6565395
story
Comments: 127 + - Linux: Chinese Gov't Pushing Linux In Rural China With Subsidies on Friday October 23 2009, @01:29AM
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topiclinuxbiz.gif); width:60px; height:71px;
linuxbusiness
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topiclinux.gif); width:60px; height:70px;
linux
nerdyH writes "The Chinese government's 'Go Rural' program offers subsidies up to 13 percent for rural residents who purchase approved nettops or netbooks. The systems come with a version of Red Flag Linux built on the Moblin stack. Along with Internet access, the software is said to provide apps for crop and livestock management, farm production marketing, remote office access/automation, and even online tour and hotel booking systems. Of course, Windows dominates the China market, and if traditional patterns hold, about 30 percent of these subsidized systems could ultimately wind up re-installed with Windows."
Related Stories
Did you move a lot of KOREAN STEAK KNIVES this trip, Dingy?
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2010 Geeknet, Inc.
13 percent? (Score:2)
the Chinese government began offering subsidies of up to 13 percent for residents in rural areas who purchase qualifying computers.
Is this really even a story? Having to buy a "qualifying" computer just to get 13% off doesn't seem like a deal.
Re: (Score:2)
Having to buy a "qualifying" computer just to get 13% off doesn't seem like a deal.
Computers are still expensive. Those 13% translate to some visible savings to a Chinese peasant.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Computers are still expensive. Those 13% translate to some visible savings to a Chinese peasant.
Not if they weren't the cheapest to begin with. Wouldn't you be skeptical of a USA Go Rural! computer being the best deal? I'm not quite sure what value to assign to an oppressive government's software either.
Re:13 percent? (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm not quite sure what value to assign to an oppressive government's software either
Assign a lot of value and you won't be wrong. Apple's iPhone is a shining example of a computer that doesn't allow execution of anything that is not approved by authorities. China, with all its oppression, is not there yet. Now look at Apple's profits.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Assign a lot of value and you won't be wrong. Apple's iPhone is a shining example of a computer that doesn't allow execution of anything that is not approved by authorities.
Commercial quality assurance and government obedience assurance aren't exactly the same thing.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
That is the problem with geeks. They see the iPhone, they step back, and they compare it's features to that of a netbook, notebook, or a full-blown desktop computer and start bitching about what they can't do with the device.
The general public does no such th
Re:13 percent? (Score:5, Insightful)
That is the problem with geeks. They see the iPhone, they step back, and they compare it's features to that of a netbook, notebook, or a full-blown desktop computer and start bitching about what they can't do with the device.
Oh fuck off. We saw the iPhone and said, ok so will it support MMS? No? 3G? No? Application market not dictated by a single entity? No? What about battery, can I change my own battery at least? No? I have a shitty symbian phone that is worth about as much as the lint in my pocket, which supports multitask, what about the iPhone? No??? Then what the fuck am I paying for? Touchscreen? No sir, the iPhone is ignored by the geeks for the same reason that Fiat is ignored by the car enthusiasts. It is simply a poor product.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Well, *this* geek looks at the iPhone and compares its feature to pretty much every other phone on the market and wonders why the iPhone can't do the same thing. At least, he did with the first iPhone...kind of lost interest after that.
Re:13 percent? (Score:4, Funny)
Sup, dawg. We heard you have problems with geeks.
GET THE FUCK OFF OUR LAWN.
Parent
Re:13 percent? (Score:5, Insightful)
You are so wrong, you make people feel like you're right again.
You are the only one, assuming your assumptions. Everybody else compares the iPhone to simple run-off-the-mill smartphones from Nokia, Samsung, etc. And it simply can't hold a candle to any of them. That's a cold hard fact. Maybe you have only seen, what companies like Verizon offer you. But that is not, what you can actually buy in countries with working markets. Look at Germany. Look at Japan, dammit! Our phones are technical MONSTERS with functions that the iPhone can't even begin to dream of. PLUS total freedom. Hell, Nokia's N900 smartphone even offers you Linux with full root access right from the factory! No unlocking, to tricks, nothing. And on top of all the normal features.
The simplest way to know that you have never used a recent smartphone: You think the iPhone is in any one aspect better than other smartphones.
Apple is trying to play catch-up. That's all. The rest is pure and raw hype and a whole load of monopolism from US phone companies.
Parent
authorities?.. (was: Re: 13 percent?) (Score:2)
"Authorities" is government. Apple is not government.
The distinction is significant, because Apple's device was made by them — it is not attributable to a dime of taxpayer's money, and is not handed out by a government as part of any policy. Maybe, you should've used government-sponsored school and library computers for your example — those are, indeed, very limited by
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
I AM VERY GLAD that the Chinese government dictates how many children they can have. It may suck for the Chinese people, but it's very good for the rest of us that they stopped the gigantic population growth they were having before these measures were in effect.
It's very nice to have opinions when we're in the First World, sitting in our leather couch, watching our plasma TV, sipping 12 year scotch.
See here [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
China was having overpopulation issues when the roman legions were still roaming the Earth.
This isn't something that you can casually extract from one country and bolt onto another (like 150 years of democracy).
Re: (Score:2)
I think the whole issue of spying on barely literate peasants is overengineered by /. I could even agree that spying on city intellectuals would make at least some sense. But peasants? Forget it. If there is anything brewing in a remote village it won't be done on Internet, it will be done in tea houses, and that's where informers come into play.
So IMO the risk of spying on peasants through this 13% program is minimal. Peasants do not matter, and there are too many of them to watch each and every one per
Re: (Score:2)
Consider more from a Chinese government perspective. They wish to distribute computers to regional areas, rather than pay the full cost, they are getting rural farmer to pay a substantive portion of the price. Now because the government is distributing the computers to keep the copy-rightists happy they can not exactly distribute them with pirated copies of windows. So distributing them at a further discount with Linux means a substantive saving for the government and if those units end up with pirated sof
But does it run (Score:2)
Green Dam?
So Simple Chinese Farmers Can Use it (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
As an American living in China, I believe that people in rural China, as well as the elderly, could really surprise many westerners. For example, it is very common for the elderly here to trade stocks as a hobby, and community English classes are often full of retired people who are eager to learn, and who race to raise their hands when it is time for questions. Many people here really value knowledge and love to learn, and they are very often not the youngest, most educated, or most privileged.
I of
Re:So Simple Chinese Farmers Can Use it (Score:5, Interesting)
Learning to speak English well is difficult. Most native speakers can't do it, and writing it is even harder. The spelling, grammar, and punctuation rules are inherited not just from several different languages, but from at least three distinct language families. The advantage English has is that the language contains a lot of redundancy (which advocates of the Saphir-Wharf hypothesis believe encourages flexibly thought, but I digress) which means that it is very easy to speak English badly, but comprehensibly.
Compare it to another popular world language, like Spanish (or Portuguese) and you'll see something that is a lot easier to learn. A few years ago I came across a study in relative difficulty of learning languages. It ranked all of the world's major languages on a difficulty scale, measuring things like regularity and similarity to other languages. This gave every language two scores, one an absolute difficulty and one a difficulty for people already familiar with some other language. English consistently ranked as one of the most difficult (although it wasn't the most difficult), both in absolute terms and relative to other languages. I can't find a reference to the study at the moment, but if someone else can then please post it.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't that study, but I did find it interesting. http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Language_Learning_Difficulty_for_English_Speakers [wikibooks.org]
I would disagree with this. (Score:3, Insightful)
Spelling, sure. All the words conform to whatever spelling rules were in effect in the language we borrowed them from, at the time we borrowed, them, rather than to some overarching set of spelling rules. That does make it hard to spell English words. Vocabulary might be an issue too, as it's my understanding that English has a lot more total words than man
Re: (Score:2)
One might add that compared to most European languages English rules for pronunciation are not easy to grasp, to say the least: e.g., compare "creature/creation", "corpse/corps", "horse/worse", "head/heat". [ucl.ac.uk]
Re: (Score:2)
Some of the European languages (and probably others) do have a handful of things that are more complex, such as gender rules, that have mostly died out in English.
How many of the Windows PCs in China are legal? (Score:2, Redundant)
The reason I ask is someone can buy one of these and "repurpose" it to a non-legal copy of Windows, ending up with a 13% + (the price of Windows on the same machine) savings.
-Todd
Re:How many of the Windows PCs in China are legal? (Score:4, Informative)
someone can buy one of these and "repurpose" it to a non-legal copy of Windows, ending up with a 13% + (the price of Windows on the same machine) savings.
It's something that only a geek would do; and even if a geek does this, it doesn't matter. There aren't too many geeks in rural China, and it could be that there is more software available for Red Flag Linux in those remote areas than for Windows. Why? Because warez, even on CDs, need to be delivered and sold, and they need to be localized, and they need to be pre-cracked, and everything should work so that a rice farmer can just plug it in and use. But how many warez are like that? But RFL software can be distributed by the government, legally of course, and there is already so much of it that you need some advice on what to use (which one out of hundred text editors, for example?) IMO, a farmer would be better off getting a cheaper computer *and* a supported OS + applications. There is even no viable reason for a farmer to need Windows. You or me may need Windows to run some specific apps; but what apps a farmer needs? A Web browser, mostly. If there is no Internet link then he needs OpenOffice and a printer. His children need some programming language (which Linux distributions are not short of.) And perhaps a few thousand ebooks in the local language. Windows doesn't come with most of that, except the browser (and the browser is IE, to make things worse.)
Parent
Re:How many of the Windows PCs in China are legal? (Score:4, Informative)
> It's something that only a geek would do
In my experience, there are plenty of geeks in PRC, rural or otherwise. People would just take it to their nearest one who is likely making a nice profit from providing the service.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The most popular IM in China, QQ, only has client for windows. Well, Pidgin also support the basic of the protocol, but lacking a whole lot of features, and I doubt how many people know Pidgin.
The online banking requires the use of Windows software (although it's an IE wrapper) to do transaction/wire-transfer. The web accessible ve
Re:How many of the Windows PCs in China are legal? (Score:4, Interesting)
What percentage of the Windows PCs in China are running a licensed copy of Windows?
If Hungary can be used as a base of estimate, I'd say somewhere between 0 and 1.
We just don't give a shit about your licencing issues. I'm not even sure fair use doesn't cover it for personal use, and I have certainly never seen anyone who didn't run a business and cared. And for the people who do, it's just a drop in the bucket in case of an audit (tax evasion is a national sport here: the alternative is bankruptcy).
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
What percentage of the Windows PCs in China are running a licensed copy of Windows?
If Hungary can be used as a base of estimate, I'd say somewhere between 0 and 1.
We just don't give a shit about your licencing issues. I'm not even sure fair use doesn't cover it for personal use, and I have certainly never seen anyone who didn't run a business and cared. And for the people who do, it's just a drop in the bucket in case of an audit (tax evasion is a national sport here: the alternative is bankruptcy).
I see Hungary is in no better state than Croatia.
Do you think we could push tax evasion as the next Olympic sport? I hear the Swedes are great at it, too...
Arrr Matey! Here there be Market Share?! (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Arrr Matey! Here there be Market Share?! (Score:5, Funny)
How can you know what the share is, if you've no legit data?
It's simple math. So you've got 1.3 billion people in China, we sold 244 [google.ca] copies, so that's a 99.9999812% piracy rate. It's obvious.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Arrr Matey! Here there be Market Share?! (Score:5, Interesting)
From here [informationweek.com].
Ballmer might also have said something to that effect, though I didn't see it. The logic is pretty obvious. Pirates cost MS little or nothing(directly, that is, "lost sales" claims can give you just about any number you want) and the tendency to keep using whatever you are already using is quite strong with complex IT systems. Far better to simply have to tighten the licensing screws later, rather than try to push wholesale migration from somebody else' platform later.
Parent
Source Code - open to scrutiny and fixes (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
They have to distribute the source code for it as well. Thus it should be much easier to spot every code that does not really belong there and aimed at spying on/restric/keeping in line the population
Chinese authorities don't need to do a thing. Just bundle a browser (IE on Windows, FF on Linux) and preconfigure its phishing checker to report all URLs to a server that is ran by the government. Preconfigure the checker to be ON by default. 99.999% of the intended audience will never realize what's happeni
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They have to distribute the source code for it as well. Thus it should be much easier to spot every code that does not really belong there and aimed at spying on/restric/keeping in line the population
Chinese authorities don't need to do a thing. Just bundle a browser (IE on Windows, FF on Linux) and preconfigure its phishing checker to report all URLs to a server that is ran by the government. Preconfigure the checker to be ON by default. 99.999% of the intended audience will never realize what's happening. Those who know what it is will turn it off, but they are too smart anyway for *this level* of monitoring.
Do they even need to do that much?
Doesn't their 'Great Chinese Firewall' already give them enough oversight of the net internal to China to control their own population?
If you control the pipe, then you can control, or at least know, what goes through it.
Re: (Score:2)
``This can be a very useful thing, if they keep their legal responsibilities according to GPL: They have to distribute the source code for it as well.''
Hahahaha! Thanks, man. I needed a good joke to start the day with.
I wish Microsoft tried to do something about it. (Score:2)
Now that would be an even battle. Possibly ending with some bitch-slapping of Microsoft.
Re: (Score:2)
Now that would be an even battle.
How would it be even? They only power MS has inside of China's borders is whatever the Chinese government choses to give them (and could take away at any time). MS isn't a government: no citizens, no army, no nukes.
Although, giving them enough time, and Ballmer enough chairs, then anything may be possible, I suppose...
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, give Ballmer some nuclear chairs! That should do it.
Livestock and crop software (Score:2)
Can any of you please tell me which applications they are talking about? Or can you point me some OS livestock/crop management applications for Linux?
Thanks!
Re: (Score:2)
People have been using IE5 for years. Don't underestimate the peasants.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't underestimate the peasants.
Yes, *especially* if you're a queen who thinks cakes are easier and cheaper to make than bread.
Re: (Score:2)
A governmental agency is supporting and distributing Linux and using subsidies to get people to buy it. But it's the Evil Communist Chinese. Oh no, what is a good China-hating Linux-loving Slashdot denizen to do?
Whine and bitch about how stupid the world is, of course. Maybe put in a little clever self-irony, a witticism or two - always keep an eye out for a "you insensitive clod" opportunity. Then click refresh repeatedly, fervently hope to be modded up to get illusions of being socially accepted.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh no, what is a good China-hating Linux-loving Slashdot denizen to do?
Whine and bitch about how stupid the world is, of course.
China-hating, Linux-loving Slashdot denizens aren't the only ones doing that.
Its a popular, global pastime.
Re: (Score:2)
I never keep an eye out for "insensitive clod" opportunities, you insensitive clod!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
As a libertarian, I think it's a perfectly legitimate action - using Windows harms everyone by encouraging people to develop only for MS, strengthening their monopoly and allowing them to implement even worse pricing/EULAs/lockin. So the government has to step in and encourage some competition.