Three-year Anniversary of Kernel Traffic 66
Eric Gibson writes: "Thought everybody might want to know, today is the three-year anniversary of kernel traffic. The site for those of us that want to like to keep up with the goings-on of the kernel mailing list, but can't afford to read 1500+ emails a day. ;-) Congratulations to the maintainer who has kept this site alive, through trial and tribulation."
3rd Anniversary of Kernel Traffic (Score:2, Interesting)
1500+ emails a day? (Score:3, Informative)
- A.P.
Re:1500+ emails a day? (Score:1)
Speaking of that... (Score:2, Funny)
Unless of course, you're talking about Hotmail. I don't remember signing up for any lists, but I sure do enjoy the hilarious back-and-forth conversations between the people trying to sell graphic p0rn and the people convinced that we should all be selling real estate for a profit!
Re:Speaking of that... (Score:1)
Re:Speaking of that... (Score:2, Insightful)
Well, usually nobody needs to read all these emails. The trick is having good mailer which can help to sort all that email and find what you do want or need to read. It is not a problem with good mailer which supports threading and kill lists (or Scoring). I've been subscribed on a number of maillists with more than 2000+ message/day in total and I could easily read them with Gnus.
Re:Speaking of that... (Score:3, Interesting)
On SunManagers i used to get about 100 a day on heavy days, and that was a LOT for me to handle. I ended up creating a new e-mail account specifically for mailing lists.. Between the SM list, Legato NotWorker, Veritas...
Just a side comment: Slashdot looks *SO MUCH BETTER* in this blue color. When will we get the option to theme slashot, like other weblog engines have?
Re:Speaking of that... (Score:4, Informative)
dan.
Re:Speaking of that... (Score:1)
Ontopic comment: You don't like procmail or similar?
Just a side comment: Slashdot looks *SO MUCH BETTER* in this blue color. When will we get the option to theme slashot, like other weblog engines have?
offtopic comment: Yeah I agree, specially about the customize thingie... it would really be sweet if we could design our own comments boxes with some %-variables or similar. But i dunno if slashdot could handle the extra load of that...
colour choice i've missed for a long time though
Re:Speaking of that... (Score:1)
Extra Props to Kernel Traffic (Score:2, Funny)
Exaggeration on kernel traffic? (Score:5, Informative)
Kernel Traffic is better for me (Score:4, Interesting)
The original post was obviously hyperbole, but having subscribed to the list myself, I know how quickly lkml can eat up your disk quota if you aren't vigilant.
Zack Brown deserves props specifically for the bug reports you mentioned. If I found a kernel bug, I wouldn't have previously known how to report it, or whether it was already reported, without sifting through tons of mailing list archives.
I read kernel traffic weekly, and I feel like the few minutes I spend reading it really keeps me on top of what's going on.
Overall, people with a 56k modem cannot deal with lkml, and they shouldn't have to.
Re:Kernel Traffic is better for me (Score:3, Informative)
The only word of warning is that people don't change the thread subject lines by convention, so the subject almost never matches the particular flame war that's going on. (The Kernel Traffic summaries generally ignore most of the interesting flamage, focusing on the prouncements of the bigwigs.)
There is also a usenet [fa.linux.kernel] front-end (which I think is what Linus uses), as well as a Google archive [google.com]
Re:Exaggeration on kernel traffic? (Score:1)
One good use of the kernel lists is to stress test your mail reader. One kernel hacker I know of posted on the LUG mailing list to say that Netscape 4 refused to read his kernel lists mailbox which was over 70MB in size.
Re:Exaggeration on kernel traffic? (Score:1)
Mailing List Stats For This Week
We looked at 2507 posts in 10941K.
AFAIK 2507/7 ~= 358
Great stuff (Score:4, Interesting)
1500 a day! (Score:1)
Different lists? (Score:2)
the one where I agree (Score:4, Insightful)
Keep it up guys!
Re:the one where I agree (Score:4, Interesting)
Also the Kerneltrap [kerneltrap.org] has sometimes news on latest kernel developments (like recent O(1)+preempt patch..).
Speaking of that, they should have full interview with Alan Cox [linux.org.uk] tomorrow..
Good starting place, but not for everyone (Score:4, Informative)
The truth is, though, that while KT gives a good overview of some areas of the mailing list, it misses a lot. This is obvious, of course; cutting 100's of posts a day down to one moderate weekly summary is going to leave a lot of information. But to be honest, though I admire and appreciate Zach Brown's efforts, I wonder what criteria he uses for deciding what threads to cover. I sometimes feel he has left out some fairly important/interesting stuff while quoting huge gobs of somewhat trivial (imho) threads.
Anyone who is seriously interested in the kernel internals shouldn't really be relying on KT too much. Head over to kernelnewbies [kernelnewbies.org] and start reading the real list. I recommend a good filternig system to help you separate out the chaff, though.
dan.
nice site (Score:1)
--BluNereid
That reminds me... (Score:2)
On the plus side, that must mean 2.4.17 is somewhat stable. :)
-Legion