Linux Kernel Bugzilla Launched 187
paskie writes "Martin J. Bligh of IBM announced
launch of a Bugzilla bug tracking
database for 2.5 linux kernel series - it's at bugme.osdl.org. Finally there will be
some possibility to easily keep track of known bugs without being subscribed to
thousand of mailing lists or googling to death. According to the relevant lkml
thread, kernel developers will still prefer discussions to happen on the
mailing lists, though. The Bugzilla server
and connection is donated by OSDL and IBM
folks administer the database."
Are you serious? (Score:5, Insightful)
Does it honestly matter how the bugs are being tracked, just as long as they are tracked?
Re:What's the point ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Did we listen? No (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What's the point ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Even if your statement is true, perhaps part of IBM's return on investment is a real-world application study with this bug-tracker as a test case?
Re:What's the point ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:My concern with this (Score:3, Insightful)
The BEST time to do it. (Score:5, Insightful)
Feature it, it's the timely thing to do, as well as the right thing to do.
For that matter, Microsoft doesn't have much room to cast stones, and if transparency becomes an issue, one can always bring up their stock dilution through options, non-payment of dividends that stockholders are requesting while sitting on $40e9 of cash, and sometimes-questionable donations to charity that look like they generate more revenue than the donation.
Re:A public database of errors? (Score:2, Insightful)
IBM's Linux Strategy? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:A public database of errors? (Score:5, Insightful)
Bug open: 11:54 EST 15/11/2002
Status: Serious
Bug Closed: 17:16 EST 15/11/2002
By: Linus T
How's Microsoft gonna FUD that?!
Christ on A Rubber OSS Crutch. (Score:5, Insightful)
First we have people talking about IBM doing this to control kernel developlemt. This is nuts. IBM understands that Linux is big in the cards for them and they also understand the Free As in Beer Developmental community needs to really have a central repository for this sorta thing.
So IBM cuts loose the space and the DB for it. Throws in an admin or two. Why? Cause they got big money on Linux, they want to move the big corps over to it. So they need the assurance that bugfixes, patches, what have you, is on a reliable server somewhere that will always be around.
Yeah it does benefit them and benefit us. More power to em. OR what we are gonna round robin the server costs every month? We are gonna set up a Paypal Account and each chip in our own unlimited funds in this street paved of gold IT industry we have now?
IBM is a business and it sees that helping the community can help itself. QUID PRO QUO my friends.
IBM was a monopoly, but they also make damn good equipment. Always have. You can go on about a failed run of hard drives, or some bad workstations. But hey happends to all of them...
And this busines that IBM needs to know the kernel inside and out. Ahhh, I do not think anyone needs to be talking out there ass about us teaching IBM anything about operating systems. Much less one ending in *NIX.
IBM is one of the best things to happen to our community. They are making the inroads in the corporate road for us.
JEEZ. Get off the high horse people.
TheFlatline
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Christ on A Rubber OSS Crutch. (Score:5, Insightful)
Great way to finish a totally pompous rambling rant.
Re:Idiotic. No ANON means no more good bug data!!! (Score:2, Insightful)
Think about it Mr. Paranoia, even if you're just scanning for open proxies rather than using public ones you're still screwed. If *I* were looking to snoop on the actions of people like yourself, I'd set up a few open proxies and log them like a motherfucker.
You are not safe. Anywhere. Anytime. Get over it.
Correct URL? (Score:2, Insightful)
Very nice (Score:2, Insightful)
This is very strategic move from OSDL and IBM cause it helps a lot of linux kernel development thus getting patches faster and because kernel gets better & stabler IBM gets more systems sold with Linux.
Besides Linux needs more corps supporting, because it's they key to Linux grow, i've found using linux a bit of hard because some corps doesn't support linux, biggest problems i've had with Linux is that my printer and scanner isn't supported and some applications what i need simply aren't there, for example Adobe Photoshop, GIMP is simply total crap when compared to Photoshop, even GIMP is very good basic image manipulation software and i prefer GIMP over Paint shop pro for example.
Next biggest problem i had was the thing i was unable to play many games under Linux, only Quakes, Unreal tournament and few others when i'd liked to play Counter-Strike, Capitalism II etc...
Emulating simply isn't the way to do it.
I know it's old news that IBM supports linux but this bug tracker might help those corps which haven't done any native Linux ports before and thus some corps starts supporting Linux, and again when more software comes to Linux IBM gets more systems sold and more people start using Linux.
I just wonder where are all those overclockers who use Linux, i found Linux way more better when i was OC'ng even i couldn't change FSB etc... by software, my old system booted fine at over 1700Mhz to Linux as under wind0ze it left me ~1670Mhz at a good day (1.33Ghz TBird air cooled)
Oh yeah, i tried to stay on topic but i just had to say some other things also