Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Trust the World's Fastest VPN with Your Internet Security & Freedom - A Lifetime Subscription of PureVPN at 88% off. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×
Microsoft

Submission + - TomTom can license FAT without violating the GPL (sdtimes.com) 1

dp619 writes: Capped per-unit royalties make FAT licensing agreements permissible under the GPL, and SD Times has found that Microsoft's public license policy caps royalties at $250k. If the royalties are capped — as they seem to be — TomTom should be able to license FAT without violating the GPL. And if that is the case.... TomTom needs some serious explaining to do as to why they aren't licensing FAT. That said, Microsoft still needs to explain why it just cannot say that folks won't violate the GPL if they license FAT under its terms.
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TomTom can license FAT without violating the GPL

Comments Filter:
  • And if that is the case.... TomTom needs some serious explaining to do as to why they aren't licensing FAT.

    Um, because it's a bad patent (neither nonobvious nor tied to something physical), and is being abused to essentially implement a "compatibility tax"?

Competence, like truth, beauty, and contact lenses, is in the eye of the beholder. -- Dr. Laurence J. Peter

Working...