Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Trust the World's Fastest VPN with Your Internet Security & Freedom - A Lifetime Subscription of PureVPN at 88% off. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Submission + - File sharing case argued in appelate court ( 1

luge writes: Harvard students, along with Prof. Charlie "eon" Nesson, took the next step in Joel Tennenbaum's case against the RIAA this week, presenting their arguments on the unconstitutionality of huge copyright damages to a panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals (one level below the Supreme Court.) Serious junkies can hear the audio recording of the discussion here. This is an appeal of last summer's ruling, which reduced Tennenbaum's damages — to $2,000 per song. The appellate court's ruling could come in a few months.
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

File sharing case argued in appelate court

Comments Filter:
  • “That’s really the crux of the issue here,’’ Tenenbaum said. “That was the center of the whole argument: Was Congress even aware of file sharing’’ when it passed the deterrence act.

    I personally believe that all our laws should have an expiration date. That way our congress critters have to review the laws and keep them current. This would have the added benefit of naturally limiting the size and scope of government as there would come a point were the work load of current laws needing review would tie up congress enough that they can not pass new oppressions (I mean laws) on the people. Or, it may just make congress "rubber stamp" all existing laws, but surly we can fix that as wel

Never buy what you do not want because it is cheap; it will be dear to you. -- Thomas Jefferson