libraries and applications. In short, you are compiling everything from source just because that is the only way to insure maximum performance and reliability on a given machine.

      2) The speed increases are notable. Your assertion that architecture tweaks vs. generic compilations make little difference are not born out by real world, emperical testing. Debian (my favorite distro before trying Sorcerer and Gentoo), even Mandrake compiled with i586 optimizations, is noticably slower in performing many tasks (like video capture and editing, smooth window scrolling in KDE, web browsing in mozilla) than either Sorcerer or Gentoo compiled from source on the same hardware.

      3) Distributions introduce their own level of bugs. Source compilations against existing libraries minimizes distribution-specific and distribution-induced bugs. Things like library version mismatches, subtle changes in behavior that break things but are unobvious, plague Debian, Mandrake, et. al. but are virtually eliminated by Gentoo and Sorcerer. What is more, the source based distros tend to stick closer to what the software authors intend in the installation of their software, reducing bugs that result from shuffling files or doing other "non-standard" things (from the orignial source author's point of view) in order to comply with the distro's file placement policies (for example). This isn't eliminated, as gentoo and sorcerer both have their policies, but it is reduced significantly vs. Mandrake, RedHat, and Debian.

      4) What is more, gentoo and sorcerer are able to remain closer to the current state of development. While one may initially dismiss this as "upgraditis" and, at best "nice but risky and not necessary," it turns out to offer significant advantages, advantages that in my experience outweigh any disadvantages.
      - one gets bug fixes immediately
      - as important, the cycle of develope/test/report bugs to the author/fix bugs is tightened dramatically, with the author getting feedback in days instead of weeks or months
      - one gets important new features immediately
      - finally, if one doesn't like the current version (e.g. X 4.2 vs 4.1) using the older version instead is a trivial matter, with recompilation of dependent packages a relatively painless process when the version is changed, be it upward to a newer version, or a reversion back to an older version.

      I cannot emphesize enough how many longstanding bugs, particularly distribution-related bugs, that have dogged us from RedHat to Mandrake to Debian, simply do not exist when running gentoo or sorcerer. What is more, we can use X 4.2 today, not months from now when it finally gets into Debian unstable. More importantly, we can use X 4.2 in a very stable environment, with one complete heirarchy of distro-induced bugs virtually eliminated.

      Furthermore, from what I saw of Sorcerer, the chosen compiler flags are system-wide instead of being based on the individual packages needs. This is not wise.

      Both gentoo and sorcerer allow individual ebuilds and spells (respective terms for suites of scripts which download, compile, and install a piece of software) to override and/or modify their respective compilation options. The "system wide" options and optimazations one sets are defaults that work for most ebuilds/spells. This is far wiser than hoping each ebuild/spell maintainer will think to optimize their own compilation (many would not, and many others would err on the side of caution). When optimization flags cause a problem the ebuild/spell maintainer typically strips the offending optimization out of the compiler options (a small sed pipe does the trick) and the spell or ebuild builds and runs fine.

      Source distros are hands down better, easier, and less buggy than binary distros, despite their young age and "green" state. I encourage you to give one or the other a try ... once you've begun using source-based distros you will likely find you can no longer stomach the issues that binary based distros, even one as well engineered as Debian, bring with them.

      And no, "apt-get source --compile" isn't at all comparable (though it does make Debian immensly more useful than many of its binary-distro counterparts). You still have the plethora of distro-induced bugs that comes with any binary distro as large and complex as Debian.

      Gentoo and Sorcerer aren't free of bugs, mind you, but they are free of several classes of bugs that exist in binary distros in addition to bugs in the software itself, and in the distro's configuration and layout. The difference may not sound like much, but in practice it is quite significant.
  • Talk about reinventing the wheel, eh? :-)

  • Interesting installer (Score:4, Funny)

    by Fizzlewhiff ( 256410 ) <jeffshannon@@@hotmail...com> on Wednesday March 06, 2002 @10:20AM (#3118480) Homepage
    Casting spells to install applications sounds pretty cool. While I have found tools like Red Hat's Up2Date and Ximian's Red Carpet very nice there's still some dependancy problems encountered when you try to go with the latest and greatest versions of Gnome and other libraries. From the review it sounded like Sorcerer downloads and compiles the packages you are installing. Would it pull dependencies too?

    I'll have to check this distro out. I can see it now.

    >Turn on PC
    Your monitor flashes. You are greeted with the message "Loading Windows 2000..."
    >Insert Sorcerer boot floppy
    There is an audible click as the floppy settles in the drive.
    >Press Ctrl-Alt-Delete
    A menu is presented giving you several options [more]
    >Click Shutdown
    Your computer restarts. Your floppy drive begins to whirr and churn with excitement. You feel a sense of power rush through you. A message slowly begins to emerge on your screen.
    >read message
    Hail and well met sysadmin. Sorcerer Linux sees you have Windows currently installed on this PC. What is thy choice friend?
    >cast magic missile at /dev/hda1
    Formatting... Please wait.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you didn't have to work so hard, you'd have more time to be depressed.

Close