Crowdfunded Linux Voice Magazine Releases First Issue CC-BY-SA 62
M-Saunders (706738) writes Linux Voice, the crowdfunded GNU/Linux magazine that Slashdot has covered previously, had two goals at its launch: to give 50% of its profits back to the community after one year, and release each issue's contents under the Creative Commons after nine months. Well, it's been nine months since issue 1, so the whole thing is now online and free to share. Readers and supporters have also made audio versions of articles, for listening to on the commute to work.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it's the 21st century, so no. I think we'd be alright with UTF-8.
Re: (Score:2)
AC probably wants Content-type: text/plain (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:PDF? PDF??? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Also, I was under the impression that PDF was an open format, just Adobe's reader is closed. PDF will make most people happy.
I'm surprised nobody sad TeX should have been used....
Re: (Score:2)
It is now. Portable Document Format (PDF) wasn't officially open until 2008. For a while it was in limbo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Document_Format
Re: (Score:1)
PDF was open enough from the beginning to have its specification available in print from the days of Acrobat 1.0: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/pd... [adobe.com]
Here: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/pd... [adobe.com]
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/con... [adobe.com] --- for some reason they don't have the first edition available (not that it's all that useful these days).
Re: (Score:2)
Also, I was under the impression that PDF was an open format, just Adobe's reader is closed. PDF will make most people happy.
Have you ever tried to copy the text out of a PDF? It's a horrible exercise where you spend the rest of the even reinserting spaces and reordering weird phantom jumps. PDF is a delivery format, not a format for editing.
Re: (Score:2)
1. There are HTML versions of many of the articles.
Many != all.
2. We're giving this away for free! To share and adapt. Feel free to pull the text from the PDFs and put it up on GitHub.
How nice. You've put it up to share and adapt... in a delivery format, not an edit format. You presumably have source files (I doubt the copy was originally written directly in Acrobat) but you won't burden us with them, you'll just give us your blessing to fight with copying and pasting from PDF.
If you're still angry about PDFs, we'll happily give you your money back... Oh wait, you got it for free! :-)
That's no excuse. You built up a lot of goodwill (and generated crowdfunding) with your promise of adaptible content, and you've left up an irritating barrier to adaptation.
Re: (Score:2)
They offer HTML versions of each article on their website too. Look a bit further down the page past the pdf link and you'll find them.
Re: (Score:2)
PDF isn't a locked down format:
http://www.adobe.com/content/d... [adobe.com]
There are extensions and other software that can encrypted and DRM pdf but I assume Linux Voice isn't going to use those.
Re: (Score:3)
PDF is an open standard, has been since 2008. Didn't you get the memo?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P... [wikipedia.org]
PDF was a proprietary format, controlled by Adobe, until it was officially released as an open standard on July 1, 2008, and published by the International Organization for Standardization as ISO 32000-1:2008,
The fact that they used a Mac to create the PDF is a slightly more valid complaint. Note I said slightly.
Re:PDF? PDF??? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Forget the naysayers, I'm a subscriber, and you guys rock.
9 months? (Score:4, Interesting)
I haven't read this magazine yet; diidn't realize it existed until today.
However, the computer industry moves so quickly -- is the information stale or outdated nine months after initial publication? If so, what's the point, other than a public relations exercise? This may be vulnerable to the same malady that killed the paper computer magazines of the 80's and 90's.
Re:9 months? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:9 months? (Score:4, Insightful)
Perhaps it is a good idea to read Linux Voice before commenting upon it's value, simply based upon the merit that it is a magazine.
While certain aspects of a magzine do go out-of-date quickly, others don't. Nine month old news, not so great. Nine month old reviews are okay. They'll introduce you to a product, even if some information is outdated. Nine old month tutorials can be useful.
Magazines do have merits other than content. The flow of information is more paced. Reading the news daily (or even hourly) means that you are more likely to run into redundant details across multiple articles. It also means that there is less time to write comprehensive stories, verify details, and edit the material. I'm not saying that they're perfect, but you really have to wonder about the quality of a lot of the online media when they publish as much a day as a magazine publishes in a month. Actually, I don't have to wonder. I've gone to many sites where the articles range from terrible to excellent, primarily because the authors range from terrible to excellent. Yet they won't cut the terrible authors because it's more important to have a continuous stream of updates than it is to invest in quality.
Slashdot (Score:5, Insightful)
Here we go again, /. at its worst. /. appears to be all about.
A 116 page CC licensed magazine with dozens of articles, and our comments?
That their format sucks, that it's out of date, that there is a smell spelling error on page 87, and so on.
Way to go guys and gals, a fine example of what
Re: (Score:2)
The smart folks left /. years ago.
I still use /. as a news aggregator, as they *sometimes* post stories that I don't find elsewhere.
In the olden days you'd find some real insights in the comments section. Nowadays you're better off on reddit(*shudder*).
Re: (Score:2)
There are still a few of us left ... ... although with that the shitty UI Beta I wonder how long before it drives the rest of us away for good.
Reddit? Please. While it has some fantastic sub-reddits, Reddit is the Dig of Slashdot. The majority is full of whiny emo teens who down vote anything "Just Because". It's moderation system sucks -- it provides no context for why something was up/down voted.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't get me wrong, reddit sucks... it's just better than slashdot in some of the technical subreddits.
Re: (Score:2)
The criticisms are a bit over the top. However, the real issue is "why?"
Back in the days of dial-up internet, linux magazines came with cover disks. It's how I got old versions of Mandrake, Suse, etc.
Now? High-speed internet killed the cover cds and the later cover dvds. The articles? Reviews are a dime a dozen on the internet (and new ones at that). Example: Review: FreeBSD 10.0. 10.1 has already been released and reviewed elsewhere. Tutorials on vim and grep? Build dynamic web pages? Why? Tis
Re:Slashdot (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Most people can't be arsed (using the Brit term seeing as your subscription prices are quoted in GBP) to cancel a subscription - the real "rubber hits the road" question is renewal rates, which will lead to the churn rate, cost of acquisition per new reader, etc.
You may be right, but the odds, sadly, are against it. Add to that the extra costs of maintaining both an e-Zine format and a print format (with higher production and distribution costs, even though you charge more for the print edition, it's prob
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, and yes, I am a subscriber to Linux Voice.
(So to the magazine and its staff - thanks).
Re: (Score:2)
I still like dead tree books, papers, etc. But ... they're an archaism. Harder to search than a digital library. Uses more resources. A PITA to store and move. A lot harder to recycle than a bunch of bits on a usb key. Restricted to static content. Needs yet another separate print edition for people with moderate visual handicaps (which, in practical terms, mostly means "forget it" or being stuck using an audio format).
Digital isn't "the way of the future" any more. In another generation or two "boo
Re: (Score:2)
(But then I also remember punched cards!)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Website's down (Score:1)
Awesome magazine (Score:2, Informative)
I just wanted to say that I bought a subscription to this magazine, and it was money well spent. Great great great read. More Linux than you can handle.
Disclaimer: I'm right in their target demo: Intermediate Linux user. Computer n00bs and crusty old SysAdmins may have a different experience.
Profit (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
A new magazine says it will donate half the "profit."
What else should they donate? The costs?
Slashdot is so full of hate these days (Score:2)
M-Saunders, please ignore the hate and thanks for your enlightened views on publishing. I was disappointed when you guys "forked" LinuxFormat but I have enjoyed what I have consumed of the new magazine and podcast. I hope your business model is sustainable and look forward to catching up with the issues I've missed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ditto
Keep Up the Goodwork (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I also have been a subscriber since the beginning and the Magazine is great. A lot of fun and a lot of useful info/tutorials etc.
And there is still room for a magazine, I travel on Helicopter, onto Offshore Installations with very little network connection available. There are still plenty of places without good network coverage.
So having the paper Magazine is important for me
How is the digital subscription delivered? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Awesome Magazine (Score:1)
The main one was that I'd enjoyed the writers' articles in their prior venture (which I also still read). Secondly, I thought the pricing of the digital subscription was reasonable, unlike others whose digital subscription price approaches that of the printed. Finally, I've begun to claw myself away from having to fond