Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Linux Software

New YOPY Screenshots 123

FWMiller writes: "Theres a bunch of new screenshots up on Samsung's new PDA, the YOPY. This thing looks really slick, emulating the Windows CE user interface quite closely." The images are in a tgz, and they look real. They demo an addressbook, and MP3 player and other apps that apparently would ship with the nifty Linux based PDA. I still haven't seen a ship date (or an english version of the software for that matter ;) so I'm not holding my breath too hard. Although after playing with Kurt The Pope's Jornada, I'm dying to see what they can do.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

New YOPY Screenshots

Comments Filter:
  • ...according to a Samsung guy at the CeBIT.

    I don't know why everyone and his mother is waiting for this crap.
  • Someone mirror them. Korea is slow.

    800 bytes/second on a t1.

    Watch the sky for falling sattelite(s) kiddies.

  • ... you could have at least asked the server admin before taking down Korea's entire link to the internet!

    Is this running on a FB or on X? Any word on when we'll see a QT/Embedded device?

  • man, already the download is crawling.. anyone want to put up a mirror? Shame everyone killed geekflavor.. would have been perfect :)
  • I wonder what their conterpart to Grafitti is, and if there's any chance of it being released as free software...
    --
  • by Ka0s64 ( 200106 )
    "THe images are in a tgz" Whoops, a Taco Typo! Nice screenshots though.
  • Wow the picture is awesome. But....um, it kind of looks familiar. It's a complete ripoff of the download screen, simulating a 1.3MB download! ! !

    Rader

  • Hey Taco? What's with linking to some kind of funky moon man file format. TGZ? Is this some kind of picture file? Do you need the gimp to view this?
    .jpeg, .gif or .png please. I thought the /. crew was into internet standards.
    --Shoeboy
  • MOOO!

    if you don't know what a tgz file is, where do you get off talking about internet standards?

  • It's a tar gzip'ed file, as (just about) any UNIX user would know. If you're running linux, type 'tar xvfz beta.tgz'. It's like pkzip in the UNIX world. Winzip will handle it too if you're stuck in Windows land.
  • With all the PDA's out there, is anyone really buying any that aren't Palms right now?
  • The first thing that should pop into anybody's head as soon as they hear this is:

    "Who would want to emulate Windows CE's interface?"
    --
  • A .TGZ extension is a Microsoft-ed, three-letter-extension version of the old and traditional Uniz .tar.gz extension sequence, indicating a group of files collected together with tar, and then compressed with gzip.

    To view the files, reverse the process.

  • These pictures look great (though someone oughta mirror them uncompressed). I have to admit, I'm currently the not-so-proud owner of a Windows CE device (or is it Windows Powered?). However, my complaints with it have nothing to do with the interface*, and if you could bring something similar to the Yopy [yopy.org] then I would definitely be interested. Anyone know when we might expect to see them?

    *If you are curious, my complaints are specifically with system resource usage and stability. While Windows CE isn't as bad as its cousins, its heritage is still apparent. If you could give me the same features and interface but with a little less bloat and cruft, I would be a very satisfied customer.

    yours,
    john
  • Really? Microsoft'ed? I've seen .tgz's for some time now. FreeBSd packages are made with them. I always thought it was in the UNIX tradition of shotening file names when possible.
  • by JonMintz ( 213263 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @09:51AM (#906349)
    Palm OS developer/Handspring founder Jeff Hawkins's "Zen of Palm" (essentially, simplify as much as possible for a palmtop unit) really holds true with current hardware limitations.

    Now, if you could give me something the size of a Palm V, with the Fitaly stamp keyboard instead of Graffiti or handwriting recogninition (plus an optional folding full-size StowAway keyboard), expansion as easy and versatile as Handspring's Springboard but as small as Sony's Memory Stick, a high-quality color display for large resolutions, built-in wireless connectivity, and long-lasting rechargable batteries...well, then you'd really have a amazingly powerful, functional palm device. Deliver it at a reasonable price point and the world will beat a path to your door.

    But it looks like Samsung is taking a big step in the race for the ultimate PDA.
  • Doesn't anyone else think that this PDA craze is getting out of hand? Sure, it's neat to have information in a small, portable form, but do we want to be "connected" 24/7? Don't we want the ability to take a vacation instead of spending our week in Hawaii sending memos to the boss on our shiny new PDA while talking on a cellphone, waiting for our beeper to ring, and coding on a laptop?

    I can think of some handy uses for a PDA -- if you were in an accident, for example, you could send a memo to the hospital. Or if you had to take notes during a meeting (but who goes to meeting these days?), you could jot them down on a PDA, assuming you could get it to recognize your handwriting. But who wants to have their address book, e-mail, pager, and ICQ attached to them, like some sort of crippling chain to their job? Unless your entire life revolves around computers and the Internet, I can't think of a reason why you'd want one of these things leeching away your free time.

    This may be the Miniturization Age, but believe it or not, we don't need everything smaller and more pervasive. Throw that PDA away and take a vacation. See the world. Stop and smell the roses.

  • No, it was shortening filenames to 8.3 standards so you could install offa a dos drive.
  • by TerryG ( 84835 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @09:54AM (#906352) Homepage
    My snide remark:

    The simple answer is to turn your machine (PDA, cell phone, beeper, etc.) off.

    I like my hammer as much as the next guy...I don't use it in restaurants though.

    TGL
  • When I first began writing the "nfp" post above, I totally stunned that I had happened onto an article with apparently no replies. It was a completely chance event -- like winning the lottery, being struck by lightning, or receiving an IRS audit WITHOUT having exposed sexual misconduct of the current U.S. President.

    I did not believe I would actually be able to type and "Submit" quickly enough to receive the coveted first post. Therefore, I included "nearly" in my subject.

    However, fate is a fickle and unpredictable mistress (interns are much easier). As it turns out, I DID in fact have the first post to this particular article.

    What led to this remarkable set of circumstances? I can only speculum. Perhaps it was because the linked file was, in fact, a .tgz download. Perhaps other first posters were thwarted by the need to both download and unzip the file. This slowed their normally cat-like posting response.

    But the above suppository has a flaw. It assumes that Slashdooters actual FOLLOW links before they post. We all know the folly of this predisposition.

    There was a time when first posts where easy to come by. Now, Slashdot has more posters than a used CD store. First posts have become even more special and rarer than beef tartar.

    I can only conclude that, for today, the gods of the universe are looking upon me with favor. This is my special day and I will enjoy it for as long as it takes to get to the tootsie roll center of a tootsie pop. The world may never know. Thank you.
  • they used a free compression format. I hate it when some company creates ZIPs of everything, which have to be unzipped, but they don't get created in their own directory then Oh No!! my directory has 50 new files in it!!

    What's even worse is that Corel's WordPerfect 8 for Linux used DOS print drivers; the drivers you downloaded off their site were self-extracting EXE's. Morons. I should've used wine.
  • by kashent ( 213325 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @09:56AM (#906355)
    http://www.pdabuzz.com/Features/Yopy.html [pdabuzz.com] Seems to be the new pics. (not sure, since my download is crawling)
  • Hey I've been living and breathing the tar gzip thing (I've even been living in an LZOP world (For those in the know)) for quite some time, but I never heard of TGZ becuase I don't mix platforms. I unix at work, I mac at home, and I windows as rarely as possible.
    Booyakka.
  • quote:
    "This thing looks really slick, emulating the Windows CE user interface quite closely."

    while the boys and girls in richmond do a fair job building user interfaces i'm sick of the free software community ripping their stuff and producing look alike - but generally inferior - interfaces.

    the palm interface is slick as shit on a wet shovel... why could they not come up with something as ground breaking for the yoppy? why the hell does the free software community not come up with a new idea in the UI space? or at least innovate rather than play catch up?
  • As evindenced by his low user number, he could not be _that_ clueless. Maybe he was pointing out the .tgz instead of .tar.gz. Or maybe it was kind of a stretch and nobody got it. w/e.
    --
  • by Anonymous Coward
    The first 20 beta testers got their Yopys Sunday (in Korea). There should be some announcement soon on a release date. If they don't get their shit together soon, I'm getting an iPaq (though I like the bigger screen with the 16bpp color on the Yopy more). Cpt_Kirks
  • by NetJunkie ( 56134 ) <`jason.nash' `at' `gmail.com'> on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @10:00AM (#906360)
    If you read the Yopy FAQ it mentions battery life being 6 hours. 6 hours!?! For a PDA?! I wanted one before, but I don't know now....
  • No offense, but a CE interface for a palm isn't a terribly good idea. Even the people that I know who use CE think that the interface is poor. Menus like that just aren't terribly suited to being the main driving thing in a DPA. Look at palm OS, very easy to use on a small display. The interfaces classic to X are good for palms. Picture enlightenment shrunk onto a PDA screen. That sort of interface would be much more useful than CE's (and I don't care if it's familiar, it IS intuitive). Pager displays and iconboxes, menus that drag out of where you place the cursor (or at least shift properly). I would hope that the YOPY would do these more like it's linux/unix/BSD brethren.


    We're all different.
  • "This thing looks really slick, emulating the Windows CE user interface quite closely." wait a minute.....two months ago, pocket pc comes out, and /. is up in arms about the overwrought interface, and how a pda doesn't need all the features of a desktop and when os X comes out, the mac will ROOL 4EVER!

    oh wait. wrong topic.

    anyway, so how come when samsung finally shows off the YOPY, its fundamental winCE-ness is regarded as slick? i mean, how many of us would call KDE 2.0 or whatever slick if it "closely emulated" win2K?
    here's hoping samsung doesn't encounter a backlash of people not understanding that the YOPY is not a CE device, and deriding it as a poor imitation. kinda like CE and windows itself, when you think about it.
  • According to yopy.org, it runs W, not X. The W window environment takes up much less space than X, thus making it more useful for small devices with less resources than your average desktop.
  • With all the PDA's out there, is anyone really buying any that aren't Palms right now?

    At least one :) I just purchased a Psion [psionusa.com] revo, and I have to say I'm very impressed. It's very stylish, fast, and has a great user interface at a pretty high resolution (for a PDA). I used to own a Palm III, but when that broke I decided to try something different. The revo is exactly that -- different. It's a whole different kind of device... it has a word processing application, spreadsheet program, E-Mail program (better than the Palm's there), agenda, contact list... Opera has even been ported to it! I'm very satisfied, excepting the fact that AFAIK there isn't any way to sync it with Linux.

    No, I don't work for Psion :)
  • Ok, what's with the hostility here. I come from a windows background ok. Hell, I used to work for microsoft. Is it unreasonable to assume that a file supposedly containing a screenshot is an image format?
    This kind of unix wookie elitism is what turns a lot of people off of adopting linux. Fortunately the freebsd community seems a lot more helpful and humble.
    --Shoeboy
  • "Who would want to emulate Windows CE's interface?"

    And perchance, do you happen to know of a good touch- (and tap-) based interface? On any OS, never mind Linux?

    And yes, Palm-type interface is good for simple things, but only for simple things.


    Kaa
  • Ahh makes much sense now since you can install FreeBSD off a DOS partition, the 8.3 would help a lot for that =)
  • Fortunately the freebsd community seems a lot more helpful and humble.

    My young apprentice,

    I believe our roles are reversed. The above was clearly a masterful stroke of trolling. Your skills obviously exceed mine. I want to learn from you.

    The learner is now the master. The learner waits while the master baits.

  • And perchance, do you happen to know of a good touch- (and tap-) based interface?

    Newton OS? It's the most consistently usable, reasonably widespread commercial OS I've used.

    There were many aspects that contributed to its death, but "lack of ease of use" sure wasn't one of them.

    (Very) early efforts to port the Newton to free software is available at www.gnuton.com [gnuton.com].
    --

  • You forgot the fundamental point of Slashdot-style advocacy. Anything that Microsoft produces (except perhaps Internet Explorer) sucks, and is just an attempt to gain more of a stranglehold over the world as a whole. When a device using Linux starts to imitate what Microsoft does, it's hailed as an incredible breakthrough, something that's almost as good as... using Microsoft products!

    On a more serious note, sometimes Microsoft _does_ make something decent on the desktop. The use of keyboard accelerators far and away beats out other desktop OS's, so I can do things like rapid data entry without reaching for the mouse. Additionally, applications tend to use common dialogs, icons, and widgets much more often. Microsoft's own Office products tend to be among the exceptions, ironically enough.

    Of course, Microsoft has practically nothing on *nix on the command line, but who in their right mind gets anything done THERE? ;)
  • is what the heck is a YOPY. Why not pick a name that's, um, easy to remember and has some meaning? Otherwise you'll be stuck in LogoHell. [go.com]

    sulli

  • bash# traceroute www.gmate.co.kr
    traceroute to www.gmate.co.kr (211.113.71.2), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
    1 209.68.XXX.XXX (209.68.XXX.XXX) 0.643 ms 0.489 ms 0.459 ms
    2 pos3-1.hsa1.sdg1.Level3.net (209.245.56.129) 0.709 ms 0.727 ms 0.783 ms
    3 lo0.mp1.LosAngeles1.level3.net (209.247.8.241) 4.376 ms 15.523 ms 4.385 ms
    4 209.247.10.194 (209.247.10.194) 4.237 ms 4.277 ms 4.264 ms
    5 209.0.227.34 (209.0.227.34) 5.811 ms 6.087 ms 6.026 ms
    6 corerouter1.Bloomington.cw.net (204.70.9.147) 9.718 ms 9.665 ms 9.136 ms
    7 corerouter2.SanFrancisco.cw.net (204.70.9.132) 16.891 ms 19.112 ms 18.515 ms
    8 acr2-loopback.SanFranciscosfd.cw.net (206.24.210.62) 17.500 ms 17.286 ms 17.495 ms
    9 bpr1.pax.cw.net (206.24.210.8) 18.244 ms 18.103 ms 18.150 ms
    10 206.24.241.90 (206.24.241.90) 16.891 ms 16.640 ms 16.506 ms
    11 211.47.0.221 (211.47.0.221) 180.773 ms 181.084 ms 181.458 ms
    12 211.47.0.105 (211.47.0.105) 180.215 ms 181.265 ms 181.399 ms
    13 211.62.63.5 (211.62.63.5) 180.526 ms 180.593 ms 180.843 ms
    14 Daebang.LL-TEMP.hitel.net (211.62.33.100) 180.620 ms 182.815 ms 182.763 ms
    15 211.113.71.1 (211.113.71.1) 4682.654 ms 4428.250 ms 4502.190 ms
    16 211.113.71.2 (211.113.71.2) 4461.430 ms 4618.915 ms 4377.226 ms

    You think they could mirror sites that they put up?

  • by po_boy ( 69692 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @10:13AM (#906373)
    Those aren't the same images as in the tarball. They are cool, though.
  • by tilly ( 7530 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @10:13AM (#906374)
    Check out Microwindows [censoft.com]. If you need an interface for an application which may run on a Linux PDA, you are likely to use this little beauty. Plus anyone who thinks that X is awful should take note. By developing things using Microwindows you can get applications - today - that run under X and also can run with a far lighter windowing interface...

    Cheers,
    Ben
  • Do you know if there's some way to program the Revo as itself (no PC)? I heard something about OPL, but haven't seen any real good info...
  • One of the main problems with these types of machines is the fact that the batteries don';t last very long drastically limits it usefulness. I know it has a 1400mAh battery but this tells me nothing about how long it will run with the processor and colour display. Anyone know anything about this?
  • That sure doesn't look like an eye to me.
  • The YOPY runs Linux. The ROM is flashable. Write your own interface if you think Samsung dropped the ball. That's what OSS is for . . .
  • they used a free compression format. I hate it when some company creates ZIPs of everything, which have to be unzipped, but they don't get created in their own directory then Oh No!! my directory has 50 new files in it!!

    What's even worse is that Corel's WordPerfect 8 for Linux used DOS print drivers; the drivers you downloaded off their site were self-extracting EXE's. Morons. I should've used wine.


    Zip is a free compression format, you moron.

    Learn to use options and you'll get all the files dumped in the right directories (clue: -D works)

    Many many more people use Zip than use tgz - I don't know why anybody bothers with tgz any more - especially for wide distribution. Most people don't know what to do with them.

    Fortunately, Winzip handles them just fine. I registered my copy - did you?
  • by Anonymous Coward
    I hereby propose a new moderation category.
    (-1, YHBT)
  • Doesn't anyone else think that this PDA craze is getting out of hand? Sure, it's neat to have information in a small, portable form, but do we want to be "connected" 24/7?

    You are confused. Your rant is, basically, against beepers and cell phones -- these are the devices that make you "connected" 24/7. PDAs are, ahem, somewhat different.

    But who wants to have their address book, e-mail, pager, and ICQ attached to them, like some sort of crippling chain to their job?

    Job??

    Does your address book have only business contacts? Is your email 99% business-related? Is it only your boss or your customers that page you?

    If so, my advice would be to get a life.

    believe it or not, we don't need everything smaller and more pervasive.

    I know a lot of women who would agree with you wholeheartedly.


    Kaa
  • I keep trying to pronounce YOPY and it keeps coming back "yuppie". Which is probably true.. that's who these things are designed for, eh? So, in that case, it's not coming into the Temple of Tech that is my house. Yeesh.. let's go beat up their marketing department in a massive game of Unreal Tournament.
  • First of all, you've owned and used one of these and then thrown it away right?

    I for one don't have connectivity built into mine (Visor) except for my hotsync cradle. I use mine as a portable to-do list, address book, and scheduler. All the other frills are nice, like readin some document/book when stuck waiting in a restaraunt, etc.

    I couldn't take notes in a meeting. People would (still) stare, and either it's not good enough or my graphitit still sucks enough that it's unfeasable. And memos to hospitals etc... that's what cell phones are for (you know of the email addresses to the right address for hospitals??? or maybe this is a new 'feature'). You seem to be lumping pagers, PDAs, cell phones all into the same category.

    And just remember this... just because maybe you or the people you know can't control themselves it doesn't mean *everyone* can't use PDAs effectively. After all we have workaholics, alcoholics, gambling addicts, and so on and we also have very well adjusted people. You either have an addiction problem or you generally *choose* to live your life that way.

    And you're going to be disappointed in the future. Everything is going to be connected, everything will get smaller, and short of moving to a log cabin in the Yukon you will be in contact with these developments.
  • by Shoeboy ( 16224 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @10:24AM (#906384) Homepage
    Smoking Joe,
    The hallowed and supa-1337 trolls of slashdot have embraced me. Yea verily spiralx has clasped me to his manly bosom and let me suckle at the teat of trolldom. There is great rejoicing in shoeboy land and a major party in my pants.
    Your young apprentice,
    --Shoeboy
  • by Ryandav ( 5475 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @10:25AM (#906385) Homepage Journal
    Actually, there have been some wonderful editorials on this topic in the NYTimes print edition, although I am unable to find any of them (anyone know of an editorial index online?) at the moment.

    The gist is, as we allow technology into our lives, we have to make it slave to us, not enslave ourselves to it. Luddites complain that cellphones keep us apart and remote while techno-enthusiasts claim it brings us together. My arkansas mother claims she talks more in email with her remote family now that she did on the phone in a year, while a fellow LUG officer I know turns his pager off the minute he leaves work because it stresses him out to be "too-connected". The truth is that tech can do both, enslave us or serve us, and it's all in the amount of control that you have technology to have in your life. Do you feel ABSOLUTELY COMPELLED to answer a ringing phone? It is in _your_ home, for _your_ convenience, and if you are busy, then let it ring and lose the stress. If you're in class, TURN YOUR FRIGGIN CELL PHONE OFF unless you just happen to be part of the 1% of the population that absolutely HAS to be reachable 24/7, and in that case, use the vibrate feature that almost all of them come with now.

    tech is what you make of it, like many other things...

  • This thing looks really slick, emulating the Windows CE user interface quite closely.

    I know others have picked up on this. (even faster than they picked up on Taco's QT/Diablo2 double-standards)

    But the /. community condoning, let alone forgiving someone for lack of innovation is quite laughable.
  • Well, if I get the $$$ together for a PDA, maybe I will :-)


    We're all different.
  • It only took like an hour or more(2)... I started the second the sory was up... usually take no more then 40 seconds for a file that size damn..

    Anyway It looks pretty sweet, the mp3 player looks cool but how much memory is that thing going to have?
  • YOPY= Your Own Personal YOPY
  • Why go for a complex, contrived explanation when the assumption that he was just trolling y'all suffices pretty well?
    --
  • Well, my download just finished. Those pics are different, so, here's a mirror I put up with the new pics. Let's see if Rice University's got the bandwidth...
    http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~kashent/yopy/ [rice.edu]
    Oh, and they are uncompressed, for those of you who care. -Kashent
  • pooh pooh.

    if you give it a wee think, you'll realise that a low user number should correlate quite well with clue.
    afterall, you lurk for a while before signing up (I know I did), so the guy's been surfing the web for a while.

    That said, I'm a little suprised that anyone reading a linux site for so long could be ignorant of slackware's tarball format, eh.

    whatever, really.
  • Check out the pix at http://linuxfriendly.com [linuxfriendly.com] and at http://ralph [ralph.cx] once it comes back up (had a drive failure)
    Enjoy! :)
  • Now if MS said that, /. would be up in arms! The truth is, that comment (write your own interface) is just an excuse for a crappy product. That's fine if the guys are OSS guys who do this for free, but if I pay for a product, I want the interface done correctly dammit! I mean you can replace the GUI in Windows even though its not OSS (its called modularity) but hell, its MS's product, I paid for it, and I want THEM to do it.
  • Can you post a mirror? It keeps dying on me.
  • by Trinition ( 114758 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @10:41AM (#906396) Homepage
    Why do we need a Linux-based PDA? All right, it can be Linux-based, but it had better be a PDA.

    If they're just shrinking down a computer into a handheld format, then it's a handheld computer. Smaller screen, different input mechanism. But that doesn't make it a PDA.

    Besides being small, durable and portable, a PDA should above all else be an assistant -- as in Personal Digital Assitant.

    That means having software thats tailored to doing PDA-like things: checking off tasks, reading e-mail, looking up addresses, etc. It must be able to do all of these PDA-like things very quickly and easily.

    As a veteran of many WinCE/PPC/PalmOS debates, it is still my opinion that Windows CE and PocketPC are designed to be handheld computers more than a PDA. Microsoft started moving in the right direction by simplifying the user interface, but the fact is, it remains built upon a non-PDA-oriented OS.

    Is YOPY just going to be a Linux version of Windows CE? The most important thing about a PDA, the human interface, is said to be already emulating Windows CE, according to the author.

  • I want 700 MHz crusoe processor beowulf cluster embedded in my skull that uses the glucose and caffine in my blood as a power source that directly patches into my retina for video output and cochlea for audio output, muscle twitch text input, a bioport simstim interface for upgrades and 'wares, and builtin PCS network interface for global roaming wireless GHz ethernet... well, then I'd be a borg.

    ;)
  • With the danger of being a troll, I feel
    it is very much uncalled for, moderating an
    obvious newbiepost as troll, just because the
    poster is a newbie.
    He didn't know about TAR-balls or Gzip?
    So what? I didn't some years ago.
    Although I use tools like this regularily now,
    the best way of scaring people off trying *nix'es,
    is by alienating them.
    What we SHOULD do, is point the person to good
    ways of getting information, or enlighten the
    person.
    On a different matter, individual JPEG's would
    be better, because it would let us look at thumbnails, and deciding what images was worth
    looking at, without really increasing size.
  • Never quite got over that [radiodepot.com]
  • You can find out more (including price) at This site [gicom.de]
  • Any PDA that has a version of Arkanoid (Breakout for the old school folks) BUILT INTO IT has my $$, I don't care if I have to sell a kidney to buy it. And re: battery life, I don't care if the thing only gets 12, 6 or even 3 hours per charge, that's still better than my laptop on a good day. YAY Yopy!
  • Mirror [uoguelph.ca] Hosted in Canada on .EDU type link.

    Windows users: File will open with Winzip.
    Unix: Need i explain?
  • by DigitalDragon ( 194314 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @10:52AM (#906403)
    Yopy in the news

    http://slashdot .org/article.pl?sid=00/04/27/0858200&mode=thread [slashdot.org]
    http://linuxtoday.com/stories/17660.html [linuxtoday.com]
    http://www.geeknews.org/news/fe b00/newsitem090.html [geeknews.org]
    http://www.palmstation.com/ view_article.py?article=1786 [palmstation.com]
    http://www.pdabuzz.com/Features/Yopy.html [pdabuzz.com]
    http://slashdot .org/article.pl?sid=00/02/27/1027237&mode=thread [slashdot.org]
    http://www.pcworld.com /pcwtoday/article/0,1510,15486,00.html [pcworld.com]
    http://www.ch ip.de/PC2D/PC2DB/PC2DBA/pc2dba.htm?id=323&ressort= 20 [www.chip.de] (German)
    http://www.twomobile.com/new_032200_y opy.html [twomobile.com] (obviously they didn't credit the source of the pictures and video footage!)
    http://ore illy.linux.com/pub/a/network/2000/05/05/magazine/L inuxPDA.html [linux.com]
    http://www.handheldmed.com/code/news /yopi1.htm [handheldmed.com]
    http://www.gnn.de/0005/7603.html [www.gnn.de] (German)
    http://www.p cwelt.de/content/news/newprodukte/2000/05/xn090500 003.html [pcwelt.de] (German)

    Company sites, product information

    http://www.sem.samsung.co.kr/ eng/product/digital/pda/ [samsung.co.kr]
    http://www.gmate.co.kr [gmate.co.kr]

    Links to other Yopy and general Linux-PDA ressources

    http://www.palmtopmagazin.de/board/linux Discussion about Linux-PDAs (German) [palmtopmagazin.de]
    http://www.palmtopmagazin.de/news/linux [palmtopmagazin.de] Linux-PDA news (German)
    http://www.theyopy.de [theyopy.de] German Yopy fan site
    http://www.handhelds.org [handhelds.org] Linux-Development for Compaq iPaq
    http://www.yopy.org [yopy.org] Another Yopy fan site


  • What's the battery life on this thing? Especially if you play MP3s or media files... I took at look at their FAQ and specs and didn't spot it.
  • Mirror [uoguelph.ca] Hosted in Canada on an .EDU type link.

    Funny thing is, these pictures are dated July 1999.

    Even funnier, it really did take this long (150 posts) to download the whole thing.

  • Ah, the traditional luddite post..

    Doesn't anyone else think that this PDA craze is getting out of hand? Sure, it's neat to have information in a small, portable form, but do we want to be "connected" 24/7? Don't we want the ability to take a vacation instead of spending our week in Hawaii sending memos to the boss on our shiny new PDA while talking on a cellphone, waiting for our beeper to ring, and coding on a laptop?

    Well, here is an idea. Don't fucking buy one if you don't want one. Don't make the rest of us suffer because you want to fucking rub to sticks together to make a fire, while the rest of us are more than happy to use a zippo.
  • if you were in an accident, for example, you could send a memo to the hospital.

    Haha. If you were in an accident you would not be able to send anything. Type recognition works like magic when your hand (head, spine, legs, fingers...) is broken. :)

  • That's 6 hours of constant use (I have to assume this). And, since the batteries are rechargable, it's just like a cell phone. My cellphone only has maybe an hour of "talk time" but it has 36 or so hours of standby (this is the Motorola i1000+ that I'm referring to). So, if you're a hardcore user of your PDA at work, you might have to just buy a second cradle for the office.
  • Do you know if there's some way to program the Revo as itself (no PC)? I heard something about OPL, but haven't seen any real good info...

    A quick Google search [google.com] turned up this [psionplace.com]. It seems like it's a way to put OPL on the revo (taking up about 40K), although I can't tell you if it works or not.

    Good luck!
  • one reason

    the only reason I can see for getting it done with W rather than X is fonts and widget set

    it I think is slower than X but offers a more complete solution

    X is fast as long as you dont use large bitmaps and widget sets which hog memory (QT and gtk are guilty when useing pixmaped themes ) I use X for Xterms and displaying a nice background and it runs @ light speed

    when we actualy use an proper solution then we will see how nice fonts can be !

    hell it uses a StrongARM it could if they wanted run X same as itsy
    they just went for a small development time with as few developers as possible this was to minamize RISK which as any project manager are BIG factors in what companys let you do

    compaq have a head start By owning digital where they actualy Know what the StrongARM is capable of !
    (they just dont know it yet and is towing the line with Microsoft)

    recompileing the kernel under WinCE is so nightmareish that nobody does it and so compromises it !
    this is how GNU/Linux can easly win

    plus have you noticed Redhat are hawking tools for the StrongARM .... Hmm

    andy Grove what did you learn by useing that intel watch !
    (dont worry its someone elses tech which works ! )

    fun and games

    john jones


    (a deltic so please dont moan about spelling but the content)
  • Here are some mirrors I've put up, served up fresh and hot from the NCNE GigaPOP [ncne.net] at CMU [cmu.edu]: (file renamed to .tar.gz from .tgz so that web servers serve it up in binary mode for you windows people)

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/andrew/usr7/nstrom/www/s tuff/beta.tar.gz [cmu.edu]
    http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/~nstrom/stuff/beta.tar.g z [cmu.edu]
    http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~nstrom/stuff/be ta.tar.gz [cmu.edu]

    Enjoy!

  • The images and accompanying text are all up at http://waxwolf.com/yopy/ [waxwolf.com].

    This does look like a nifty little beastie, though I'd like to handle one before buying...
  • Here's a mirror in the US: http://dynodns.net/yopy [dynodns.net]
  • No, it's called people who can't be arsed to learn something for themselves and need endless hand-holding to get through it. Instead of posting a very crap and flamebaity post ('moon-man format' indeed), those who do not know something should TRY and find out, there's LOTS of info available. and if they're stuck and want help they should ASK NICELY .. it's not much to ask.. jeez. Courteous questions always get courteous replies. Acting like a fuckwit gets you rightly labelled as one.

    Get over yourself already.

    --
  • by kootch ( 81702 ) on Tuesday July 25, 2000 @11:07AM (#906415) Homepage
    "But it looks like Samsung is taking a big step in the race for the ultimate PDA."

    That's only if you believe there is such a thing as the ultimate PDA. A PDA doesn't have to be of the Palm/Handspring genre, but can instead me any small mobile device that has organizing and functional abilities incorporated into it.

    Personally, I'm sick of the genre. I'd like a PDA that had the ability to call a phone number from my phone/address book, to listen to and search for mp3's and listen to them as they stream out of thin air into my headphones, etc.

    But while I want one Palm-sized device, I would also like a miniature device that would function just as a phone with some additional functionality but be able to sync against my Palm, a miniature laptop that could sync to both my phone and my Palm, and a way to sync all of these devices and maybe 20 more all together, each specializing in one thing instead of having a big cell phone that tries to act like a PDA.

    ultimate PDA you say? Ha. you'll wish you were only carrying 1 gadget 10 yrs from now.

  • I put the pix up at http://linuxfriendly.com [linuxfriendly.com] thumbnailed for ya :)
  • I don't want 1000 people hitting my pc and all the web space I have access to just was switched over to a sever that has a metered connection...

    I'll see If I can figure somthing out.. do you have somewhere I can upload/send it?
  • They are old pics from the CeBit show in Hanover I believe. That Yopy is running the old UI... thanks for the link though
  • Okay, I'll bite at the troll post..

    Tried saving unix file permissions in a .zip file? .. my case rests. Just because you don't know what to do with them doesn't mean they are not useful for other people. Also gzip, IIRC, as in what the tar (TApe Archive for the REALLY un-clued) is passed through to compress it, has a higher compression ratio than Zip compression.

    Where'd this 'many many more people use zip' comment come from?? obviously in windows-land they do.. that's plainly obvious.

    --
  • and watch me shuffle my socked feet across a shag rug and zap you, effectively turning all of that cool gadgetry into dead hardware that's just waiting to rust in the depths of your brain.

    read Interface [amazon.com] by Stephen Bury

  • This is soooo sily.... so you don't think PDAs are useful? Then just don't buy them! You want to use a PDA to send a memo to the hospital in case of an accident?? That's quite ridiculous, to say the least!

    A PDA will give you access to any information you store on it! If all you can think is to put your boss' address on it, so you can contact him/her, may be you shouldn't take your PDA on to your vacations. As far as I know the titanium chain to your neck is still an optional, these days...

    PDAs are pervasive? Only if it gives information away to someone else, without your control. I don't think that's quite the case, yet. Just be careful on what model you buy.

    P.S.: I don't endorse any particular model of PDA. I just feel people shouldn't be blindly bashing on a whole class of products based solely on technophobia.
  • When compressing files, I usually like to make them as small as possible. The bz2 format is the smallest, so I use that. Zip and gzip don't even come close.

    Put your ear up to the monitor, ok, now listen closely. Baaaaaaa baaaaaaaaa. Sound familiar? It's the sound of other zip users.

  • Hmmn.. I figure it would be more entertaining
    To hack him dont you think??

    I mean we can effectively deafen, blind him leaving his only sense left the internet

    Just imagine that.. instead of having regular senses all you have is IE (AHHHH) and Media player for sound. hehe.. just wait for ILOVEYOU to come to you :)

    Hmmn Jeremy


    If you think education is expensive, try ignornace
  • Well, I sure like the Palm OS.
  • by sulli ( 195030 )
    YAWN = Yet Another Worthless Name
  • by Anonymous Coward

    I made a quick little page for those of you wanting to actually VIEW the contents of the TGZ file (as well as making a ZIP version). Thumbnails, etc. quick and dirty. http://rm-f.net/~orange/yopy/20000 725/index.html [rm-f.net]

  • two conflicting arguments.

    1. the Windows OS, as much as we all hate/loath it, is the most recognized and used operating system EVER. this doesn't mean it's great, but there are millions that are comfortable with it.

    2. the WinCE OS currently holds between 15 and 30 percent of the mobile market. Palm and Handspring have the other 70 to 85 percent between the two of them.

    So while WinCE might be familiar to everyone, it doesn't currently seem like this is a great selling point. Although, it could be because the USABILITY of the Palm OS and PDA is much higher. Yes, WinCE might have more functionality (afterall, it IS supposed to be Windows crammed into a small body), but if users can't figure out how to use it, what good is it?

    Symbian's EPOC might be very kewl when it comes out. Sony's next generation of mobile devices (both PDA's and cell phones) might be running this OS with 3G capabilities (wishful thinking of course). When Sony, including both their techies and their marketting people, get involved with mobile devices, just you wait. They'll take over the market in much the same way they've taken over consumer electronics.
  • There's nothing particularly wrong with the WinCE user interface. And .. it is only superficially like the desktop interface. The very idea that it can take the place of a laptop for writing or real spreadsheet work is in itself problematic. But for PDA-ish and field computing type applications (stock taking, field surveys) the WinCE interface is fine.

    The real problem comes in the desktop integration. It's the idea of seamlessness that doesn't work. Sometimes you need to be able to see the seams because the "seamless" version papers over significnt things. Like some drivers I've seen that make tape drives "look like" hard drives -- yeah great, but I'd rather have a fast tape drive than a slooow hard disk. The same applies to the ActiveSync; it doesn't achieve what it sets out to do perfectly and with utter reliability, as Palm's Hotsynch does.

    In short, I've found ActiveSynch to be flaky. Better predictable and "seamy" than flaky and "seamless".

    My company uses both -- Palms for day to day stuff where utter reliability is the premium, WinCE handhelds for things that require more power in the field.
  • The genius of the PalmComputing platform is not that it is "ultimate" in any way.

    The Palm machines are designed around the exact opposite, namely being designed around a set of design compromises.

    • There is a limited set of buttons (7 in all)
    • There is a screen of limited size
    • Limited resolution
    • Limited set of colours
    • Limited amount of memory
    • Limited amount of CPU horsepower
    • NO "secondary storage."

      Thus nothing resembling "disk," or "files."

    This set of design constraints mean that rather than doing the "WinCE" thing of "trying to be Windows, with a somewhat smaller screen," PalmOS is completely different.

    It encourages creating embedded applications that do fairly specific things, rather than creating "generic" applications like spreadsheets to do "generic" things.

    While all of the above looks like criticism, particularly in light of the usual "GNU" thing of encouraging there to be no arbitrary limits, I would take the opposite tack. PalmOS has provided a case of relishing the limitations, and working with them rather than the approach of fighting against them.

    The net result has been pretty successful. You can do a number of useful things with a Palm III, which make it worth having one.

    I'm not sure that the Yopi has chosen its design compromises carefully enough to be able to be successful.

    • If all it provides is a faster address/calendar book than PalmComputing, it loses.

      PalmComputing generally doesn't suffer from being too slow.

    • If it needs a barrel of additional hardware, like keyboards and such, to be made useful, it loses.

      It needs to be useful without the extra stuff, unless it includes a keyboard by default.

    • If the "cool part" is merely that it runs Linux, it loses.

      A few people will run it because of that, but I'm a Linux advocate [hex.net] and I wouldn't spend the money just because of that.

      At present, the iPAQ 3600 [handhelds.org] may run Linux, but does so only if you have a desktop "terminal" to connect to it. It may ultimately become "useful on the road," but it's not there yet.

    I just don't think Yopi has yet come up with a suitable set of compromises in order to become amazingly functional.

  • My Young Apprentice,

    I bit down on my tootsie roll when I heard you had been admitted to the hallowed halls of trolldom! To the wise trolls who admitted you, I can offer only this advice:

    Carry your own toilet paper with you. [slashdot.org]
  • Okay, I'll bite at the troll post..

    Hey, who's trolling?

    Tried saving unix file permissions in a .zip file? .. my case rests. Just because you don't know what to do with them doesn't mean they are not useful for other people. Also gzip, IIRC, as in what the tar (TApe Archive for the REALLY un-clued) is passed through to compress it, has a higher compression ratio than Zip compression.

    Depends on how you compress it. Images shouldn't be compressed anyway - not if they're GIF or JPG - you gain nothing.

    Frankly, I already know how to use tar and gzip - in fact, I can use Winzip to do the same thing if I want to (which is convenient).

    The permissions argument is a useless one for this particular instance anyway. Images don't need them. Documents don't need them. And that's what most people use Zip for.

    Where'd this 'many many more people use zip' comment come from?? obviously in windows-land they do.. that's plainly obvious.

    ZIP is available on Unix.
    JAR files use Zip compression.
    More people use Windows on a day to day basis - including surfing from work - than would be likely to have access to Tar and Gzip.

    Simon
  • Several years ago there was an excellent essay on ubiquitous technology, it was called Calm Computing [ubiq.com].

    Well worth the read.

    Cheers,
    Ben

Swap read error. You lose your mind.

Working...