SuSE Cluster 26
nicedreaM writes "Found this link:
SuSE will be introducing a new cluster
system called SALT (SuSE Advanced Linux Technology).
Also they'll be releasing an Alpha distribution."
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!
Prob. not free like much of SuSE. Stick w Beowulf! (Score:1)
In my experience, the only *pre-selected* "non-free" package is xv, and they do in fact point out that it has a restrictive, shareware-type license. I also recall that, when you select the qt libraries, there is a pop-up cautioning you to make sure that you understand the license terms for qt. It always seemed to me that they were simply less dogmatic than RedHat. My biggest problem with SuSE was always that, while they include an astounding number of packages, they don't seem to be able to keep up with recent releases. Some of the stuff on SuSE 5.3 is over a year old and three versions behind. Since they don't have the same level of contrib activity as RedHat, one often has to get down and dirty with RPM SPEC files to bring your system up to date. That, and the fact that it was virtually impossible to install a 2.1 kernal without just about rebuilding the whole OS. I really hope that they've fixed most of these problems in 6.0, which I haven't tried yet.
Debian Alpha (Score:1)
Prob. not free like much of SuSE. Stick w Beowulf! (Score:1)
Anyway, whatever he said, your very stupid. Your posting says 'I don't have my own brain, but someone else said so and so, and since people generally like him that's my opinion as well, because I hope the think _I_'m smart when I repeat things other people who ARE smart have said'
--
Michael Hasenstein
http://www.csn.tu-chemnitz.de/~mha/ [tu-chemnitz.de]
Not true! SuSE separates out "Pay" software (Score:1)
alpha distributions (Score:1)
Prob. not free...(Did you read it?) (Score:1)
Not true. Open Source and free software are _exactly_ the same thing. Open Source is just a new name for free software. See http://www.opensource.org [opensource.org].
The "Open Sound System" for Linux is not Open Source, because it doesn't meet the Open Source definition. (And the term Open Source was invented only about a year ago, specifically with this meaning.)
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm (Score:1)
Prob. not free like much of SuSE. Stick w Beowulf! (Score:1)
All software does not need to be free. Heck, RedHat, SuSE, etc. all make money w/ Linux!
freedom (Score:1)
Free software won't always be the best option in every circumstance, simply because there are some areas where the free software world hasn't produced any finished products yet. (KDE vs. GNOME anyone?)
Freedom usually includes freedom of choice, including the freedom to choose not to use free software.
Prob. not free...(Did you read it?) (Score:1)
"According to Richard Jelinek of SuSE, the software cluster technology *IS OPEN-SOURCED*..."
Suse 3c509B module on install? (Score:1)
Hope the following document will work for 3c509B
"3c509: howto Linux"-
http://www.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=309254354
There's another Linux clustering project: MOSIX (Score:1)
(Requires Linux kernel 2.2.X, when finished.)
There's another Linux clustering project: MOSIX (Score:1)
(Requires Linux kernel 2.2.X, when finished.)